
The Department of Labor calculates that 400,000 people will lose unemployment benefits if the Senate isn't able to break Sen. Jim Bunning's blockade of a measure that would extend the benefits.
The Labor tally says Bunning has "blocked the process each time" and Secretary Hilda Solis complained that "[t]he consequences of partisan obstructionism could not be clearer."
"If the extension is not approved immediately, millions of Americans could lose the safety net programs they deserve and desperately need," she said.
The White House sent the state-by-state totals to regional reporters last night. Bunning's Kentucky is at the low end, with 4,300 people affected. Florida has one of the higher totals of 49,000, as a result of Congress not extending jobless benefits.
Here's the Labor Department's tally of the projected number of people losing their unemployment insurance by state for the week ending March 13:
Alabama 3,600 -- Alaska 0 -- Arizona 8,300 -- Arkansas 5,200
California 0 -- Colorado 9,000 -- Connecticut 0
District of Columbia 600 -- Delaware 2,100
Florida 49,600
Georgia 41,000
Hawaii 1,600
Idaho 0 -- Illinois 28,200 -- Indiana 16,100 -- Iowa 4,600
Kansas 0 - -Kentucky 4,300
Louisiana 4,300
Maine 2,200 -- Maryland 4,700 -- Massachusetts 0 -- Michigan 0 -- Minnesota 0 -- Mississippi 2,700 -- Missouri 8,700 -- Montana 0
Nebraska 1,300 -- Nevada 0 -- New Hampshire 0 -- New Jersey 0 -- New Mexico 0 -- New York 54,300 -- North Carolina 0 -- North Dakota 500
Ohio 16,200 -- Oklahoma 4,600 -- Oregon 0
Pennsylvania 0 -- Puerto Rico 0
Rhode Island 0
South Carolina 14,400 -- South Dakota 300
Tennessee 7,500 -- Texas 27,400
Utah 2,700
Vermont 0 -- Virgin Islands 100 -- Virginia 10,700
Washington 0 -- Wisconsin 0 -- West Virginia 2,600 -- Wyoming 900
From the release:
If Emergency Unemployment Compensation and full federal funding for the Extended Benefit program are not extended, 400,000 Americans will lose unemployment benefits during the first weeks in March. By May, nearly 3 million people could be left without these benefits. Furthermore, if the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act subsidy under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act is not extended, thousands of families will lose access to affordable health care.If the extension is not approved, an estimated 500,000 workers who lose their jobs will be ineligible for subsidies to cover the cost of health care over this month. Over the rest of 2010, an estimated 5 million workers will be ineligible for the Recovery Act COBRA subsidy that covers 65 percent of the cost of coverage. Without this assistance, many of these families will be forced to join the ranks of the uninsured.
...
Without an extension, the number of Americans who lose unemployment insurance benefits will increase to 1.5 million within a month. Within two months, nearly 3 million Americans will have lost their benefits. Even if Congress acts down the road to retroactively reinstate UI benefits, a gap in the program forces administrative burdens onto states, which may cause significant delays in getting checks to unemployed individuals.
cambridgeMR
March 2, 2010 11:06 AM
I called his office. I needed to try over 20 times, the phone line was busy each time.
When I finally got through, I asked them why Sen. Bunning is trying to cut my grandmother's Medicare benefits by 20%.
The staffer said "Senator Bunning supports the bill, he just wants to find the money to pay for it."
I said they could find the money easily, if he weren't blocking the bill.
Then she said she would pass on my message to the senator.
Yay democracy.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
DownriverDem
March 2, 2010 1:58 PM in reply to cambridgeMR
Don't forget: Bunning is not running again.
Bunning doesn't give a damn.
The GOP is just using him to do their dirty work.
Will Americans care? It appears that half of the country will care as usual.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ottis
March 2, 2010 11:06 AM
Heckuva job Jimmie!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lapdogs
March 2, 2010 11:14 AM
So Kyl thinks that 8,300 citizens of Arizona are goof-offs, who could care less about looking for work and "enjoy" having their unemployment checks roll in?
