
It all comes down to votes now. Assuming total opposition on the part of the GOP, President Obama can only enact comprehensive health care reform if 216 Democrats vote for the legislation. That will require pleading, promises, and arm-twisting, and it will also mean Democrats can't afford to lose any more yes votes between now and the end of next week.
But they already let one slip away.
Neil Abercrombie resigned at the end of February to pursue the governorship of Hawaii, and took with him an assured "yes" vote on health care reform.
Contrast that to the closest Republican analog, Georgia gubernatorial hopeful Rep. Nathan Deal (R-GA). Deal announced his retirement shortly after Abercrombie did, but was pulled back in at the last moment, before his retirement took effect, so he could vote against the health care bill.
These decisions have substantial weight. In the House, a simple majority of members present and voting is required to pass legislation. On a partisan bill like health care, that means Democrats have the incentive to keep as many yes votes on hand as possible, and Republicans have the incentive to keep as many no votes on hand as possible. But whereas Abercrombie retired abruptly, Republicans managed to keep Deal around.
What were Democrats thinking?
If health care reform fails by a vote, there will be a lot of blame to go around, but the decision to allow Abercrombie to retire will get its fair share. And yet, leading Democrats treat Abercrombie's retirement non-chalantly.
"I think Neil was determined to get moving on his gubernatorial race," DCCC chairman Chris Van Hollen told me yesterday.
House Democratic Caucus Chair John Larson placed some blame on the Senate for dragging the health care fight on as long as it has, but he also says the decision was Abercrombie's to make.
"The Senate could have acted a lot earlier," Larson told me after a Dem caucus meeting today. "If there's any quarterbacking done, it's generally about the Senate."
I pressed, asking whether leadership could've taken any steps to keep Abercrombie around until after the health care vote. "Once a person makes up their mind to do something, this is America, they're free to do it."
Easy come, easy go, right?
Well, Democrats did luck out (in a way) when Rep. Eric Massa (D-NY) resigned this week. His departure canceled out Abercrombie's vote. But if that hadn't happened, Democrats would have had to find yet another yes vote on health care--and if you hadn't noticed, that's proving to be a difficult task.
FreeRider
March 12, 2010 3:09 PM
If, if, if. If a dog had a square butt, he'd crap bricks.
*yawn*
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Aksh486
March 12, 2010 3:13 PM
That last paragraph completely negates everything in the rest of this post.
It'll be fine.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Kevin Sutton
March 12, 2010 3:50 PM in reply to Aksh486
Not really. Massa didn't leave because of Abercrombie. The Democrats lost a net of one vote because of this particular event. It may yet not matter, in the same way any one vote may not matter. But it doesn't mean it wasn't a mistake.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Clavis
March 12, 2010 4:33 PM
Democrats are ordinary politicians, distracted and corrupted by their own self-interest. In contrast, many Republicans in office are ruthlessly devoted to the cultlike Republicanite "tribe", and will take orders and tow the line in ways that Democrats just don't.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
we r all husseins
March 12, 2010 6:22 PM in reply to Clavis
Democrats reflect our respresentative democracy. Republicans reflect their preferred form of government: dictatorship.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jdb316
March 12, 2010 8:02 PM in reply to we r all husseins
And yet they're much better at selling their message and making what they do sound palatable than Democrats.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Gramps 409
March 12, 2010 10:44 PM in reply to jdb316
Once you crank up indignation, the message is lost. Fear mongering and shit stirring, that's what the Cons do best. Message? What message?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
masanf
March 12, 2010 9:53 PM in reply to we r all husseins
What stupidity. The Dems are trying to pass a bill that forces people to buy insurance from private companies and the Republicans are the dictators because they talked a guy out of retiring?
Your comment perfectly illustrates what happens when blog is dominated by individuals almost entirely on one side of the political spectrum: stupid comments that have no basis in reality whatsoever are made and people just go along with it.
