TPMDC

Richard Shelby Drops Blanket Holds, Says They Were A Success

Spread the word and support this article. Share it on Digg!


Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL)

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL) has dropped all but a handful of the 70-plus holds he placed on President Obama's nominees last week. Shelby's office told TPMDC today that the goal of the blanket holds had succeeded three days after it was reported and roundly attacked by Democrats and the White House.

"The purpose of placing numerous holds was to get the White House's attention was to get the White House's attention on two issues that are critical to our national security," Shelby spokesperson Jonathan Graffeo said in a statement, referring to two programs that would sent billions in taxpayer funds to Alabama. Shelby will continue his hold on several Air Force and Pentagon nominees.

Since the blanket hold was announced by aides to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid last week, Shelby's office has been tight-lipped about the controversy, refusing to respond to reporters questions about the holds or the reasons behind them. The holds lifted, Shelby's office finally began to detail them, rejecting Reid's claim that Shelby pushed a blanket hold in the first place. According to his office, Shelby's holds didn't include the uniformed military, federal judges or nominees to the Treasury Dept.

Last week, Reid's office told reporters the Shelby holds extended to "all executive nominations on the Senate calendar."

Moving forward, Graffeo said Shelby has placed holds on the following nominees: Terry Yonkers, Assistant Secretary of the Air Force; Frank Kendall, Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics; and Erin Conaton, Under Secretary of the Air Force. Graffeo said the holds will continue until the Obama administration agrees to reexamine the air refueling tanker contract and improvised explosive device lab that led to Shelby's controversial wider holds.

Graffeo denied that the IED lab project and the refueling contracts were "earmarks," despite the fact that Shelby secured the funding for for the lab to be built in his home state back in 2008, according to CongressDaily (sub. req'd). The tanker contract would send billions in manufacturing funds to Mobile, AL where the planes are scheduled to be built by European manufacturer Airbus and American defense contractor Northrop Grumman. In a competing plan to build the planes from Boeing, manufacture would take place in Washington state and Kansas.

Read Graffeo's full statement to TPMDC here.

Comments (7) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (0)

February 9, 2010 9:55 AM   

The US Senate is not a democratic institution.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 9, 2010 10:05 AM   

The hell with our country and putting our country first. This turd is nothing but a facist pig who desreves to put over a a huge pit and skewered!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 9, 2010 10:17 AM   

So how do America-hating soshulists Pat Roberts and Sam Brownback feel about the urgent need for those tankers to be built by Northrup Grumman/Airbus in Alabama rather than Boeing in Kansas? I'm sure the homefolks will really appreciate it if they support Shelby in a filibuster on the nominations he's still got a hold on.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 9, 2010 10:58 AM    in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve

Insightful point, as usual, Steve. What has me scratching my head is that since Roberts and Brownback will doubtlessly be in lockstep with Shelby in his anti-Democratic obstructionism (the ultimate goal), why would the good folks of Kansas continue to support them when they consistently vote against their constituents interests, both long and short term?

I can't for the life of me figure out what is so appealing about the Republicans to these people. Is screwing the Democrats really more important than keeping people employed at Boeing?

What a country....

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 9, 2010 11:42 AM    in reply to Schmed

"why would the good folks of Kansas continue to support them when they consistently vote against their constituents interests, both long and short term? Because Jesus wants Republicans to win

"Is screwing the Democrats really more important than keeping people employed at Boeing?" Yes

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 9, 2010 11:43 AM   

Ooop, I hope folks realize that the remark above is meant to be sarcastic.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 9, 2010 11:45 AM   

I suggest that the contracts be reexamined, just as Shelby demands. Then send the work to Boeing in Kansas and Washington.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on