
House Democrats are home for a long Memorial Day break with a gift-wrapped wedge issue delivered just in time for district campaigning. One of their final actions before adjourning late Friday was passing a measure that would strip tax breaks for companies that ship jobs overseas by a 215-204 vote.
Sure, wedge issues are usually social in nature, but the Democrats stand ready to divide crucial midterm election voters on economic policy. Democratic campaign types are thrilled with the timing of the vote, saying the outsourcing issue gives candidates the perfect platform to repeat Mark Critz's successful campaign that helped him win the special election in Pennsylvania's 12th Congressional district earlier this month. One Democrat said the Republican opposition to addressing outsourcing "will be a clear line in the sand" that members are being asked to highlight back home next week.
"They are voting against jobs," the Democrat said in a preview of television attack ads and pressure campaigns Republicans can expect this week.
Rep. Anh "Joseph" Cao (R-LA) was the lone GOPer to agree with the majority party, though Republicans are quick to point out that 34 House Democrats opposed the outsourcing amendment.
For few dozen members in both Republican and Democratic primaries from Virginia to California, the week gives them a chance to give voters one last pitch for why they should stay in office. Those primaries are for seats that are considered safe for the fall.
Promising to end tax breaks for companies who outsource jobs was always one of Barack Obama's loudest applause lines when he was a candidate for president, and Democrats have adopted similar rhetoric, especially in states harmed by NAFTA.
DCCC Chairman Rep. Chris Van Hollen told reporters last week that outsourcing was the biggest issue in the PA-12 race and boasted that the Democrats would give Critz (D-PA) another chance to shore up his promises and earn him reelection for a full term this fall. Labor unions, of course, have joined in to pressure Republicans on the issue.
On another topic, members have shored up their own cred with progressives they need to show up this November by passing a measure to repeal Don't Ask, Don't Tell. It still needs to get through the Senate, but with the deal Democrats struck with the White House and the Pentagon, there's a good chance it will become reality this year. The DNC's Organizing for America on Friday started a campaign to get supporters to sign on to calls for the bill to pass Congress and be signed by Obama. Expect to hear more about it in the coming weeks as well.
Meanwhile, the GOP is going to say that Democrats punted the budget by putting off votes on the spending blueprint before leaving. They'll keep it up on fiscal responsibility attacks throughout the campaign.
House Minority Leader John Boehner -- who hopes to become speaker if the Republicans can win enough seats -- wrote a memo Friday saying Democrats "squandered" the last seven weeks because of "zero action on a budget to rein in federal spending and boost job creation" among other things.
The Democrat compared the new push to their effort to expose hypocritical Republicans for opposing the $787 billion stimulus funds but bragging about the spending in their home districts. The issue is "very potent" for voters, the Democrat said.
A GOP aide said the Republicans also will call out Democrats for not hosting town halls, saying that the majority party is "continuing to ignore the voices of their constituents at every turn."
TPMDC obtained a memo from House Democratic leadership to members asking they campaign during the break (which they call a "district work period") on the votes they took on jobs and the economy. They also are continuing to campaign on the implementation of the health care law, especially since many of its benefits are kicking in earlier than expected.
They also are urging members host military-focused Memorial Day events.
On the Senate side it's likely to be a little quieter, with the exception of Sen. Blanche Lincoln being locked in a tight runoff Democratic primary battle with Lt. Gov. Bill Halter in Arkasas. She's also being hit over NAFTA as Arkansas jobs have emerged as a top campaign issue.
