TPMDC

New Republican Group Sparks Worries About Party's Future


The annual Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey 'Elephant Walk' in Washington, D.C.

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

There is growing worry that a mysterious new Republican political action committee formed by Bush-era heavyweights including Karl Rove could harm the Republican National Committee down the line. As we've been reporting about the RNC's woes and chairman Michael Steele's tenure, more and more GOPers tell me that Rove's new "American Crossroads" group spells trouble.

"That is very destructive to the party," a former very high-ranking RNC official told me in an interview today. The official said the group, which already has $30 million in donor pledges but does not seem to have an active Web site, will have broad implications for the RNC if it is successful during this election cycle.

The former official told me that my story about Steele sparring with Rove and his allies offers a glimpse at where the new group is headed. "They are gathering the sinews of power and drawing off RNC resources. If they have the power, the party will have to turn back to them for leadership," he said.

As I reported yesterday, Steele allies believe that he didn't do himself any favors by clearing house of the nearly 100 RNC staffers when he took the helm in 2009. They suggested the Bush-era consultants and staffers who were booted may have fanned the flames of the anti-Steele political fire ignited when spending reports showed a $2,000 tab at a bondage-themed nightclub.

As Steele's problems picked up steam in recent weeks, American Crossroads formed and generated buzz -- though those involved with the group say privately there is nothing to worry about. In addition to Rove, former RNC Chairmen Mike Duncan and Ed Gillespie are on board. An RNC spokesman also told me that these groups "will help all Republicans as we move towards November. But it comes as top Republicans like Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council are encouraging donors to put their money into other groups. Other GOPers say there has been an uptick in donations and new members joining outside political groups and the campaign committees.

If Rove and his team do raise the cash they are boasting about, the RNC will run out of money and the old Bush team will be controlling the finances of the party, the official griped. That may leave top donors looking to American Crossroads and others instead of to the national party in future cycles.

"This is drawing [donors] away from the party and into something else, and its very formation is communicating to the donors nationally that there is no confidence in the Republican party," the former official said. He suggested this would allow the RNC's donor base to atrophy and put the next chairman in a position of needing to completely rebuild.

Several other RNC members and GOP operatives told me about similar concerns in recent days, and one specifically suggested that Gillespie is aiming to lead the next Republican convention in 2012.

Comments (62) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (3)

April 16, 2010 12:19 PM   

Oh, dear Lord, please let the Republican party fracture into little separate pieces!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 17, 2010 1:46 PM    in reply to LindyLou

Now I can give them both money: they'll spend it trying to kill each other like tarantulas in a jar

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 16, 2010 12:20 PM   

I don't see how this is a bad thing. It just means that there will be a shadow RNC.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 17, 2010 9:38 AM    in reply to Maritza

Put this development together with the Supreme Court decision declaring that a corporation is a person and can donate money to election campaigns.
Rove will be gathering up all that Big Oil, Big Insurance, Wall Street Bank money and controlling the RNC in short order.
Those people that said that ruling wouldn't change things that much didn't take Karl "the Bagman" Rove into account.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 17, 2010 3:51 PM    in reply to Maritza

Can darkness have a shadow?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 17, 2010 11:49 PM    in reply to wake up

Ooooohhhhh yes, you can be certain that darkness has a shadow.
It's where all the people in the Party of "Hell No You Can't" hide.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 18, 2010 11:41 AM    in reply to wake up

Hilarious !

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 18, 2010 12:40 AM    in reply to Maritza

A shadow RNC, how novel.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 18, 2010 12:45 AM    in reply to Maritza

in the RNC, even the arras has a curtain behind it
and so on ad infinite

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 16, 2010 12:30 PM   

Are there rules the RNC has to abide by that the Shadow RNC doens't? Is this a way to get around the law?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 16, 2010 1:39 PM    in reply to MNPundit

What law? Post-"Citizen's United", there is effectively no law.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 16, 2010 12:33 PM   

I wonder where the Cheney tag-team stands in this mess? Liz has been awful quiet lately, and we hear nothing at all from the Dark One.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 16, 2010 12:45 PM   

Mike Duncan is still chairman of board of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). Is he permitted to engage in political fund raising while employed by the government? I thought that was a violation of the Hatch Act.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

mcc

user-pic

April 16, 2010 12:48 PM   

Doesn't really sound like a shadow RNC to me. Sounds just more like another Republican faction-- an outside group for Bush Neocons, to add to the outside groups that the business conservatives and the religious right already have. The Republicans' big coalition is breaking down into its constituent components and this sounds like just another one of those components.

