Howard Dean Tells TPMDC: 'Big Night' For Progressives

"Progressive"? What's that supposed to mean?

RE Kentucky:

With all this supposed motivation on the right, with a marquee name teacreature in Rand Paul, here's what I took out of yesterday's primary vote in Kentucky, the numbers - Democrats 448,000 votes, Republicans 330,000 votes.

THIS is what the teabaggers call a "big victory."

I French-laugh in their faces: (snorted through the nose) "Hoh, hoh, hoh!"

I can't WAIT for teabaggers and progressives to get together. Meet me down at the corporate banker's house with a pitchfork.

"My belief is that progressive Dems are a lot more appealing to mainstream voters than tea party advocates,"

Howard Dean,

You are so right, mainstream voters are now made up of 'non-citizens' and progressive seditious, these voters do prefer the 'Living Constitution' to the Constitution and 'Rulers Law' to the 'Rule of Law'.

Thanks Howard for making a great argument for validating U.S. Citizenship when people register to vote and vote...soon your dirty little secret will be common knowledge!

Very soon all States within this Union will have Photo ID and validation of citizenship Laws to prevent your vision of 'mainstream voters' from voting, remember only citizens are entitled to vote...lets enforce the law to keep it that way!

Ha...Ha...Ha! You must be a seditious progressive without an gram of 'Common Sense'. There is tons of evidence everywhere of illegals and non-citizens voting, you just have to be objective and nonpartisan to find out for yourself!

The Threat of Non-Citizen Voting

While I do not intend to argue this question on the present occasion, let me ask, if it be not somewhat singular that, if the Constitution were intended to be, by its framers and adopters, a slave-holding instrument, why neither slavery, slaveholding, nor slave can anywhere be found in it.--Frederick Douglass

Like most seditious progressives you misread, twist and warp the Constitution to suite your socialist dogma, the Constitution never promoted slavery or condone slavery only protected the institution for Southern States inclusion into the Union.

The Founders hoped the institution of slavery would be vanquished from the Union within twenty-five years after the adoption of the Constitution. Unfortunately with the invention of the 'Cotton Gin' slavery became more profitable for the Southern States and it took 'Republicans' to end the institution of slavery in America.

No evidence of illegals voting hollywoo? What exactly would you consider a credible source on the matter? Would a U.S. House of Representatives be considered a reliable source. Because the House determined that in a 1996 congressional race in california 748 votes were cast and initially recorded by illegal aliens. These votes were only disqualified after a lengthy investigation by a contested election task force set up by the house. Those votes by the way represented about 75% of the margin of victory in that race. I doubt that race is an isolated incident, and with razor thin margins in many races these days it is possible perhaps even likely that illegals have provided the margin of victory in some races