TPMDC

Blanche Lincoln Gets A Democratic Challenger In Arkansas


Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-AR) and Arkansas Lt. Governor Bill Halter (D)

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

After months of speculation, Arkansas Lt. Gov. Bill Halter made it official this morning, announcing he'll challenge Sen. Blanche Lincoln for the Democratic Senate nomination in Arkansas.

"Enough is enough," Halter said in a video announcing his candidacy posted this morning. "It's past time to put more Arkansas values in Washington."

Polls have shown Lincoln is unpopular in the state she's represented in the Senate since first being elected in 1998.

Even with a new Democratic candidate, the TPM Poll Average shows the GOP with a significant lead in virtually all potential matchups. Pitted against Rep. John Boozman, seen by many observers as the strongest candidate in the eight-man field for the GOP nomination, both Lincoln and Halter are behind significantly in recent polls. Boozman is ahead of Lincoln 55-34 in the TPM Poll Average, and he leads Halter 53-30 according to a the latest polling on the race from PPP (D).

But Halter could have a significant advantage in a general election Lincoln would not -- the support of national progressives and the Netroots. Lincoln's voting record over the past year has drawn the ire of national leaders on the left, who objected to her opposition to so-called "card check" legislation and the inclusion of a public option in health care reform. For months, progressive groups have been on the ground in Arkansas, building an organization to help a defeat Lincoln in a primary while urging Halter to run.

Halter could prove to be a formidable primary opponent when he officially files the paperwork to run in the primary against Lincoln tomorrow. He's a proven statewide Democratic winner, and progressive groups have told me for quite a while now that his entry in the race would give them the best shot at taking Lincoln down. But it's still not clear what effect the backing of progressive base would have on a Democratic candidate in a general election in Arkansas, where "liberal" is not the first word that springs to mind when considering the electorate.

In his announcement video today, Halter laid out a populist message for his campaign, while taking not-so-subtle jabs at Lincoln. Halter attacked the financial bailouts ("bailing out Wall Street with no strings attached") and the health care reform process, of which Lincoln has a been central player. He called the reform process so far "protecting insurance company profits instead of protecting patients and lowering health costs."

"Washington is broken," Halter said, in a seeming reference to Lincoln. "It's working for the special interests, not Arkansas families."

Comments (40) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (4)

March 1, 2010 8:35 AM   

Finally! I just chipped in a few bucks at:

http://billhalter.com/

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 8:39 AM   

Thanks for the link. Do you know anything about him. He could be as bad!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 9:51 AM    in reply to lousgirl84

No, he couldn't.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 10:36 AM    in reply to lousgirl84

Maybe, maybe not. But the important thing is that he isn't tainted. Lincoln should step aside like Dodd did and allow for Halter, who isn't tainted, to run unhindered.

Also, Halter is a populist centrist, like the centrist Dems elected since 2006 (Tester, McCaskill, Klobuchar, Casey etc) as opposed to the 'problem centrists' (i.e. corporatists) that have been in office longer (Lincoln, the Nelsons, Landrieu, Lieberman). So he would most likely be at least some improvement

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 1:45 PM    in reply to lousgirl84

Even if he is exactly the same as Blanche, unseating her would serve the purpose of showing other Dems what could happen to them if they try to play Republican against their own party for individual gain. There has to be some instrument of discipline to keep Dem legislators together. Senators have to be punished by the voters.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 8:48 AM   

I'm not from Arkansas but i will be donating to Mr. Halter's campaign. He seems genuine and Lincoln represents everything that is corrosive and toxic in D.C.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 12:34 PM    in reply to ru4862

I'm not so concerned about DC corruption. I am concerned about the importance she puts on being re-elected. Seems like she'll agree to anything as long as it helps her and places no importance on the Democratic Party. She's not a centrist, she's a me, me, me. Halter's getting a contribution from me too.

The dems are a big tent party, which is good, but she's out of the tent. She and Ben Nelson have to go. He's the only one worse than she is.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 8:48 AM   

Remember, this year's midterms are going to be an anti-incumbant wave. Sen. Lincoln will certainly be a casualty of it, but Bill Halter could paint himself as an Washington Outsider and avoid the brunt of it. In fact, it appears he's trying to do just that.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 9:13 AM   

I'm just wondering where that most important Arkansan, Bill Clinton will fall in this battle, or if he takes a side at all.

For what it's worth, Halter did serve in the administration for almost the entire eight years.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 9:15 AM   

Why a Real LIberal Can Win for Arkansas and America

Obama, Lincoln and many Democratic 'leaders' do not a have a bone in their bodies to favor middle class Americans.

Here are eight decisions made by the so-called liberal Democrats, none is a 'liberal decision' and all are slanted to the corporate interests, the wealthy or are an acceleration of previous Republican policies:

1.Ignoring previous Republican crimes, misdemeanors and profligacy 
– e.g. tax cuts for the wealthy. 

