
Today's the big day - President Obama for the first time will throw his full weight behind a health care plan with the White House stamp of approval, a hybrid piece of legislation the administration is posting online at 10 a.m.
Obama has endured criticism for months that he wasn't giving Congress enough guidance beyond broad health care principles, saying that he supported both the House and Senate bills which passed last year.
Now, the endgame approaches. We'll have lots for you today detailing the compromise proposal which tees up Obama's bipartisan Congressional health care summit Thursday.
Meanwhile, Congress comes back to town and we're expecting even more senators signing onto a letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid urging he use reconciliation (which needs just 50 votes with Vice President Joe Biden as the tiebreakers) to pass a public option plan.
The White House leaked some details of the plan to the New York Times last night.
Among the highlights in the Times story is that Obama will propose new government power to block insurers from imposing massive rate hikes on customers. It's inspired by the 39 percent proposed increases from Anthem Blue Cross in California.
More from the piece:
[A]dministration officials said it will incorporate legislation proposed last week by Senator Dianne Feinstein, Democrat of California, in response to the Anthem increases and officials said would "help make sure that people are not unfairly subject to arbitrary premium hikes."The president's bill would grant the federal health and human services secretary new authority to review, and to block, premium increases by private insurers, and it would create a new Health Insurance Rate Authority, comprised of health industry experts that would issue an annual report setting the parameters for reasonable rate increases based on conditions in the market.
The legislation would call on the secretary of health and human services to work with state regulators to develop an annual review of rate increases, and if increases are deemed "unjustified" the secretary or the state could block the increase, order the insurer to change it, or even issue a rebate to beneficiaries. States would be eligible for a portion of $250 million in grants finance premium review and approval.
The new rate board would be composed of seven members, including consumer representatives, an insurance industry representative, a physician, and other experts such health economists and actuaries, the White House said. The board's annual report would offer guidance to the public and states on whether rate increases should be approved.
The president's bill, like the measures adopted by the House and Senate, is expected to require most Americans to obtain insurance, and would provide new federal subsidies to help moderate-income people afford to buy private coverage.
CranialRectalLoopback
February 22, 2010 9:15 AM
Full weight ... sure.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ondioline
February 22, 2010 9:34 AM in reply to CranialRectalLoopback
Does the sky fall up or down on your home planet? I'm sure it's constantly falling. I just wonder in which direction...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jim43
February 22, 2010 9:17 AM
Obama needs to make Republicans an offer they shouldn't refuse, but will. The GOP is going to walk away from anything for the simple reason that it is Obama and the Dems proposing it.
Say that tort reform and some other centrist measures will be in a final bill and publicize it, then let the GOP deal with the consequences.
http://www.political-buzz.com/
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hunter
February 22, 2010 3:37 PM in reply to jim43
Tort reform is not a "centrist measure." It is a right-wing lunatic measure. We're talking about maybe a 1% savings in health care costs. And to get there we have to:
1)Completely throw out civil due process. Juries are supposed to assign damages.
2)Cause horrible injustice to individuals. A preventable medical screwup causes someone to be a quadriplegic for life and his damages are capped at $250k!?
3)Destroy the principle method for removing bad doctors from the field. The vast majority of malpractice claims are levied against a very small portion of incompetent practitioners, and they need to be driven out of the business. That's the market at work, and conservatives want to subvert it. They should be beaten over the head with the fact that they're all for socialism, as long as it's for rich doctors.
This is how we lose the Overton window. Call a spade a spade and quit referring to this disaster as "centrist."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SoBenji
February 22, 2010 9:18 AM
This might be almost as effective as the public option. Provided it's not a corrupted process filled with people getting rich on the backside by the insurance companies.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Moose49
February 22, 2010 9:40 AM in reply to SoBenji
It's definitely a good step to take and they should do it regardless. But the downside is that if and when the Repugnuts control the executive branch, the regulatory mechanism will be eviscerated or ignored, with insurance industry hacks hired to watch over the henhouse. So it shouldn't be in lieu of the public option, IF there are 50 or more Senate votes for one.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
calbearinillinois
February 22, 2010 10:00 AM in reply to Moose49
The GOP would probably keep it around just to whack people they don't like from time to time (the way they don't disband the SEC, FEC or FCC).
Along with the premium/claim ratio piece of the legislation, this could have real potential for setting the table for a public option, since it would give HHS the right to collect the unvarnished data that would make the best case.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
theWalrus
February 22, 2010 9:36 AM
Well, that's it. The Retroublicans can stay home now. They wanted Obama to scrap everything and start over.
Why did it take over a year for the WH to come up with its own plan? Unfortunately, all Obama needs to do now is get the Dumbocrats behind it. Good luck!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Joe Monster
February 22, 2010 10:08 AM
Do it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?