TPMDC

Dems United, Republicans Split, By Bunning Benefits Blockade

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Sen. Jim Bunning (R-KY) has caused no shortage of problems for unemployed Americans, federal workers, and Medicare doctors. The list goes on and on. But he's also put the Republican party in a tricky position--upsetting members of his own caucus who want the benefits restored, but who haven't been able to rein him in--and he's unified Democrats, who are using his filibuster to put a human face on the victims of Republican obstruction.

Republican leadership doesn't have a great deal of leverage over Bunning, who is retiring at the end of the year. But they also don't particularly oppose what he's doing. Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl (R-AZ) has risen to Bunning's defense, as has NRSC chairman John Cornyn (R-TX), whose job it is to get Republicans elected to the Senate.

But within the Republican caucus, members as liberal as Susan Collins (R-ME) and as conservative as James Inhofe (R-OK) have publicly criticized the Bunning blockade. Collins even pleaded with her colleague to end his filibuster on the floor this morning, to no avail.

One Republican strategist says the division extends outside the Senate, into the conservative movement, where activists are rallying to Bunning's side while consultants--people paid to get Republicans elected--are advising their candidates to dissociate themselves from the Kentucky senator if and when the issue comes up.

"I know activists who like this," the strategist said. "Consultants have told their candidates that if this comes up, be against Bunning."

And, indeed, you can find an outpouring of support for Bunning on any number of high-profile conservative websites.

Democrats, for the most part, are charging hard at Bunning, and pinning this on the Republican leadership as well.

Noting that a number of Republicans have risen to Bunning's defense, Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH) told reporters at a press conference today that "the Republican party and the Republican leadership have set the tone for a year of 'let's find as many possible ways to obstruct as we can.'"

They say Republicans hope that the fallout from the Bunning filibuster--disappearing benefits, diminishing doctors fees--will be pinned on Democrats, who are supposed to be running the show. "Any victory for Obama is something the Republicans take personally as a defeat for them," Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) told reporters today.

At the same time, in a sign that they're playing hardball, they find themselves confronted by a simple irony. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid could force an end to debate on this temporary unemployment package, and bring it to a vote--a process that would take several days. Reid isn't doing that. Instead, he's pushing Bunning to end his filibuster, while pressing ahead with a separate bill that would extend these benefits for a full year. But in the meantime, people are being cut from the roles, and losing their COBRA subsidies and some wonder whether the Democrats should say "enough's enough," and take the time-consuming steps needed to end the filibuster.

Soon, perhaps. But not yet.

"I think that the Majority Leader is wise not to immediately collapse to a strategy of giving up all that cloture time, when there is at this point, there is a single person in the front of the Republican objection, to try to work his way through it and try to make sure that there's a price for it, rather than just letting them just burn the time of the nation and the Senate," Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) told reporters today.

Likewise, in response to a question from TPMDC, Brown acknowledged that this can't be allowed to go on much longer. "We urge Senator Reid to move on it as legislation if it drags on much longer," Brown said. "But then the Republican leaders got their way."

Comments (41) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (0)

March 2, 2010 2:12 PM   

I wonder how many Grandmas Bunning has killed in the past two days?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 2:14 PM   

OMFG Democrats! A very venal, senile old gander is giving away free golden eggs. Where are you? Call a presser! Get Robert Gibbs out there! There is no downside to this one. None. He wanted to watch a basketball game, fer chrissakes. You have it on digital freaking video. Make Bunning the poster child of Republican contempt for American workers--who through no fault of their own--have been laid off.

Don't make me go all Lewis Black on you. Just do it!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 2:36 PM    in reply to nowhereman

Golden Eggs. How appropriate. Bunning is in favor of the bill. He just wants the newly legislated PAYGO to happen. As he says if a popular bill like this can't get funding why would any other?

All Democrats have to do is take ten billion from the unspent stimulus and viola, the bill passes. But no. And why not? You'll have to ask the Dems.
Heh.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 3:08 PM    in reply to shooter242

Better idea: Take 10 billion from highway funds away from Kentucky and use it to pay for unemployment benefits for the rest of the country. Kentucky elected this Alzheimer's poster boy. Let them pay the price.

Heh.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 3:16 PM    in reply to EastWest

I like that. Make Republicans pay in dollars not sent to their state when they obstruct. No highway funds for Kentucky.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 5:23 PM    in reply to EastWest

Kentucky doesn't have ten billion dollars worth of passable roads in the entire state.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 3:38 PM    in reply to shooter242

Are you still here parading your stupidity? Where were you when we were hocking our asses to China? Did you write your senator, representative in congress? Did you back the unfunded Medicaid Drug Bill that added to the deficit and will be there for your grandchildren (not liking the picture of you spawning)?

