
Former Sen. Dan Coats (R-IN) will reportedly announce that he is running for the Republican nomination for his old Senate seat, which is currently held by Democratic Sen. Evan Bayh, Indiana journalist Brian Howey reports.
Coats was first elected to the House in 1980, and appointed to the Senate in 1989 after Dan Quayle's election to the vice presidency. Coats was then elected in his own right in 1990 and 1992, and then retired in 1998, with Bayh picking up the seat.
Coats is a late entrant to the primary race, with former Rep. John Hostettler, state Sen. Marlin Stutzman, and Tea Party activist Richard Behney already in the race. The election is also approaching its filing deadline -- Coats will have to gather at least 4,500 ballot petition signatures, 500 within each of the state's nine House districts, in the next two weeks.
There are some highlights from Coats' career, with which Democrats could have some fun.
In 1998 he questioned Bill Clinton's bombing of al Qaeda targets in Afghanistan and Sudan, as being a possible distraction from the Lewinsky scandal. Coats said: "Once the president has broken the bond of trust with the American people, as he has done with his repeated lies, it raises questions about everything he does or does not do."
In 2005, while helping to shepherd the failed Supreme Court nomination of Harriet Miers, he declared: "If great intellectual powerhouse is a qualification to be a member of the court and represent the American people and the wishes of the American people and to interpret the Constitution, then I think we have a court so skewed on the intellectual side that we may not be getting representation of America as a whole."
Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee spokesman Eric Schultz is already on the attack, releasing this statement on a prospective Coats candidacy: "Dan Coats is a federally registered lobbyist whose client lists include banks, private equity firms, and defense contractors. Coats is a Washington DC insider who lined his own pockets as taxpayers spent $700 billion bailing out Wall Street banks. Indianans won't ignore Dan Coats' decade as a lobbyist working the system to gain special favors for the banking industry at the time of financial collapse and at the expense of working Americans."
JOC
February 3, 2010 10:55 AM
We remember, of course, that Coats wasn't the first champion of the misrepresented dummy class in the Supreme Court nominating process.
G. Harrold Carswell was nominated by Nixon in 1970. As Wikipedia says, "In defense against charges that Carswell was 'mediocre,' U.S. Senator Roman Hruska (Republican, Nebraska) stated, 'Even if he is mediocre, there are a lot of mediocre judges and people and lawyers. They are entitled to a little representation, aren't they, and a little chance?' That remark is believed to have backfired and damaged Carswell's cause."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
WestRox
February 3, 2010 11:16 AM
Um, note to Mr. Schultz ... it's Hoosiers, NOT Indianans. I was raised there and have never heard that term.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
oleeb
February 3, 2010 11:43 AM
Q:
What real difference will it make in the US Senate if Coats is there instead of Bayh?
A:
No difference at all.
I wish someone in Indiana would primary that corrupt horses ass!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
felix
February 3, 2010 12:07 PM in reply to oleeb
Did Bayh vote for the stimulus? Yes
Did Bayh vote for the health care bill? Yes
Did Bayh vote for Sotomayor? Yes
I could go on.
Now - is Bayh horses ass? Yes
Does that make him a right-wing Republican? No
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
brewmn61
February 3, 2010 12:31 PM in reply to felix
Good response. I'm not crazy about defending Bayh. His comments after the Brown victory in MA were especially disgusting.
But I'm not looking to move the Senate even further to the right in order to send a message.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ETSpoon
February 3, 2010 12:40 PM in reply to felix
O.K., you're right, Evan Bayh is not a right wing Republican. He is, though, a member in good standing of the Democratic Leadership Council, that cadre of triangulating, corporate-loving Clintonesque "moderates" who are the living, breathing embodiment of "not a dime's worth of difference."
Sorry.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
felix
February 3, 2010 12:45 PM in reply to ETSpoon
He sure is and I don't like him having any influence in the party. But I prefer him over someone like Dan Coats. Bottom line: If I lived in Indiana I would vote for Bayh.
And I don't support primarying conservative Democrats in red states.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ETSpoon
February 3, 2010 1:03 PM in reply to felix
But if the guy isn't challenged in the primary the ideologically pure left will either stay at home or vote Green.
