
Florida Republican Senate candidate Marco Rubio charged grocery bills, car repairs and a number of other personal expenses to a GOP-issued credit card during his tenure as speaker of the state's House, according to a report in the Miami Herald.
Records obtained by the newspaper show that during his time as speaker, from 2005 to 2008, Rubio charged $13,900 in personal expenses on the American Express the party issued him. That includes $1,000 for repairs to the Rubio family car. Among the other charges, which were covered by the party as "political expenses":
• $765 at Apple's online store for ``computer supplies.''• $25.76 from Everglades Lumber for ``supplies.''
• $53.49 at Winn-Dixie in Miami for ``food.''
• $68.33 at Happy Wine in Miami for ``beverages'' and ``meal.''
• $78.10 for two purchases at Farm Stores groceries in suburban Miami.
• $412 at All Fusion Electronics, a music equipment store in Miami, for ``supplies.''
Rubio has become something of a conservative darling in recent months, and is seen by many as a favorite to knock off moderate Gov. Charlie Crist in Florida's Senate primary. The latest Rasmussen poll gives Rubio a 54-36 lead over Crist.
In a letter to party chair John Thrasher, Rubio called the leak of his credit card statement an "appalling act of desperation" from the Crist campaign. Rubio blamed former party chair (and Crist ally) Jim Greer for giving the records to the newspaper.
It is clear these internal documents were taken from the RPOF by former Chairman Jim Greer, or someone working for him, and were leaked to the media by the Crist Campaign.
These actions are an appalling act of political desperation. The idea that the former chairman of the RPOF, or those working for the Governor, would selectively leak internal RPOF documents is disturbing.
He explained his expenditures this way:
When it came to incurring expenses, I erred on the side of caution and maintained two operating principles: If it was questionable as to whether the expense was state or Party related, I tried to err on the side of saving taxpayer money by charging that expense to the Party. If it was a question between Party expenses or personal expenses, I tried to err on the side of protecting Party money by paying personally for those charges directly.
During the period in question, there was no formal process provided by the Party regarding personal charges made on an AMEX account. At no time during my four years as a cardholder did the party ask me to provide additional information about, or personally pay, any of the charges I submitted for payment. I always took it upon myself to identify and directly pay American Express for all non-official expenses.
The party, it seems, does not necessarily agree.
Spokesperson Katie Gordon told the newspaper that the American Express card "is a corporate card and is meant to be used for business expenses.''
FreeRider
February 24, 2010 11:19 PM
Compared to the $150,000 for Palin's wardrobe? Pocket change!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
DownriverDem
February 25, 2010 9:45 AM in reply to FreeRider
As usual the Repub hypocrites will say "so what".
Crist should change parties and move on.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Marinus van der Lubbe
February 24, 2010 11:24 PM
They just cant help being on the grift...even for nickels and dimes.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JNagarya
February 25, 2010 5:06 AM in reply to Marinus van der Lubbe
Another manly-man chickenhawk welfare queen.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Sailormarlowe
February 25, 2010 5:39 AM in reply to Marinus van der Lubbe
Don't the other boys call you "Air-tight?" What did you do for nickles & dimes? You know, back then...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Marinus van der Lubbe
February 25, 2010 7:14 AM in reply to Sailormarlowe
SailorFELCHQueen,
youre attempt at any humor, however pathetic, is duly noted. Also noted is your lack of capacity to keep up, be original, make a point, offer a coherent opinion other than your kiddie porn lust for attention that obviously mommy neglected when all your "uncles" came to visit. Your fixation with me, while hardly a compliment also shows your stalker tendencies that no doubt have earned you some notoriety in your workplace with your female counterparts in the negative sense.
Take your very sticky dustjacket to "Going Rogue" and just go spank it and leave the grown-ups to discuss things? That's a good little felcher.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
February 25, 2010 8:32 AM in reply to Marinus van der Lubbe
ROFL. Go get em Marinus. xxxooo
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CityGuy
February 25, 2010 8:48 AM in reply to lousgirl84
Seconded! lol
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Dorn76
February 24, 2010 11:28 PM
Small Government, small purchases...what?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Official A
February 25, 2010 7:45 AM in reply to Dorn76
Corruption small enough to drown in a bathtub?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Q Jordon
February 24, 2010 11:29 PM
Why is this an issue? WELCOME to the world of politics.
This will be a minor dent to his supporters, but it might change attitudes from the independents.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
3star2nr
February 24, 2010 11:54 PM in reply to Q Jordon
because he could have used his OWN money. hes just cheap and an asshole
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
datora
February 25, 2010 1:40 AM in reply to Q Jordon
"Why is this an issue?"
Hello? Tax evasion? Methodical, habitual over several years, $14K in undeclared income ..?
Any form of tax evasion should result in a minimum ban of 5 years from any government employment, elected or otherwise. For egregious tax evasion (say, in excess of $20K in any 18 month period), it should be an automatic and mandatory lifetime ban.