Arundhati
May 31, 2010 9:46 AM
And dimocrats love wedgies.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Patterman
May 31, 2010 2:30 PM in reply to Arundhati
what, and rethuglikans like yourself don't? Cum'on, who you kiddin'? Abortion, gay marriage, flag burning -- wedgie has been the hallmark of real Rethuglikans for decades.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hopper_i
May 31, 2010 10:33 PM in reply to Arundhati
come on people. What kind of title is that? Who are we driving a wedge between with this issue? CEO's and everybody else? How about "Democrats Plan To Use The Recess to Hammer Republicans for Shipping Jobs Overseas"
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mcc
May 31, 2010 10:49 PM in reply to hopper_i
They're trying to drive a wedge between Republican voters' votes and Republican voters' self-interest?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Chabuka
June 2, 2010 2:07 AM in reply to Arundhati
So..you like tax breaks to companies who ship your job over-seas...? Are you completey "rat in the sh*t house crazy"...? My God how the hell do you benefit, how do you feed yourself, put a roof over your stupid head, get medical attention, for your self, your spouse or your children when some Chinese (Viet Namese, Indian, Mexican, etc., worker has your job for/at 50 cents an hour...? Are you completely blind stupid in your hatred, or just a Corporatist (another word for fascist) of some kind...? If so, get the hell out of here and go peddle your wares to the GOP/Blue Dog members of Congress...the peasants aren't buying your tarnished "Corporations/free market is GOOD ..Government (regulation) is Bad" crap, any more
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
conniptionfit
May 31, 2010 10:26 AM
Great idea. Too bad it doesn't have a hope in hell of passing the Senate. Obama ran on this issue. I hope he comes out swinging for it. I can't think of any good reason for American taxpayers to continue to fiance outsourcing jobs during a recession.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Cornelius
May 31, 2010 11:08 AM in reply to conniptionfit
You are correct but hoping Obama comes out swinging will only result in more disappointment. He's only shadow boxing for his corporate sponsors, said to say.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreemanW
June 1, 2010 2:22 AM in reply to Cornelius
Are you kidding?
When he sells out and pushes for a bill to increase H1B Visa's and other measures for the corporations--measures that will further provide employer leverage against a desperate labor pool of unemployed and under-employed . . .
I can hear the Obama lovers now.
At least it's a start!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Steaming Pile
May 31, 2010 7:26 PM in reply to conniptionfit
Reconciliation will get it done.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mcc
May 31, 2010 10:55 PM in reply to Steaming Pile
Hm, this is an interesting idea, but it may not be possible to do it in the short term. Reconciliation is a bit complicated as a process and I think you have to pass "reconciliation instructions" early in the year stating what you want to use reconciliation for in this year's budget in order to use reconciliation later in the year. Did the "reconciliation instructions" for this year contain anything about offshoring tax breaks/penalties?
(Note I could be wrong about the process here.)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
zenzane
May 31, 2010 10:36 AM
Well, this is great as political tactics, but obscures the real issue: manufacturing has become much more efficient [something to do with that computer-revolution thing a while back]. According to "Manufacturing is not Dead" on Fivethirtyeight.com, manufacturing is growing quite nicely in the United States. It's the jobs that have gone bye-bye. I'm all for giving tax incentives to companies to create jobs here and disincentives for shipping them overseas, but let's get on to dealing with the real issue: greater productivity means less labor required.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Richardxx
May 31, 2010 2:22 PM in reply to zenzane
The jobs that are being shipped overseas are to a great extent deskilled jobs that can be done by labor with less training. If the employers were to instead spend money retraining their work force, create new jobs specifically so that they don't have to lay off existing work force (high profits being less important than keeping trained and motivated workers on the job) and work to cover health care for employees who go out to create new businesses, those jobs would stay here in the U.S. and our overall productivity would climb much faster.
Wall Street would not get immediate short-term profits out of it and executive bonuses, tied to short-term gains, would not be as large. Removing tax breaks from firms that export jobs would be a major step towards refocusing companies towards longer term business-building as opposed to the short-term quarter-by-quarter executive bonus building that currently is destroying American productivity.
It's a lot easier to do financial calculations to predict short-term gains than it is to predict the gains from a better trained, experienced workforce, so the bankers will fight it every step. Top managers prefer to manage things that can be neatly reduced to paper descriptions on a profit-and-loss statement. But building a business cannot be reduced to just the data in a statement of profit and loss. You can't exchange management of finances for experience building a business and compete with others building businesses. Computerizing jobs and making them more efficient isn't the problem. Using that to skim excessive "profits" from the business and destroying jobs in the process is the problem.
