
Political memos from Congressional Republicans and Democrats get obtained and posted by the press every single day, but a curious PDF file instructing "Democratic health and communications staff" to avoid discussing the details of the cost of health care reform rocked Washington today. Is it a fake? A mistake?
We still don't know who wrote the memo. But we know that a Republican lobbyist (and maybe more than one) sent it to several political reporters today. Based on numerous interviews with Congressional aides, the 2-page PDF, complete with a handwritten note identifying one bit as "important," starting hitting email inboxes around noon.
[READ THE MEMO HERE]
TPMDC dug deeper into the kerfuffle after Democrats accused Republicans of an elaborate plot to try and derail health care reform in the final hours before the expected vote Sunday in the House.
A Republican aide on Capitol Hill told me today in an interview they first learned about the memo at about 12:30, getting an email with the PDF attached. The aide's office decided not to do anything with the memo "without knowing where it came from or its origin," the aide said.
A Politico story describing and reprinting the memo was published soon after with a 12:46 p.m. time stamp and caught fire on the Internet, at one point being the lead item at the top of the Drudge Report.
Once the Politico story broke, it was a green light for Republican operatives. Michael Steel, a spokesman for House Minority Leader John Boehner, sent reporters an email just before 1 p.m. quoting from the memo. He also attached a copy of the memo, which appears to be the same PDF document that Politico posted.
A Senate Democratic aide said today their office started getting calls around 12:30 from reporters asking if the memo's claims were true. The Democratic aide's office was sent the PDF by reporters, who said they had obtained it from Republican lobbyists on K Street, the aide told me in an interview.
That aide and several Democratic staffers told us that reporters who posted the memo did not call them to check its authenticity. It appears to have been posted in the noon hour at The Washington Times and on Andrew Breitbart's Big Government Website (time stamp is Pacific time), but the Politico item received the most play on the heavily trafficked Drudge site.
Soon after we posted our initial story, in which Democrats cried foul on the memo at 2:39 p.m., Politico removed the item and memo with this disclaimer:
An earlier post in this spot detailed what was purported by Republicans to be an internal Democratic memo regarding the upcoming health reform vote Sunday. Democratic leadership has challenged the authenticity of the memo. POLITICO has removed the memo and the details about it until we can absolutely verify the document's origin.
The Atlantic's Marc Ambinder posted a mea culpa about the memo this afternoon, saying he should have checked its authenticity before publishing. A reporter for The Hill tweeted the publication opted against posting the memo.
But that didn't stop Sen. David Vitter (R-LA), who claimed on Twitter and his Web site that he'd "intercepted" the memo.
By 3:40 p.m. when House Republican leaders held a press conference on the Hill, reporters were ready with questions about the memo. The leaders dismissed its importance and accused the Democrats of attempting to pull a hoax on the American people.
"The appropriate question there really is ask the reporter who wrote the article alleging that it was a hoax. I know nothing more than what I read in Politico," Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA) said. Watch that moment here.
Late Update: Politico addressed the memo in a piece filed tonight, saying that it had been sent to them by "multiple Republican sources" who could not verify that it was written by Democrats.
The piece concludes:
In the end, POLITICO followed an old rule-of-thumb in journalism in taking down the memo: when in doubt, leave it out. By day's end, it was still impossible to tell exactly what's the real story behind the memo. But in the next few months, when Democrats try to pass a multi-billion-dollar "doc fix," maybe that will shed a little light on the Democrats' real intentions.
Additional reporting by Brian Beutler
tapdancer
March 19, 2010 7:43 PM
"A republican K street lobbyist"?
Who would that be?
