
The Rasmussen daily presidential tracking poll is registering its highest level of strong support for President Obama in months. At the same time, the number of poll respondents saying they "strongly disapprove" of the job Obama is doing has dropped to it's lowest level since Scott Brown won Ted Kennedy's old seat in Massachusetts Jan. 19. According to the pollster, the shift came after Obama's State of the Union address last week.
The latest numbers from Rasmussen's rolling poll of 1500 likely voters shows 35% "strongly approve" of the job Obama is doing as president. The last time the number was that high was in June. The day before Obama's State of the Union, it was 27%. On the opposite end of the spectrum, 39% strongly disapprove of Obama's performance in the latest results. That's down from 42% before Obama's address to the nation.
Obama's overall approval is on the rise in Rasmussen's poll as well. For the last three days, Obama's approval rating has hovered around 50%. It had fallen to 44% after Brown was elected. Today's approval/disapproval split was 50/49.
Over at Gallup, the granddaddy of presidential tracking polls, Obama has also seen a bit of a boost since the State of the Union. Before the speech, Obama's Gallup approval split was 47/46. In the last poll, taken in the days following the address, the numbers have shifted to 50/44. Gallup doesn't break out strong approval and strong disapproval the way Rasmussen does and in the pollster's own analysis of the recent Obama poll surge, Gallup says it's too early to tell if the speech had an impact.
The day after the speech, I dug into the overnight insta-polls that showed strong support for the speech among all viewers, and a shift in support for key policies and programs among Independents, who were a key to Obama's 2008 victory but have turned away from the Democrats in recent elections. The new approval polls don't confirm the insta-poll results on the policy front, but they do suggest that results showing that the speech revitalized Obama's image among his supporters -- and maybe changed a few minds among his detractors -- were not a fluke.
Late Update: A few of you wrote in after this story went up, arguing that the boost in Obama's approval ratings could be attributed more to last Friday's "Question Time" with the House GOP than to the State of the Union. I asked Scott Rasmussen about that, and he told me this evening that it's possible the Q&A session was part of an Obama boost, but that his polling shows the Obama approval surge began with the State of the Union.
"Did the Friday event contribute to it? I don't know; it's impossible to quantify," Rasmussen told me. "But what we do know is that the numbers from Thursday, the first night after the speech, showed the president got a bump."
Rasmussen said that Obama's stepped up willingness to take on the GOP, evident in both the State of the Union speech and the Q&A, fired up his base, and shook off some of his detractors leading to both the recent rise in rise "strongly approve" rating and the dip in the "strongly disapprove" rating. So it's possible the Q&A is part of the improved numbers, but unlikely that it's entirely responsible for it. Either way, Rasmussen said, the most important polling is still to come.
"The real key is where the numbers are a week from now," he said. "If [Obama's approval rating] stays up, it shows that he may have changed the storyline for the 2010 elections."
Later Update: Greg Sargent asked Gallup's Frank Newport the a similar question to the one I asked Rasmussen. Newport told Sargent that "it's possible" that the rising Obama approval ratings "could be a delayed reaction to the SOTU, the session with the Republicans, or some other factor." But Newport said his "data do not allow us to make that determination."
Pete Bilderback
February 1, 2010 4:13 PM
Rasmussen's daily presidential tracking poll is fixed, but it is probably registering a genuine uptick in his approval rating.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tonnyb
February 1, 2010 4:43 PM in reply to Pete Bilderback
Funny how Rasmussen polls get accurate right before election day.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Bloggin
February 1, 2010 5:07 PM in reply to Pete Bilderback
We already know that the Republican/Rasmussen poll that's run by a Republican and funds the GOP won't be accurate. And the ONLY reason it shows the 'extreme' views and other don't , is to give the right-wing/Tea Party nuts a voice. They know the 'Extremely Dissatisfied/Hate' category is there just for them.
I don't even know why this website 'promotes' that GOP Survey.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
fbacon2
February 1, 2010 4:14 PM
Bravo, TPM, for reporting a positive polling story. However, I'd point out that the Gallup numbers are about where Obama was holding steady since the autumn. Not that anyone would notice with all the "Obama's numbers are falling" stories.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lapdogs
February 1, 2010 4:20 PM
GALLOP: Obama Approval Hits 50% After Stretch of Sub-50 Ratings
http://www.gallup.com/poll/113980/Gallup-Daily-Obama-Job-Approval.aspx
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Weitberg
February 1, 2010 4:35 PM
Instead of a flag pin he should just wear a hard hat.
TheWeekinRebuke.com
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jim43
February 1, 2010 4:36 PM
Despite what some of the more idiotic pundits said, there was never a doubt that Obama's SOTU was a smash hit and would instantly boost his poll numbers and overall support for his agenda. The question now becomes how he can sustain it and build on this to save his own presidency and boost Dems in the fall.
http://www.political-buzz.com/
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Darrius
February 1, 2010 5:00 PM in reply to jim43
How can he build on it????? The answer is create jobs.
Jobs are to Obama what 9/11 was to Bush.
The Same thing applies to Democrats and Republicans.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
phd_student
February 1, 2010 4:40 PM
I wish the entire political sphere of thought would just keep Nate Silver on retainer for poll analysis.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
February 1, 2010 4:49 PM
I think his sparring with the GOP on Friday gave him more of an uptick. That was the story of all stories the way I saw it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
twirling fartknocker
February 1, 2010 5:05 PM
hmm. Dem stands up to Repugs and people like it. go figure.
you'd think their approval ratings would soar when they behave like quivering pusillanimous pretend friends of the people and vote like sniveling repugs-lite, as has happened over most of the last year
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Overreach THIS!
