
When Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid decided that he would bump climate-and-energy legislation behind immigration reform as his next priority, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) was apoplectic. Graham, along with Sens. John Kerry (D-MA), and Joe Lieberman (I-CT), had spent months drafting a climate/energy bill, and was prepared to introduce it Monday, when, enraged by Reid's plan, he backed out.
Earlier today, Reid appeared to reverse course, saying climate/energy would be the next logical issue to address, followed only afterward by immigration reform. So everything's groovy, right?
Far from it. Tonight, Graham told me that he will filibuster his own climate change bill, unless Reid drops all plans to turn to immigration this Congress.
"Immigration was interjected before we rolled out the [climate and energy] bill not because anybody's serious about passing it, but because Harry has got a political problem with the Hispanic community," Graham told me tonight. "It makes the heavy lift of energy and climate impossible and everybody knows that."
Graham has said for days that he's dropped out of climate/energy talks, but pressed tonight, he said that he will filibuster his own bill if Reid tries to bring it up without tabling immigration altogether.
"If they can do this without me, go ahead.... I am not going to be part of an energy-climate process that has no hope of success," Graham said. "I am not going to let that happen with my vote."
That complicates things for Kerry and Lieberman, who hoped bumping their climate bill back into the lead would be enough to settle the dispute.
Graham counts himself a supporter of immigration reform in principle, but says that, in the wake of the partisan row over health care reform, he now takes the long view: a goal that may be attainable in President Obama's first term, but not now.
"What we ought to do this year is address what people in Arizona are concerned about, which is a broken border," Graham said. "We should work together this year to try to find a pathway forward, because the 2007 bill is not going to make it." But comprehensive reform will have to wait until next Congress at the earliest.
I asked him how he imagined immigration would pass in 2011 or 2012, particularly with Republicans poised to gain seats in the 2010 election.
"My belief is the Republican party will, like we did in the past...embrace comprehensive immigration reform when they think politically it's possible to do so," Graham said.
That may be wishful thinking. In 2007, Senate Republicans dealt President George W. Bush a stinging rebuke by torpedoing his immigration reform initiative.
OhioGuy
April 27, 2010 8:33 PM
Big Pink has definitely gotten to Lindsey.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mJJ
April 28, 2010 7:17 AM in reply to OhioGuy
I used to think that Senator Graham was at least sort of grown up but this little tissy-fit convinces me he has either regressed woefully OR I was just plain wrong in my initial assessment. As a Republican, I find him totally embarrasing and like a 4 year old having a tantrum. Obviously the guy has lost it!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
_jonny_5_
April 28, 2010 9:56 AM in reply to mJJ
I'm taking the ball and going home (pout...pout)
Lets call him a Whambulance...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
calchala
April 27, 2010 8:34 PM
If it aint clear by now it should be. Graham wants no conversation on immigration while McCain is running for reelection. McCain has it pretty good with Graham protecting his left and Kyl his right.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
An Outhouse
April 28, 2010 9:27 AM in reply to calchala
The republicans in Arizona blew up that plan.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
chameleon
April 28, 2010 9:31 AM in reply to calchala
That is the truth...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
GTFOOH
April 27, 2010 8:40 PM
If I don't get the big piece of chicken, I'm not going to eat my vegatables!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Rick Jones
April 27, 2010 9:39 PM in reply to GTFOOH
And then I'll hold my breath till I turn blue.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CityGuy
April 27, 2010 9:57 PM in reply to Rick Jones
So there!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
GTFOOH
April 28, 2010 12:04 AM in reply to CityGuy
...as panties bunch up in a wad!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tigerhawkvok
April 27, 2010 8:42 PM
So Graham dislikes a *different, not yet formed bill*, and is therefore going to filibuster *his own bill*?
If this isn't the flashing neon sign with searchlights and loud music declaring that the filibuster is broken, I don't know what is.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AhTrini1
April 27, 2010 8:45 PM
Oh the hypocrites know they have woken a sleeping giant with the racist AZ bill, so now they are tryng to bargain with immigration reform?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
david46
April 27, 2010 8:48 PM
Well, Graham has Pulled A Lucy again. This ia about him maybe getting renominated as a Republican in SC. One must remember that Rep. Inglis is getting primaried this year from the right--something I did not think was possible. Graham cannot get renominated if he has anything to do with a realisitic immigration bill. I never have understood why Schumer and the White House thought they could work with him on immigration.
