TPMDC

The Re-Emergence Of Rick Santorum -- From Ex-Senator To Potential Presidential Candidate

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

Former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA)

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA), who was defeated for re-election in 2006 by a whopping 18-point margin, has been slowly but surely re-emerging on the political scene -- and could be a presidential candidate in 2012.

Over the last few months, Santorum has built up a schedule of visits to the top three primary and caucus states: He has already made two trips to South Carolina, one in December and another in January; he visited Iowa this past October, and will be headed back in March; and he just announced a trip to New Hampshire on April 30.

A month ago, Santorum stepped up the rhetoric in an e-mail sent to his supporters. "I promise you, I will stop at nothing when it comes to defending our freedom and our values," Santorum wrote. "That's the real reason why - after talking it over with my wife Karen and our kids - I am considering putting my name in for the 2012 presidential race." So let's take a brief look at what else he's done over the past year.

Santorum was an early participant in the right-wing rhetoric against Obama's presidency, before the Tea Party movement had caught on. In February 2009, Santorum told Think Progress at CPAC that he agreed with Rush Limbaugh in wanting Obama to fail. In early April 2009, he wrote: "Watching President Obama apologize last week for America's arrogance -- before a French audience that owes its freedom to the sacrifices of Americans -- helped convince me that he has a deep-seated antipathy toward American values and traditions."

In March 2009, Santorum strongly implied that he would not support the renomination of then-Republican Sen. Arlen Specter (PA), who had just recently helped pass the stimulus bill and was facing a likely primary challenge. "In 2004, President Bush and a Senate colleague from Western Pennsylvania made the difference for Specter. Those dogs don't hunt anymore," Santorum wrote, adding that the primary against Specter "will be fun to watch. And watch I will." (As we all know, Specter switched to the Democrats about a month later).

In August 2009, as he was about to head to Iowa he said: "What this country needs is someone with strong conviction who can articulate those convictions and who can provide a vision for America that is an alternative to the big government, freedom-depriving vision of Barack Obama. I don't know who that is."

In September 2009, Santorum said: "A lot of people are going to take a look and see what they can do to try to confront this presidency, which many of us -- as you're seeing from the tea parties and the like -- which many of us believe is injurious to America."

In December 2009, he took a slight shot at a potential competitor, Sarah Palin, making it clear that a presidential campaign wouldn't be easy for her: "I think, you know, she's done a lot to draw attention to herself that's positive. She's done some things that, you know, certainly are going to cause her to have to do some explaining if she runs for president."

If Santorum does indeed end up running for president, he could face any number of social-conservative competitors, such as Sarah Palin and Mike Huckabee. But when it comes to infuriating liberals, over the years few politicians have been quite as good at it as himself. And that by itself could be worth something.

Comments (72) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (0)

February 17, 2010 1:54 PM   

"But when it comes to infuriating liberals, over the years few politicians have been quite as good at it as himself. And that by itself could be worth something."

This is simply nonsense. Santorum infuriates no one because he's not taken seriously, even as a possible political threat. Granted, some conservatives get under our skin. Palin to some extent (but that has more to do with the media's obsession w/ her), Guiliani perhaps, GWB for sure, maybe there are others.

But Santorum? No.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 2:51 PM    in reply to felix

That.

If you want a barometer for the political climate, see who runs against Obama. If Obama is vulnerable, you'll see a Romney or a Gingrich challenge him. If not, it will be nuts like Santorum and Palin, who don't have a chance or a clue, or maybe someone of the Dole mold, who is simply too old to wait another four years.

Smart candidates who can wait till 2016 will do just that unless they smell blood. Santorum always smells blood, because he's insane.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 3:17 PM    in reply to dudeguy

RIght, which is why you're likely to see folks like Jindal and Thune take a pass in 2012 if Obama is in pretty good shape. Romney has to run because he'll be 65.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 3:32 PM    in reply to dudeguy

He smells blood because he snorts it. Thinks it will make him live forever. Just ask him, it's another one of those insane things he's proud of, like calling every homosexual a beast and locking women up in the kitchen.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 18, 2010 4:01 AM    in reply to dudeguy

But Romney is going to run whatever, because the man is on a mission. His personal plan is to become president, and nothing and no one will stop him or even slow him down.