Dont smirk and think you even are revealed to be a person even of low wit. Youre a hypocrite just like that old fuck Bunning. Youre just a simple garden variety asshole.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 3:41 PM    in reply to shooter242

Except he voted against PAYGO. Face it, he's a hypocrite.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 3:50 PM    in reply to shooter242

Shooter, Bunning has used the budget deficit as an excuse. He's really trying to drag this out to leverage Kyl's amendment that would cut the estate tax, thus INCREASING the budget deficit.

Heh

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 4:21 PM    in reply to shooter242

Weird. I had no idea Bunning was such a PAYGO fan, probably because he voted against it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 4:42 PM    in reply to shooter242

This is an emergency funding bill, genius. PAYGO rules don't apply.

Besides, where were you when Bush handed your tax dollars to his rich buddies? Where was the PAYGO there? Where was the PAYGO when a TRILLION dollars got handed out to Halliburton and Blackwater to electrocute our troops and serve them tainted water?

You're a worthless POS. Come to NYC so I can treat you to some New York hospitality sometime.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 4:49 PM    in reply to shooter242

Right, because the way Congress does things is that a single Senator decides how *he* wants things to be done, and then he holds up business and rejects all overtures until he gets his precise way, regardless of what's been previously decided upon by all the relevant committees and leadership.

Why, what a principled man Bunning is! Here he is standing in the way of a similarly-unpaid-for 2003 unemployment benefits extension:

"This is hopeful news for our most needy families in Kentucky. By approving this legislation we will help those folks who are currently without work continue to make ends meet until they can find new employment."

Oh, wait, that was 2003, when a Republican wanted the bill passed. My bad.

Shooter, doesn't it make you sick that you and your fellow Republicans are such soulless, despicable hypocrites? Can't you just execute yourselves and vastly improve things? Please? Just for me?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 5:01 PM    in reply to shooter242

"And why not?"

Because the majority has chosen not to follow that course of action. Hell, 99% of the Senate has apparently chosen that course of action.

Bunning is well within his rights as a Senator to do this, of course. He clearly feels strongly about it, as he's willing to let his constituents suffer for his opinion. He'd be a fool now to back down, frankly.

This uncovers some real issues with moving legislation through the Senate in a timely manner. When it takes 3 days for 99 Senators to overrule one member of the body, something needs to change.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 2:24 PM   

When will people finally start paying attention to what is happening in the Senate? Just this morning the Senate voted 99 to 0 (Senator Hutchenson did not vote) on "Motion to Invoke Cloture on the Nomination of Barbara Milano Keenan, of VA, to be U.S. Circuit Judge." Why did that vote need to be taken? Who objected? Take a look at the votes in the Senate. Today's vote was the 28th one since the session began in January. I have recently written both my Senators to urge that they introduce/support legislation forcing disclosure on who is objecting to (holding) nominations and other Senate business and why. Remember Shelby's holds last month? There is too much that needs to get done to let this glacial pace of business continue.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 2:31 PM   

Making matters even worse for Republicans: Bunning opposes the $10 billion aid package saying it's not paid for -- forcing Republicans to join him or undercut their efforts to make deficit spending a campaign issue.

http://politicalwire.com/archives/2010/03/02/bunning_complicates_republican_strategy.html

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 2:37 PM   

Jim Bunning woke up one day and found that he had been elected to the United States senate, all on the strength of being elected to the Baseball Hall of Fame. Ah, the power of celebrity. He is a dullard and a tool who began believing his own press. Unfortunately for him, his fellow Republican politicians, seeing that the people in Kentucky had finally realized that poor Bunning was an embarrassment, turned on him and have not supported him at all in an aborted attempt at re-election. His somewhat bewildered response has been to go into full tantrum mode making his party appear wildly obstructionist. Oh, my! He need a quick slap in the face which I feel McConnell would be more than happy to administer.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 3:22 PM    in reply to Mary Alice

Hear! Hear! That slap would be well-deserved but also quite necessary to wipe that condescending look off his face; I see the photo accompanying this story & don't believe I'm really reading into it to think it describes Bunning's thought process: "Gee, I'm being an a-hole, and I LOVE it!"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 4:44 PM    in reply to Mary Alice

I'd slap him, but only with a catcher's mitt. Who'd want to touch that puffy white assface? Blech!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 3:04 PM   

What we need in the White House is somebody with the brains, balls, and political sense to take advantage of this opportunity to show the filibuster for what it is: A mean-spirited, selfish movement to quietly shut down the government at the expense of working Americans.