He will keep Pulling A Lucy on the Climate bill as well despite the strong support for the bill from Duke Energy, a major power in SC. Last week, Graham was at an energy/climate meet in Charlotte hosted by Duke Energy and other very major corporate players in SC as well as, of course, NC. Evidently he is more afraid of the SC far right than the major corporate players in SC. [The CEO of Duke Energy very strongly supports the Senate Climate bill and also likes most of the House bill; I personally heard him say so at a meeting (no press allowed) in DC a few weeks ago. He was also publicly speaking in strongly in favor of it in Charlotte last week.]
Opposing the Climate bill poses a significant politcal risk for Graham. The SC far right hates him, and he cannot afford to have the Duke Powers of SC walk away from him if he wants to have any chance of getting renominated. This is the only somewhat "tough" thing they have asked him to do and if he will not deliver then what use is he.
It would be interesting to what threats McConnell and Kyl have made.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
TBender
April 27, 2010 9:01 PM
Let this happen. Please.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
david hilton
April 27, 2010 9:57 PM
Filibuster your own bill - no comment. . .
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
david hilton
April 27, 2010 9:57 PM
Filibuster your own bill - no comment. . .
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Hobbes83
April 27, 2010 10:01 PM
"Repubs show their hypocrisy again..." and in other news, water is wet.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
datglster
April 27, 2010 10:58 PM
Hey, McCain....Graham's got your back...if I were you, I'd make sure he doesn't get too close ;-) !
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mass_murdock
April 27, 2010 11:00 PM
Oh please oh please let this happen.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Leftflank
April 27, 2010 11:06 PM
Reid: Ok
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mcc
April 27, 2010 11:34 PM
Well then. If Graham's going to filibuster either way then we might as well go ahead and do immigration first?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Riyaz Guerra
April 28, 2010 12:08 AM
Screw them...if Graham filibusters his own climate bill, fast track immigration reform.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
inokeah
April 28, 2010 12:40 AM
"Climate Bill" one day will be thougt of as:
"The Flat Earth Bill" lock the non believers in the tower.
"The Dred Scott Bill" keep them, you know whats, in their place.
and Al Gore the invertor of the Internet has another GREAT idea.
It seems you Dems will believe anything!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
stavrogin2
April 28, 2010 5:08 AM in reply to inokeah
Wow, even for a troll, you're stupid.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bruno2
April 28, 2010 7:23 AM in reply to inokeah
Al Gore was instrumental in the CREATION of the internet, as he said. Anyone who prefers to believe that he claimed to "invent" it is probably ignorant enough to believe that it actually had an "inventor." Thanks again, Mr. Gore, for being decades ahead of your time, and for putting up with ridicule from lesser people than yourself.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Sir T
April 28, 2010 8:42 AM in reply to inokeah
http://www.snopes.com/quotes/internet.asp
"Despite the derisive references that continue even today, Al Gore did not claim he "invented" the Internet, nor did he say anything that could reasonably be interpreted that way. The "Al Gore said he 'invented' the Internet" put-downs were misleading, out-of-context distortions of something he said during an with Wolf Blitzer on CNN's "Late Edition" program on 9 March 1999. When asked to describe what distinguished him from his challenger for the Democratic presidential nomination, Senator Bill Bradley of New Jersey, Gore replied (in part):
"During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet. I took the initiative in moving forward a whole range of initiatives that have proven to be important to our country's economic growth and environmental protection, improvements in our educational system. "
Clearly, although Gore's phrasing might have been a bit clumsy (and perhaps self-serving), he was not claiming that he "invented" the Internet (in the sense of having designed or implemented it), but that he was responsible, in an economic and legislative sense, for fostering the development the technology that we now know as the Internet. To claim that Gore was seriously trying to take credit for the "invention" of the Internet is, frankly, just silly political posturing that arose out of a close presidential campaign."
