TPMDC

Inside Man: Daryl Metcalf Promises To Take On His Own Party In PA Lt. Gov. Race


Candidate for PA Lt. Gov. Daryl Metcalfe (R)

Read More

PA-GOV

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Pennsylvania state Rep. Daryl Metcalfe says he's a different kind of Lt. Gov. candidate. The self-described "most conservative lawmaker in the legislature" says he won't be "a silent partner" to the top of the ticket in Pennsylvania, where Republicans hope to retake the governor's mansion for the first time since 2003.

Instead, Metacalfe -- best known across the state for his controversial statements about gays and climate change -- promises to be a political check on the Republican nominee he might share the ticket with. If the nominee veers away from the right toward positions that "hurt our freedom," Metcalfe says he'll call him out in public. He's already running against his own party, claiming he had to run a secret campaign to get on the ballot so the state GOP wouldn't try to stop him.

If he wins the Lt. Gov. nomination, it may be difficult for Metcalfe's fellow republicans to keep him happy given the views he holds. Metcalfe says he's a dyed-in-the-wool conservative (he told me "I was a tea partier before it was cool") and promises to fight his own party if necessary to maintain purity on issues like gun rights, tax reduction and "keeping marriage between a man and a woman."

Last October, Metcalfe landed in hot water after he called veterans who support global climate change treaties "traitors to their oaths to uphold the constitution."

That flap, which netted him national attention from the netroots, came just a month after Metcalfe objected to a state resolution calling for a Domestic Violence Awareness month because he claimed the bill "had a homosexual agenda." That stance got him national headlines.

Metcalfe stood by his controversial statements in our conversation last week, claiming that he expresses the position of the majority of Pennsylvanians. What's more, he's prepared to make them the position of the Republican ticket should he win the nomination. He said two men currently vying for the gubernatorial nomination, Attorney General Tom Corbett and state Rep. Sam Rohrer, seem to be saying the right things on the trail now, and he's declined to endorse or criticize either one of them. But Metcalfe warned me that he's seen that movie before.

"From what I've heard so far, they're lining up where I'm at [on the issues]," Metcalfe said. "Bit we usually see Republican candidates line up on the right side before the election, though. It's when they get elected that they change their minds."

I asked him what he would do if he saw his party's nominee for governor shift to left on the campaign trail.

"I would take them on if they went that way," he said.

The gubernatorial nominee would not be forced to appear with Metcalfe or run with him in public. But Metcalfe would be on the GOP ballot line if he wins the primary and would have a powerful bully pulpit from which to lob criticisms at the gubernatorial nominee taking stances he doesn't like. The infighting could cause problems for a Republican party facing an open race and polls that show them with an early lead (Democratic incumbent Gov. Ed Rendell, is prevented from running again due to term-limits.)

Metcalfe fears that should Republicans take back the top job in Pennsylvania, their nominee will end up going moderate rather then sticking to their conservative guns. Metcalfe intends to make sure conservative Republicans know if their governor is slipping.

"I'm tired of politicians, especially Republicans, saying one thing on the campaign trail and then changing completely when they get into office," Metcalfe told me in an interview Friday. "I'm running as the accountability candidate."

Metcalfe says that throughout his political career, he's seen Republican nominees run to the right during the campaign only to watch them flip once in office and support programs that impose "a greater tax burden upon our citizens that takes away our wealth" and support legislation that "violates the trust of the voters by reducing our freedoms."

If he wins, he says he'll do regular reviews of what the government is up to, working from the inside as a kind of public advocate for conservative values. His leverage will be a promise to run a primary campaign against a Republican governor that strays from the rightward path. "Nobody has ever run a Lt. Gov. campaign like this one," Metcalfe told me. "I'm saying 'make me Lt. Gov. and I'll run against the governor in four years if he doesn't do what he says he will."

To get there, he'll have to beat a field of nine Republican candidates already vying for the Lt. Gov. nomination. Metcalfe's entry into the race was something of a surprise, coming on the last day candidates could file to run. Local media reports suggest that no one knew Metcalfe was planning to run for statewide office.

Metcalfe told me that was all part of the plan. He said he had to run a "under the radar" signature drive in secret, because if the state party found out what he was doing, it would "run a liberal Republican against me in a primary [in his legislative district] to keep me out of the race."