Please name names!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
TomT
March 19, 2010 7:50 PM
Nice work, Christina!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Docb
March 20, 2010 1:09 PM in reply to TomT
Boneher and Mcconnell...all the talking points--Maybe from Penn... and Erickson!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
kalena
March 19, 2010 8:02 PM
Amazing...Thank you Christina!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
kalena
March 19, 2010 8:02 PM
Amazing...Thank you Christina!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
barbara63
March 19, 2010 8:17 PM in reply to kalena
Agreed.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
chimpale
March 19, 2010 8:05 PM
...after you've already posted it and made sure it's gotten everyone's attention. Politico is only slightly less conspicuous than Fox News.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Cal Gal
March 19, 2010 9:29 PM in reply to chimpale
Exactly. I don't think the "old rule of thumb in journalism" is "publish then verify."
I think it's more like, get two sources for everything. Or, if you can't verify it DON'T publish it.
ReThuglicans -- rewriting the old-rules in journalism as well as in government.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JNagarya
March 19, 2010 9:36 PM in reply to Cal Gal
It used to be the "Three Source Rule".
Otherwise, why no questions about how Republicans "intercepted" an alleged internal Democratic memo?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Barry Champlain
March 19, 2010 10:02 PM in reply to JNagarya
There should be a new "rule": when your so-called "sources" have burned you, true journalists should burn these "sources".
It should be a matter of journalistic integrity, to reveal the parties who maliciously attempt to taint the national flow of information with deceit and propaganda.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JNagarya
March 19, 2010 10:06 PM in reply to Barry Champlain
Agreed.
And instead of complaining that if they don't do stenography, choosing instead to state the facts, they will be denied access, they should state the facts -- including those of being denied access for stating the facts.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
kgb999
March 20, 2010 2:14 AM in reply to Barry Champlain
Couldn't agree more. I'd say it's because the Politico really wanted to post the thing so they aren't discouraging the originators ... but there are so many instances in so many publications where the journalist was fed clearly bogus information and still won't say who used them to lie to everyone.
Really, there's much that ain't totally broken these days. Even the stuff we're supposedly reforming still needs to be fixed - more urgently than before in some respects. If the people running the show here in America were contractors, they'd have all lost their licenses long ago.
If they ever yank the a-hole in charge of source disclosure rules ... you've got my vote for replacement!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
septictank
March 19, 2010 10:52 PM in reply to JNagarya
It used to be the "Three Source Rule".
Oh, they had three sources. They just happened to be three Republicans.
If Politico were a serious news org they would have made some effort to confirm this with the Dems -- or at least put it up high that they got this "alleged/purported" memo from Republican sources and that it couldn't immediately be authenticated. The news biz moves faster now and with fewer hands, so maybe it wouldn't have been an unpardonable offense to just throw it up there, but you've got to be transparent about your sourcing and authentication on stuff like this.
Unless you're just a cog in the rightwing news conveyor belt and really don't give a shit about veracity. Which is pretty much what Politico is, with a decent reporter or two tacked on to give it legitimacy.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mcrose68
March 20, 2010 10:13 AM in reply to septictank
Or in the case of Judith Miller, she just needed Scooter to tell her the same lie three times before she could publish it.
I mean, what's the big deal - it's not like Republican lies to reporters have led us into a war or anything. . .
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Coloured European Observer
March 19, 2010 9:56 PM in reply to Cal Gal
That's "RepubliKKKans"
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Grumpy Demo
March 20, 2010 7:11 PM in reply to Cal Gal
Actually, there's a new rule of journalism:
"Publish the GOP smear then wait for Rupert to call with a job offer."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
P White
March 20, 2010 6:14 AM in reply to chimpale
The piece I read at Politico this morning was a serious justification piece...a great attempt at CYA. (Well it LOOKED and SOUNDED like the real thing!) Whoever wrote the piece brought to mind the old movie scene where a guy is standing in the middle of the room shouting "YOU WOULD HAVE DONE THE SAME THING!" as all others walked away from him shaking their heads.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mcc
March 19, 2010 8:07 PM
Ladies and gentlemen, the Republican establishment.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JEP07
March 20, 2010 10:12 AM in reply to mcc
I noticed that, too. "The Usual Suspects" in sheer abundance.
