TPMDC

Tea Party Crashing Establishment CPAC To Hang With 'Fellow Conservatives'

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

A protester outside the U.S. Capitol

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

The Conservative Political Action Committee is the most establishment of all the gatherings on the right, but the tea partiers will be in on the action.

When CPAC kicks off tomorrow in Washington, members of the tea party movement will be on hand. They are sort of strange bedfellows, since tea party members insist they aren't about the Republican party and CPAC is viewed as the marquis event for the GOP and its potential presidential candidates. As we've been writing, Republicans across the country have been trying to harness the tea party energy for their own races as anti-establishment sentiment sweeps the nation in the leadup to the midterm elections.

There are plenty of divisions from within the tea party umbrella as well - a split between groups like the Tea Party Nation which charged $549 for its recent convention and citizens who say the last thing they want is to be an official third party.

Despite these fissures, top officials with tea party groups will speak and the documentary about the Tea Party will be on hand. Rapper Hi-Caliber, who stars in Tea Party material, even plans to perform.

The Tea Pary Express, founded by GOP consulting firm Russo, Marsh, is hosting a "mini-rally" Friday night at CPAC. The Tea Party Express has coordinated several major events with Republican Dick Armey's group FreedomWorks. Armey also will speak at CPAC.

"This is the only conference that's specifically branding itself conservative, there are going to be a lot of our friends there," Levi Russell, a spokesman for the group, told TPMDC.

He said tea party "patriots" from across the country will be attending and that the groups aren't worried the event is too establishment.

"We'll have a great time at CPAC with fellow conservatives," he said.

There are several tea party events on the CPAC agenda, including a discussion called "Saving Freedom One Patriot at a Time," starring Ginni Thomas of LibertyCentral.org, Dana Loesch of St. Louis Tea Party, John O'Hara, author of A New American Tea Party and Jenny Beth Martin of the Tea Party Patriots.

Colin Hanna is hosting a "REAL Tea Party & Book Launch" on Friday, and that night a CPAC film festival will show the 90-minute Tea Party documentary.

(TPM's Rachel Slajda watched that last year so you don't have to.)

RNC Chairman Michael Steele huddled with some leaders from the tea party movement (while others weren't involved) for several hours yesterday, attempting to show them he wants to cooperate with the movement, not absorb it.

CNN reports:

Indeed, when a group of participants were asked after the meeting if they consider themselves Republicans, nearly all shook their heads and boasted that they were "American citizens." Others said they knew of fellow Tea Party activists who refused to come to the meeting because they do not trust the Republican leadership.

Steele, however, won over many in the group when he pledged that the Republican Party will not to meddle in local races - especially GOP primaries featuring candidates backed by Tea Party activists. At one point in the meeting, the divisive Senate primary battle in Florida between Marco Rubio and Charlie Crist was mentioned. The chairman said the role of the national party is to back whoever becomes the Republican nominee.

"He is leaving it up to the people, and that's what we want," said Cheryl Couture, a member of the 9.12 Project from Naples, Florida. "We don't want people interfering with the process, because that's not American."

Further exposing the split today is a group of conservatives - many who will attend CPAC - signing a "manifesto" today at Mt. Vernon.

Family Research Council's Tony Perkins said on Fox News this morning, "I think over the years the conservative movement has become too aligned with the Republican Party."

Correction: An earlier version of this item incorrectly stated that FreedomWorks organized the Tea Party Express. TPE was founded by GOP consulting firm Russo, Marsh.

Comments (52) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (0)

February 17, 2010 9:56 AM   

These people make my head hurt!!!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 9:56 AM   

So teabaggers are a bunch of lying racist conservatives in denial; who knew?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 12:11 PM    in reply to AhTrini1

Ad hominem attacks only demonstrate that the speaker has no argument.

The Tea Party Movement, the other TPM, is a populist movement with strong libertarian leanings. It wants government off our backs, less taxes, less militarism, less regulation, less nanny state, less limitation on our freedoms. It all sounds good to me. And, while at the moment it favors the Republicans, it might just as well favor the Dems (on social issues) if the Dems were not so hellbent on growing government to Greek proportions.