If the focus of business becomes to build, keep and add jobs rather than strictly making a fast-buck profit and removing it from the business then computerizing jobs ceases to be a problem and becomes a benefit.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
cimabuehw
June 1, 2010 10:37 AM in reply to Richardxx
Technical jobs are also being outsourced. Outsourcing involves many more problems than just those created by outsourcing unskilled jobs. Engineers of all kinds are also seeing their jobs outsourced. I also question your assumption that everyone can improve their horizons by more advanced training since it assumes that all have equal intellectual ability.
Had you made the argument that we need to make sure technical training is directed toward our current and future needs rather than obsolete needs; and that our work force needs to be retrained for our current and future needs, I would have agreed with you.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Stretch, PhD
May 31, 2010 10:50 AM
At the risk of sounding like a xenophobe, I'm all for keeping phone banks in the US of A. I speak American English, and it's just plain easier to talk to somebody who speaks the same version of English. And, after spending three hours on the line with a poorly trained, thick-accented Indian who eventually tried to pin the blame for a manufacturer's defect on me, I'm done with outsourced call centers.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Given Up
May 31, 2010 10:59 AM in reply to Stretch, PhD
Amen.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rwc
May 31, 2010 4:32 PM in reply to Given Up
ditto
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Hobbes83
May 31, 2010 12:18 PM in reply to Stretch, PhD
You don't sound bad for that, I think the same thing and I'm probably the most open-minded person out there.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
midnight rambler
May 31, 2010 2:14 PM in reply to Stretch, PhD
Actually, having dealt with both, I've found that Indians are a lot more polite when blaming the manufacturer's defect on me. Has it been so long that everyone has forgotten what assholes Americans in call centers are?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Cornelius
May 31, 2010 4:24 PM in reply to midnight rambler
Yes but I can understand the Americans when they give me an attitude.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
DavisDem
May 31, 2010 2:17 PM in reply to Stretch, PhD
It's always such fun talking to "Bob" or "Susan" in Mumbai, but midnight rambler is right that the nationality of the call center isn't usually makes it such a hell to deal with.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Matt Jones
May 31, 2010 11:28 AM
Boner:
Because apparently 7 weeks of Republicans obstructing and delaying anything that might restrict their homeboys on Wall Street is *Democrats'* fault. Makes *perfect* sense!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Cornelius
May 31, 2010 12:40 PM in reply to Matt Jones
It really doesn't matter. the Jobs Bill is chump change anyway.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rwc
May 31, 2010 4:45 PM in reply to Cornelius
It's like Bill Maher says: "This is because we don’t have a left and a right party in this country any more. We have a center right party, and a crazy party. And over the last thirty odd years, Democrats have moved to the right, and the right has moved into a mental hospital."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Hobbes83
May 31, 2010 12:20 PM
With all the Republicans bitching about the economy and asking "where are the jobs?" you would think that they would have introduced legislation like this. They will do anything, including exposing the broad hypocrisy inherent in their current message to attack the left.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
It's Pat
May 31, 2010 4:05 PM in reply to Hobbes83
It's Opposite Day every day for the GOP. Whatever President Obama or the Democrats are for, they are against -- even if it means voting against something they initially proposed.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Leftflank
May 31, 2010 12:41 PM
The GOOP is going to keep attacking on "Fiscal Responsibility".
That's the joke of the day, year, decade & last 30 years. They attacked it alright, & completely destroyed it.
The GOOP & fiscal responsibility are an oxymoron.
That is a wedge issue within a wedge issue.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
timba
May 31, 2010 2:58 PM
The same Senate that ruined HCR will ruin this and Obama will help them do it. What a disaster this Adminstration has been on nearly every important issue.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
May 31, 2010 5:54 PM
unbelievable. the gop cannot even bring themselves to support this. i wonder if they truly believe in their vote or are just doing this to try to keep the obama andmin and this congress from passing legislation that helps regular working americans.
this really is unpatriotic-not wanting to take away tax breaks for these companies that move to foreign countries. the gop just stated that they agree with this by their vote.
why do middle/working class whites keep voting for these morons?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bill
June 1, 2010 2:35 AM
Here's what Obama has done:
1. Ignored previous Republican profligacy, crimes, misdemeanors – now, he cant 'run against Bush' because he never called him out on any of things he did, because it simply does not ring true to wait two years to say 'they did wrong'.