And isn't it ironic that Bunning voted AGAINST PayGo, yet he is holding everything up because the democrats are not paying for this emergency spending using PayGo!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Rick Jones
March 2, 2010 11:15 AM
Which is more of an abuse of Senate procedural rules? A single Republican Senator, probably doing the bidding of many other Repubs, stopping an extension of unemployment and COBRA benefits to hundreds of thousands of Americans hardest hit by the recession and cutting fees by 21% to doctors who treat Medicare patients? Or having a majority rule vote on some tweaks to healthcare reform legislation that has already passed by a super majority? I know this is a tough question.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CityGuy
March 2, 2010 11:16 AM
So why didn't he demand that his buddy Shrub pay for HIS programs also? Yes and the MSM is-slowly-picking up on Bunning by name, and giving details about his obstruction. Cross your fingers Dems, this could be the "government shut-down" of the 2010 election cycle.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tiowally
March 2, 2010 11:18 AM
There's always been stiff competition for the title of "Sleaziest Bastard in the Senate" but the race has really been heating up lately, with Bunning in the running. Cruel and conscienceless are the key characteristics of this Asshole from Hell, truly a real Rethug psychopath.
I understand he was a good pitcher. Someone needs to contact James Guckert/Jeff Gannon (or KKKarl) and find out if Bunning was ever any real competition.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jeffgee
March 2, 2010 11:26 AM
Lotsa red states in that list. But Bunning's not running again, so he can raise his middle finger all he wants with no consequences. Even McConnell doesn't like him. For Bunning's future I'd like to see him lose his government-funded retirement and health care. Let him try to get insurance on his own. He can live off his baseball fame in retirement.
I'd be curious about whether he's gotten any death threats yet, maybe by an armed unemployed Kentuckian visiting his office.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Nandemosan
March 2, 2010 11:42 AM
Isn't Bunning the one who may have taken one too many fastballs to the head and thought to be losing his faculties (such as they were - he is a Southern Rethug after all) during the last election?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Rick Jones
March 2, 2010 11:59 AM in reply to Nandemosan
According to his stats in Baseball Almanac (online), Bunning was only hit by a pitch once during his pro career. He was a pitcher who, on the other hand, hit 160 batters he faced. Kind of like he's now throwing behind the heads of the unemployed.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Nandemosan
March 2, 2010 12:41 PM in reply to Rick Jones
While we're piling on Bunning, let us not forget that the House Ethics committee cleared seven of their colleagues for taking lobbyist's money to assure that earmarks got funded, and one of them was a dead man!
I'm pretty much at the "a pox on both their houses" stage. I don't think anyone represents me any longer and certainly not the Americans most in need.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
johnnydoughey
March 2, 2010 11:59 AM
I'm confused...
Which mob is just thinking of themselves and not the commoners?
Is it the one whose senator is blocking unemployment benefits for those out of work... or is it the one which is allowing a lone minority party senator to block unemployment benefits for those out of work?
NEITHER mob cares about us, folks... they're MOBSTERS!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Progressive Party
March 2, 2010 12:03 PM
Estate Tax for the unemployed. When the unemployed slowly die off it is so nice to know that Bunning was on thir side and he fought with his values to protect him. I'd like to see Bunning alone on a street where the people could get to him and show him the value of the estate tax has for him!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
runfastandwin
March 2, 2010 12:09 PM
For the umpteenth millionth time, it's not a filibuster, it's a threat of a filibuster. Sure the republicans suck donkey dicks all day long, we all know that. The question is what tools do we have at our disposal to stop them. Senator Reid could keep the Senate in session and force them to stand and hold the floor until they relent or collapse (hopefully the latter) if he so chose. But he chooses not to even try. I just cannot understand why.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Backcountry
March 2, 2010 12:22 PM in reply to runfastandwin
Well, even if it's not exactly an all-out filibuster, the effect is surely the same. It's an example of Senate rules hampering the public good.
The reason the wimpinator Harry Reid won't put the screws to this kind of stuff is simple: There's way too much "respect" for Senatorial colleagues going on from the Democratic side while there's absolutely no respect being shown from the Rethuglican side.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mcrose68
March 2, 2010 6:42 PM in reply to Backcountry
The actual fillibuster sounds like a great idea to me.
If Bunning's friends in the GOP come out to support his fillibuster it would be a nice time to showcase how the GOP really feels about America.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Marinus van der Lubbe
March 2, 2010 12:55 PM in reply to runfastandwin
Please don't insult donkeys and infer they have sexual relations with republicans!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
philogratis
March 2, 2010 12:20 PM
I am getting confused too. Why don't they vote for cloture? Surely there are a few Republicans who would go along?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ICare
March 2, 2010 12:22 PM
It isn't a filibuster to object to a unanimous consent motion. It merely requires senators to actually vote on the record. Why is that such a problem for Democrats? If the measure is that important, and more than a few Republicans will vote for it, then why didn't Harry Reid schedule a vote within 24 hours? Could it be that he is playing politics by not scheduling a real vote?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
numediaman
March 2, 2010 12:37 PM
Democrats are playing this for all its worth, rather than fighting it. This is just politics, and millions of Americans are the victims.