Except the voters, LOL.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 3:30 PM    in reply to felix

Please let it be so! We'll have the opportunity to hear the entire electorate issue a massive "Ewwwwwwwww!"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 6:41 PM    in reply to felix

A man's attitude goes some ways as to how his life will be. Is that something you would agree with?

DeMint, Coburn, Imhofe, Cantor, their attitudes get under my skin, even though nihilistic buffoons they clearly are. I take Santorum less seriously than any of these.

These are people who must not care about the good life.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 2:00 PM   

God help us. Now we have rick the prick leading the repuke charge? Rambo and rick the prick. God help us all.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

mcc

user-pic

February 17, 2010 2:41 PM   

Hypothesis: The main reason Bill Clinton ran in 1996 was because the Republicans couldn't find anyone to mount a credible run against him.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 18, 2010 2:21 PM    in reply to mcc

and he was the incumbent.......

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 2:48 PM   

Failing upward.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 2:56 PM   

mmm... Santorum

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 7:09 PM    in reply to tweakyd

What a frothy mix he is.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 2:58 PM   

Isn't this the guy who took his wife's miscarried baby home in a jar or something, so his kids could see their "little brother"?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

ESK

user-pic

February 17, 2010 3:17 PM    in reply to EastWest

Yep. That's him, sick puppy that he is.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 5:45 PM    in reply to ESK

Jeebus! I've never heard that story. Creepy.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

slb

user-pic

February 17, 2010 8:14 PM    in reply to ESK

Oh, Gawd! I'd never heard that, either. That really is a bit creepy.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

slb

user-pic

February 17, 2010 8:29 PM    in reply to slb

OK, I looked this up on Wikipedia. This was a baby that was born prematurely and did not survive. That's a little less creepy.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 11:23 PM    in reply to slb

Hate to disagree with you, but that is still creepy, big time.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 18, 2010 6:28 AM    in reply to ESK

Santorum's actions are the natural consequence of Republican fetus worship.

They care about the fetus before it is born, but after that the fetus needs to get an effing job already and stop living on other people's charity.

The fetus was never born, so it remained in a state of grace. Who wouldn't want to bring home the perfect child?

(By the way, I always thought that the reason the Iraq war happened was that no one used the following killer argument: "There are pregnant women on the ground. Odds are that one of them is going to be killed by a bomb, thus killing the sainted fetus. So by supporting the war in Iraq, you are condoning abortion. Consequently, we should not go to war in Iraq.")

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 3:27 PM    in reply to EastWest

A very sick fuck, that guy...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 3:05 PM   

Everywhere small dogs are running for cover...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santorum_controversy

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 5:31 PM    in reply to JPointsNYC

LOL. And big dogs, too. Wasn't it an Irish Setter he strapped to the top of the station wagon?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 5:49 PM    in reply to Cal Gal

I think that was Romney.

But Santorum/Romney? Potato/potato.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 18, 2010 1:56 PM    in reply to FlownOver

Santorum strapped Romney to the top of a station wagon? Cool...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 3:11 PM   

"Watching President Obama apologize last week for America's arrogance -- before a French audience that owes its freedom to the sacrifices of Americans -- helped convince me that he has a deep-seated antipathy toward American values and traditions."

When did Obama apologize for America's arrogance in front of a French audience? Like Palin, he just makes things up.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 3:45 PM    in reply to booch221

before a French audience that owes its freedom to the sacrifices of Americans

Guess Santorum never heard about Le Marquis de LaFayette.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 5:53 PM    in reply to Schmed

Or human rights. Or moving pictures or heliocentrism, for that matter.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 3:19 PM   

How could we forget this winner of a photo?

http://www.lies.com/wp/images/2006/11/santorum.jpg

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 3:25 PM    in reply to rbeats

Eww.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 3:55 PM    in reply to rbeats

Yikes!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 6:49 PM    in reply to rbeats