2. Supporting a stingy stimulus that was half of what was needed and 
was one-third tax breaks, not jobs.

3. Killing the only option that would have slowed the cost of health 
care & led to universal coverage.

4. Accelerating the Bush bailout, $ 4.3 Trillions in bailouts, 
guarantees and purchasing assets from the private sector at well above market 
value.

5. Escalating a meaningless and fruitless war.

6. Gutting real financial reform and substitute finger wagging and silly 
taxes and fees, while banking fees continue up, lending freezes and credit 
tightens.

7. Not helping people with bankruptcy and mortgages remediation – 
accelerating middle class decline.

8. Fiddling around and not passing a jobs bill.


Arkansas and America need representatives who will represent them and represent true traditional Democratic policies, i.e. standing up for the American middle class. Bring down Lincoln and the other psuedo-Democrats, who are simply toadies for the wealthy.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 9:18 AM   

It's not just public option -- she's wrong on the Employee Free Choice Act, on the Becker NLRB nomination, on dirty air, on almost everything of significance. If Arkansas voters are faced this fall with a choice between a real Republican and a Republican wannabe, they'll pick the real thing. But if they have a choice between a real economic populist and a Republican, at least we'll have a fighting chance.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 9:21 AM   

where is he on the issues?

EFCA?
Choice?
HC?

c'mon, help a foreigner out

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 9:23 AM   

" Even with a new Democratic candidate, the TPM PollTracker average with a significant lead in virtually all potential matchups."

Is it just me, or does that sentence lack something – like a verb?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 9:24 AM    in reply to FlownOver

Otherwise, Yay!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 9:28 AM   

Good news, we can get rid of a corporate whore (Walmart's Senator). She is going to lose in the general election for numerous reasons. No harm running a fresh young face who is a populist.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 9:38 AM   

Evan, I think you're off-base in saying Halter's advantage over Lincoln would be "national progressives and the Netroots." Those things are only marginal factors.

Where Halter DOES have a POTENTIAL advantage is with IN-STATE progressives. Lincoln has spent the past year trying to triangulate but instead coming off only as having no grounding, thus pissing off all ideological sides. But Halter has the advantage of giving disillusioned progressives and Democratic interest group voters an alternative, while also offering a blank slate and opportunity to self-define before a larger November electorate.

Ultimately I think Halter is a longshot, as the Rethugs probably pick up this seat anyway, but I don't doubt that given enough money and a competent campaign, Halter has an outside shot at holding the seat for Dems, while Lincoln is past the point of no return and has NO shot.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 7:34 PM    in reply to DCCyclone

There are progressives in Arkansas?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 9:51 AM   

I also am woefully ignorant of internal Arkansas politics. But it is absolutely clear that Blanche will not be able to rely on the kindness of strangers anymore. She is almost literally, a dead turd flushing.

The Repubs are guaranteed to defeat her. At least Halter can run from outside the Beltway. Perhaps if this election is just not going to happen, he could polish his credentials for another run in 2016. The Dem bench in Arkansas is practically invisible from outside the state.

FREE Don Siegelman! I'm looking at YOU Holder!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 10:21 AM   

YEAH BABY!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 10:21 AM   

Lincoln should get a clue and withdraw allowing the Lt. Gov. to raise money and make a viable run at the seat against the Republicans as an actual, real live Democrat. Either way, Lincoln isn't going to remain Senator so it really is pointless for her to run for re-election.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 12:26 PM    in reply to oleeb

No. Hang on, Blanche, and give us the satisfaction of canning your rearend in the primary.

Blanche Lincoln has NO chance in the general election, so this can't hurt. I'm sending Bill Halter some money right now.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 10:23 AM   

Bye bye Blanche!!!

:)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 10:53 AM   

I wonder when Blanche will change parties....

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 12:18 PM   

I will send Bill Halter a few $.
Get out the popcorn folks,remember,Joe Biden held a fundraiser for Lincoln sometime last yr,wonder where the WH support will trend,if nothing folks are hitching to smack down the Prez for his cajoling of conserva dems.And now they have as good a reason as any to pie the Prez in his face by supporting Halter.

Shows how insignificant the leadership of the DNC has become,in general people are leary of Dem leadership big time.

Woo!hoo! good times are here again.If you can't produce for the people you ought to be kicked out on your ass.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 12:24 PM   

Is Halter any better, though? What are his stands on issues, aside from the usual vague talking points? Links, please?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 12:29 PM    in reply to Ripper McCord

I hear you, and while I don't think that Bill Halter is a huge improvement, I think he's a small one. That's enough, because Blanche Lincoln needs to be brought down as an example to other obstructionists (like Halter, if he becomes one).

