
Kentucky Senate candidate Rand Paul, a conservative activist and son of Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX), has just put out a press release officially announcing the endorsement of Sarah Palin. Paul also announced that his campaign has received a "generous contribution" from Palin's PAC.
"Governor Palin is providing tremendous leadership as the Tea Party movement and constitutional conservatives strive to take our country back," Paul said in the press release. "Sarah Palin is a giant in American politics. I am proud to receive her support."
Paul is running in the Republican primary against Secretary of State Trey Grayson, who is widely regarded to be the party establishment's favored candidate in the race.
trblmkr
February 1, 2010 11:43 AM
Don't tell me, he's named after Ayn Rand? Hooboy! How hokey is that?!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
MLabreche
February 1, 2010 12:46 PM in reply to trblmkr
Rand is short for Randall.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Gopherit
February 1, 2010 2:13 PM in reply to MLabreche
Yeah, but don't fool yourself. Using the name Rand is not coincidental.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
masanf
February 1, 2010 12:48 PM in reply to trblmkr
Yeah, you just made yourself look like an idiot.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Ajax the Greater
February 1, 2010 1:51 PM in reply to masanf
No rumor. It is indeed fact. I was there when Randy Paul changed his name to Rand in 1988. He was obsessed with the rock band Rush at the time, and getting his Dad to meet with them, cause of their fascination with Ayn Rand’s philosophy. Randy even spoke directly with one of the band members of Rush at one point, but failed to get an endorsement for Ron’s Libertarian Presidential campaign.
Randy’s Dad thought he was being a bit “weird,” at first when he announced his decision to family, friends and campain staff. At first nobody took it seriously. But a few months later, he did go to the courthouse here in Texas and got it changed.
Eric Dondero, Travel Aide
Libertarian Party Presidential candidate
Ron Paul 1987/88
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
trblmkr
February 1, 2010 1:55 PM in reply to masanf
What are you guys, a blog version of tag team wrestlers? My cousin's name is Randall and I know at least three other Randalls. None of them shorten to Rand, but Randy. It's an affectation.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Sailormarlowe
February 1, 2010 11:59 AM
Gov. Sarah Palin stands tall, strong, prestigious & proud with honest public servants and sincere patriots. The overwhelming victory of Senator Paul is assured.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Acewrap
February 1, 2010 12:10 PM in reply to Sailormarlowe
Do you realize how much you sound like old Chinese propaganda when you start gushing about that tart?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Sailormarlowe
February 1, 2010 12:14 PM in reply to Acewrap
How old? Which tart? The last Ching empress, or Chiang Kai Shek's wife?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
farnsworth
February 1, 2010 1:16 PM in reply to Sailormarlowe
Which military position? We know the one in your dreams is doggy style.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JadeZ
February 1, 2010 1:46 PM in reply to Sailormarlowe
poop tart....ahh pop
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
masanf
February 1, 2010 12:49 PM in reply to Acewrap
Yeah, well he could write that stuff until the cows came home and it wouldn't touch the nauseating love letters penned to Obama by commenters on this site
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Gopherit
February 1, 2010 2:15 PM in reply to masanf
It's okay. Throw up. We'd rather enjoy that.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
farnsworth
February 1, 2010 2:42 PM in reply to masanf
If it is so nauseating, why are you here?
