TPMDC

More National Groups Sign On To Saltonstall Campaign


Rep. Bart Stupak (D-MI) and 1st District congressional candidate Connie Saltonstall (D)

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

More national progressive groups, including NOW and Blue America PAC, have signed on to help former county commissioner Connie Saltonstall in her insurgent bid to beat Rep. Bart Stupak in Michigan's 1st District Democratic primary. Democracy for America is about to get in, too, according to a spokesperson.

It's not yet clear how real the effort will turn out to be. But the national coalition to primary Stupak is certainly building, and Stupak's wife told me today her husband will be ready for it.

A day after DFA asked its members to take a position on the campaign, the group says more than 25,000 members have weighed in. And 97% of them say DFA should throw its weight behind Connie Saltonstall, the progressive former county commissioner who's challenging Stupak in the 1st District, where he's been a Democratic incumbent since 1993.

A spokesperson for the group said that the result means "it's very likely" DFA will back Saltonstall in the near future. The group is already backing Bill Halter over Sen. Blanche Lincoln in the Arkansas Democratic primary, after a similarly-overwhelming DFA vote showed the group's membership wanted to use its resources to knock out Lincoln, another moderate like Stupak who progressives blame for slowing down health care reform.

"With overwhelming support like this from our membership, it's very likely that the national DFA community will get involved in this race," DFA communications director Mary Rickles told me today.

In a release today, National Organization for Women president Terry O'Neill said her group isn't waiting -- NOW is getting on board with Saltonstall now. Like most progressive interest in the contest, O'Neill said she's backing Saltonstall due to Stupak's anti-choice views.

"What a relief that a courageous feminist candidate stepped up to the plate to challenge the co-author of the anti-choice Stupak-Pitts Amendment," O'Neill said in a statement today. "Thanks to Connie Saltonstall, Stupak's bullying attempts to use health care reform as an opportunity to restrict women's access to abortion will be contested at the polls."

O'Neill promised NOW will send money and resources to Staltonstall through NOW's political arm, the NOW/PAC. "we look forward to sending her to Capitol Hill to fight for the rights of women and girls," O'Neill said.

On the progressive site Crooks And Liars today, the Blue America PAC endorsed Saltonstall and also promised to send money her way.

Meanwhile, Stupak is gearing up for a fight. His wife, Laurie, told me today that Stupak is prepared to fight national progressives over his anti-choice views.

"We're not surprised at that," she told me when I asked her about the growing progressive effort to depose her husband. "The Stupak Amendment has been controversial with national groups, and we understand that."

Stupak said the first district shares her husband's anti-choice views, and that he's well positioned to defend himself against angry national progressives.

"Ms. Saltonstall I'm sure is a formidable candidate," Stupak said. "And the Congressman is looks forward to attending debates, parades, candidate forums and all the other events of the campaign."

"We feel like we're in a strong position," she said when I asked her what the addition of a national focus would mean for the race. "Congressman Stupak has always been aggressive -- and if it looks like some of the pro-choice groups are going to be contributing to Ms. Saltonstall or any of the other candidates than we'll just have to adjust accordingly."

Comments (10) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (0)

March 17, 2010 7:08 PM   

In the 2008 cycle, two unions were among Stupak's biggest contributor. Not so this time around. He gets 72% of his money from PACs, lots from communications and health care. He's not an above-average fundraiser. It will be an interesting primary.

http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cycle=2010&cid=N00004196&type=I

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 17, 2010 7:14 PM   

He'll easily beat her - his district is anti-choice. However he could lose the general as he could bleed pro-choice support even if his GOP challenger is anti-choice as well.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 17, 2010 7:47 PM    in reply to Walter Mitty

This is a primary. Democratic primary voters are not anti-choice. A poll taken showed that even anti-choice voters didn't want him to torpedo healthcare.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 18, 2010 5:40 AM    in reply to FreeRider

He might have also hurt himself by revealing what a narcissistic prick he really is and his C Street affiliation/denial speaks to a streak of prevarication.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 18, 2010 10:36 AM   

Stupak is prepared to fight national progressives over his anti-choice views

This is not about his anti-choice views, it's about Stupak's anti-health reform care lies.

Stupak goes to great lengths to read "abortion funding" into the health care reform bill and then opposes it based on his "misunderstanding" of the it? No. Unless Stupak is a complete idiot, which I'm not ruling out, btw, then he opposes health care reform for some other undisclosed reason.

If Stupak can't get behind basic, Democratic legislation; if he wants to oppose Obama's signature bill; if he's not smart enough to read the bill and vote with his party; if he steadfastly refuses to do the right thing, then he has earned this primary challenge -- big time.

Unlike the GOP, the Democratic party is a big tent, but there are limits. When a person is reduced to making up stuff about what's in a bill in order to oppose it, that's pushing it. When that same legislation has been in the Democratic platform for decades, in my book, that's crossing the line.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 18, 2010 10:58 AM    in reply to regular_joe

Agreed! It's because of his (relatively) treacherous behavior that the Democratic Party primary should kick his FAMILY directed ass out of any position of political power.

I certainly don't pretend to know whether his district would be willing to elect Saltonsall to that seat. It certainly is reported as "conservative" and anti-abortion. So be it.

It's long past time to clean house in Democratic ranks and sweep the camel turds out of the big tent. To abuse yet another tent-themed expression, it's far better that those pissing on Democratic ideals are outside the tent, pissing on the surface, rather than inside, watering the campfire. He has already done too much damage to Democratic goals. I don't want him screwing around with jobs, energy and re-regulation as a "powerful Democratic sub-committee chairman".


Since it is a party primary, I have hope he can be rejected. Dang! His wife sounds as noxious as he is! Does anyone here know if independents and Republicans can crossover and vote in a Dem primary?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 18, 2010 11:15 AM   

I am from Mich 1St CD. There is no splitting tickets in our primary. People can certainly cross over but if they have a GOP candidate they want or need to vote for down ballot then they need to decide between that vote or a vote for Stupak.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 18, 2010 2:21 PM   

Stupak believes he can't be challenged because he read it in the constitution someplace & he has like 47 or 12 or a couple people that agree with him & are definitely probably with him.
Oh & for the record, he doesn't know C-Steet, can't see it from his house, doesn't know whom he pays rent to or why his share of the rent is only enough to maybe cover restroom usage & he believes in total transparency.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 18, 2010 2:25 PM   

A legislator is supposed to vote for his constituents and not his own "personal values"! His LOL statement that he only listens to MEN when evaluating his stance is despicable, if only because he is saying that he devalues women's opinion...which I would suspect is 1/2 of his constituents.

Stupak and his anti-abortion amendment is beyond the pale of a reasonable DEM...he is a DINO and needs to either be a Lieberman or GOP.

Not being one of his constituents, I can only hope they are paying attention.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

AS

user-pic

March 19, 2010 6:29 PM   

Bart Stupak stated (in an interview on FOX News) that he does not listen to the nuns because these courage women and nuns are "lower" on the Catholic Churches' hierarchy.

Help defeat Bart Stupak in his zeal to kill reform by supporting his primary challenger, Connie Saltonstall.

Visit:

http://www.actblue.com/entity/fundraisers/24052 to pledge your support for Connie Saltonstall.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on