
Sen. Jim Bunning (R-KY) has accepted a deal to drop his one-man filibuster of a bill that would extend expiring unemployment benefits for hundreds of thousands of people.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's office has confirmed to TPMDC that Bunning accepted the deal, but declined to provide details.
Bunning, in exchange for dropping his objection, will get one vote on an amendment to pay for the bill, which will cost an estimated $10 billion. Bunning's amendment to pay for the bill will be the only amendment allowed on the floor. A final vote is scheduled to begin at 8:30 tonight.
Bunning will also get two votes on amendments for another bill which would extend unemployment benefits for one year, according to Roll Call. A spokesman for Reid would not confirm that detail.
Bunning's office released a statement:
"I hope Senate Democrats tonight vote for their own pay-fors and show Americans that they are committed to fiscal discipline. I will be watching them closely and checking off the hypocrites one by one," he said.
Bunning voted no on pay-as-you-go legislation last month.
FreeRider
March 2, 2010 7:15 PM
Is that it? He gets to offer an amendment that he could have offered five days ago? LMAO!
He spent days ticking points off the Republican brand and settled for this?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
eratosthenes8
March 2, 2010 8:16 PM in reply to FreeRider
I know this is a little bit off topic, but I have to ask: what made you change your icon?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
March 2, 2010 8:31 PM in reply to eratosthenes8
Someone else had my whale icon. I like being unique.
I'm going to change this one, too since I really shouldn't be wearing the president's face when I cuss folks out--which I really, really enjoy doing.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bvd
March 2, 2010 7:15 PM
He buckled because they were going to make him stay up all night. They could have done this last Friday and saved a lot of people pain.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dougom
March 2, 2010 10:02 PM in reply to bvd
Also, he didn't want to miss another basketball game.
This guy is a grade A, true blue, number one, first water jerk of the highest order. He deserves to be shot in the face. Call Dick.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
March 3, 2010 1:12 AM in reply to dougom
Anybody think he looks like Gollum?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Brownbagger
March 3, 2010 11:09 AM in reply to slb
Yes, but one was a grimy hateful white creature with a grating voice, and the other one lost a ring.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Walter Mitty
March 2, 2010 7:18 PM
He didn't balk. The amendment deal should have never been offered. Offering deals just encourages more of these stunts.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
March 2, 2010 7:28 PM in reply to Walter Mitty
Letting someone offer one amendment is really giving away the house, ain't it?
By all means, I pray that more Republicans will pull these kind of stunts. This was the worst 72 hours the Republicans have had in the past six months!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
cawleybo
March 2, 2010 8:39 PM in reply to FreeRider
Which is exactly why the dems should not have offered a deal. That should have made him actually filibuster or back down with NOTHING.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dtOZONE
March 2, 2010 9:22 PM in reply to cawleybo
He didn't get anything. For Chrissakes, Bunning's amendment failed and the Democrats won...WTF more do you morons want?
My God, when the Democrats win, they lose, what is with you people?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ohiomeister
March 2, 2010 10:40 PM in reply to dtOZONE
Where's the "never waste a crisis" plan? Joe Biden should go on TV and say, "This just goes to show how broken the Senate is. We are looking into changing the rules to prevent this situation from ever happening again."
Then, leak a set of new Senate rules that also eliminate the filibuster and holds.
GOP freakout ensues. Next time someone pulls this stunt, push the rule change meme a little further. Wash, rinse, repeat.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
March 3, 2010 1:15 AM in reply to ohiomeister
Actually, the junior senator from Colorado, Michael Bennet, mentioned tonight on Rachel Maddow's program that he is writing up some rule changes that he is going to be proposing.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JEP07
March 3, 2010 9:47 AM in reply to ohiomeister
Rachel, is that you?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JEP07
March 3, 2010 9:46 AM in reply to dtOZONE
good point, dtO, the same critics would have found grounds for griping had it gone the other way. They aren't sincere, they are naysayers, posing as regular folk. They are consummate hypocrites.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mackaroni
March 3, 2010 1:19 AM in reply to Walter Mitty
Exactly. How does Reid caving and giving Bunning a trade off to drop his filibuster = Bunning Balking. Seems to me like more proof a weak Senate Majority Leader.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JEP07
March 3, 2010 10:06 AM in reply to mackaroni
Does this sound like Reid's gae up anything? Did you even read this line and acknowledge it's true meaning?
