
Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) will co-sponsor legislation to repeal the military's ban on gays, the New York Daily News reports.
"Next week, the Connecticut senator will announce that he's taking the lead on repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell, the 1993 law that prohibits gay people from serving openly in the armed forces," writes Daily News columnist James Kirchick.
Lieberman told the Kirchick that allowing gays to serve openly would provide them "an equal opportunity to do whatever job their talents and sense of purpose and motivations lead them to want to do - including military service."
When you artificially limit the pool of people who can enlist then you are diminishing military effectiveness.
Lieberman said he sees repealing Don't Ask, Don't Tell as "the next step of the civil rights movement."
What matters is not the gender of the other person in your unit or the color or the religion or in this case the sexual orientation. It's whether that person is a good soldier you can depend on. And that's why I think it's going to work.
Late Update: Lieberman has officially announced his intent to introduce this legislation.
I will be proud to be a sponsor of the important effort to enable patriotic gay Americans to defend our national security and our founding values of freedom and opportunity. I have opposed the current policy of preventing gay Americans from openly serving in the military since its enactment in 1993. To exclude one group of Americans from serving in the armed forces is contrary to our fundamental principles as outlined in the Declaration of Independence and weakens our defenses by denying our military the service of a large group of Americans who can help our cause. I am grateful for the leadership of President Obama to repeal the policy and the support of Secretary Gates and Chief of Staff Admiral Mullen.
Viva!America!
February 22, 2010 8:43 AM
The attention whore is back. So Joe? are you going to pull your vote at the last minute like you did on hcr? what would your bff John McCain say?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Maritza
February 22, 2010 8:56 AM in reply to Viva!America!
At least it is for the right cause.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Davran
February 22, 2010 9:01 AM in reply to Maritza
Well, if Joe's on our side, we can't win, right?
Joementum!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Viva!America!
February 22, 2010 10:08 AM in reply to Maritza
yes, but I don't trust him.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
GTFOOH
February 22, 2010 8:47 AM
If he is about to admit to a threesome with John McCain and Lindsey Graham, I would rather keep don't tell in place.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
DeathSquad
February 22, 2010 9:04 AM
Just trying to keep himself relevant.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ClosetLuddite
February 22, 2010 11:01 AM in reply to DeathSquad
That ship has sailed...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
apache
February 22, 2010 9:12 AM
You malign Joe. He's very sincere when he says something. It's just that he's like a goose--everytime he blinks his eyes he wakes up in a new world.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AnswerFrog
February 22, 2010 9:22 AM
Just trying to triangulate his polls numbers in CT. I guess he looks at the polls, sees that most americans favor repealing DADT, and thinks he can help himself for 2012.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dick c
February 22, 2010 9:27 AM
"Next week, the Connecticut senator will announce that he's taking the lead ..."
Aren't there already people out in front on this? Do we really need, or want, Joe Lieberman to get involved in this this? ... unless it's a matter of his vote for repeal being contingent on him getting maximum exposure grandstanding.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
griffin
February 22, 2010 11:48 AM in reply to dick c
"Aren't there already people out in front on this?"
I'm not seeing anybody - are you? Hard to call someone "out in front" if they're not actually out and in front.
Wasn't there speculation during the whole hcr clusterfu that the reason the White House was letting Joe No get away with his nonsense is that he'd agreed to be the point man on a couple of other initiatives? I think DADT was mentioned, specifically.
Look, I can't stand him, either, but if this is what it takes to repeal DADT? I"m not about to let lgbt service people hang fire because I want to hold a grudge.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
junkmailqueen
February 22, 2010 9:47 AM
Too late. At least this CT Dem won't be voting for him, not even if he delivers a pony for every man, woman and child in the state, plus a vacation home in the Bahamas.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Catsy
February 22, 2010 10:46 AM
Two thoughts on this.
1. Like others here, I don't trust Lieberman not to scuttle this at the last minute. Liars and backstabbers don't get the benefit of the doubt.
2. It is absolutely shameful that of all the people in Congress, it took this unprincipled, lying, mendacious sack of shit to start the ball rolling on this.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
cleavet
February 22, 2010 10:55 AM
Good for him, but hard feelings persist.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
GayIthacan
February 22, 2010 11:07 AM
I don't want this fucking loser's name on ANYTHING to do with DADT.
Apparently some of the 'intelligent' people here have memories less expansive and lengthy than a goldfish's!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
chrisl
February 22, 2010 11:34 AM
Traitor Joe is all for repealing DADT because he clearly sees the need for all of us to extend an open arm to those who are willing to fight to death for his country - which starts with the letter 'i'. His number 1 priority has consistently been about defending that country.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
xargaw
February 22, 2010 11:53 AM
Lieberman is confused. He thinks DADT means, "Don't ask me if I'm really a Republican and I then I won't have to tell you."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
KirkW78
February 22, 2010 12:07 PM
Looky there Joe is back in the public spotlight...he must have been feeling left out
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Vincent F
February 22, 2010 1:11 PM
Joe might actually do the right thing here? Perhaps the bill will be called "The Joe Lieberman Act to allow military servicepersons for Joe Lieberman to serve openly for Joe Lieberman, even if they are homosexuals for Joe Lieberman."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
doggie daddy
February 22, 2010 8:54 PM
The whore who won't go home.
Anything to keep his name in the new.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dudeguy
March 4, 2010 4:10 PM
Ten points to Slytherin.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
apache
May 6, 2010 9:26 AM
When do weird, contorted, illogical, and spiteful legislative proposals morph into a certifiable mental illness?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
June 8, 2010 4:12 AM
I'm not seeing anybody - are you? Hard to call someone "out in front" if they're not actually out and in front.
Wasn't there speculation during the whole hcr clusterfu that the reason the White House was letting Joe No get away with his nonsense is that he'd agreed to be the point man on a couple of other initiatives? I think DADT was mentioned, specifically.
m65 kamagra
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?