Please, do have an argument to share.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 12:32 PM    in reply to jasonsuggs

Jason, do you think a $27 Trillion unregulated derivatives market is a good idea?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 1:23 PM    in reply to expat46

I don't think it's a good idea, but whether it's a good idea or not is irrelevant. People are free to enter into whatever foolish contracts they wish. What is a bad idea is to allow our Congress, President, and the Federal Reserve to bail out investment bankers (particularly if they do so without any Constitutional authority).

We must not allow financial terrorists to control our government. The bailouts should never have happened and have only allowed the real problem (bad debt that must default) to fester. If you follow true progressives like Kucinich and Nader you'll know they were against the horrendous bailout policy.

Eliminate the bailouts, claw back the bonuses, and put the felons in prison. It will be rough at first but it will set us on track for real growth.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 2:13 PM    in reply to matty

The bank bailouts were abhorrent but necessary. You can't find a serious economist on the left or the right that denies this. Necessary because the repeal of Glass-Steagall set the stage and the failure to regulate these "foolish contracts" was the opening act of this sorry three part tragedy.

I agree that the Bush/Paulson TARP implementation was unbelievably, almost criminally, mishandled. It pisses me off when libertarian wing nuts like Ron Paul go on about bitter medicine. Who do they think that jagged little pill would have hurt the most. I'll tell you who, the poor and the middle class or what's left of it.

Claw back the bonuses, put the felons in prison, demand repayment of the bailout funds with interest and create meaningful financial reform with hard ass enforcement.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 1:25 PM    in reply to jasonsuggs

Speaking in platitudes only demonstrates that the speaker has no argument.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 18, 2010 10:59 AM    in reply to jasonsuggs

Less militarism? Really? I missed those signs. If these angry white guys and gals are for chopping our imperial military budget in half, closing a few hundred bases, then I'll go get me one of those silly hats. Go Teabaggers!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 18, 2010 11:12 AM    in reply to jasonsuggs

Please do tell me how 4% Democrat and 80% white fits into your argument?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 18, 2010 11:48 AM    in reply to jasonsuggs

Yes, getting into bed with the party that wants to abolish people's access to all contraception indicates that love of liberty quite well. It's pretty obvious they are just stooges for the Republicans and that all their Libertarian talk is just a smoke screen.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 10:04 AM   

Oh wait, the tea baggers are an arm of the GOP? Who knew?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 12:13 PM    in reply to Rich in NJ

Actually, the Tea Party Movement has strong libertarian leanings which are neither Democrat nor Republican.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 12:44 PM    in reply to jasonsuggs

Cite some facts to support your claim.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 7:28 PM    in reply to Rich in NJ

Dick's Army, a well known and connected Republican activist and donor, bankrolled much of the early tea party movement including busing people for free to Washington.

Libertarians like free stuff therefore the Tea Party Movement has strong libertarian leanings.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 8:31 PM    in reply to An Outhouse

Dick Armey is a Republican operative.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 18, 2010 11:14 AM    in reply to Rich in NJ

Not really an "arm", but the body part does start with an "A------".

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 10:06 AM   

Yeah, we listened to you, if you in fact voted. Now is the time to listen to us. Last time I checked, we won at the ballot box. Time to hear our voices for a change. Just because you show up with a sign provided to you by your corporate sponsors does not mean that your voice is any more important than mine.

Elections have consequences.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 10:18 AM    in reply to SchoolyT

Heh. Yes they do, and the most recent elections in the bluest of blue states of NJ and Mass. speak volumes.
That said, I like the conservative-liberal arrangement over the parties. It makes the debate more substantive and less technical.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 10:37 AM    in reply to shooter242

and like every congressional special election last year--oops, the Dems won them all. Guess you get to pick and choose which elections mean what to fit your nonsensical teabagger agenda, whatever it is.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 2:56 PM    in reply to shooter242

Yeah, shooter, your team lost about a year ago, so there's another three years left to try to avoid being totally marginalized politically. Not that I particularly mind that they choose to self-destruct rather than attend spring training.