If Democrats want to benefit from this they will fight it -- but they won't. It is easier to point the finger at Bunning, a senile old man. than to require a floor fight.
Does anyone in Washington realize the level of anger that is growing? Republicans AND Democrats are playing with fire. Get to work now: pass the extension, pass health care reform.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Max Thrax
March 2, 2010 1:00 PM in reply to numediaman
For the first time in a while, I'm happy with the way the Dems are playing this. They have no choice really, they have to get the MSM off the 'both sides are responsible' meme. This one event could change the public perception that the corporate media has tried so hard to sell.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
numediaman
March 2, 2010 1:36 PM in reply to Max Thrax
"I'm happy with the way the Dems are playing this."
Exactly, which is why I hate Democrats almost as much as Republicans.
When will the Democrats stop playing games and start governing? If the Republicans want to play games, let them. One party has to lead. We voted in Democrats to do this -- but they so far refuse. In November their time will be up and they will get a well deserved thrashing . . . and we will be stuck with the crazies in charge again.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Max Thrax
March 2, 2010 2:17 PM in reply to numediaman
Sorry, the MSM is at it's core center-right, they have to be fought as well. It's the reality dude. The American people need a black and white example to perfectly illustrate what's been going on since Obama came to office. Part of leading, in the current zeitgeist, is framing things in a way that's obvious to the rubes and leaves the corporate media no wiggle room to play their center-right games.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreemanW
March 2, 2010 5:39 PM in reply to Max Thrax
"Sorry, the MSM is at it's core center-right, they have to be fought as well. It's the reality dude. The American people need a black and white example to perfectly illustrate what's been going on since Obama came to office. Part of leading, in the current zeitgeist, is framing things in a way that's obvious to the rubes and leaves the corporate media no wiggle room to play their center-right games."
. . . and just as soon as you find someone, even a group of people, capable and prepared to do just that?
Let us know, okay?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Max Thrax
March 2, 2010 12:57 PM
I understand that they took an unofficial poll at last night's happy hour cocktail party at Sally Quinn and Ben Bradlee's. The results: this hurts Democrats.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Barry Ragin
March 2, 2010 2:01 PM
The current AP article contains this paragraph:
Democrats want to pass the measure with the unanimous permission of all senators, a common tactic to speed non-controversial measures through the notoriously balky Senate. Otherwise it could take almost a week to slog through the procedural steps required to take up the measure and defeat Bunning's filibuster.
My question is, why hasn't the clock started on those "procedural steps" to force the Republicans to publicly defend this action day in and day out until they cave?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Glenn in NYC
March 2, 2010 3:09 PM in reply to Barry Ragin
That's my question -- has Reid filed for cloture and, if not, why the hell not?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Armchair Firebrand
March 2, 2010 2:32 PM
Bunning’s callous indifference to the plight of everyday Americans struggling to make ends meet exposes the Republican Party’s prime directive: unwavering commitment to defending an unsustainable status quo that rewards and protects the rich at the expense of those less fortunate.
Behind a facade of phony fiscal fortitude, the G.O.P. blindly obstructs legislation essential to our economic recovery, hoping that this cynical strategy will return them to power.
Moreover, by repeatedly refusing to engage in a serious exchange of ideas, Congressional Republicans fail to acknowledge the fundamental truth behind health care reform: that it is an economic and social necessity.
Read more @ http://armchairfirebrand.wordpress.com/
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Long Memory
March 2, 2010 3:10 PM
Bunning might not have been re-elected the last time he ran but for the fact that Bill Frist and McConnell ordered him to shut up, to duck further debats and keep his head down. I seem to recall that he said he couldn't go home for debates because the threat level was orange and it wasn't safe. But he's a typical GOP dim bulb.
And yet. And yet, I'd have a little more understanding of his standing on principle if I had ever seen it before. He's just like Evan Bayh, without the charm.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
kindness
March 2, 2010 4:42 PM
What filibuster? A filibuster is forcing the person to stand up and talk. No one is forcing Grandpa Bunning to do so. Let him wear Depends & talk.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?