
Sen. John McCain's campaign (R-AZ) is strongly objecting to a new online fundraising ad from his opponent in the Republican primary, former Rep. J.D. Hayworth, depicting McCain's face in blue warpaint.
The online fundraising ad offers up McCain as a potential Oscar winner, as "nominee for best conservative actor." The Arizona Republic speculated that the ad may have been a reference to the movie Avatar. The Hayworth campaign has put up a revised version that changes McCain's skin color to a dark blue, in addition to the lighter blue warpaint, making an Avatar connection more obvious.
Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl (R-AZ), a McCain ally, told the Republic: "Ads like this have no place in the Republican primary, and J.D. Hayworth should immediately take it down and apologize."
McCain campaign manager Shiree Verdone told the paper: "Ex-Congressman J.D. Hayworth should immediately apologize and and take down his latest online ad, which is an outrageous offense to John McCain's lifetime of honorable service to our state and nation, and insulting to Native Americans here in Arizona and across America."
Hayworth spokesman Jason Rose responded to the calls to take down the ad, telling the Republic: "We respectfully decline the request and would encourage Senator McCain to get a sense of humor. After all, if Sunday's show did have an award for best election year flip-flopping and transparent conservative conversion, the incumbent would surely win the Oscar."
Dorn76
March 5, 2010 10:29 AM
That's just bizaare.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Michael A
March 5, 2010 10:47 AM in reply to Dorn76
Yep, very bizarre. The repukes are soooo juvenile. I guess he is playing to his base. Uneducated angry white guys.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Rick Jones
March 5, 2010 10:54 AM in reply to Dorn76
Wonder what the Avatar people think about the misappropriation going on here?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
March 5, 2010 12:37 PM in reply to Dorn76
You guys are aware of the the whole wingnut freeper tizzy over how "Avatar" is evil librul propaganda intended to poison the minds of the young against the benefits of environmental devestation, right? One more block in the grand librul plot to steal money out of the pockets of honest, hardworking Republicans, it is.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
sheerahkahn
March 5, 2010 1:40 PM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
I was going to say that Hayworth is playing to two demographics...one is the political/business-is-everything conservative tying McCain to a liberal stance on upping taxes and global warming, and the other demographic is the religious/social conservative who are viewing Avatar as satanic propaganda peddling nature worship paganism.
Even though for every else this has a subtext of racism, remember who their audience is...this is a primary, not the general election.
Come the general election one or the other will probably use far more subtler messages painting the democratic challenger little more than satan himself.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
admiralmpj
March 5, 2010 5:27 PM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
The Republicans would have a better argument if Uncle Rupert hadn't made 2.5 Billion dollars off Avatar Worldwide.
(Remember, Fox Production. $712 Million U.S Domestic Ticket Sales, $1.83 Billion dollars Worldwide.)
The Rethugs may be complain' about it, but they're sure as @#$% going to see it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
nellieh
March 5, 2010 10:41 AM
Thr Republican Party doesn't like it when one of their own is ridiculed with unflatering renditions of their persona but hardly murmer when Obama is rendered as "the Joker," "Hitler," or as a "target." McCain's camp would be believable if they howled at all depictions that ridicule or demean other politicians.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Dorn76
March 5, 2010 10:48 AM in reply to nellieh
McCain has always been about McCain, plain and simple.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Jim H
March 5, 2010 10:53 AM in reply to nellieh
Bingo. Note what Kyl says:
Yeah, save those kinds of junvenile attacks for the general election against the demeecrat!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mld678
March 6, 2010 12:45 PM in reply to Jim H
Oh aboslutely - Ads like this have NO place in the Republican primary - How LOW can JD get. that is just awfully distasteful, offensive, childish.. JD Hayworth is a TEABAGGER. I'll be voting McCain for re-election. Hayworth is old corrupt air, and he makes McCain looks better!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
calbearinillinois
March 5, 2010 1:44 PM in reply to nellieh
Not only silently permit, but overtly endorse - see that GOP/RNC fundraising presentation with Obama as Joker leading the "Evil Empire"
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mike from Arlington
March 5, 2010 10:55 AM
I really hate this stuff when they act like children with Democrats but it's apparent they do this stuff with everyone.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ariseatex
March 5, 2010 11:04 AM
I can't stand McCain, but this is a major fail on the part of the Hayworth campaign. Arizona has one of the largest Native American populations in the country. Hayworth was the representative of AZ-06 in the 1990s, which had a Native American population of close to 25% due to its inclusion of the Navajo and Apache nations. To put McCain in what could effectively be considered blackface in two representations of the same ad alienates not only Hayworth's former constituents and the 300,000 Native Americans in Arizona, but anyone who grew up in Arizona respecting the native culture.
