
Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) has signed onto a letter calling for Senate leadership to insert a public option into the health care reform bill via reconciliation.
Mikulski's office confirmed to TPMDC that she signed the letter this morning. She is the 15th senator to sign onto the letter, written by Sen. Michael Bennet (D-CO), which will be sent to Majority Leader Harry Reid.
Greg Sargent reports today that Sens. Barbara Boxer (CA), Jack Reed (RI) and Tom Udall (NM) have also added their names to the letter.
Under reconciliation, 51 senators would have to vote for the provision.
Sens. Bernie Sanders (VT), Al Franken (MN), Patrick Leahy (VT), John Kerry (MA), Sheldon Whitehouse (RI), Michael Bennet (CO), Sherrod Brown (OH), Kirsten Gillibrand (NY), Jeff Merkley (OR), Dianne Feinstein (CA) and Roland Burris (IL) have all signed.
wbgonne
February 18, 2010 11:06 AM
It's 16.
http://whipcongress.com/?source=bp
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
sbv
February 18, 2010 11:07 AM
call your senator; have your spouse, significant other, family and friends call their senator. tell him or her the 11% who self identify as tea partiers, are not the majority. tell him or her to pass the public option in reconciliation; and most importantly, tell him or her, you VOTE!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
superking
February 18, 2010 11:08 AM
The only surprise on the signatory list is Gillibrand, I thought she was considered to lean Right?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
virginiacentrist
February 18, 2010 11:11 AM in reply to superking
She's in a primary. This letter is BS. It's posturing. And it'll backfire, because it'll raise people's hope, and then they'll be pissed when it fails.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wbgonne
February 18, 2010 11:14 AM in reply to virginiacentrist
Do you support the public option, yes or no? If you do, call your senator or get out of the way. The train is rolling.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
virginiacentrist
February 18, 2010 11:10 AM
Great, now the base will get excited again, only to be let down again (since this won't get more than 35 signatures)! This is a great tactic by these Senators!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wbgonne
February 18, 2010 11:12 AM in reply to virginiacentrist
Better hope than hopelessness. And John Kerry would not have signed this unless things had significantly changed within the Senate Dem caucus. Please call your Senators.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Overreach THIS!
February 18, 2010 7:06 PM in reply to wbgonne
Seconded.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mans_best_friend
February 18, 2010 11:13 AM
ZZZzzzz.....Wha'??? 15??? Somebody wake me when they get to 45.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wbgonne
February 18, 2010 11:14 AM in reply to mans_best_friend
Here's the list:
http://whipcongress.com/?source=bp
Have you called your senators?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mans_best_friend
February 18, 2010 11:26 AM in reply to wbgonne
Both my senators are already for it, but it doesn't make a damn bit of difference. The PO couldn't get more than about 47 votes last year. Who's going to change their vote? You need three more to flip. Name just one.
This is just tilting at windmills, which appeals to a lot of people because it's easier than actually trying to accomplish something.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wbgonne
February 18, 2010 11:36 AM in reply to mans_best_friend
Last year was before progressives got disgusted, sat on their asses, and Ted Kennedy's seat went to the Male Sarah Palin. Before Obama smacked down Blanche Lincoln on national TV. Before Bayh quit because the Republicrats had lost control of the Senate Dem caucus. A lot has changed in a year.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mans_best_friend
February 18, 2010 11:47 AM in reply to wbgonne
I was wrong. It's worse than I said earlier. They couldn't get more than 47 last year but they've lost one seat, which means they need FOUR more to flip, not three, and that's assuming everyone who was for it stays on board.
All the changes you mentioned move the ball in the WRONG DIRECTION. If there was a snowball's chance in hell Blanche Lincoln might have voted for a PO last year it's gone this year. Ditto for Bayh.
This is for show. Pissing away their time on stuff like this is part of the reason they haven't accomplished anything. Get behind something that might have a chance of actually passing.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Jackster
February 18, 2010 1:35 PM
Just wrote to Feingold requesting he sign on.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
EvanR
February 18, 2010 3:31 PM
Man's best couldn't be more spot-on. Look, I still have the pro-Public Option sign I carried for hours around the streets of Manhattan on multiple occasions. There simply weren't the votes for it last year and there are even fewer now. A couple dozen relatively liberal senators pandering pointlessly to their deluded base accomplishes nothing. If I could wave a magic wand, I'd want something like single payer. I'd love to get for-profit insurers out of the system entirely. But, for the utterly deluded on here, passing legislation -- real legislation that actually gets to a friendly President and is enacted into law -- requires having enough votes. Why do you think it's been an incredible struggle for Democrats to get even this close over 75 years of trying? Because Barack Obama and Harry Reid let you down all throughout the 20th Century? Because progressives weren't "bold enough". No, because it's incredibly difficult, even with relatively large Democratic majorities, to get anything meaningful done in this country. All the money and entrenched interests are against us. Getting to 60 votes in the Senate -- even after making lots of concessions -- was incredibly difficult. We're closer than we've ever been. And yet so many are determined to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. By throwing a tantrum and holding out for more at the last second, because the legislation that could actually clear the Senate didn't match their wish list. Look, a lot of senators who grudgingly voted to let the Senate bill pass late last year would never, ever support letting improvements pass by reconciliation. You lower the threshold you need to clear by nine votes, but you lose even more by pursuing this method. I thought we were part of the reality-based community here. Do you want comprehensive health care reform to actually pass? Or do you want to occupy yourself with fantasy? I work two jobs, neither of which offers health insurance. Like many, I am one accident or diagnosis away from disaster. And I am sick enough already of my supposedly progressive left-of-center allies eschewing a giant step toward decency for tens of millions who have nothing and regulations that will significantly help everyone because they are fixated on this one pet idea that has nowhere near enough votes. People, you pass the best legislation you can. You show people you can get things done, you make an actual difference in their lives and then you keep building on it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?