When will the likes of Drudge finally get the lack of respect they deserve?
And does anyone doubt this represents desperation on the part of Republicans and their string pullers?
Their corporate handlers are getting nervous. When all else fails, LIE!!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JEP07
March 20, 2010 10:21 AM in reply to JEP07
PS; wonder if Politico will plant phony staffers in all the top political campaigns the way they have done in the past?
Someone ought to look into that a bit more closely, aren't there laws against media spies working on political campaigns?
Remember when Kerry's people exposed one of those insiders by planting the "Gephart is the VP" story?
http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/12/report_obama_campaign_manager.php#comment-3317917
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Aexia
March 20, 2010 11:31 AM in reply to JEP07
That'd be a clever trick seeing as Politico didn't exist until early 2007.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tmc
March 19, 2010 8:07 PM
that's objective journalism right there, folks...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
cinesimon
March 21, 2010 9:32 PM in reply to tmc
Exactly my thought
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dweb823
March 19, 2010 8:09 PM
So at the end of their post, POLITICO is saying....we can't verify this memo or its claims, so we are removing it, but we have no problem in stating that its assertions that Dems are planning a post-passage "doc fix" will be happening.
Cute.....I think you call that deniable plausability.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Cal Damage
March 19, 2010 8:47 PM in reply to dweb823
"A lie can run around the world before the truth puts its socks on." - Mark Twain
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JNagarya
March 19, 2010 9:38 PM in reply to Cal Damage
"A lie is half way around the world before the truth can get its boots on." -- Mark Twain.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Domo
March 19, 2010 9:53 PM in reply to JNagarya
"I never said that." - Mark Twain
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JEP07
March 20, 2010 10:23 AM in reply to Domo
"Yes I did" Mark Twin
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
March 21, 2010 5:01 AM in reply to dweb823
Actually, hasn't Nancy Pelosi publicly said that they want to introduce "doc fix" legislation? Right now, this is something that is done more or less "under the table" every year. Pelosi wants to end the charade and make what they're doing anyway part of the official policy.
But it's all a separate issue from HCR, which is why it was not included in that bill.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Matt Jones
March 19, 2010 8:16 PM
I love how the Republicans are acting like the "doc fix" is something terrible. It's been done EVERY YEAR since 1999. I seem to recall there were a *few* Republicans in positions of authority some of those years....
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
nova voter
March 19, 2010 8:18 PM
haha no shit
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JNagarya
March 19, 2010 9:39 PM in reply to nova voter
He knows that much!? I'm impressed!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SleepinJeezus
March 20, 2010 7:24 AM in reply to JNagarya
He looks at the pictures. Boehner actually reads the text to him. They're kinda' "joined at the hip," so to speak.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JEP07
March 20, 2010 10:25 AM in reply to SleepinJeezus
"Hip" just doesn't describe either of them, really.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
March 19, 2010 8:18 PM
Except they didn't leave it out, did they? They rushed it onto their site without calling a single goddamned Democrat for comment because of their banal "win the hour" mission statement. And if it also fucks the Democrats and stokes the hydrophobic wingnut imbeciles who comment there, well that's just a bonus isn't it?
And this isn't a newspaper. It's a website. "They took it down?" Anyone remember the line from American Pie about how getting something off the Internet is like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
March 19, 2010 9:41 PM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
It's hard not to laugh at your punchline but I feel your disgust!! I don't even read stories lined to Politico. I only get the acid reflux going.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JEP07
March 20, 2010 10:28 AM in reply to lousgirl84
And the gag reflex...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
oskieoskie
March 19, 2010 8:18 PM
If we want to write a really cool political story, and there are no factual sources for it, we just make shit up.
