
Former Sen. Dan Coats (R-IN) is running for his old Senate seat, apparently on a platform of opposing government takeover of the private sector. But as it turns out, in 2008 he lobbied the Senate on the TARP bill, on behalf of none other than Chrysler's parent company.
The NBC affiliate in South Bend quoted Coats early this week, explaining why he was returning to politics. "Well, nobody anticipated that government's going to try to run auto companies, bank insurance companies, take over the private sector," said Coats.
However, according to a federal lobbying report for the third quarter of 2008, Coats served as a lobbyist on behalf of Cerberus Capital Management, the firm that owned a majority share in Chrysler. The subject matter of the lobbying: The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 -- a.k.a. the TARP bailout. The issue listed for lobbying: "Treatment of motor vehicle finance companies as financial institutions, disposition of troubled assets, and related issues."
Cerberus Capital Management bought an 80% stake in Chrysler in 2007. In December 2008, Chrysler received a loan of $4 billion from the Treasury Department, and has received about $6 billion more since then. In March 2009, Cerberus lost its equity stake as part of the bailout.
So is there a conflict between Coats' criticism of government trying to run big companies, and what looks like Coats having lobbied on the subject of government aid for business?
Coats's campaign press secretary Pete Seat says that despite what the lobbying filings show, Coats did not seek bailout help for Chrysler. "Dan Coats never lobbied on behalf of Chrysler in pursuing federal assistance. Anything to the contrary is false and pure politics," Seat told us.
Instead, Seat says, Coats was lobbying for "small business" loan guarantees. Seat says: "Dan's only related work was on behalf of small businesses - the very lifeblood of our economy - to ensure they could raise the capital needed to increase production, inventory and add jobs. Dan Coats did more for job growth in the third quarter of 2008 than Democrats did in all of 2009."
When we asked why Coats was listed as a lobbyist for Cerberus, a giant investment company, if he was lobbying for small business, Seat responded, "Dan advocated for small businesses in 2008 on giving the Department of the Treasury the authority to guarantee consumer and small business loans."
We specifically asked again, what the nature was of Coats's lobbying on the bailout bill for Chrysler's parent company, and what benefit they would get from it.
Seat declined to identify which small businesses benefitted from Coats lobbying effort, and would not say how or if Cerberus benefitted as well: "The provision related to small businesses in a broad sense and was not targeted at any specific business."
A representative for Coats's former lobbying firm, King & Spalding, told us that the company does not discuss the work they do for their clients. A representative for Cerberus has not returned our request for comment.
mans_best_friend
March 12, 2010 6:10 PM
A hypocritical Republican? Stop the presses!!!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
March 12, 2010 6:14 PM
BUSTED!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rbeats
March 12, 2010 6:41 PM
Yeah and Chrysler is not even a publicly traded company. Its a bunch of rich fuckers who lost their ass. That company should have never been bailed out.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Walter Mitty
March 12, 2010 7:16 PM
Dems should sit on this stuff until after this guy wins the GOP nomination. Unless he is the strongest candidate of course. Ellsworth has a good chance at keeping the seat, though I don't know how much good that really does Dems.
Thanks for nothing Bayh.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Max Thrax
March 12, 2010 7:18 PM
I doubt it matters to the conservative base.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
we r all husseins
March 12, 2010 7:50 PM
No, just their parent company. But we all know that's different. Right, Dan? And "lobbying for small business loan guartanees? Chrysler is a small business now?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bibimimi
March 14, 2010 1:44 PM in reply to we r all husseins
This is like GWB's "Want some wood?" moment. Ask a serious question and u get some smarmy eff-you bull excrement.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
marksalot21
March 12, 2010 8:13 PM
i really really wish his campaign manager is named ____ Shoes.
that would just kill me.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
erica
March 12, 2010 11:02 PM in reply to marksalot21
Or if his opponent were named Shoes and it was a close election, the headline could be "Coats Ties Shoes."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JEP07
March 14, 2010 1:20 PM in reply to erica
in a clothes election...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
erica
March 15, 2010 12:58 AM in reply to JEP07
I can't believe I missed that one....
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bibimimi
March 14, 2010 1:47 PM in reply to marksalot21
Additionally, what kinda name is 'Pete Seat'?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Q Jordon
March 12, 2010 11:21 PM
Dan...Dan...Dan... Why are you in denial. I suppose it is a matter of time before you claim you have never heard of Chrysler.
Schizoids rule in the Republican roost. Someone pass the Prozac, please.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Leftflank
March 13, 2010 5:37 PM
Denial isn't an actual stance. Caught with his hand in the cookie jar, big Dan goes with the, no matter what...Deny, Deny, Deny method. Also, just to make sure we know he's an absolute arrogant prick, he claims that he single-handedly did more for job creation during the heart of the meltdown than anything that our current President & his entitre administration did by ending the aforementioned meltdown. And finally, isn't it cute how he & his company don't discuss the work they do, not to mention the revolving door action.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bibimimi
March 14, 2010 1:42 PM
Nothing was received as collateral. Money changed hands, no strings. Not one shred of input from the lender. And the "Government Takeover!!" whining commences. Takes balls to bitch, Coats. Not the good kind, neither.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
kmac
March 14, 2010 3:48 PM
These Repubs are a bunch of hypocrits ..... They are for anything on the table that would benefit them ..... when that picture changes, they swing right along and are then against the policy.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SA Rose
March 14, 2010 9:25 PM
I wonder how many voters in Indiana will read this piece. Maybe it will be picked up by a few papers and TV stations in the state. Maybe some people here from Indiana will write a few letters to the editor of those papers and send the info to the TV stations. Somebody will have to try, unless we want to see this revolving-door-lobbyist back in the senate.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
August 22, 2010 12:00 PM
Thank you for the mp3 dinle information your provide.mp3 indir
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?