
Two of the Senate's top Republicans have now publicly come to the defense of Sen. Jim Bunning (R-KY), whose implementation of the Senate filibuster rules has led to the discontinuation of unemployment and COBRA benefits for thousands of Americans, and has resulted in a 21 percent fee cut for doctors seeing Medicare patients.
"My colleague from Kentucky made a good point," said Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl (R-AZ) on the floor today. Bunning says he's holding up the bill because he wants it to be paid for with stimulus dollars, during a recession. Kyl agrees.
Likewise, Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX)--who runs the Senate GOP's re-election committee--said he sympathizes with his beleaguered colleague.
"I admire the courage of the junior senator from Kentucky, Senator Bunning," Cornyn said, also on the Senate floor. "It's not fun to be accused of having no compassion for the people who are out of work, the people for who these benefits should be forthcoming, and I believe will be forthcoming. But somebody has to stand up, finally, and say enough is enough, no more inter-generational theft from our children and grandchildren by not meeting our responsibilities today. And that's what I interpret him to have done."
Democrats may be able to retroactively reverse some of the cuts Bunning is forcing--including to doctors treating Medicare patients. But even in those cases it's causing major administrative head aches. And for those federal employees who've been sent home, or people whose jobless benefits have been cut, the situation is much worse.
Republicans haven't exactly rallied around Bunning, who's taking a lot of heat for interrupting key benefits at a time of high unemployment. But it's not as if they're distancing themselves from him or exerting pressure on him to cut it out. Far from it.
mcc
March 1, 2010 7:35 PM
Kyl also defended Bunning on Fox News Sunday.
With Bunning flipping off ABC reporters and using "tough shit" as his defense of his actions to Senate Democrats, maybe they'd be better off not aligning themselves too closely with this guy. Reports so far have made Bunning look like a loose cannon acting outside where the Republicans can control him, but at some point Bunning will start to look like he's just doing what the Republican leadership wants.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mcc
March 1, 2010 7:44 PM
By the way-- did anyone see this? EJ Dionne, in the middle of a somewhat convoluted column, argues that although Bunning was the proximate problem here for denying the temporary extension of benefits, the only reason Bunning was able to pull the stunt in the first place was because Jon Kyl was trying to force in a huge cut to estate taxes, a cut Kyl was cosponsoring with... Blanche Lincoln.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SchrodingersCat
March 1, 2010 8:17 PM in reply to mcc
Nice catch. Shocking that the senator bought and paid for by the Walton family would be pushing for a cut in estate taxes.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Nancy Irving
March 1, 2010 11:25 PM in reply to mcc
I wish that reporters would not call tax cuts tax "relief," a word that suggests release from some intolerable pain or burden.
Tax cuts are cuts. "Cuts," unlike "relief," is value-free.
When a reporter talks about tax "relief," he has already granted the premise of the right--that taxes as they stand are a crushing burden.
This is particularly annoying when used to characterize estate taxes, which are currently not only low, but are assessed only on the very wealthy, in fact on the very wealthy dead.
A tax less crushing, less of a burden to any living thing, can hardly be imagined.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Jaycal
March 1, 2010 7:52 PM
"There are generations of Iraqi children that need the funding supported by our military expedition in that country! How can the Democrats pretend to care about them with the criminal overspending being proposed on the welfare queens and never-do-wells, like my fellow people of Kentucky!"
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
baba2nde
March 1, 2010 7:56 PM
Mental illness is an insidious foe. Compassion rather than malevolence is probably called for, difficult as it is.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bibimimi
March 2, 2010 3:01 PM in reply to baba2nde
Compassion in the form of a tranquilizer shot, a straight jacket, a pair of Depends, a stretcher with restraints and an ambulance waiting discreetly by the back door.
Problem solved.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Phoebe Fay
March 1, 2010 7:58 PM
Thanks, John Kyl. Now we can all say it's the RepublicanS plural blocking this bill. If the minority whip is standing up for him, there's no way it's just one rogue senator (no matter how big a stinking pile of *#%* that one senator may be).