Then again Hayworth's base is made up of transplants from out of state who want the warm climate but not the culture that has been there for hundreds of years, so I shouldn't be as surprised.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Michael A
March 5, 2010 11:13 AM in reply to ariseatex
I don't think any native americans are part of this nut's voting base. In fact, his base probably likes insults of those "dirty" non-lily whites.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ariseatex
March 5, 2010 11:18 AM in reply to Michael A
True, but eventually he has to win a general election in a state that's 44% non-white. Unless 80% of white Arizonans vote for him he doesn't have a chance after this; it could come back to haunt him.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Suznaz
March 5, 2010 12:40 PM in reply to ariseatex
I hadn't noticed any blue Native Americans around Coconino County... or anywhere else for that matter. Doubt it's offensive to any but the let's look for offense everywhere crowd. I don't agree with Hayworth on much but suggesting the acquisition of a sense of humor is pretty on target.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
calbearinillinois
March 5, 2010 1:46 PM in reply to Suznaz
I think the NA link made more sense in the first version, where all McCain had was some blue stripes (ala "warpaint" in 1950s Westerns) on his pasty skin.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Nandemosan
March 5, 2010 1:28 PM in reply to ariseatex
To put McCain in what could effectively be considered blackface in two representations of the same ad alienates not only Hayworth's former constituents and the 300,000 Native Americans in Arizona, but anyone who grew up in Arizona respecting the native culture.
However, isn't that about 15 people who aren't Native American or Hispanic?
My mother moved to Tucson. So far as I can tell, about 99% of everyone that lives in Arizona now was born and raised somewhere else, and that includes McCain. Furthermore, they are overwhelmingly conservative and don't like brown people of any kind, so the Rethugs don't gear campaigns to appeal to Hispanics or Native Americans in the least.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
elle a
March 5, 2010 2:19 PM in reply to ariseatex
how in the world is this offensive to native americans?????
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
farnsworth
March 5, 2010 11:28 AM
Exactly!
They should be save to smear the Democrats in the general election!
Ah, hypocrisy, thy name is GOP.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Schmed
March 5, 2010 11:30 AM
I find it a somewhat subtle tweak that I wouldn't have thought possible for a teabagger: most conservatives find Avatar to be blatent liberal propaganda that analogously decries the rape of the land and the genocide of the natives by white male invaders. Slapping the blue Navi paint on McCain has a certain irony that I didn't think Hayworth or his people have in them.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Powkat
March 5, 2010 11:36 AM
Just how far do the wingers have to go before someone calls stop? They are now devouring their own as well as the other. I fear we are heading for an assassination, mass murder or bombing as the rhetoric continues to escalate and more people are outright packing. I rarely go to Starbucks, but now it's off my list - I do not want the guy who gets the wrong drink to be armed. Both my kids worked at Starbucks, so glad they don't anymore.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ariseatex
March 5, 2010 11:39 AM in reply to Powkat
I followed you up until the Starbucks thing. Most people, if they get pissed off at one Starbucks, they just go to another one a mile away from then on. :p
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Nandemosan
March 5, 2010 1:41 PM in reply to ariseatex
You haven't been following the news? Starbucks is welcoming those packing heat with open arms. Another reason to shed a tear for the company that, if nothing else, made the world safe for good coffee.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2011216449_apusgunscoffee.html
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
terje
March 5, 2010 1:43 PM in reply to ariseatex
Do you get the Starbucks reference? There is a controversy in some circles because some gun groups have decided to start holding meet-ups of sorts in Starbucks with their guns to exercise what they consider their 2nd amendment rights. After some discussion, the chain decided they wouldn't adopt an anti-gun carrying policy in states where open carry is permitted. That decision has upset some anti-gun groups, as well as some folks who don't feel comfortable going to (or working at) a coffee shop hopping with handguns.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Nandemosan
March 5, 2010 1:32 PM in reply to Powkat
Just how far do the wingers have to go before someone calls stop? They are now devouring their own as well as the other.
As far as they want! The more intramural nonsense like this, the better. Eating their own seems to suit the Right just fine. We just need a Yojimbo to push them down this road a bit farther.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CityGuy
March 5, 2010 11:36 AM
I saw the blue paint and thought of Braveheart personally. Imagine the dialogue from Wallace McCain (MacCain?): ...but they'll never take away our free perks!" Now THAT is Oscar material.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Walter Mitty
March 5, 2010 12:14 PM
The bit didn't need the face paint really. But trying to tie it to degrading Native American heritage is desperate. It's obvious that they were going for the Avatar look.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Viva!America!
March 5, 2010 12:22 PM
I think they were going for Avatar here now that I see the original photo. I can see that election season is going to be very childish.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
twoviragos
March 5, 2010 12:54 PM in reply to Viva!America!