Now really I'd like to see the Green Party become a viable alternative to DLC and Blue Dog Democrats. I'd also like to see the tea bagger movement openly challenge establishment Republicans in primaries and general elections. The pro-corporate establish of both parties need to be shaken to their very core.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
February 3, 2010 2:42 PM in reply to ETSpoon
And when no one wins a majority in your new, improved, multi-party nation, how, exactly will the deal making to build a governing coalition be substantively different from what goes on within the parties right now?
The only differences between multiparty and two party systems is that in two party systems, the dirty deals necessary to form a government occur before the general election and in a multiparty system, they happen after. The voters in multiparty systems get to feel a little more pure and fresh for not having to buy-in in the compromising at the time they vote and two party systems tend to have a scoche more governmental stability, but that's about it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
cwnidog
February 3, 2010 1:07 PM in reply to ETSpoon
So, that would make him a liberal (AKA "Rockefeller") Republican. The DLC is where they went when the GOP got too weird.
Realize that "liberal" is relative.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
oleeb
February 3, 2010 2:34 PM in reply to felix
Sotomayor didn't need his vote for one thing and on the other matters the relevant question is less whether he voted for it than it is: did he water down and do all he could to undermine those pieces of legislation? The answer is yes. He is a Republican in all but name and an embarassment to the Democratic Party.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
solerso68
February 3, 2010 1:13 PM in reply to oleeb
the big difference is that a republican (presumably) wont be invited to write important democratic legislation, and the excrable direct pipeline for wellpoint will be gone. it can only be good (for democrats) in the long run to have dan coates representing the republican party.as it has been good to have sarah palin plastering herself all over the MSM
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Chris Brown
February 3, 2010 11:55 AM
If I was and Indiana voter and had the choice of Bayh or Coats. I'd vote for Coats in hopes of just getting rid of Bayh the Buffoon.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
felix
February 3, 2010 12:04 PM in reply to Chris Brown
Good thing you're not an Indiana voter then, because you're an idiot.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Chris Brown
February 3, 2010 12:36 PM in reply to felix
Very cogent comment. Calling other idiots really demonstrates your superior intellect.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
solerso68
February 3, 2010 1:15 PM in reply to Chris Brown
rawther.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
terje
February 3, 2010 12:25 PM
So the Republicans big hope for winning the seat is a 66 year old former Senator who has been working as a Washington lobbyist for years and is currently registered to vote in Virginia?
Wanna bet that, in this environment, Coats has trouble even making it through the Republican primary? If it comes down to a choice between an establishment insider and a raving wing-nut like Hostettler, I'd give it close to even odds.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
indianadave
February 3, 2010 12:30 PM
Dan Coats is not the answer to any questions.
The voters of Indiana will not support him.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
An Outhouse
February 3, 2010 12:53 PM in reply to indianadave
Evan 'No Go' Bayh?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jana47
February 3, 2010 1:30 PM
Evan Bayh is all about Evan Bayh and should be a Republican. Today is the perfect example of why he's all about his RE-Election and Blanch Lincoln proved the same
Blanch Lincoln asked a "are you smarter than a 5th grader question"
Why is she in the Senate of all places and can't explain what many americans are the reciepient of? She acted like we could take a pill and be better in the morning. She acted as if she doesn't live in America or any other part of the world, she acted completely oblivious to the 5+million families struggling to make ends meet, homeless, jobeless and she's asking a ridiculous about what to tell a small business owner. The guy had a business so apparently he didn't get hit as hard as others
Evan Bayh same situation, his question was about convencing his Republicans friends why he's worthy of getting re-elected wanting the President to just WISH AWAY YEARS OF DEBT THAT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH HIM OR THE DEMS.
Bayh is litterly telling the Dems to throw the same Americans who bailed this country out under the bus for shoring up the National Debt and Deficit that's been there for years and even more than qudribled in the last 8 years
Thanks mr. Bayah for your lack of concern for getting those 5 million families on the streets back on its feet and asking the President to HALT any help for them in favor of cleaning out the National debt that is largerly Republican left overs.
These people are why the Dems must use reconcillation because they are not going to vote for anything other than a Republican agenda scared that they won't be able to take our money to stay employed for doing absolutely nothing.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?