Besides, TPN represents a whopping 11%. That and a bullhorn might send you to the back of the line, not the front.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 18, 2010 11:25 AM    in reply to shooter242

I think progressive-regressive is more accurate.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 10:15 AM   

"Saving freedom one patriot at a time"? Blech. It's people like these that make me want to move to Canada with Hillary Clinton:

http://bit.ly/ahQTbl

(satire)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 10:18 AM   

Tea partiers: the new Republican closet cases. They still won't own up, despite all their friends being Republicans, all their speakers being Republican, all their candidates *running* as Republicans, or the Republican PR flacks that fund several of their operations.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 10:21 AM   

Lets hope for more infighting.

http://randomthoughtstd.blogspot.com/

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 10:26 AM   

"Listen to Me." I'm an angrgy white man who must be obeyed.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 10:28 AM    in reply to Brownbagger

My, how racist of you.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 10:33 AM    in reply to shooter242

yeah, nothing like your teabagger leader holding a "n---r" sign. Just a coincidence that all the teabaggers are old white people on Social Security and Medicare ranting about a "government takeover". Irony lives, the joke's on you, losers.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 10:54 AM    in reply to shooter242

Sorry if I offended you. You regressive must learn to less sensitive. He does look like an angry white guy to me. Perhaps he's instead one of the many black or hispanic teabaggers. My apologies. Kindest regards.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 11:04 AM    in reply to shooter242

This horrible persecution of white people must end!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 10:30 AM   

This seems to shed a light on what the Repubs have been all along.
Dominantly white, xenophobic, paranoid, and yes somewhat racist.
The problem for establishment R is that TP's may be a real thorn in their side when it comes to trying to hide their true intentions. Let the DIS-course begin.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 10:44 AM   

Time to test the next generation bunker-busters.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 10:45 AM   

So I would assume that if any Tea Partiers are captured, they will give only name, rank, and social security number, right ?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 11:35 AM    in reply to rbe1

Yes, in fact my sources tell me they will forego their Social Security checks in order to reduce the deficit run up soley by President Obama. How sweet.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 10:53 AM   

Tea Partiers and Birchers hanging with Republicans...

Plenty of material for political ads.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 11:05 AM   

What I don't get is how they can be so generationally hateful? They never accept any change. They are still fighting the same battles their grandparents started.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 11:09 AM   

Family Research Council's Tony Perkins said on Fox News this morning, "I think over the years the conservative movement has become too aligned with the Republican Party."
Where to begin?
I thought the Republican Party was the party of conservative thought. Pretty telling to think someone like Everett Dirksen or Barry Goldwater or William F. Buckley would no longer be welcome in today's GOP. The sooner they implode, the better.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 11:13 AM   

A friend of mine pointed out to me recently that one can argue that the Tea Party movement has the potential to seriously skew political discourse in the U.S. for a long-time. He used the example of how the New Left influenced politics in the 60s and 70s. The significance of this argument is that once more, we have another reason why not to dismiss Tea Baggers, even though it is easy to parody them.
I think it is fair to say that the New Left did not seriously leave an explicit mark on conventional politics in Washington. After all, no matter how much I would have liked, Abbie Hoffman was never elected to any major political office. The same is true of all other significant leaders of the New Left, SDS, and the many other Leftist groups that arose in the 60s and 70s (from mild to radical). I don’t think any of them ever was elected to a national position. If one or two were elected, I apologize to them for still concluding that they left little of an overt conventional presence in Washington. Now yes, I do know that few New Leftists ever ran for such office, but the point is, they never held major political positions. Having said all of this however, I also think it is fair to say that these groups did influence political discourse in the U.S. in a significant manner. I’d say they had a role in ending Vietnam. I’d give them credit for making Nixon expand Great Society programs. I can go on, but I won’t.
Tea Baggers are today’s New Left. Yes, Sarah Palin (it really pains me to impy she is Abbie’s equal) will never get elected to national office. I doubt any Tea Bagger will. But they are moving political discussions to the extreme Right. For example, I see Obama has once more brought up his idiotic idea in my opinion of a commission to trim the deficit. History is repeating itself.
The message here folks is don’t dismiss these lunatics. To do so is cavalier and foolish. The Left must mobilize itself for resistance.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 11:38 AM    in reply to Iggy Pop