If we have a bunch of factional mini-RNCs, each with their own priorities and vision of what the Republican party should be, plus an actual RNC that's basically disfunctional, then we'll be going in to this election with all these groups potentially working at cross purposes and nobody pushing for The Republicans in a partisan sense except Fox News. (Which... well, actually might be all they need to win.)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 16, 2010 12:59 PM    in reply to mcc

Fox OWNS the GOP.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 16, 2010 1:29 PM    in reply to jeffgee

you mean "OWES"...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 16, 2010 1:30 PM    in reply to JEP07

and vice versa,
doncha know,
they're clutched, an embrace,
kinda quid-pro-quo.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 16, 2010 12:52 PM   

This is likely just another pressure point to get Steele out from his Chairmanship. What I imagine we'll see is that AC will continue to raise "pledges" of money, and when Steele leaves the RNC, we'll get a Bushie to replace him...all those pledges will simply shift over to the RNC.

I hope it's a true fracture in the GOP, but I doubt it's the case. The money is going to go somewhere, and it's going to be used in elections either way.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 16, 2010 1:43 PM    in reply to The BBQ Chicken Madness

You are probably correct. After all, Steele won't be chairman forever. And those Bushbots DID love being in power, creating their "own realities" and such. This may help get Steele out even sooner, and insures a ready group of Bushbots to replace him and his.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

mcc

user-pic

April 16, 2010 2:40 PM    in reply to CityGuy

The big push against Steele this last month or so originated WITHIN the Republican party, remember. The Daily Caller broke the lesbian bondage story in the first place. I don't think it would be surprising at all if we found out later that Rove / "American Crossroads" manufactured (in the sense of seeding and hyping the media) the recent scandal and push against Steele's leadership specifically so that they would have an excuse to introduce their alternative-RNC group they'd been planning.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 16, 2010 1:28 PM   

Between the AC group and the Teamob, there's not much left on the fundraising carcass fore the vultures from the RNC to pick at.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

TJ1

user-pic

April 16, 2010 2:47 PM   

Which is the tea party faction? The "New Republican Party" or the Rove Gillespie faction?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 17, 2010 5:30 PM    in reply to TJ1

Neither. It's the Faux Faction.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 16, 2010 4:17 PM   

And here I thought Republican politicians were responsible for the demise of The Republican Party.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 16, 2010 6:44 PM   

Stipulated that anything that involves Karl Rove is a crime wrapped inside an obscenity, but from a Republican point of view, how is keeping money out of the hands of Michael Steele a bad thing?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 17, 2010 8:44 AM   

Good thing there are so many well intentioned Christians in the Republican Party. At least nobody has to worry about money going unaccounted for. You can be sure that nobody would divert money into their own pocket, because that would be wrong. Good thing they have a trustworthy fellow like that Mr. Rove. He seems to have a good head on his shoulders. He'll make sure everything is on the up and up. Their troubles are over. That was easy.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 17, 2010 9:33 AM   

American "Crossroads", you say?
Would that be the crossroads at Hwy 61 and 49 in Clarksdale, Miss?
The one where Robert Johnson sold his soul to THE DEVIL for his guitar skill?
Wasn't the (theoretically) dead Lee Atwater a guitarist?
Karl Rove, you say?
And Haley "Bossman" Barbour is contemplating a run for the White House?
Where's Hunter Thompson when you need him?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 17, 2010 5:32 PM    in reply to Dave5

So true. I would LOVE to read "Fear and Loathing at C Street."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 17, 2010 12:34 PM   

The Republican party is splintering. If only the Democrats would do the same. There will never be a better time for Progressives to claim their share of party resources while separating themselves from conservadems. I know this site is mainly for party-line Dems, but before you scream "Naderite", consider the possibility of a party you don't constantly have to apologize for. With a 4-way split, an anti-corporate, anti-war party would have a real chance.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 17, 2010 2:08 PM    in reply to metetzky

A real chance of what? Forming a coaltion with the people you hate? Yay.

The only difference between multiparty systems and two party systems is that in multiparty systems the voters can don a mantle of false moral superiority because the deals that are necessary to the formation of a governing coalition will be done by the the politicians after the election rather than by the voters before.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 17, 2010 3:44 PM    in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve

Agreed.

Now about that legal research on the HCR bill you were going to do... :)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Lee

user-pic

April 17, 2010 2:03 PM   

Steele allies believe that he didn't do himself any favors by clearing house of the nearly 100 RNC staffers when he took the helm in 2009. They suggested the Bush-era consultants and staffers who were booted may have fanned the flames of the anti-Steele political fire ignited when spending reports showed a $2,000 tab at a bondage-themed nightclub.

