
Several large American trade associations and the National Chamber of Commerce are preparing to blanket the country with a new multi-million dollar ad campaign aimed at putting the brakes on Democratic health care reform efforts that now seem to have reached the home stretch.
The campaign will cost "between $4 million and $10 million," Chamber vice president Bruce Josten told reporters on a conference call today. Some ads will run nationwide, but other components of the campaign will be targeted at lawmakers "in 17 states" where American industry believes the final votes in support of comprehensive health care reform will be found -- or lost.
"We're going to underscore why their reluctance is exactly the kind of thing they should have in their gut before they risk it [on a yes vote]," Josten said of the lawmakers the group is targeting.
Josten was joined on the call by trade association leaders representing manufacturing, wholesalers, retail and housing. Each told reporters that the health care bill favored by Democrats would the loss of thousands of American jobs.
"These bills are job killers," National Retail Federation vice president Neil Trautwein said flatly. "Retail simply cannot afford any higher benefit costs or burdensome mandates."
Though all the associations on the call as well as the Chamber expressed support for health care reform as a concept, each claimed that the way the Democrats have gone about it will mean nothing less than kicking the nation's economy when it's down.
"The construction industry is in a very fragile state," Geoff Burr, vice president of the Associated Builders and Contractors, said. "To be looking over the horizon at the potential of costly employer mandates and increased taxes...is daunting."
Burr said the Democratic reforms will mean fewer new jobs created by his industry and "less employment" in he housing sector overall.
Though the industry reps and the Chamber are on their face non-partisan, it was no secret on the call which party's take on the health care debate American business favors. Mixed in with the criticism of the reform bills themselves were attacks on how the Democrats in Washington plan to pass them.
Josten dismissed President Obama's recent focus on health insurance rate increases to build support for reform as essentially a political gimmick used by the White House to turn the health insurance industry into the bad guy.
Josten said health insurance profits are relatively low -- "about 2.2 cents on the dollar" -- and that insurers have actually been proponents of reform in the past.
"It's easy for the President to pick somebody," Josten said, "and he picked [insurers] to vilify."
"I'm not sure what he hopes to accomplish by that," he continued. "Someone's going to have to administer this system."
Jade West, a vice president at the national association of wholesalers, attacked the plan among some Democrats in the Senate to use reconciliation to alter the bill passed on Christmas Eve so it more closely matches portions of the House bill passed earlier last year.
Democrats "have rejected any number of reasonable health care reform ideas, ignored the public which opposes their mission, and now threatens to twist the rules of the Senate to effectively silence all dissent," she said. "It is time for Washington to start over and get it right."
In one of the ads the business groups are launching soon, reconciliation is also a focus.
"We thought Washington understood," the ad script reads in part. "But this week Congress is trying to use special rules... to ram through their same trillion dollar health care bill."
See the ad:
Steve LaBonne
March 9, 2010 3:36 PM
What a bunch of idiots. The interests of the insurance companies and those of most of the members of these organizations are pretty much diametrically opposed.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
March 9, 2010 3:43 PM
Kucinich Sides With Big Business Against Struggling Americans With No Healthcare. Film at 11.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JorgeOrwell
March 9, 2010 4:18 PM
Big business pretend to hate this bill. They know if we see them protesting we will encourage the opposite and fight for its passage. Classic Machiavelli !
Nobody benefits from this Senate piece of crap more than corporations.
Your being suckered if you beleive they are "against" it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
March 9, 2010 4:28 PM in reply to JorgeOrwell
Desperate anti-HCR troll. HA!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
calchala
March 9, 2010 4:50 PM in reply to JorgeOrwell
They're spending 4-10 million dollars and you think that's a "shell game"? Yet, when they spend LESS money to fight the public option, that's real! Just unbelievable logic.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JorgeOrwell
March 9, 2010 4:57 PM in reply to calchala
4-10 million? That's chump change. I bet they're spending a hell of a lot more than that. And guess who is paying for it? YOU AND I!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
calchala
March 9, 2010 6:21 PM in reply to JorgeOrwell
Of course they COULD spend more, but c'mon they could have spent more on the public option fight. They're targeting only a handful of districts. Trust me 10 million bucks in those districts is a HELL OF A LOT of money.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
chimpale
March 9, 2010 5:34 PM in reply to JorgeOrwell
They've all been spending hundreds of millions of dollars over the past several months on a head fake. Yeah, I'll bet that's it.
