TPMDC

Orszag Insists He's No Peacock

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

CBO Director Peter Orszag

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

I asked Office of Management and Budget Director Peter Orszag this afternoon about criticism from the left of President Obama's proposed spending freeze.

Specifically, I asked his reaction to Brian's report about the Center for American Progress suggesting that discretionary spending freezes were used by "deficit peacocks."

CAP's tax and budget expert Michael Linden suggested that those who "claim that we could get the budget back to sustainability if we only cut out earmarks, or say that the solution is to simply freeze discretionary spending, are just peddling fiscal snake oil."

"I don't know that I would describe it quite that way," Orszag told me.

He defended the Obama freeze proposal as one tool, and said if it existed in a vacuum it wouldn't be sufficient. But that's why the administration has found $1.2 trillion in savings, the freeze is "only one step," he said.

Orszag was speaking to reporters about the Obama administration's new budget blueprint revealed today.

Comments (11) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (0)

February 1, 2010 5:39 PM   

Actually Orzag is the father of a bastard child. Tsk.
Meanwhile, saving 20 billion on a 2 trillion deficit is directly analogous to saving $20 on a $2000 credit card bill. Whoop-dee-doo.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 6:10 PM    in reply to shooter242

And Orsag's bastard child is different from Sarah Palin's daughter's bastard child?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

BL

user-pic

February 1, 2010 6:16 PM    in reply to shooter242

$20 billion is better than $0, isn't it?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 6:10 PM   

Sour grapes - asshole? Saving $20 billion is better than wasting 20 billion. Of course you repigs don't like anything he does. If it was your party saving 20 billion they would tout it as 200 billion.

You people are sickening

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 6:42 PM   

With that beak of his, he certainly not a Peacock.
He's looks more like Toucan Sam.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 7:05 PM   

He' s still better looking than the best looking ugly republican!! LOL And he fathered a child with a hot looking chick and he's engaged to another so at least two hot chicks like his beak.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 11:39 PM   

He was go good at cutting earmarks that we let him write another 100 Billion in pork. This will save or create all kind of 'make work' jobs, which will need another funding because they create nothing.
But he is a cute little sucker is't he.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 2, 2010 12:21 AM   

Why not admit you totally misunderstood Linden's argument and who it applied to instead of embarrassing yourself by asking Orzag that question.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 2, 2010 12:23 AM   

This thread seems to have attracted an inordinately high number of asswipes...at least 3.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

mcc

user-pic

February 2, 2010 2:17 AM   

Meanwhile back outside the blogosphere, the normal media is busy attacking the budget for not cutting enough and fretting about the tax increases above the $250,000/yr income mark.

Just as happened all last year, the national debate is between what Obama offers and Republican/conservadem extremism, and the blogosphere is standing off to the side policing obscure details of framing.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

June 12, 2010 5:20 PM   

Sour grapes - asshole? Saving $20 billion is better than wasting 20 billion. Of course you repigs don't like anything he does. If it was your party saving 20 billion they would tout it as 200 billion.

You people are sickening.

m65 kamagra

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on