
A top member of President Obama's health care team said today that his summit with Republicans and Democrats will help move the health care reform measure forward.
"I think he sees this as a step to actually accelerating the process forward. He wants to move forward. He wants a bill at his desk and he sees this as kind of closing the loop and let's go," Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius told Huffington Post after a speech today at an event sponsored by health care magazine Health Affairs and Academy Health.
She also said Obama wants to tell Republicans, "Rather than just sitting on the sidelines and saying 'We don't like this, we don't like that,' come forward and show us your plan."
In her speech she said the team must get the GOP to "re-engage" in the process.
"I think it is not acceptable that half of the legislative body pushed away from the table when this conversation began months ago and basically said, 'We don't want to participate in this process.' If you remember, for a long time, the discussion was, 'Well, we don't want to participate in anything that has a public option in it,'" Sebelius said, according to Huffington Post.
"Well, as far as I have determined, the public option is no longer part of the plan and yet no one has come back to the table and said, 'We will now talk about how to move forward with a private market strategy,'" she said.
More from the report:
[Sebelius said] ... Obama is willing to "add various elements" to health care legislation suggested by Republican lawmakers during an upcoming bipartisan meeting on the topic. But he won't change the entire plan and he is "absolutely not" hitting the reset button on the legislative process, the former Kansas governor insisted.
JorgeOrwell
February 8, 2010 12:41 PM
Yes! This calling Repubs out in public is a good move. He needs to get on all the talk shows and really push this. Keep up the pressure and expose there empty rhetoric. Time for him to get out on a speaking tour, Truman style.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JorgeOrwell
February 8, 2010 12:46 PM
or "their"
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Moose49
February 8, 2010 1:33 PM
I'm just mystified by this. The way to get health care reform through swiftly is clear and relatively simple -- reconciliation followed by House passage of the Senate bill. All this will do it delay the process and make it look even uglier -- a larger-scale version of the "gang of six" fiasco. When will they learn to stop asking Lucy to hold the ball?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JorgeOrwell
February 8, 2010 7:25 PM in reply to Moose49
Why would the House pass the Senate bill? No PO or antitrust regulations there. You mean the Senate should pass the House bill, right?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JorgeOrwell
February 8, 2010 7:27 PM in reply to JorgeOrwell
louisgirl84 posted a good idea in this thread, explaining an alternative method...
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/02/obama-congress-might-drop-the-ball-on-health-care--but-either-way-lets-shelve-it-for-several-weeks.php#comment-3779654
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Indie Pro
February 8, 2010 1:42 PM
Obama is willing to "add various elements" to health care legislation suggested by Republican lawmakers during an upcoming bipartisan meeting on the topic
Will leadership make the bill even more conservative in order to win GOP votes?
Or will they make the bill even more conservative in an effort of political theater?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Indie Pro
February 8, 2010 1:52 PM in reply to Indie Pro
If you remember, for a long time, the discussion was, 'Well, we don't want to participate in anything that has a public option in it.'... Well, as far as I have determined, the public option is no longer part of the plan and yet no one has come back to the table and said, 'We will now talk about how to move forward with a private market strategy.'"
I think this sums up why leadership is against the Public Option, the GOP didn't want it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
condew
February 8, 2010 1:59 PM in reply to Indie Pro
What the Senate needs to do is add the best of the Republican ideas and vote, but vote such that the motion will fail without a significant number Republicans voting yes. When the motion fails, strip out ALL the Republican trash and pass a good, comprehensive solution via the existing bill and reconciliation. Then drive home the obstructionism and bad faith of Repubcan "negotiations" every week, every day, in every appearance through first Tuesday in November.
I am fed up with Republicans getting anything they want and still getting to vote against the product; and that goes for the closet Republicans who call themselves Democrats, too.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
condew
February 8, 2010 2:00 PM in reply to condew
And put the public option back, too.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
714Day
February 8, 2010 6:49 PM in reply to condew
Make the PO "Medicare for More" and the 2/3 of self-identified Republicans who aren't totally nuts will be on board, too.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
condew
February 8, 2010 1:52 PM
It might be OK to invite the cameras in to show all the empty seats on the Republican side of the table. Then maybe we can stop all the "bipartisan" pandering once and for all. Obama, Republicans hate you, they want you to fail; please stop helping them.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Andreams
February 8, 2010 7:02 PM
It would be nice if he'd have working sessions with the democrats. And it would be double nice if he remembered who elected him!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Jyrinx
February 8, 2010 8:21 PM in reply to Andreams
Hear, hear.
Let him answer pointed questions about why single-payer was never even considered, or why the still-popular public option, which in its robust form would've saved $100B+, fell victim to people who call themselves budget hawks.
I wanna see him answer a tough question for once.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
labman57
February 9, 2010 12:25 AM
The GOP has long called for a televised bipartisan discussion on the health care reform legislation, claiming that they would cease their obstructionistic tactics if such a public forum took place.
Obama has just called their bluff.
Obama to Congressional GOP: “So what exactly are you proposing with respect to health care reform?”
Their reply: “Proposing? Nothing. It is not the role of the Republican Party to propose any viable solutions to the problems facing the nation. Our job is simply to oppose any and every proposal emanating from the White House.”
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?