"Bunning, in exchange for dropping his objection, will get one vote on an amendment to pay for the bill,"
Bunning's amendment isn't going to pass. It is just a way for Bunning to delude himself he's done something his wealthy supporters will appreciate, even though it is never going to be attached to the bill.
Reid gave him nothing but a few minutes to spout another stupid idea for purely political purposes. And it ended the filibuster threat, so this can be moved along.
Political kabuki, yes, caving to republican demands, no.
But, if that is how you need to frame any kind of procedural twist, we can't stop you, this is a free-speech site. You can pose any frame you can muster up, but if you are sincere, at least read before you write. And try to understand the whole implication, not just the topical trivia.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JEP07
March 3, 2010 10:38 AM in reply to JEP07
one more point; the reason his wealthy supporters want to see this kind of obstruction is that the inevitable truth they all want to avoid revealing(that the wealthy are the only people who can save our country by paying higher taxes) is getting more and more evident as we close in on more thanone fiscal threshold. The longer they wait to give it up , the closer we get to meltdown. If they don;t blink, everything they own will be worth less, and the money the do have might be nearly worthless.
They are so desperate to protect their ingrained self-right to their Bush generated tax-bracket percentages, they ignore the total picture that their own greed has created.
Rather than swallow their arrogant pride, and pay more taxes, they would see the whole country's finances collapse.
Pride cometh before a fall.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Brownbagger
March 3, 2010 11:04 AM in reply to JEP07
Thanks. You've nailed it. Well said.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jeffgee
March 2, 2010 7:30 PM
The worst nihilist is one with nothing to lose. It's his swan song ego trip before retiring.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
NobleCommentDecider
March 2, 2010 7:32 PM in reply to jeffgee
Did you say nihilists with nothing to lose? Here are two.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
March 2, 2010 7:33 PM in reply to jeffgee
And his revenge against the other gentleman from Kentucky for hardballing his senile, stupid old ass out of his planned reelection campaign.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CityGuy
March 2, 2010 8:14 PM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
Precisely.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JEP07
March 3, 2010 10:17 AM in reply to CityGuy
Revenge of the lame duck? That really does make sense, Formerly. How much more of this will we see?
These guys like Bunning will cement their ties to K-Street with these obstructionist histrionics, so when the dust settles, they'll have lucrative rewards for their desperate efforts.
Bunning, like so many other lame duck Republicans, is trying his best to become one of the vultures.
We REALLY need to handicap those K-Street vultures Bunning is acting out for. That alone would go a long way towards normalizing our government.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Brownbagger
March 2, 2010 7:45 PM
And so his legacy goes from perfect game to perfect ass.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
we r all husseins
March 2, 2010 7:49 PM in reply to Brownbagger
From the Hall of Fame to the Hall of Shame.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Marinus van der Lubbe
March 2, 2010 10:18 PM in reply to Brownbagger
Wonder how bad the price drop is on my 1964 Bunning Phillies card...since I wiped my ass with it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Brownbagger
March 3, 2010 8:55 AM in reply to Marinus van der Lubbe
You'll be OK. No one will be able to tell the difference.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JEP07
March 3, 2010 10:33 AM in reply to Brownbagger
Let em' dry out and put em' on Ebay! with a disclaimer...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rbeats
March 2, 2010 7:48 PM
So why not let Durbin filibusterer and screw him on the earmarks?