I think you're stepping into Glenn Back territory with the contorted logic there.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JorgeOrwell
March 9, 2010 5:40 PM in reply to chimpale
Didn't the article say 4-10 million?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
chimpale
March 9, 2010 5:52 PM in reply to JorgeOrwell
Yes, but for your little conspiracy theory to work, the insurance companies would have been working on this since early summer, too. They've all been spending tons of money to stop health care reform.
Or so they would have you believe.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JorgeOrwell
March 9, 2010 5:47 PM in reply to chimpale
No wonder our premiums are so astronomical!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
March 9, 2010 6:04 PM in reply to JorgeOrwell
OUR? So you have insurance from a private insurer?
The anti-HCR troll caught in yet ANOTHER lie!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
March 9, 2010 8:30 PM in reply to FreeRider
Nail is butt to the cross Free Rider. Jorge is a lying sack of crap.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
March 9, 2010 8:58 PM in reply to FreeRider
Nail is butt to the cross Free Rider. Jorge is a lying sack of crap.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Dorn76
March 9, 2010 7:52 PM in reply to JorgeOrwell
That's a stretch.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
March 9, 2010 8:12 PM in reply to JorgeOrwell
You really amaze me with your stupid negative comments.... you never have anything positive to say - you really need to get a new avatar. FDR is probably turning over in his grave.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JorgeOrwell
March 10, 2010 3:30 PM in reply to lousgirl84
Obama could use a little more FDR in his spine...
"They had begun to consider the Government of the United States as a mere appendage to their own affairs. We know now that Government by organized money is just as dangerous as Government by organized mob.
Never before in all our history have these forces been so united against one candidate as they stand today. They are unanimous in their hate for me—and I welcome their hatred."
http://www.dailykos.com/tv/w/000499/
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
March 9, 2010 8:13 PM in reply to JorgeOrwell
The only sucker here is you. They are "pretending" by spending millions of dollars to defeat it - they just like throwing their money away --is that what you are saying???
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JorgeOrwell
March 9, 2010 9:14 PM in reply to lousgirl84
Remember, if you have insurance, its YOUR money they are throwing away!
Corporate CEO's are going to walk with their millions in bonuses whether they are profitable or not.
I don't know what motivates you to throw in the towel on the wildly popular PUBLIC OPTION (59% public support), but it sure makes the rest of us wonder about who is buttering your bread.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
March 9, 2010 10:42 PM in reply to JorgeOrwell
Oh my gosh. Your asininity is mind boggling. It really is......there are ways to tell real trolls but apparently you are too stupid..... so knock yourself out...believe what you want to believe. LOL
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
afisher
March 9, 2010 4:20 PM
As these ads FAIL to ANSWER exactly WHO's TAXES will be going up, they must think that the American public will assume the individual...after all, it worked for the TPartier. Most are smarter than them.
There argument only bolsters the Reconciliation to ADD a Public Option so that Americans will not be held hostage to a Private Insurance group who are guided by a Profit Model.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mans_best_friend
March 9, 2010 5:13 PM
Everyone knows the only way to solve the health care problem is to give big tax breaks to businesses.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Powkat
March 9, 2010 5:24 PM
Are there no penalties for lying in advertising? Every word in that ad is a lie. And if I hear that woman's voice one more time, I will track her down and gag her!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Moloko+
March 9, 2010 5:34 PM
Guarantee profits for big banks - We're ok with that....
Guarantee healthcare for citizens - it's the end of civilization....
Marx criticism of Capitalism is spot-on. People interfere with profits....except during war.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Newt
March 9, 2010 6:20 PM
They will not use reconciliation to add the public option. The Senate bill is exactly what Obama, Republicans and ConservaDems want: No public option, with mandates to ensure continued profitability for the insurance companies that have already drained the financial life blood out of their current customer base and need a larger host body.
Didn’t we learn anything from the bankster bailouts? Unable to get much else done in his likely one term presidency, Obama wants to go down in history as the man who gave us UHC, even though the rest of us will be stuck with a lousy, expensive system that bolsters the very people who’ve already wrecked our healthcare system with their greed.