The Republicans prefer dictatorship? I would ask you to back the claim, but it is so stupid, it refutes itself.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
masanf
March 12, 2010 9:55 PM in reply to Clavis
Yeah Democrats are so distracted by their own self-interest and so disinterested in pushing a doctrinaire ideology that a huge bunch of them are about to push a bill that they know a majority of their constituents don't want and that they have admitted could be costly politically. Jeez, some of you people are just fucking stupid.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Andreams
March 13, 2010 1:21 PM in reply to masanf
You sure do like to type stupid. Stupid, defined, is those people who don't understand that the only way for insurance to be affordable is if we all chip in. Stupid is also forcing us to buy from companies that care about nothing but profit. Stupid is voting down importation of drugs at a lower cost. Stupid is not establishing one giant risk pool. Guess everyone is stupid but at least we'll get some kind of reform that will help people who are denied coverage now. Stupid would be not to support the bill.
Stupid is kind of a nice word these days.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
inokeah
March 12, 2010 6:34 PM
Rep. Abercrombie knows something. This is what the Olympic Committee and the voters of Massachusetts also know.
There are way to many good Democrates bailing out, something very wrong is going on in this Whitehouse, that they don't want to be conneted with. More will be revealed.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Donald from Hawaii
March 12, 2010 6:54 PM in reply to inokeah
And you, like most of the clueless white wingnuts who populate today's GOP, obviously know bupkus about boopkus.
The simple fact of the matter is that Neil Abercrombie will be facing a contested Democratic primary with Honolulu Mayor Mufi Hannemann, and he can't very well campaign for governor of Hawaii while he's 5,000 miles away. He originally had plans to resign late last year, after the health care votes, but when the Senate dragged its heels, he put it off for four months. It was time to come home.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ICare
March 14, 2010 8:47 AM in reply to Donald from Hawaii
I'm not aware of any congressional rule that requires a member to be in D.C. at any time. If Abercrombie needs to be home to campaign, you have not adequately explained why he can't do that while waiting for a phone call to get on an airplane to go vote. Do you believe the Democrats will call for a floor vote on a moment's notice? If they have the votes, but need one more, do you believe Pelosi can't schedule a vote that allows Abercrombie time to return? Or is her ability to twist an arm limited to a few hours only?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
emears
March 12, 2010 7:11 PM in reply to inokeah
I believe more Republicans than Democrats have declared they are not running for re-election.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Starman033
March 12, 2010 9:18 PM
Travel time from Washington DC to Atlanta GA : 3.5 hours
Travel time from Washington DC to Honolulu, HI : 13 hours
Tell me how Abercrombie is would be able to campaign in his home state and serve as congressman? You are reading way too deep into something that is very unrelated.
He cannot physically do both. And he is the best candidate for gov in Hawaii.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
midnight rambler
March 13, 2010 2:31 AM in reply to Starman033
Plus, who are the options to replace him? Establishment crook Hanabusa, Blue Dog-lite Ed Case, and wannabe corporate lapdog Djou. Freakin' great. Thanks a lot Neil.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ICare
March 14, 2010 8:52 AM in reply to Starman033
Why not? He needs only to be present for a couple of votes that will be taken the same day. Are you saying that Pelosi's ability to twist an arm is limited to a few hours only, that won't allow Ambercrombie time to return to vote?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
agio
March 13, 2010 11:26 AM
Mr Ambercrombie is a very rare bird indeed: a politician with a full beard.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
June 12, 2010 7:37 PM
I'm not aware of any congressional rule that requires a member to be in D.C. at any time. If Abercrombie needs to be home to campaign, you have not adequately explained why he can't do that while waiting for a phone call to get on an airplane to go vote. Do you believe the Democrats will call for a floor vote on a moment's notice? If they have the votes, but need one more, do you believe Pelosi can't schedule a vote that allows Abercrombie time to return? Or is her ability to twist an arm limited to a few hours only?
m65 kamagra
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?