Sounds like the equivalent of disbanding the Iraqi army, haha.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 17, 2010 2:47 PM   

No one has ever, ever invited me to a bondage-themed night-club.
Not once, never, Nada! What's wrong with me?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 17, 2010 3:23 PM    in reply to Mooser

You need to network. Go to the men's bathroom in the airport or a public park at night. Meet some nice republicans, have a little fun, get invited to all of the gay ole parties.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 17, 2010 3:07 PM   

A covert shadow organization with big money donors is just what the GOP wants. That way Rove and his cohorts can engage in Rove style dirty politics under wraps and shield the RNC. Even if Steele were not a diaster, Rove would likely want to form such as group. It is his standard MO, but now Steele's mishaps provide him with an excellent fund raising tool.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 17, 2010 4:15 PM   

It's actually called "Un-American Crossburners." Steele won't budge, so they have to start up their Jim Crow-style country club all over again.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 17, 2010 4:35 PM   

I love the picture. PT Barnum is probably the most appropriate poster child the GOP could ask for. Caveat Emptor, Buyer Beware, There's a sucker born every minute. That pretty much sums up their utopian vision.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 17, 2010 5:56 PM    in reply to rustbelt

Agreed. I'm a fuddy duddy, so I'm not too keen on editorializing with unflattering portraits. I can support visual irony and snark though.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 17, 2010 11:14 PM    in reply to rustbelt

I don't know who is in charge of picking the photos for the stories, but it is definitely one of the things TPM does best. Their photos add another aspect to the story that you won't find in other publication/news outlets.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 17, 2010 5:00 PM   

To me, its an indication of what I have been telling people. The democratic party should split into 3 parties, the reps into 2 or 3, and then they would be intellectually honest. But the American system symply does not do third parties. Its 2 parties or nothing. SO you get these huge awkward umbrella groups of people that privately hate one another. Right now the real democratic opposition to the Democratic party is the Democratic party.

If the Republicans are splintering it can only be a good thing in the long run as its the only way the moderates will regain control. They will have to lose an election hard to do it though.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 18, 2010 12:14 AM    in reply to Sir T

The splintering of the Republican party is a progressive's wet dream. However, I will not hold my breath. The various factions crave power too much to go their separate ways. They will put their party first, in the end.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 17, 2010 5:26 PM   

Pass the popcorn!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 17, 2010 5:43 PM   

when the republican party starts fighting itself, i can only hope that there will be a schism between the fringe hard right'ers and the much more palatable moderate Meghan McCain style republicans...

that way we can actually get back to governing the country in a bi-partisan manner while the fringers howl in the wilderness

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 17, 2010 8:34 PM   

The way I see it, Republicans, or I should say those self identified who are of the hopefuls of the Tea Party persuasion are the closest party we have to Duct Tape politicians. They will be the demise of the GOP. They know how to put patches on things with band-aids and duct tape, but never actually fix things. It's because they only see the symptoms of the problem, and have no clue how to do an actual and meaningful legislative repair job. But then each and every career politician carries duct tape. And now it'll be free courtesy of the unlimited donation warehouse of duct tape owned by the corporations.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 17, 2010 9:40 PM   

This is what happens when humans eat their own. ( cannibalism ) A desease forms in the brain, and they go crazy.... And god knows that the GOP,the teabaggers and those armed militia idiots are exibiting sick, crazy,racist behavior... So, why should`nt we expect a snot nosed, chicken hawk, treasoness, coward like Karl Rove to continue to exibit his insane devisive ways... I`m lovin` it... lol...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 18, 2010 1:08 PM    in reply to dbl.r7711

fyi: Catholics practice cannibalism...its their highest sacrament to eat the flesh and drink teh blood of christ...

what does that say about the Catholic religion as a whole AND the people who follow the faith

(creeps me the eff out)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 17, 2010 9:49 PM   

Crap...Karl Rove cast in 2012 US elections playing the role of Newt Gingrich in the 1994 live-action historical remake, "Lethal Contract on America: Part Deux."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 17, 2010 9:52 PM    in reply to Impishparrot

P.S. I understand Michael Steele is being considered for the part of Ned Beatty in the remake of the 1972 Jon Voight movie,'Deliverance.'

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 17, 2010 11:24 PM   

It only makes sense.

That administration looted the treasury before it left so
it was just a matter of time it turned it's blood sucking
fangs into in self.