I feel sorry for those children.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 3:22 PM   

Santorum? Isn't that semen mixed with feces?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 3:35 PM    in reply to Frex

'santorum' is the stuff you wipe off after anal sex.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 4:52 PM    in reply to Joe Monster

Well, he's gonna have to work up a froth to get noticed.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 18, 2010 6:30 AM    in reply to Frex

You forgot lube.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 3:26 PM   

You mean "man on dog" Santorum is resurrecting his political career just in time to join the conservative call for eradicating Social Security? Santorum led the charge when Bush was president and pledged to raise the retirement age to 70+...as high as he could push it. Remember when he tried to convince people that private accounts would “solve” Social Security’s possible solvency problem in 30 years? Those same private accounts that would have been decimated in the Crash of 2008? We need to get rid of the 'Santorums' that still haunt Congress, not raise the old ones from political death.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 3:37 PM    in reply to Impishparrot

If it means people will learn about the actual plan, I'd be happy to see him run. Problem is, it will turn into a slight of hand campaign, point to something and complain about something else.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 5:42 PM    in reply to Impishparrot

Don't forget he was also one of the architects of the K-Street project.

Run Rick Run!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 5:47 PM    in reply to expat46

Oh and I forgot about Terri Schiavo.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 3:26 PM   

Maybe Santorum will get together with Michele Bachmann and they can procreate some demon spawn...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 3:38 PM    in reply to Shoto

I understand Santorum is more interested in dogs than horses.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 3:29 PM   

I hate this dick. Another smug smiler with nothing but shame for his humanity and overblown concern about your morality.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 3:31 PM   

Santorum has more baggage than a Pullman car. The last one that broke before he was ousted was a charity scam he was operating as a make work job program for campaign workers.

I still call him Rick Sanitorium.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 3:50 PM   

It seems that altar boys like Santorum and Mark Thiessen have an I smell catshit look on their face. I don't know why, but if they had been religiously educated by catholic priests, I think they might have been a little too close to the dark undersides of theology. It's a look you get when you learn not to close your nose. So have a little sympathy for this father's boy, his entire identity is wrapped up in catholic self righteous ideas. But don't take this pathetic wimp seriously!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 3:54 PM   

This is the guy who brought home a miscarried fetus (or child, or baby, or corpse) so his kids could hug it and say goodbye?

Dude... good luck with that one.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 3:58 PM   

rbeats: The single greatest political picture ever. It's fascinating. The wife ... silently wishing death on the voters and media. The girl ... five years too old for the dolly and the dress. The son ... fated to be in the news as a serial killer in 2025 or so.

Creep. Eeee.

Weeferdog

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

slb

user-pic

February 17, 2010 8:28 PM    in reply to Weeferdog

The girl might be Bella, who has a genetic abnormality known as Trisomy 18. Like Down Syndrome, it's caused by an extra copy of a chromosome (in this case chromosome 18), and also like Down's, it can be characterized by mental retardation and developmental delays as well as physical abnormalities. (Most fetuses with Trisomy 18 do not survive to birth.)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 8:29 PM    in reply to Weeferdog

The boy looks like Pugsley Addams gone bad.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 4:04 PM   

the Mitt-Sarah-Ricky boy threeway. And with T-Paw on the side, looking at them. Nice. Can't wait.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 4:13 PM   

Candidates can hide who they are, they can lie...

... but the one they they cannot do, ever, under any circumstances, is survive the ridicule of becoming a national buffoon (see also: Dan Quayle).

That said... SANTORUM 2012!! :-)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 4:21 PM   

I find Santorum more repellent than other conservaloons. I'm not even sure why. The sickly smile is part of it, the grotesque things he says too - he just turns my stomach more than the others, who are merely horrible.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 4:23 PM   

Well, if it gets him off the editorial commentary page for the Philadelphia Inquirer, maybe that isn't so bad.

A real social values nut job.

At least we would know his health care policy. Malpractice caps (after all his wife already got her $$$ payment), no reproductive rights, and taxpayer money to churches for abstinence only teaching.