In fact, it should be a separate crime to serve in office if you evade taxes, regardless if you are convicted yet or not. That way, when you are convicted, there are additional charges and penalties for knowingly working (as opposed to resigning) once you have engaged in tax evasion.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
DownriverDem
February 25, 2010 9:47 AM in reply to Q Jordon
Can you spell "hypocrites"? Repubs are the biggest hypocrites on the planet. This is why it's important.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
benintn
February 24, 2010 11:45 PM
Look, Rubio needed the money more than the people of Florida did.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Nancy Irving
February 25, 2010 2:55 AM in reply to benintn
Actually it says he got the money from the Republican Party, not the taxpayers.
And since most of the money in GOP coffers comes from multimillionaires, Rubio probably DID need the cash more than they did, LOL.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Given Up
February 25, 2010 10:28 AM in reply to Nancy Irving
Ahh, gotta love unintentional irony...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
benintn
February 24, 2010 11:49 PM
Rubio's a real standup guy, isn't he? Rather than acknowledge wrongdoing, he blames the whistleblower.
Where have we seen this tactic before...?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
3star2nr
February 24, 2010 11:52 PM
i love republicans always good for a laugh hahahahaha
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Bruce Webb
February 24, 2010 11:53 PM
Minor dent?
Yes unless it triggers criminal fraud statutes. Somehow a defence of "I wasn't stealing fro
the People of Florida everytime, sometimes I was just stealing from the Republican Party of Florida" might pass the Huey Long/Louisiana test but may not fly in Florida.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
NobleCommentDecider
February 24, 2010 11:59 PM
GOP Boilerplate Response:
(1) It's a partisan/liberal media smear.
(2) I don't recall the details.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
theWalrus
February 25, 2010 12:00 AM
What, no hookers?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Beth's in Paradise
February 25, 2010 12:07 AM
Just more GOP pond scum....you think Glenn and Rush and Sean will "investigate"?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Solomon Drek
February 25, 2010 12:09 AM
"I always took it upon myself to identify and directly pay American Express for all non-official expenses."
Then where are the receipts and cancelled checks?
This is not a "game-changer". It only proves that Rubio is a chiseler like any other politician.
Peebaggers don't care about this stuff anyway. They voted for Scott Brown despite his moderate credentials so they could "stick it" to Obama and they'll vote for Rubio for the same reason.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jeffgee
February 25, 2010 9:40 AM in reply to Solomon Drek
The whole Tea Party thing is about "sticking it" to whoever they disagree with.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Rich in NJ
February 25, 2010 12:11 AM
It probably won't make a difference because many of his supporters are indifferent to facts.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
farnsworth
February 25, 2010 2:53 AM in reply to Rich in NJ
And there, sir, you have hit the nail squarely on the head.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
sdf (Stu)
February 25, 2010 10:12 AM in reply to farnsworth
Yes, precisely.
"Game changer," I'm afraid is incredible wishful thinking here.
IOKIYAR, esp. a teabagger darling (IOKIYAREATD)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
inokeah
February 25, 2010 12:21 AM
This is the best you've got? If you put what Dodd, Franks, Pelosi, Rangle have taken this is chicken feed. But by the simple minded blogs on this page, this might be a sizeable stack of chips to you folks.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JNagarya
February 25, 2010 5:09 AM in reply to inokeah
Oh, I agree 100 per cent: if we aren't gonna bust those against whom you make allegations -- without a shred of evidence -- then we shouldn't bust those against whom there is abundant evidence, including likely tax-evasion.
Just like with murder: if one murderer gets away, we should cease prosecuting any and all other murderers. Especially if they are Republicans.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
kernel
February 25, 2010 10:22 AM in reply to inokeah
Trot out the evidence (you know, the facts?) and we'll have a trial.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bdtex
February 25, 2010 12:46 AM
Unless he was/is an employee of the GOP in some capacity,why would he even have a GOP-issued credit card? As a Florida State Representative and Speaker Of The House he is a state employee.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
psyopswatcher
February 25, 2010 9:04 AM in reply to bdtex
Campaign expenses to get the job in the first place? And keep it?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
DICKERSON3870
February 25, 2010 1:33 AM
I wonder if Rubio reported any of the $13,900 as income on his tax returns.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
nova voter
February 25, 2010 6:19 AM
i think rubio is a tool, but this [potentially] doesn't really bother me. i had a corporate amex card a long time ago in my first job (NOT a government job, btw), and i used it for just about everything. at the end of the month, i had to pay the whole bill, and i submitted a "travel & expense" report for the non-personal stuff.
that said, we did eventually get an email that said we weren't supposed to use it for personal stuff, so i stopped. but because of how we handled the reimbursements -- the bill coming to my house, me actually having to pay the whole thing directly to amex and THEN me submitting the itemized monthly statement to my employer for reimbursement, i didn't really see it as a problem. but i did stop when we got the email.
if that's how it was handled here, then i don't have a problem with it. if, on the other hand, amex sent the bills to the RPOF instead of rubio, and the RPOF paid the bills, then i think it's a problem. it's not clear to me how the billing issue worked, though, or even if he really did submit only professional costs for reimbursement (if it indeed worked the way it did at my job).