Every Democrat should be screaming from the rooftops about the obstructionism of the Republican Party. All of 'em.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CityGuy
March 2, 2010 11:26 AM in reply to Phoebe Fay
Co-sign. BTW: I think that it is beginning to sink into the public mind-set what Bunning and his Rethug colleagues are doing.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
eratosthenes8
March 1, 2010 8:27 PM
Stay classy, Republicans.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Michael A
March 1, 2010 8:28 PM
Gotta love the hypocrites. There was no complaining when we invaded a country and killed hundreds of thousands of innocents on a credit card, but when it comes to helping people, they are all "worried" about the deficit. I hope these animals rot in hell.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CVille Dem
March 1, 2010 9:33 PM
This reminds me of when the repubs closed down government over the same shamified idea. They lost big-time because of it. In fact, the National Gallery of Art's Impressionist show was shut down because of it (which as I recall was the biggest stink about the whole thing).
Now they are screwing regular people (a great many of them republicans, I would guess), and using the hypocritical stance that they suddenly care about spending. Paul Begalia had the goods on Bunning -- all the unpaid for pork he has voted for, and of course the wars.
OK, Dems! We have the ammunition! Are we going to blow ourselves up with it, or are we going to use it?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
midnight rambler
March 1, 2010 9:59 PM
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Progressive Party
March 1, 2010 11:29 PM
These motherfuckers need to be walking the street next to the ESC (Unemployment Offices) whistling this song and dance....go some construction sites that are shutting down....how long would you give them before their ass was grass!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
IMNOTBITTER
March 2, 2010 2:13 AM
Why is everyone upset about this I mean they had the same tough approach to the Wall street Banksters and bank banksters when they gave them billions of dollars to save them from the greedy and selfish consumers and workers of america didn't they. THey did find the money to cut from other areas before they gave it to AIG right they did do that didn't they????????
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
nancydenis
March 2, 2010 8:55 AM
But somebody has to stand up, finally, and say enough is enough, no more inter-generational theft from our children and grandchildren by not meeting our responsibilities today
Can someone explain why the opposition continuously gets away with the children and grandchildren statements when doing nothing will make life much worse [and often times much more expensive] for our children and grandchildren?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Gettysburg
March 2, 2010 11:45 AM
Ultimately Bunning's maneuver isn't going to work. He knows that, which is probably why he's gone through this trouble in the first place. At the end of the day, Congress needs to get serious about what it's long term vision is. A perpetual extension of benefits, even in a down economy, is the same as sweeping the problem under the rug time after time.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bibimimi
March 2, 2010 2:58 PM
Are they dumb enough to think this is benign neglect? Do they think Bunning is digging his own grave and they don't want to interrupt him? The 'pukes are so emboldened, they think every shit thing they do is golden. How long before the ill-will stick like eel ooze?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Peter Principle
March 2, 2010 4:30 PM
I'm beginning to understand why the Dems are trying to downplay this rather than shout it from the rooftops.
They understand that the longer it goes on, the more the media plays it as a case of "Senate gridlock" (rather than GOP obstructionism), which reinforces the impression that the system is hopelessly broken, which fuels anti-incumbent rage among the vast majority of voters who have only a vague notion of what is really happening. And they're not only incumbents, they're the incumbents who are at least notionally in charge.
And the Republicans are quietly supporting Sen. Jock Strap for the very same reason.
We've reached the point where the smartest political tactic for the opposition is to trash the process completely -- so that the voters will put them back into power, so that they can be completely trashed in turn (assuming the Dems have the stomach for it.)
It appears our political system has passed from surrealism into pure nihilism.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
TDGoddard
March 2, 2010 5:05 PM
BREAKING: Democrats play hardball with Bunning and may force him to stage an actual filibuster in an all night session.
http://politicalwire.com/archives/2010/03/02/senate_democrats_may_force_all_night_session.html
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Tosh
June 6, 2010 7:58 AM
This reminds me of when the repubs closed down government over the same shamified idea. They lost big-time because of it. In fact, the National Gallery of Art's Impressionist show was shut down because of it (which as I recall was the biggest stink about the whole thing).
Now they are screwing regular people (a great many of them republicans, I would guess), and using the hypocritical stance that they suddenly care about spending. Paul Begalia had the goods on Bunning -- all the unpaid for pork he has voted for, and of course the wars.
m65 kamagra
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?