Seriously.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreemanW
March 2, 2010 7:50 PM
It is so refreshing to see a member of the GOP standing strong in their convictions. [/snark]
Bunning, what a waste of human flesh and a parasite on society.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Frank Pentangeli
March 2, 2010 7:52 PM
Can't believe y'all didn't go with the obvious:
Bunning Blockade Broken
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Allbiz
March 2, 2010 7:52 PM
Bunning is cunning. He had the Dems on their knees and he wa filling their mouths.
They had to give back 24 billion in earmarks that they are telling you all about.
Harry Reid just got a pay-as-you-go bill passed last week andf then the first opportunity to adhere to his own bill comes along and he reneges. Bunning has the Dems number now and they can't move without his okay. LMAO.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
March 2, 2010 7:57 PM in reply to Allbiz
ROFLMAO. If you were trying to be funny, you succeeded. ROFLTMAO.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Brownbagger
March 2, 2010 9:28 PM in reply to Allbiz
Please spare us what goes on in that disgusting mind of yours. Thanks.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
March 2, 2010 7:56 PM
What a despicable, hateful, angry man!!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Brownbagger
March 3, 2010 10:17 AM in reply to lousgirl84
Did you miss the part about him being a Republican? I will admit he's exceptionally vile, but hateful and angry have been identified as the key Repub genes. We are awash in data on this. You could look it up, but please do wear gloves, goggles, and a nose clip.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
we r all husseins
March 2, 2010 7:56 PM
Um, didn't I read on this very web site earlier that the reason for Bunning's whole filibuster stunt was because the bill didn't satisfy the pay-as-you-go legislation?
Republican reasoning causes the Blue Screen of Death to flash before my eyes.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
March 3, 2010 1:19 AM in reply to we r all husseins
Yes, you did read that. "Republican reasoning" is an oxymoron. (Or would that be an oxymoran?)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tiowally
March 2, 2010 7:57 PM
Bunning "will be watching them closely and checking off the hypocrites one by one," something he practices every morning in front of his bathroom mirror. Fucking cur.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
third-stone
March 2, 2010 8:03 PM
I like Bunning's ideas. When you can't pay for things don't do them. I expect he must also be against the countless wars we are involved in. No doubt he must be against letting medical insurers carrying off money at a rate we cannot keep up the payments on, and is probably also against contracting war to money guns.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CityGuy
March 2, 2010 8:12 PM in reply to third-stone
Right, and I hear that he voted for pay-as-you-go legislation also. And stood up to Shrub for the American taxpayer too! Bunning certainly has been consistent as a deficit hawk the last decade huh? *snark*
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
third-stone
March 2, 2010 8:07 PM
I like Bunning's ideas. When you can't pay for things don't do them. I expect he must also be against the countless wars we are involved in. No doubt he must be against letting medical insurers carrying off money at a rate we cannot keep up the payments on, and is probably also against contracting war to money guns.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jdb316
March 2, 2010 8:18 PM
I'm very disappointed that he got offered any deal. He either should have had to give up his fight unconditionally or stand up there objecting all night.
When are the Democrats going to actually message themselves right and call the Republicans' bluff? When are they going to have the you-know-whats to play hardball the way the Republicans do?
Yes, Bunning is retiring and has nothing to lose politically himself by acting like a petulant child here. But this was a golden opportunity for the Democrats to force the Republicans to actually follow through on their threats with little risk to themselves. They could have made great TV ads out of this to air during this year's elections. And instead they squandered the chance.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dtOZONE
March 2, 2010 9:23 PM in reply to jdb316
Good God, he wasn't given "a deal" He was offered the same thing he was offered a week ago and he balked and accepted it.