So....Drink up!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 18, 2010 12:28 AM   

Steele, as much of a jackass as he is, is also a figure with underestimated unscrupulousness and street-smarts that no one should attempt to corner. Methinks that if he goes down, he'll drag more enemies down with him than most currently suspect. One can only hope.

BTW, the TPM-selected image is, as pointed out, indeed astute, but it is also a reminder of the disgraceful predicament faced by one of nature's most glorious creatures in this Twenty-First Century, that of a dwindling habitat due to humans vs being exploited for petty entertainment, once again, by humans. We really can do better.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 18, 2010 12:37 AM   

Who f-ing cares?

Screw them.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 18, 2010 12:41 AM   

As far as elephants go -- they can go extinct as far as I'm concerned. And I'm typically very concerned about the environment.

But elephants -- standing for a bunch of hateful, ignorant people? If that's all they stand for, then they can go to hell as far as I'm concerned. They're going extinct anyway. Let the Rethugs see them in the circus and let them go extinct.

I hate elephants.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 18, 2010 3:27 AM   

We saw what a little splinter group like the Tea Baggers did in NY-23, a Democratic gain after 150 years of being Republican. Can you imagine in the fall when the Republican vote is split not only by the Tea Baggers but by Rove's bunch of crooks too?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 18, 2010 7:56 AM   

Conservatives spend millions for political power, but not one red cent for job creation. Meanwhile, the *pachydermata* patrol the streets of Washington.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 18, 2010 11:52 AM   

Politics is always a struggle for power, and those struggles have always gone on inside each party in addition to the more visible struggles BETWEEN the parties.

The article seems to try to paint a sympathetic picture of Steele. He has caught a lot of flak and there are two sides to every story. However, Steele's problems result mostly from his own arrogance and the fact that he is clearly trying to use this position as a launching point for his own personal ambitions. That certainly is not unprecedented, but in his case, his ambitions are not warranted. People correctly see him as a fake -- an empty suit -- a little guy with a big mouth. His problem, as a friend of mine used to say about characters like this, is "he has an abundance of lack."

That is why he is in trouble. If Steele were raising lots of money and providing strong leadership behind the scenes, there wouldn't be any other groups trying to eat his lunch.

Having said that, $30M isn't a lot of money, if that is Rove's target. That is enough money to maintain a slush fund to conduct dirty tricks, which is Rove's modus operandi. But it isn't nearly enough money to support campaigns across the country the way a healthy RNC would do.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 18, 2010 12:03 PM   

The only way this fractures the GOP is if American Crossroads backs non-RNC candidates. If they are backing the same candidates it is just an alternative vehicle for fund raising, probably because the RNC has been such a mess and scared money away.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

drv

user-pic

April 18, 2010 1:55 PM    in reply to MASON

The GOP is already fractured. It's just that we only hear from the tea bag faction. But the establishment faction is still around.

The creation of the AC is the beginning of the de-teabagification of the GOP and the marginalization of Sarah Palin. There are lots of smart, establishment Republicans who understand the threat SP and her ilk are to the party. They have been sitting by while the tea baggers have been running amock and making inroads in the RNC. This is their move to begin to take the party back.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 18, 2010 12:04 PM   

This will be just another key on the Wurlitzer. The GOP is remarkably decentralized that way -- they have think tanks, newspapers, a TV network, generals up the wazoo, talk radio, "concerned citizen" groups, militias, corporate leaders, religious entities, an entire fictional grassroots party. This is how they do business -- 3 card montie, always moving the shells. It all started with the Plumbers group -- Nixon's own personal espionage force.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 18, 2010 4:29 PM   

The whole idea of the "Tea Party" was to find a way to make the Republican party viable again, despite having developed such a terrible brand. Turning away from the RNC is more of the same.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 18, 2010 5:45 PM   

Oy vey..

Jewish support for the Jug Eared idiot is down 36%

http://www.mclaughlinonline.com/6?article=28

"They should be..uh..they should be thankin' meh"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 18, 2010 6:34 PM    in reply to Barney

You say that like it is a bad thing.

Personally I don't want the Israeli's effectively in control of America as they have been the past 50 years. They still dominate the banking system and the tops of the most powerful corporations, so it isn't as if they have given up any power. Basically we have seen over and over again that the Israelis have the power to effectively order our troops into wars that cost us thousands of lives and trillions of dollars.

We still have some work to do to get that number down to about 10% where it should be.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 18, 2010 5:46 PM   

hay are those Elephants holding each other by the
tail or what ??

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on