Doesn't say much for your intelligence now, does it?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
gayinmt
February 1, 2010 12:32 PM in reply to Sailormarlowe
It's just Sarah Palin now, not Gov. Sarah Palin. She couldn't hack it as a governor.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jman
February 1, 2010 12:58 PM in reply to Sailormarlowe
huh? Sarah Palin is a patriot? What has she done besides quit a job after a year and 1/2? What has she sacrificed for this country.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
farnsworth
February 1, 2010 1:15 PM in reply to Sailormarlowe
So, what is the military position for Palin again? Is it camp follower?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Gopherit
February 1, 2010 2:22 PM in reply to Sailormarlowe
HAHAAHAHAHA! Honest politician and sincere patriot? I bow my hat to your obvious trolling skills. No one is stupid enough to attribute either of those qualities to "Give me $100K and I'll Dance, you betcha!" Sarah.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
NuttyProf
February 1, 2010 1:02 PM
Why would she endorse him? he hates the war and the Patriot Act like his father. I am continually confused by Palin, please just STOP
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Reefdancer
February 1, 2010 1:14 PM in reply to NuttyProf
It's the word salad. LOL
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
midnight rambler
February 1, 2010 1:50 PM in reply to NuttyProf
Minor details like actual positions aren't important to Sarah. He's a good traditional American, and that's what matters, you betcha!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
trblmkr
February 1, 2010 2:10 PM in reply to midnight rambler
"Minor details like actual positions aren't important..."
That's what SHE said.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Gopherit
February 1, 2010 2:19 PM in reply to NuttyProf
I think a better questions is why Paul would accept her endorsement? It's a damned cynical ploy for a guy who wants to appeal to "better government." You're going to owe her followers something, Paul.....I hope you squirm when it comes due.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Fried Chicken Lover
February 1, 2010 4:25 PM in reply to NuttyProf
Actually he's starting to flip on war, & has even gone as far as to say "military spending should be our country’s top budget priority".
So...who wants to break it to him that military spending has been Big Chief Numero Uno in the U.S. budget since practically forever already?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Nick
February 2, 2010 12:46 AM in reply to Fried Chicken Lover
I think he was referring to the red herring that "libertarian-constitutionalist-conservatives" want to dismantle the military. The point being is that he wants to drastically reduce the size of the federal gov't, but that national defense is one of the 17 enumerated powers of the Constitution and an important and legitimate function of the federal gov't. I'm sure he knows, like any American who actually follows politics, that defense spending comprises a major part of the budget.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
labman57
February 1, 2010 6:44 PM
A case of "I'll scratch your horns with my pitchfork if you scratch mine with yours".
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
murphthesurf
February 1, 2010 11:26 PM
Checking Mr. Paul's Website, and looking at his previous political pronouncements one discovers the following about Mr.Paul.
a) He is his father's son. Republican in name, constitutional libertarian in philosophy.
b) He has not held elected office.
c) He believes that military action overseas that is sustained and requires significant resources must be ratified by a formal Declaration of War by the U.S. Congress. For this reason, he was opposed to the War in Iraq, to the War in Afghanistan and to action in Yemen.
d) He is opposed the Patriot Act as overly invasive in citizens lives.
e) He is opposed to the Federal Reserve and would not have endorsed the bailout of the Securities and Investment, and Banking relief/bailout acts.
f) He supports significant smaller governments and balanced budgets, but he does provide explicit cuts in the budget that he would make. He does advocate the complete elimination of earmarks and a requirement that bills be limited to spending only on the subject of the legislation.
g) He favors term limits for all politicians. He has spoken of three terms for members of the House, and two for members of the Senate.
h) He is pro life.
i) He is opposed to gun controls on the federal level.
So like his father, Rand has some strong points in his appeal to the GOP (Pro Life, No Gun Control). But, both father and son have spoken of the dangers posed by industries and investment corporations whose livelihood depends on a large military. Not a GOP position. No Patriot Act? Not GOP. His positions on the Fed, big business relief and no earmarks would not be popular with almost any member of the Congress, especially the GOP. Term limits? What other member of the House or Senate thinks this is a good idea.
There is a reason why Ron Paul did not have the endorsement of his own party in his run for the presidency. Paul is not really a Republican. That is true of Rand.
So Sarah has backed a non-Republican That may have been her plan, but it will not make her beloved by the Party. Paul's opponent, Trey Grayson, has the backing of a large number of GOP leaders in the state. He is not a great candidate, but he is an office holder and fits the GOP groove better.
Sarah, being mavericky again.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?