It seems in fact that it is you trolls will actually believe anything.
I do research.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Marinus van der Lubbe
April 28, 2010 12:26 PM in reply to inokeah
Hey da kine...you sure you were a Gondolier, because you write like you went to Castle or McKinley.
Sad that an islander can be so heartless and have no aloha. You're just a menehune fucking troll.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dolstein
April 28, 2010 1:43 AM
Let me get this straight -- it's unacceptable to Graham for the Democrats to push an immigration bill for political reasons, and so he's demanding that the Democrats wait until the Republicans are willing to support immgration reform for their own political reasons.
If Graham wants to fillibuster his own energy bill, fine. If the Democrats cave in to his demands, they are merely inviting other Republicans, like Snowe and Collins, to make similar demands.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
kidchampion
April 28, 2010 7:51 AM
Sir, why does your state flag look like the muslim crescent?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mjeffn
April 28, 2010 12:06 PM in reply to kidchampion
That's the wrong question. It should be stated as follows:
Sir, in what ways does the appearance of your state flag not look like the muslim crescent?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The BBQ Chicken Madness
April 28, 2010 8:17 AM
He's going to filibuster his own bill unless Sen. Reid tables an issue that he was calling a priority a month ago?
And how are Dems not utterly destroying this yahoo's credibility?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
maya89
April 28, 2010 8:54 AM
and these are the same guys saying Arizona passed that anti-immigration law because the feds have refused to act on the issue.. now this jerk doesn't want the feds to act.. who can figure out these crackpots???
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
decisivemoment
April 28, 2010 9:34 AM
Screw him. There's no real point dealing with climate change regulation at the federal level anyway. The CAFE standards and the forced restructuring of the auto industry were all we're going to get, and even then only because it was the only way of preventing total bankruptcy.
Until the filibuster disappears and the Republican Party along with it, we're going to have to let the states deal with climate change. Maybe it's even time to delegate the authority to sign international treaties to the states. I hear Texas is already doing rather well with developing renewables to lower energy bills.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
EnnuiDivine
April 28, 2010 9:50 AM in reply to decisivemoment
And I hear Arizona has developed an alternate source of fuel based on burning the corpses of undocumented immigrants that just happened to be "detained" by the police.
Not very climate friendly, but it sure saves on oil imports.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Steve LaBonne
April 28, 2010 9:58 AM
Lindsey got outed by the SC teabaggers and is desperately flailing to try to retain some wingnut cred. End of story. Don't bother trying to find more in it than that.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
concerned parent
April 28, 2010 10:09 AM
Thou dost protest to loudly. The gop knows if the debate is about immigration this fall they are going to get walloped. They will filibuster the energy bill regardless of what dems may do so screw em. Grabs the little punks by the ears and let them scream like the little babies they are.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Perry
April 28, 2010 10:14 AM
He had better make sure he locks the Senate bathroom while he is filibustering to his own bill. It'd be pretty embarrassing for him if he got caught.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Flybynite
April 28, 2010 10:38 AM
And so we get a glimpse into the depth of Sen. Graham's concern about climate change. So more irreparable damage is done to the earth's atmosphere, what does that matter compared to Lindsey's ruffled feathers?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Powkat
April 28, 2010 11:16 AM
The Republican line on immigration is, 'Arizona had to act because the federal government hasn't.' After the atrocity in AZ, Dems say, 'We DO need to get to this sooner.' Lindsey says 'But we were going to drag out climate change until the election and then accuse you guys of not doing anything on immigration. You're spoiling our plan, that's not fair.'
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Marinus van der Lubbe
April 28, 2010 12:28 PM
Graham: "Damn right I will filibuster my own climate bill...I would even fuck my own sister if she were a man."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Metzengerstein
April 28, 2010 12:31 PM
Graham will throw his hissy fit and then after a while find some face-saving way to sign back on to the climate bill or they will find someone else to sponsor it. The climate bill is too important to GS and the other big banksters to let go. They are salivating over cap-and-trade because it is ideal for the next big financial bubble/fraud vehicle to reinflate Wall Street.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?