No, don't dismiss, but do DISS. ATTACK, ATTACK, ATTACK. Never let their lies go unchallenged.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 12:49 PM    in reply to Iggy Pop

I thought Glenn Beck was Abby Hoffman. Sarah Palin is Thomas Eagleton. These tea-baggers aren't exactly getting clean for Gene. :)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 11:16 AM   

LISTEN TO ME!

LOL!! Sounds like a 2 year old if I ever heard one.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 11:22 AM   

When the word "Republican" is spoken for the final time on earth and the last person who heard it spoken passes away, then we will renew the face of the earth. Then we will begin to listen.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 11:30 AM    in reply to Jesus H. Christ

THANK YOU, JESUS!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 11:29 AM   

The thing that bothers me the most about the Tea Party, is the apparent lack of education and stunning disregard for all things factual. They are anti-intellectual, anti-education and pro real-Americans. These people would take us back to the dark ages if given a chance.

Sarah Palin was the keynote speaker at the Tea Party Convention. Do we really want people who warship at the alter of Palin, to have any significant political power? "Keep your dam government hands off my health care!" "Obama's a Nazi Socialist!" Both are popular themes amoung the Teabaggers.

We must reform education in this country. If we are to succeed in the next century, we must have a smart population. Not a liberal or conservative population but a smart one. If we let the anti-science-teabagging-radicals take control this country is finished.These people are to be shunned.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 12:13 PM    in reply to Kuro

They worship at the altar of 'Free Enterprise'. I wish someone would remind them that their 401K's didn't lose half their value and their home mortgages aren't under water because of TOO MUCH GOVERNMENT REGULATION. These people won't be happy until we're living in some Ayn Rand libertarian fantasy/nightmare. Even Alan Greenspan, the oracle of free markets and close personal friend and idolizer of Ayn Rand, admitted that his/her basic world view was wrong. WRONG! WRONG! WRONG!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 12:09 PM   

I think this whole 'GOP reaching out to Tea Partiers' is Reps trying to get them back, they add nothing to their electoral totals, how do you think these guys voted before?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 12:29 PM    in reply to njlib

Some of them didn't vote at all. Some people that have never really bothered to follow politics have decided that they need to be better informed so they tune in to Fox News, after all they're fair and balanced.

My fear is that these people will be flush with success after the 2010 midterms and the right wing whackjobs they elect will decide to follow through on their libertarian utopia vision, damn the consequences.

Ignoring them is not an option.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 12:16 PM   

They need a new moniker: the AOF party, which of course, stands for Angry Old Farts.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 1:35 PM   

Christina,

The word you want to use is, "marquee" not "marquis."

Very different meaning.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 1:40 PM   

Indeed, when a group of participants were asked after the meeting if they consider themselves Republicans, nearly all shook their heads and boasted that they were "American citizens."

Well, you obviously cannot be both!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 10:23 PM   

So.... now the teabaggers are claiming to be college educated, I guess they are graduates of Pat Robertson,Oral Roberts,or Jerry Falwell`s so-called universities. Bastions of higher unintellengence,and learning. ( how to be look-alike robot zombies )

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 18, 2010 12:04 AM   

"I think over the years the conservative movement has become too aligned with the Republican Party."

Like flies attracted to manure.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 18, 2010 11:21 AM   

The teabaggers are like their leaders Beck and Limbaugh, who love to shout and complain and denigrate from the sidelines but aren't equipped to actually do something useful. They are unpatriotic whiners. Why unpatriotic? They see no problem with disrespecting the U.S. flags by wearing clothing made from it. They might influence an election, but if any of they, themselves, are actually are elected, they won't have a clue about how to govern.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on