Tell Congress to stop the “Insurance Industry Profit Protection and Enhancement Act.” Without a public option, this bill is simply a another corporate welfare scheme legislating wealth redistribution from America’s middle and working classes to the super rich.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
calchala
March 9, 2010 6:23 PM in reply to Newt
Republicans want? They sure do have a funny way of showing it. Please stop with the reform bashing. This bill WILL help millions of Americans. Every day I'll see one commenter or another asking for insurance. ENOUGH. This MUST PASS.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
chimpale
March 9, 2010 6:40 PM in reply to Newt
Sorry. As flawed as the HCR bill may be, I'm not about to sign on to the all-or-nothing approach. Getting nothing now means getting nothing for decades to come. I'll take the best that we can possibly get now with just enough votes to pass. After that, I'd like to see us replace a bunch of Conservadems and continue improving on the HCR until it finally does what it was intended to do without any more gifts to the insurers.
At the same time, public financing of campaigns is badly needed. Everything is going to be an uphill battle just like this one until we separate special interest money from elections.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JorgeOrwell
March 9, 2010 7:26 PM in reply to chimpale
Without the public option, we will simply have a number of Scott Browns emerge victorious in November. Even in my state, Patty Murray, once considered untouchable, is in hot water with the base over her vacillation on the issue.
Demographically, Mass and Washington are very similar. I can tell you, several bleeding hearts I know, are rethinking their support for her over this. At the very least they won't be throwing any money at her.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
March 9, 2010 8:14 PM in reply to JorgeOrwell
I wish I could insert my own amendment to the bill and that would be that when it passes you don't get to participate in any of it!!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JorgeOrwell
March 9, 2010 9:06 PM in reply to lousgirl84
Don't worry, If your Senate bill passes, I won't get to participate anyway.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
March 9, 2010 10:44 PM in reply to JorgeOrwell
Good - mazel tov.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JorgeOrwell
March 9, 2010 7:33 PM
Get on the PHONE to your Senators and tell them to sign the Bennet letter in support of the PUBLIC OPTION!
http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Nutter
March 9, 2010 8:35 PM in reply to JorgeOrwell
If you get the public option, you do not want to hear anything from you ever again.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JorgeOrwell
March 9, 2010 9:03 PM in reply to Nutter
I don't?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Tanjaoui
March 9, 2010 8:26 PM
It's true, the health insurance industry isn't a big money maker. 2% growth isn't breathtaking. Of course their CEO's...that's another story. But the industry is partly responsible (along with health care providers - really a 3rd rail, because noone wants to talk about that) for the skyrocketing health care costs. It's the paperwork, billing, and multitude of insurers that drive up costs. Something like 30% of health care costs in the US goes to its administration. That compares to about 16% in Canada. And this bill builds on that system.
Everyone should be looking at Massachusetts. It's coming apart there. Everyone's covered, but their costs are increasing. So what happens as costs rise? People choose cheaper plans. But those plans - the ones people can afford - require much higher out of pocket costs (co-insurance, deductibles). So you can't afford to really use the plan. Funding for clinics in poorer areas is drying up. Cities are frantically slashing budgets to help them meet rising costs. It's a mess, and it will get worse. Massachusetts has the highest health care costs in the world. Do we want this for the entire country? Gee...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
March 9, 2010 8:28 PM in reply to Tanjaoui
Combined, all health insurance companies made $12 Billion last year - Up 56% from the year before. I saw that on the news last night.. In 2008 there were 2 million more people insured compared to 2009.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JorgeOrwell
March 9, 2010 10:15 PM in reply to Tanjaoui
Exactly why Brown took it! Mass has already tried this plan and it doesn't work without a strong public alternative.
Not brain surgery folks!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bayroad22
March 9, 2010 10:53 PM
why don't these teapartiers go over to the AHIP meeting to protest health care company takeover of Americans and their death panels?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JorgeOrwell
March 9, 2010 10:59 PM in reply to bayroad22
Amen! Pretty sure most of these haters work for AHIP. Their goal is to sink a government run health care option. They would simply be singing to the choir over there.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?