Good old rule-of-middle-finger.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Cal Gal
March 19, 2010 9:31 PM in reply to oskieoskie
word
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Brownbagger
March 19, 2010 8:54 PM
Bravo Senora Bellantoni!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
crudenbay
March 19, 2010 9:01 PM
That's a laugh, invoking the journalistic rule: When in doubt, leave it out. It's supposed to be applied to what you publish BEFORE you publish it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JNagarya
March 19, 2010 9:43 PM in reply to crudenbay
Yep: that was one's of Twain's rules of writing, and it applied at the word level, several of which were:
Never use two words where one word will do.
Never use a big word where a little word will do.
When in doubt, leave it out.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JEP07
March 20, 2010 10:31 AM in reply to JNagarya
"If you get caught, take it out."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Coloured European Observer
March 19, 2010 9:46 PM in reply to crudenbay
so true! I used to think they were repukkkes, then I had momentary lapse of reason and thought they were neutral, but now I'm convinced they are repuKKKes again.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
March 19, 2010 11:02 PM in reply to The Coloured European Observer
Nice to see you here.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Coloured European Observer
March 23, 2010 9:44 PM in reply to lousgirl84
thanks
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
TRUTHMAN
March 19, 2010 9:09 PM
Seriously? For real, tho'!! SERIOUSLY?? My wife and I are on the dayum floor on this one. This thing mdade it (snap) that far. And it was a Dem hoax??!! Seriously?? When the votes started lining up, THEN, a secret memo is INTERCEPTED by a Republican lobbyist who is really FOR the American people), and runs it too... wait for it...a Republican who then shares it with many of others of the GOP. (Seriously??) [sidenote: I got the part about it going to a GOP congressman from another blog, but it makes so much sense..]...oh, where was I, "SERIOUSLY??" Then its sent by ALL of them to the Drudge Report AND POLITCO and NO ONE FACT CHECKED THE DAYUM THING?!!! seriously?? Then these yahoos stand in front of the camera and FRIKKIN DOWNPLAY THE THING?? SERIOUSLY??? Sorry, but ain't the GOP the ones who were causing a national calamity over the Prez not wearing a lapel pin?? Think they would let a double secret, password required, guide to misleading the American people go, with wimper and a bow no less??? Seriously???!!
That memo must have been us other "REAL" Americans. Incredible.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Majorajam
March 19, 2010 9:23 PM
The reductio ad absurdum of Politico. 'Who knows what the story is? All our 'sources' are shrugging their shoulders at the moment and we believe them when they say the memo was beamed to them by an unknown spaceship. So really, who's to say if we have any responsibility for broadcasting disinformation pushed by monied interests from a mountaintop?? How could we know... really? All that we do know is that it's true that Dems are up to something sinister here.'
If it were possible to uncompost the nuclear excrement that is Politico content you might've just heard a toilet flush. Alas, I'd say we'll see a team of monkeys invent cold-water fusion first.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Cal Gal
March 19, 2010 9:30 PM
If Dan Rather had to go, then someone at Politico should be fired, too.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Marinus van der Lubbe
March 20, 2010 2:05 PM in reply to Cal Gal
You almost have to think Frank Luntz runs Politico.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ComradeAnon
March 19, 2010 10:01 PM
Wouldn't be surprised to hear that Dick Armey is behind it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JEP07
March 20, 2010 10:35 AM in reply to ComradeAnon
But if Politico reported it, they'd use a convenient typo to amplify the facts;
"Army behind Republicans."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
juke R
March 19, 2010 11:13 PM
I think the Republicans seriously muddied the water far to long ago for this to have any traction. I keep skimming over the actual content of the memo, and, quite frankly, I can't remember what it is that the Dems are supposedly doing or planning that the memo reveals... Something about planning on passing more legislation in the future (the horror!).
Lets face it, when one has babbled on about death panels and forced abortions, whatever it is that this memo is apparently touting isn't going to get much transformative attention or attract much outrage.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
fpie
March 20, 2010 6:48 AM in reply to juke R
The best I can figure the bitchin' is about is Dem congress critters being instructed to not get into discussions (read on camera) about CBO details but instead keep it simple stupid and read talking points. In other words, 'Don't take a chance of sticking your foot in your mouth this weekend and bringing the whole damn business down around our ears!'