How about a dream ticket: Santorum-Palin. He would never take second spot.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 5:35 PM    in reply to PAvoter

I disagree. I think he is much more likely to take the second spot that La Palin.

Palin/Santorum 2012!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 8:35 PM    in reply to PAvoter

Natural bottom.

Though Palin would have to Man Up.

Hope it wasn't dinner time.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 4:54 PM   

Not one troll comment so far. Santorum doesn't even have their support.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 4:58 PM   

Just when you think all the Santorum's gone, more just seeps out. :)

Or so I'm told...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 5:24 PM   

The GOP is worse off the more faces emerge as potential 2012 contenders. Look at how much Democrats were damaged (short-term, at least) from the Hillary-Obama primary fight.

Now imagine Romney, Palin, Huckabee, Pawletny and Santorum going after one another.

http://www.political-buzz.com/

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 5:38 PM   

Oh, I really hope he runs! Can you imagine "debates" between him and Palin? Who can out-stupid/crazy whom?

Huckabee and Pawlentny will be wasting their time and, I hope, lots of money.

Romney's a complete tool, but he looks relatively presidential versus the others likely to run.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 6:20 PM   

Ego.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 6:39 PM   

What a hoot!

Worthy of a quick recap:

Santorum not worthy

Good barometer

Babies in jars!

sick puppy

man-on-dog Santorum aka dog fucker

rbeats: The single greatest political picture ever.

Eww.

Yikes!

'santorum' is the stuff you wipe off after anal sex.

Eww.

Weeferdog: The single best play by play of a political picture ever.

Mitt-Sarah-Ricky boy threeway with a T-Paw assist

Santorum has a lot of baggage

altar boy always smells catshit


In other news: Rick Santorum takes one look at the comments section of TPM and reconsiders his presidential bid.


Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 6:46 PM   

I've believed for a long time that Santorum is gay. Anybody who thinks and worries and scolds that much about other people's sex lives has something weird going on (not that homosexuality itself is weird, but hiding it and obsessing about it sure is).

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 6:49 PM   

Santorum/ Palin or Palin/Santorum 2012 candidates for the Moronocracy Party.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 8:05 PM   

Im not from Pennsylvania, but Santorum (along with my old senator Ted Stevens) was the worst of the last crop of upper-house assholes and probably was the one who most deserved to leave. I dont think I'll ever forget the 109th congress (05' to 07'). These guys did absolutly NOTHING except funnel money into Iraq and talk about Terri Schaivo for two years.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 8:55 PM   

Whoever suggested to Rick that he make this move, really screwed the pooch!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 17, 2010 10:30 PM   

Run, Ricky, Run!

Why is it that any Republican with hair thinks he should be president?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 18, 2010 12:01 AM   

Ever since Dan Savage and the porn industry decided to use this guy's last name as a slang term for the byproducts of anal sex*, I have been unable to take him seriously. Actually, sorry, I was unable to take him seriously long before that.
*look up "santorum" on urbandictionary.com

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 18, 2010 11:37 AM    in reply to araucaniad

This. Santorum will never outlive what Dan Savage did to his name.

That aside, I hope he does run. He's not smart enough to talk about policy--certainly not against Obama--and he's so deep into crazy wingnut territory that Republican primary voters would love him but the general electorate would recoil in horror. He wouldn't even carry Pennsylvania.

If Santorum runs in '12, buy stock in microwave popcorn companies.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 18, 2010 1:08 AM   

Sign seen at Santorum/Bush event, summer 2005: Bush + Santorum = Man On Dog Politics.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 18, 2010 10:54 AM   

Yeah, hook him up with Sarah Palin so we can have two religious dim bulbs running the country into the ground. If you want to know what we in Pennsylvania thought of Santorum, just remember we called him Sen. Sanitarium.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 18, 2010 2:26 PM   

If you think Sarah Palin is a magnet for derisive comments, then you must relish the opportunity to savage Ricky-boy.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

PDQ

user-pic

February 18, 2010 4:04 PM   

I'm sorry, but every time I see him my gaydar goes off the chart. It's like the feeling I get when I see a certain Republican politician from Florida.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on