It wasn't "a deal," it's what was always on the table, because it's what a Senator has the right to do...offer an amendment.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jdb316
March 2, 2010 8:19 PM
Jon Stewart had it right. The Republicans are playing chess and the Democrats are in the nurse's office again because they once again glued their balls to their thighs.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
An Outhouse
March 2, 2010 8:26 PM
This could easily be used to beat McConnell over the head with next time he is up for election. Can't control a hypocrite member of his own delegation. What a buffoon - both of them.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Barfood
March 2, 2010 8:43 PM in reply to An Outhouse
McConnell? You mean Admiral Ackbar? IT'S A TRAP!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Brownbagger
March 3, 2010 10:59 AM in reply to Barfood
Good gosh, thanks! That's who he looks like! Ackbar is, of course, more handsome.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
cawleybo
March 2, 2010 8:46 PM
Josh "helpfully" adds a post where he asks then answers. "If they could make Bunning actually filibuster, why not do the same on HCR?" Because they coud actually sustain a filibuster with 30 or 40 senators.
Well, no duh?
That's the point genius! LET them sustain it. Make them show the world what obstructionists they are. Make it crystal clear who the problem is.
Playing Harry's way (and apparently Josh's), all Joe Public understands is that the dems can't get anything done even with 58 votes in the Senate.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SqueakyRat
March 3, 2010 1:24 AM in reply to cawleybo
How many times does this have to be explained? The way the rules are now, at best the filibustering party needs to have one member on the floor of the Senate at any given time. Everybody can go home and snooze.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
valgal
March 2, 2010 9:14 PM
Pretty interesting turn out at Bunning's Lexington office today for the protest / support rally.
Amazingly, all signs I saw and photographed contained correct spellings.
McConnell owns this state, dream on getting rid of him easily. We'll keep trying though.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
neesy08
March 2, 2010 10:10 PM
i've seen 2 year olds with more maturity. i think the tpm story is missing some details. i heard on the ed show that the dems threatened to stay up all night if he did not end this fillibuster, which the media will not call it what it is: a fillibuster. uk doesn't have a game tonight, so bunning should have been willing to stay and fight his fight. however, he is old and decrepit. he needs his sleep, ya no. the ammendment could have been done days ago. bunning was being hardheaded
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Moindie
March 2, 2010 11:23 PM in reply to neesy08
that's because it's not a fillibuster.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
WestRox
March 2, 2010 10:47 PM
I hope that people in his family suffer because of his actions. What a piece of shit he is.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
willia451
March 3, 2010 5:08 AM
The poster child for everything that is wrong with the dysfunctional United States Senate.
Whether or not you agree with his stand, one fucking United States Senator should not have that much power over the nation.
It's obscene.
It's contrary to the ideals of democratic and republican principles. And makes us a laughing stock to the entire world.
WTF?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
March 3, 2010 8:07 AM in reply to willia451
I totally agree. The Senate is a disgrace. There are 290 bills languishing in the senate that passed the house a lot of them with many republicans signing them. Now they sit because the stupid senate won't pass them.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JEP07
March 3, 2010 9:47 AM in reply to lousgirl84
The House of Lords...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Brownbagger
March 3, 2010 10:15 AM in reply to willia451
Did you miss the part about him being a Republican? I will admit he's exceptionally vile, but hateful and angry have been identified as the key Repub genes. We are awash in data on this. You could look it up, but please do wear gloves, goggles, and a nose clip.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Leftflank
March 3, 2010 11:49 AM
His stance could be compared to being a professional pitcher & being totally against throwing the best, most useful pitch that you possess because that would be the best thing he could do. Rather, throw up your worst pitch, watch it get knocked out of the park & then laugh at your own team & somehow blame the winning team.
In other words, a completely obstinate jerk throwing tantrums not good pitches.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Tosh
June 6, 2010 10:50 PM
These guys like Bunning will cement their ties to K-Street with these obstructionist histrionics, so when the dust settles, they'll have lucrative rewards for their desperate efforts.
Bunning, like so many other lame duck Republicans, is trying his best to become one of the vultures.
m65 kamagra
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?