February 1, 2010 5:06 PM
He gave budget speech today in which he sounded like a tough, new man. No nonsense. No tolerance of silly views. Chasing them down in fact, a a few strong words. Very Presidential.
Been burned. And he's learning. I believe one can feel it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Viva!America!
February 1, 2010 5:06 PM
not news. talk to me when they are in the mid 50's.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
philogratis
February 1, 2010 5:10 PM
Rasmussen polls aren't fixed. They just have a likely voter screen which tilts right. You can call it fixed, but all polls are projections, based on assumptions. Assumptions may very, but so far this cycle Rasmussen is doing fine. Sure, they put out some crappy, dishonest issues polling but that's just red meat for the dogs. I would not be too dismissive of Rasmussen's methodology or very sanguine about the Democrats prospects in Nov. I think they are in real danger of losing the House if they can' get their act together.
I watched the Friday debate with the House GOP and I would say it raised me from marginal approval (due to HCR disappointment) to strongly approval. I know it doesn't mean much in the greater scheme of things but it was such an awesome smackdown that I'm letting my optimism bubble a little. What I can't understand is why Obama hasn't had a press conference since last summer.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
philogratis
February 1, 2010 5:11 PM
Rasmussen polls aren't fixed. They just have a likely voter screen which tilts right. You can call it fixed, but all polls are projections, based on assumptions. Assumptions may very, but so far this cycle Rasmussen is doing fine. Sure, they put out some crappy, dishonest issues polling but that's just red meat for the dogs. I would not be too dismissive of Rasmussen's methodology or very sanguine about the Democrats prospects in Nov. I think they are in real danger of losing the House if they can' get their act together.
I watched the Friday debate with the House GOP and I would say it raised me from marginal approval (due to HCR disappointment) to strongly approval. I know it doesn't mean much in the greater scheme of things but it was such an awesome smackdown that I'm letting my optimism bubble a little. What I can't understand is why Obama hasn't had a press conference since last summer.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Bloggin
February 1, 2010 5:17 PM
I think President Obama has figured out that he will have to be the balancing voice against the right-wing noise machine. Facts carry much more weight that rhetoric for the thinking American.
However, he may need to start using subtitles for those against elitist education. Maybe using words with no more than 4 letters, and phrases using groups of 3 words. Bring back the bouncing ball from Sesame Street.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ondioline
February 1, 2010 5:27 PM
"Call me an idiotic talking bobblehead, but I just didn't understand the state of the union speech at all! I just made a list of 178 things that are wrong with the country and Obama didn't mention ANY of them!"
Somebody remind me of that guy's name again so I can never read anything he ever writes and so that I can turn the television off when he is going to be on...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CT Voter
February 1, 2010 5:33 PM in reply to ondioline
You're kidding, right?
RIGHT? Someone said something like this?
(I turned off the bobbleheads immediately after the speech. I'm finding my sanity is less threatened when I don't listen to the analysis. Not to mention the health and well-being of my TeeVee. . .}
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
besetfree
February 1, 2010 5:46 PM in reply to ondioline
i hope when you listed what is wrong with this country you included yourself
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
besetfree
February 1, 2010 5:49 PM in reply to besetfree
sorry i didnt mean you
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ondioline
February 1, 2010 6:10 PM in reply to besetfree
Perhaps you meant me, in which case you'll be happy to know that I definitely include myself in any list of what's wrong with anything. I'm often, but not always, right at the top. People think that's me being self-deprecating, or alternately, hypercritical, but the truth of the matter is, I just haven't killed my quota. And it haunts me. God put me on this earth to fulfill one purpose... many, many times... And I fall short of his grace because of my mercy.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
kJCUWzUl
February 1, 2010 5:46 PM
If you want someone to not accomplish anything, why not favor Obama over someone else?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ondioline
February 1, 2010 5:54 PM
It was posted on the front page of TPM with video and everything. I can't seem to find it, but there were actually two videos and in one he said there were 20 things on his list and in another 25... You could tell he felt very clever about it because he repeated the formulation like he'd been saying it in a mirror or something...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CT Voter
February 1, 2010 6:05 PM in reply to ondioline
Was it Mark Halperin?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ondioline
February 1, 2010 6:06 PM in reply to CT Voter
Bingo! He's too slimy for me to ever remember his name of my own accord, but everytime someone mentions him, I get a little sick to the stomach. It was def. Halperin!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CT Voter
February 1, 2010 6:09 PM in reply to ondioline
He's precisely the reason I turn off the blabberheads.
If I listened to him OR Candy Crowley, I couldn't be held responsible for the state of my furniture.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
nova voter
February 1, 2010 6:25 PM in reply to ondioline
make sure you have a trash can or barf bag handy before clicking:
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2010/01/great_halperin_moment.php#more
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ondioline
February 2, 2010 10:50 AM in reply to nova voter
That's the one! Not sure why the heck I couldn't find it. But thank you! I think... I'll be in the infirmary if anyone is looking for me.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
oaguabonita
February 2, 2010 2:09 PM
Nuther update (correction) needed!
You reversed approval/disapproval numbers (actually, 50/49, respectively, i.e., net positive, even if barely and insignificantly so, per your Rasmussen link).
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?