
Health care's done. Members of Congress are home, or will be soon, and will spend the next two weeks talking to their constituents about the monumental law they just passed. But when Democrats return to Washington they'll have to balance their health care sales job with a completely different, and long-brewing initiative: financial regulatory reform. And despite the complete absence of Republican support, they are confidently predicting success.
Though overshadowed in the media by the twists and turns of the health care saga, the Democrats' efforts to rein in financial industry excess and address the problem of too-big-to-fail institutions have already come a long way. Last year the House passed the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, with zero Republican votes. Last week the Senate Banking Committee advanced its bill on a perfectly party-line vote. And now, with health care behind them, Dems are ready to pivot to that legislation, and are even daring Republicans to obstruct and oppose the initiative.
"As we go forward, we will see if the Republicans are willing to reform Wall Street," Pelosi said at her weekly press conference yesterday. "Regulatory reform, Wall Street reform--we said yes, they said no."
On Sunday, AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka told me unions will also set their sites on Wall Street after health care's done.
"I can't wait for Republicans to stand with the banks against financial regulation and reform, or with the CEOs, who just gave themselves $145 billion in bonuses," Trumka said. "I can't wait for that to happen."
Thusfar, the enterprise has been a purely partisan one. But recently there have been some signs that Republicans are thawing, aware that, with the economy still in the pits, voting against imposing stricter rules on Wall Street is politically toxic. In a significant break from GOP convention, Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN)--a leading Republican reg-reform negotiator--said this week that a bill will likely pass, and the Republicans have made a huge tactical error by pulling out of negotiations.
"I find it very difficult to see a scenario where financial regulation doesn't pass the Senate," Corker said after an appearance at the Chamber of Commerce. Corker called Republicans' refusenik approach to the issue a "major strategic error," and acknowledged that, when time comes to vote, the public--on both the left and the right--will expect the public to vote yes.
That, and the passage of health care, makes Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd confident. "I think, frankly, there are a number of Republicans who went along with the strategy of 'just say no' who were never really happy with it, but if it worked they would go along," Dodd told reporters yesterday. "They saw it fail. And now they've had enough of it. And they really want to be involved in crafting things."
He'll have a chance to test that theory once members return from Easter recess next month.
theone718
March 26, 2010 10:38 AM
Talk about some serious momentum, all we need is the economy to improve some more, for it to FEEL like it is on the upswing and we can definitely stave off some major losses come November.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Docb
March 26, 2010 10:54 AM
Keep on pluggin --we know that the repubs are frozen in 'No'...serious push for the American agenda--Call and encourage them to plow thru...1.866.311.3405. Whoa Woooo!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Silence
March 26, 2010 10:55 AM
By David M. Dickson
President Obama's fiscal 2011 budget will generate nearly $10 trillion in cumulative budget deficits over the next 10 years, $1.2 trillion more than the administration projected, and raise the federal debt to 90 percent of the nation's economic output by 2020, the Congressional Budget Office reported Thursday.
In its 2011 budget, which the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) released Feb. 1, the administration projected a 10-year deficit total of $8.53 trillion. After looking it over, CBO said in its final analysis, released Thursday, that the president's budget would generate a combined $9.75 trillion in deficits over the next decade.
"An additional $1.2 trillion in debt dumped on [GDP] to our children makes a huge difference," said Brian Riedl, a budget analyst at the conservative Heritage Foundation. "That represents an additional debt of $10,000 per household above and beyond the federal debt they are already carrying."
........snip.........................
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/26/cbos-2020-vision-debt-will-rise-to-90-of-gdp/
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Ann Arbor
March 26, 2010 11:25 AM in reply to Silence
Yes, those Bush tax cuts were a fiscal disaster. Instead of preparing for the future while there was no crisis, he handed out $1.3 trillion mainly to the wealthy.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Stroszek
March 26, 2010 11:36 AM in reply to Ann Arbor
Well, now that the GOP has committed to not cutting Medicare, I'm sure they'll propose a series of tax increases to make up for lost revenue.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Stroszek
March 26, 2010 11:31 AM in reply to Silence
But last week, you guys told us that the CBO is always wrong, so no worries, right?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
aq
March 26, 2010 10:55 AM
Republican Strategery: Pick the side that's least damaging in hopes to pick up a few seats.
'Sure, we're REALLY against reform in wall street and the banking industry, but we're gonna do what makes us look the best'
I read a post the other day saying what a wonderful world it'd be if the Repubs were more than a bunch of spineless chumps and actually put forth some conservative ideas instead of just reactionary ones.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JohnW1141
March 27, 2010 10:22 AM
One of the last Democrats that I want in control of financial reform is Chris Dodd.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?