Unfortunately, Bill Clinton already has a job. Instead we've got Obama. His message? ~crickets...~

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 3:25 PM   

The democrats will fold. We don't know how to fight. We don't know how to message. We're pathetic. I'm completely disgusted.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 4:04 PM    in reply to MarkAtl

Looks like you folded faster than a lawn chair yourself.
But gee, youre so handsome!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 6:11 PM    in reply to Marinus van der Lubbe

Hi Marinus!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 3:29 PM   

As much as it sickens me to type this, Dems are weak.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 4:47 PM    in reply to Rich in NJ

Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? No!!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 5:48 PM    in reply to blader

~Two thumbs up~

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 3:36 PM   

Are the Democrats in charge? Or not? Rightly or wrongly, that's how America sees this. Senator Reid I implore you, right now, today, call their bluff. Make them hold the floor around the clock, right through the weekend and into next week and beyond if that's what it takes. This is our opportunity to crush the Republicans, if only you take the lead. I bet they would fold within 48 hours rather than endure being shown on cable news day in and day out to be filibustering an unemployment extension for godsssakes.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 3:37 PM   

Plus, think of the headlines. SENATOR REID TO REPUBLICANS: STAND AND DELIVER OR SIT DOWN AND SHUT UP

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 3:48 PM   

My God, the Republicans spent money they borrowed from China for 8 years so they could go into debt tromping around Afghanistan and Iraq looking for Osama Bin Laden and WMD. And now when it's time to support American Families and Retired People because the economy tanked on THEIR watch, they're gonna be all PAYGO about it?

Shout it from the hilltops.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 4:11 PM   

It is a sorry state we find ourselves in; I am so tired of apologists for the Democrats.

They're almost as disgusting as the Reprobates. Dems hold a larger majority in Congress than the Reprobates have had in decades; and yet, what have we to show for it?

Pathetic is one adjective.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 4:37 PM    in reply to FreemanW

...and we who live in the real world are sick of black and white thinking idiots who choose to ignore reality and the archaic rules of congress, just so you can easily pin blame where you feel like it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 5:25 PM    in reply to cinesimon

So, you have nothing of substance to argue so you throw a third grade playgroung ad-hominem.

There is a job for you in the U.S. Congress.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 5:54 PM    in reply to cinesimon

So let's get this straight. Either you're for Obama or you're against him. If you're against him, Cinnamon here thinks you're an idiot. Nothing black and white about that.

And before anybody starts up with the Repug-Lite faux outrage, that is not a racial comment. It's using Cinnamon's own words against her.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 6:19 PM    in reply to cinesimon

Bingo. Thanks for inserting some common sense into the equation. I am so sick of the whiners.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 4:12 PM   

There must be something more to this that goes unstated. Is there a strategic difference in moving the extension forward via unanimous consent as opposed to calling for a vote on cloture? Is there precious other debate occurring now? Why is Reid and the whole Democratic leadership not leveraging their moment to focus the spotlight on Republican obstructionism? Is it that Reid has all his eggs in the full 1-year extension? Or, has he done a count and doesn't have the votes to do it - absences, those opposed within his own party, whatever?
I may well be naive, but there has to be something else at stake, or a rule that is more complicated than I would otherwise guess. If not, call the vote!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 5:13 PM    in reply to Chris in Fargo

"Is there a strategic difference in moving the extension forward via unanimous consent as opposed to calling for a vote on cloture?"

The problem is that if Bunning wants to, he can force up to 4 votes on this legislation that has the consent of 99 other Senators. Each vote has to be separated by a period of time, and I'm not sure if any other business can even take place during that time.

This should have passed last week, before the previous measure expired. Calling the full slew of votes on this delays it even further while simultaneously giving in to minority obstructionist tactics yet again.

Better to make it crystal fucking clear what Republicans are all about while simultaneously working on a bill that will pass and prevent this in the future.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 5:29 PM    in reply to Chris in Fargo

"Why is Reid and the whole Democratic leadership not leveraging their moment to focus the spotlight on Republican obstructionism?"

Why? Because they are weaklings and political incompetents is why. They can thank the disasterous eight years of Bush and GOP leadership for their majority, not their presumed political brilliance.

Obama was out today to announce an energy saving "home star" appliance rebate program. Snooze.

NOT A FUCKING WORD ABOUT BUNNING.

I used to think they must have some secret strategy, that they couldn't be this incompetent and weak. Now I have accepted the truth that they are simply weak and incompetent. God help us all.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 4:16 PM   

Sen. Bunning has put Republicans in an uncomfortable position: How to act like a bunch of self-involved assholes without being perceived as a bunch of self-involved assholes.

I have no doubt Frank Luntz is hard at work squaring this circle as we speak.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 4:27 PM   

heard a rumor that Rand Paul held some kind of vigil or rally at 3 PM today in support of Bunning - anyone know any more?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 5:06 PM   

BREAKING: Democrats may force all night session and make Bunning actually stage a real filibuster.

http://politicalwire.com/archives/2010/03/02/senate_democrats_may_force_all_night_session.html

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 5:20 PM   

Where the fuck are the Democrats?

Being their usual, timid, limp-dick selves is where.

Where is President Milquetoast???? He's the invisible fucking man! maybe he's reaching out to Bunning to see how he can appease him. What a fucking loser.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 2, 2010 6:12 PM    in reply to tommyo

The only loser I see here are you dumb ignorant thugs. You all are experts on limp dicks.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on