Besides, he pointed out, the "under the radar" story netted him statewide media coverage that other Lt. Gov. nominees didn't get. Plus he said his conservative credentials have built him a ready-made state network outside the mainstream of Republican politics.

"I've been pounding away in the shadows for months already," he said.

Comments (10) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (0)

March 15, 2010 2:02 PM   

Good for him! at least someone has balls in the GOP

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 15, 2010 2:05 PM   

I live in Pennsylvania, and I would be surprised if he got any traction. As a state, elections (and primaries) trend right but not to Looney Tunes characters. Pat Toomey only started to look credible this year when he said some nice things about Obama and had debates with Joe Sestak. No one can win statewide with the six counties (out of 67) that encompass the Greater Philadelphia region and Pittsburgh against you, although you can win if they, and no one else are for you. That's why the likes of a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn will never get elected here. Santorum's the worse we ever had and he was defeated when he had a credible opponent (Casey) and felt confident enough to say things out loud like women should not hold a job outside the home. At the moment, the Rep. Lt. Gov. nomination looks like it's going to a not moderate but not extreme county commissioner from the Philadelphia suburbs.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 15, 2010 3:12 PM    in reply to Harry Truman

Gotta disagree with you, HST.

Here in Western/Central Pennsylvania, also known as "Pennsyl-tucky," there are a lot of people who openly agree with the kind of nonsense Daryl Metcalfe spouts.

And make no mistake --- Daryl Metcalfe says some really vile stuff. If anything, he's to the right of Rick "Man on Dog" Santorum.

The question is whether he can raise enough money to mount an effective campaign --- he's from a pretty rural district on the fringes of the Pittsburgh metro area.

But he has been very effective at getting copious media attention, mainly for his ridiculous tea-bagger nonsense.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 15, 2010 4:28 PM    in reply to Yinzer Nation

I hear you. Remember though that Rendell in 2002 beat Casey with Philly, Bucks, Delaware, Montco, Chester & Allegheny counties. The R's in this corner of the state are not much different than the D's on the social issues, and they do not like screwballs. The R party bosses in the southeast see screwballs as a threat to their power and do everything they can to put stakes in their hearts when there is a contest. That's why I htink Cawley from Bucks will win it in a walk, and he will be no worse than Schweiker was (they're from the same county).

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 16, 2010 12:42 PM    in reply to Harry Truman

Metcalfe's idiotic ravings are not going to fly with Republicans in Chester, Montgomery, Delaware and Bucks counties. They do not, for example, want this sort of madness gaining a toehold in the local school districts via the school boards. I know several right-wing Republicans here in Chester County who are quite opposed to abortion, for example, but who have no problems with their children being taught the theory of evolution in school.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 15, 2010 3:17 PM   

The story doesn't make it exactly clear, but Pennsylvania's election laws are kind of screwy when it comes to selecting candidates for governor and lieutenant governor.

In most states, the governor and lieutenant governor run as a "ticket" in the primary --- if you vote for one, you automatically vote for the other.

In Pennsylvania, the governor and lieutenant governor run separate campaigns in the primary, and are combined on one ticket for the general election.

So it's possible for two candidates to win the primary when they actually despise each other --- by many accounts, Ed Rendell wasn't pleased when the late Catherine Baker Knoll won the Democratic nomination for lieutenant governor, and he was forced to campaign for the general election with her.

Also: Two of the last three lieutenant governors have wound up in the governor's office --- Mark Singel under Bob Casey Sr., and Mark Schweiker under Tom Ridge.

The idea of "Gov. Daryl Metcalfe" gives me piss-shivers.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 15, 2010 4:28 PM   

"I've been pounding away in the shadows for months already," he said.

Ewww. TMI.

Maybe he and Eric Massa should get together.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 15, 2010 6:14 PM    in reply to commie atheist

Exactly, that's what I was thinking. Tea-bagging, shadow pounder isn't real Family Valuish & like Massas' tickling/snorkeling admission, probably a giveaway.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 15, 2010 6:32 PM   

This will be INCERDIBLY entertaining.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 29, 2010 5:25 PM   

Wow, there is a lot of intolerance for those on the right.

Oh well, I think it is great that there is someone who would challenge the party leadership of either major party. We certainly do need a shakeup to knock lose the major corruption that exists is both major unconstitutional parties.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on