And that would differ from other election seasons, how?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
joejustice
March 5, 2010 12:23 PM
You can put facepaint on a pig, but...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Marinus van der Lubbe
March 5, 2010 12:40 PM
I just have to laugh everytime they roll out that "He Who Cannot be Mocked" bullshit. McCain gave up any rights to his 'honorable' service after 2008 when he was exposed as the virulent pandering and erratic dipshit of elections. He forfieted his integrity or whatever he had left after being punked by Bush and has no claim on any parcel of highground. Let him and that saurian looking cavedweller Hayworth beat the shit out of each other.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Nandemosan
March 5, 2010 1:48 PM in reply to Marinus van der Lubbe
What integrity McCain had was bestowed on him by the media. Once you know his history, he's pretty much the mirror image of Shrub - a petulant, spoiled little boy. Any success either one had, and it could be argued that there has been none, was a gift from powerful friends and family. Both were crappy students and failed pilots. Both were involved directly or indirectly with business swindles. In Shrubs case, it was oil. McCain should have been bounced for connections to the S&L debacle.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Marinus van der Lubbe
March 5, 2010 1:57 PM in reply to Nandemosan
Being almost 60, and from the same alma mater, I know all about that weasily prick. Believe me, if not for his daddy and grandaddy, he would have done the seabag drag as a plebe.
And youre right about him being a creation of the media and reporters that had a symbiotic realtionship with him in buildin gup his bullshit image.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
concerned parent
March 5, 2010 1:04 PM
I think the gop was hoping to save this for november to use against the dems. DOH! It is however very funny, and always good to see the right getting outraged by one of their nuttier factions.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Leftflank
March 5, 2010 1:19 PM
War-paint? That's total bullshit. It's obviously an Avatar thing, which is on topic with the actor reference & current. Whomsoever gets native American insult out of this is pretty damn touchy & primed & prone to find hidden messages that don't exist.
The message is, that Mccain is an actor that will play any role he has to at any moment without the slightest thought of integrity or regard for any position he supposedly stood for in his entire career. In other words; Zero Credibility!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Rich in NJ
March 5, 2010 1:38 PM
Few politicians deserve to be mocked more than McCain.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Sassinator
March 5, 2010 1:55 PM
Perfect payback for the Paris Hilton ad. Couldn't have happened to a more deserving codger.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
zonk
March 5, 2010 1:57 PM
Perhaps I'm being insensitive, but the McCain camp's response sort of reads like an outrage mad-lib.
We are OUTRAGED and think the ad should be taken down... because.... well, because.... Patriotism! Native Americans! Smurf fans!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
midnight rambler
March 5, 2010 2:17 PM
I find it pretty funny, and a little disturbing, that so many liberals here seems to be buying McCain's line that this ad is OUTRAGEOUS and yet another example of how extreme the right wing is willing to go. How long before they just go ahead and kill McCain outright?
Seriously guys, get a grip. It's not even a nasty attack ad - it's short, funny, and fact-free yet not untruthful, exactly the kind of thing that sticks in people's heads. If Democrats ran more ads like this they'd do a lot better.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Loudocracy
March 5, 2010 2:58 PM
The ad is deeply offensive to the Na'vi and should be taken down.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
GTFOOH
March 5, 2010 3:01 PM
This is a complete outrage. Everybody knows, McCain is more SHREK like!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Lynn Dee
March 5, 2010 8:53 PM
Why the heck does McCain think Native Americans should be insulted by the depiction of him as a Na'vi? Are Native Americans supposed to feel some special connection to a make-believe, computer-generated indigenous people?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
GTFOOH
March 5, 2010 10:39 PM in reply to Lynn Dee
People of color.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
busdrivermike
March 6, 2010 2:03 PM
The ad is effective because:
It causes the McCain camp to respond
It captures the news cycle
It continues to hammer McCain as too liberal
It causes the McCain camp to use the knee jerk "St. McCain" response. How many times will that be effective before the primary vote? Every time it is used, it loses power.
Great ad. Until Democrats figure out that this shit works, they will always have to bow to the Republican far right. Can you say Health care reform town hall meetings?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Owen
March 7, 2010 10:48 PM
The GOP/Teaparty presidential primary is going to be a real doozy.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Lono65
March 8, 2010 11:06 AM
JD Hayworth is a shitweasel of the highest order and I hate to defend him, but McCain's full of shit on this one.
He's manufacturing outrage, attempting to make this a racial thing. I saw him on a local chat complaing about how they'd "darkened his face." It's obviously a play on Avatar, they didn't "darken" his face (a la OJ on Time magazine), they made it fucking BLUE! John McCain is the whitest friggin' person in Arizona. He's practically transparent. Hayworth giving him a tan isn't going to scare off the old white voters. If the ad wasn't specifically an Oscar spoof, maybe there'd be something here. If they'd put McCain's head in a giant bomb-disposal helmet from the Hurt Locker, McCain would be complaining that it was some sort of a mockery of his service. If he'd been portrayed holding a bunch of balloons, he complain it was a mockery of his age.
McCain ha become a perpetual victim like his buddy Sarah. If we don't call him on it now, we can't call him on it when he does the same thing to a Dem opponent.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?