Now that particular bit of advise sounds pretty smart to me regardless of who wrote it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
StarShineSpeaks
March 20, 2010 12:06 AM
Christina is a real journalist thank goodness! Great work!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
barnninny
March 20, 2010 12:17 AM
Doesn't this sound familiar to anyone? Fake memo? Forged letterhead? Republican lobbyists?
Hellooooo. How many times have they pulled this in just the past 12 months?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
RHERSH12
March 20, 2010 1:43 AM
Well, I'd like to believe that the GOP leadership is really this stupid but they're probably not. This was a bush league stunt and the leadership is more sophisticated than this. They wouldn't try something that had so narrow a scope and so large a risk of backlash. If it's ever found out where this came from I'm betting it's a local or state level GOP organization gone rogue. It just doesn't have the panache of a Washington GOP dirty trick.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Peter Principle
March 20, 2010 2:27 AM
Politico: "In the end, POLITICO followed an old rule-of-thumb in journalism in taking down the memo: when in doubt, leave it out."
So first they post that shit-eating non-correction correction story -- which ends up sounding more like a GOP expose on the supposed "doc fix" conspiracy. Then they pat themselves on the back for doing what they did NOT do -- "when it doubt leave it out." When actually it was more like: "When your lie is found, take it down."
These people really are scum.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JoshQuasimoto
March 20, 2010 2:45 AM
Maybe it's just my own hyperbole but how is this story not a bigger deal. I understand that there lies a pre-concieved notion of democratic "type" of story and a republican "type" of story but this is absolutely egg in the face to GOP and it's staffers, not to mention politico. For fu^k's sake is there any integrity in journalism or is it just entertainment and advertising.
And why do I have to hear a clip of Rep John Boehner every day ripping this current bill when his signature is on the medicare part D bill. I mean does it take a room full of reporters to just sit on their heads and not acknowledge the fact that this guy voted for a bill that not only increased the deficit but also cost well over 1 trillion dollars? One may argue that "that was then" and "this is now" but we can have those arguments all day. I mean it's not like the conservatives I know will ever let Jimmy carter go (for whatever reason) or for them not to blame the Clinton for the economic downturn during the first term of Bush II.
Obviously I am probably preaching to the choir here but we have to do a better job of calling the kettle black.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Verified
March 20, 2010 4:38 AM
Sounds like something right out of the old Nixonian "Trojans for Representative Government" crowd.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JohnW1141
March 20, 2010 8:42 AM
If its sensational it leads, whether its true or not doesn't matter; we can always come back and apologize.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JohnDoe
March 20, 2010 8:52 AM
This is why I stopped reading Politico; wasted bandwidth.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Michael A
March 20, 2010 11:43 AM
I read the memo and it sounds like a right-wing child wrote it based on a train wreck beck definition of a democratic staff worker. No staff worker dishing talking points would write that nonsense. Dems don't stick to talking points in any event. They talk things to death and get into minutia, which has always been the problem for dems. No bumper sticker labels on legislation and have no idea how to dodge tough questions with lies like the repukes do.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
shepherd wong
March 20, 2010 2:50 PM
News flash: you can't trust Republicans and their water-carriers in the media.
I hope that someone is going to chase down the story on this, which is the insurance corporation lobbyists who created and disseminated this disinformation piece. This was no "hoax", it was a professional lie paid for by the insurance industry to trick the American public into voting against their own self-interest and in favor of the corporate interest instead. Again, nothing new there but if there's no price to be paid for it...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
BaileyWu
March 21, 2010 9:25 PM
You can look first every time for the fox who plays the hen house game better than anyone: Karl Rove.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
August 22, 2010 11:29 AM
Thank you for the mp3 dinle information your provide.mp3 indir
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?