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Official A
February 25, 2010 7:53 AM in reply to nova voter
Yep, an early over-reaction could come back to haunt, kinda like the McCain extramarital affair or the Dan Rather fiasco. I think these situations are often setups. False accusations vaccinate against all the true accusations that follow.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mastershake1
February 25, 2010 11:31 AM in reply to nova voter
I have to disagree with you. Yes, there are many people out there who use credit cards provided by their business to charge personal expenses. But people expect government officials to do things differently.
I mean, arguing that it was okay to charge personal expenses to his GOP card because there was "no policy?" Not only is that a weak excuse, it makes him sound like a slimy politician. I realize that Rubio's inner Leonna Helmsley thinks that reimbursement requests are for little people, but come on.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Viva!America!
February 25, 2010 6:42 AM
No game changer, they've put way too much into this guy to turn on him now.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
February 25, 2010 8:30 AM in reply to Viva!America!
Plus they'll find a way to play it down. These people don't care about things like this. This is just business as usual.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
al24
February 25, 2010 7:13 AM
No surprise here. Another one of the seemingly inexhaustible supply of nasty Hitler Youth style wingnuts feeding at the public trough. Corrupt bastard.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
El Camino
February 25, 2010 8:06 AM
Most of politicians are bastards!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
whitenoise100
February 25, 2010 8:10 AM
Paging Nelson Muntz.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
RAM
February 25, 2010 8:11 AM
Wait. The media dug up the fact this guy's a crook BEFORE he was elected? What's up with that? They usually wait until after the election to tell us this kind of stuff. Not that I have any high hopes the people in Florida will do anything about it, but still, it's certainly an oddity in political news coverage.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bill
February 25, 2010 8:30 AM
Rubio needs to keep the BS rolling, because the closer his 'position' is examined the more hypocrisy will be exposed. Such is the story of the self-righteous, right wing shills and such it will always be. The exposure begins.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Grumpy Demo
February 25, 2010 8:39 AM
I can't wait for the new campaign adds:
-Marco Rubio: He spends less than Sarah Palin.
-Elect Marco Rubio: He kids want to go to Chucky Cheese.
-Rubio For Senate: He need to make a car payment.
Just another GOPer acting like a corporate CEO: grab as many goodies as you can while you can.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AhTrini1
February 25, 2010 9:00 AM
Oh, dem honest value voter conservatives; you gots to luv dem, nah? They only care bout "handouts" (getting over) when it's for others than themselves.....
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
latichever
February 25, 2010 9:20 AM
Using a Republican credit card for personal expenses is no different from using political donations for personal expenses. The former governor of my state, Connecticut, John Rowland, went to jail for building his vacation homes with money from political supporters. I don't really see the difference.
That said, I love the discord among the Republicans.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jeffgee
February 25, 2010 9:38 AM
Mike Steele's s big spender with The Party's money too
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Alex Milstein
February 25, 2010 10:47 AM
Maybe I misread or did not fully comprehend Rubio's explanation, but the crux seems to be that when making these personal expenses, he questioned whether he should bill Florida taxpayers or the GOP.
Did he ever think about a third choice...paying with his own money?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bidalah
February 25, 2010 10:54 AM
I agree with the masses here. Crist has allowed Rubio to build too much momentum, and there isn't nearly enough dirt here to stop him now.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
navamske
February 25, 2010 11:02 AM
Rubio was asked about plane reservations he'd made for his wife. His response was one of the funniest things I've read in a long time: "'My wife was the First Lady of the Florida House of Representatives and it is absolutely appropriate for her to accompany me to official events and party functions,' Rubio said." First Lady of the Florida House of Representatives"? That's a new one. Is Paul Pelosi the First Gentleman of the U.S. House of Representatives?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Leftflank
February 25, 2010 11:11 AM
How dare someone share his "public record" that he supposedly serves. As speaker of the house, he demaned that everyone stop speaking, ABOUT HIM!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Tony C
February 25, 2010 11:19 AM
As much as I hate this clown, come on, an Apple Store purchase could easily be a computer, the food and drinks, very common business expense. He might actually be saving money and eating healthier by getting groceries rather then take-out for a late meeting.
I don't see anything suspicious, where is the story ?
Unless he charged hookers or flew to Bermuda on that card this is going nowhere. The reason corporate cards are so easily abused is because it's nearly impossible to prove what they purchased wasn't professional in nature. It's the reason strip clubs use billing pseudonyms.
I am not saying he didn't abuse it, but there isn't anything he cannot easily account for. Without the actual receipt, there is absolutely no way to prove what he purchased.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CVille Dem
February 25, 2010 6:48 PM in reply to Tony C
I agree with you, which is more than any republican would do in a similar situation. I definitely doubt the car repairs, however. There is never a time when the state, or your party should have to repair you family wheels.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
GTFOOH
February 25, 2010 11:29 AM
Rubio, you got sum splainin to do!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?