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 12:30 PM   

This is great news.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 12:41 PM   

What effect would having the Clintons support him have? At least Bill for sure, hopefully would be a positive vote getter.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 1:33 PM   

As Woody Guthrie might sing: "So long, Blanche, it's been good to know ya"
or, after George Burns, "say goodnight, Blanchie."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 1:41 PM   

Dear Blanche,
If you are "not afraid" of a primary challenge, you are as much a fool as a corporate meat puppet. Keep running the right and show the rest of the corpor-crats the quickest path to their "official" corporate lobbying jobs.

I already donated through;
Act Blue & Move On

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 3:02 PM    in reply to rawresolve

Be aware that Act Blue is not in itself committed to progressive candidates. One of its pages is selling Reception tickets for a fundraising dinner for Sen. Claire McCaskill, a conservative Dem.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 3:32 PM    in reply to Ripper McCord

you are correct sir. but as opposed to supporting the dlc that works to keep incumbents in their seats. act blue allows you to support individual liberals/progressives if that is you desire.

and, i like you mustache.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 4:13 PM    in reply to rawresolve

good to know.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 3:49 PM   

Remember how insurgent anti-Iraq war Democrat Ned Lamont was treated by the Democratic establishment, led by NY US Senator Hillary Clinton, when he defeated Joe Lieberman in the '06 Connecticut primary? Tepid would be an overstatement.

I hear, the Obama White House backs Blanche "Stinkin'" Lincoln.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 4:03 PM   

Buh-bye Blanche, take Ben Nelson with you.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 4:38 PM   

I live in Arkansas and have my entire life and, as much as everyone is unhappy with Blanche, if Halter defeats her in the primary, the republican will win the seat. Halter left the state to earn his living and when he came back to Arkansas it was to run for Lieutenant Governor. That was a big hurdle he had to overcome in order to win election. Our Governor, Mike Beebe, is extremely popular and a democrat. I think most people who supported Halter in his race did so because he was pushing the lottery. In fact, he was instrumental in getting it up and running. Now the lottery is losing popularity in the state. One thing you must understand about this state, and it pains me to say it but it's true, is that Arkansas is a racist, ignorant state. Most of the residents here watch Fox News and voted for John McCain. If Hillary had won the nomination she would have carried the state overwhelmingly. She won the primary with 70% of the vote. Even the Northeast corner of the state, a very liberal area, voted for John McCain. We are loaded with redneck, racist hillbillies and they will vote for the republican before they will vote for Halter. Arkansas is also a state that depends heavily on our farms. Like her policies or not, and I don't, she is good for our agriculture community. That would have probably helped her eke out a victory in November. Having Obama as our president has turned the citizens of my state into foaming at the mouth extremists!! I have been shocked by how bad it's gotten. In fact, one of the clips shown repeatedly on TV from the town halls was a local woman, embarrassingly crying that "I want my country back!" As much as all of you may detest Blanche and her positions on the issues, you'd better hope she beats Halter in the primary. It is our only chance at holding the seat. We currently have 3 democratic House members and one republican. The one republican is taking Blanche on in the Senate race leaving his seat open. That seat will remain safely republican. The problem is that 2 of the other 3 were occupied by Vic Snyder (An exemplary statesman) and Marion Berry. Both are retiring. We stand a very good chance of losing at least one of those seats to a republican. Mike Ross, my representative whom I cannot stand, is running for re-election and would appear safe. Although in this environment, who knows. Mark Pryor, our other Senator is also a democrat and isn't up for re-election for four years. Hopefully by then his seat will be fairly safe. He is very popular here but in the environment this year who knows what could happen. I hope I am proven wrong if Bill Halter does win the democratic primary. I hope he is able to pull off a victory in November. I just don't believe he can.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 5:59 PM   

Oh don't be fooled, we are taking that seat, PERIOD.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 6:17 PM   

Blanche is still popular in the state. If you are counting on the republicans taking the seat you may be very disappointed. Arkansas voters are very schizophrenic! We currently have a democratic Governor, Lieutenant Governor, both senators are democratic and three of four representatives are democratic. The state houses are also majority democrat. However, with the exception of Bill Clinton, we almost always go republican in the Presidential elections. Hillary would have been another exception. Arkansas is NOT predictable when it comes to elections but I believe Blanche's chances of holding the seat are much, much better than Halter's chances of taking it from her. He will almost surely lose in November if he does. I'm not convinced a republican can take her out in November. In fact, I think if she wins the primary she will hold the seat in November.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 10:09 PM   

Oh come on! Am I the only one silly enough to notice the irony of a guy named "Bill Halter" running AGAINST Lincoln?! Shouldn't that be her name, or Nelson's or Baucus' or EVERY Republican's?

Whatever happened to our favorite Pennsylvania thug, Philly Buster All?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 4:23 AM   

Best news in months. Since Obama's backing her, may her corporatist butt get kicked in a record landslide.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on