2. Supported a stingy stimulus that was a third tax breaks - now, cant say 'we've done every thing we can', because, when he had a chance, he didnt.
3. Doubled-down, the accelerated the Bush bailouts (effectively closing off any other options to address the recession) - now, he has put the nation's money into the banks and, by so doing, has closed off his options for job creation, unemployment insurance, etc. and exacted no cooperation from the financial industry.
4. Escalated a meaningless and fruitless war - now, he has added to the nation's debt and shame; another trillion dollar debacle, another Vietnam, another squandering of national wealth and prestige.
5. Gutted real financial reform - now, no Glass-Steagle, no 'too big too fail.
6. Not helped people with bankruptcy & mortgages remediation - now, yet another failed 'attempt' to help individuals, while the financial industry posts record profits.
7. Fiddled around & not passed a jobs bill - Still the highest unemployment since the 1930s.
8. Rejected the only option that would have simultaneously extended coverage and cut costs (single payer) - now, so convoluted no one, not even the ones who voted for it, can defend it.
9. Promoted off shore drilling - enough said.
So, what can the Democrats do over the recess? Find a Democratic candidate for President.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
It's Pat
June 1, 2010 3:16 AM in reply to bill
"So, what can the Democrats do over the recess? Find a Democratic candidate for President."
You should call each and every one of them to suggest that, lol
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
It's Pat
June 1, 2010 3:14 AM
Things President Obama/Democratic Congress has done:
Saved the collapse of the American automotive industry by making GM restructure before bailing them out, and putting incentive money to help the industry
Attractive tax write-offs for those who buy hybrid automobiles
Authorized construction/opening of additional health centers to care for veterans
“Cash for clunkers” program offers vouchers to trade in fuel inefficient, polluting old cars for new cars; stimulates auto sales
Changed the failing/status quo military command in Afghanistan
Closed offshore tax safe haven
Ended media “blackout” on war casualties; reporting full information
Ended previous policy of awarding no-bid defense contracts
Ended previous policy of cutting the FDA and circumventing FDA rules
Ended previous practice of forbidding Medicare from negotiating with drug manufacturers for cheaper drugs; the federal government is now realizing hundreds of millions in savings
Ended previous practice of having White House aides rewrite scientific and environmental rules, regulations, and reports
Ended previous policy of not regulating and labeling carbon dioxide emissions
Ended previous policy of offering tax benefits to corporations who outsource American jobs; the new policy is to promote in-sourcing to bring jobs back
Ended previous policy on torture; the US now has a no torture policy and is in compliance with the Geneva Convention standards
Ended previous practice of protecting credit card companies; in place of it are new consumer protections from credit card industry’s predatory practices
Ended previous “stop-loss” policy that kept soldiers in Iraq/Afghanistan longer than their enlistment date
Energy producing plants must begin preparing to produce 15% of their energy from renewable sources
Established a National Performance Officer charged with saving the federal government money and making federal operations more efficient
Established a new cyber security office
Expanded the SCHIP program to cover health care for 4 million more children
Expanding vaccination programs
Federal support for stem-cell and new biomedical research
Funds for high-speed, broadband Internet access to K-12 schools
Immediate and efficient response to the floods in North Dakota and other natural disasters
Improved housing for military personnel
Improved conditions at Walter Reed Military Hospital and other military hospitals
Improving benefits for veterans
Increased infrastructure spending (roads, bridges, power plants…) after years of neglect
Increasing opportunities in AmeriCorps program
Increasing pay and benefits for military personnel
Increasing student loans
Instituted a new policy on Cuba, allowing Cuban families to return “home” to visit loved ones
Limited salaries of senior White House aides; cut to $100,000
Limits on lobbyists’ access to the White House
Limits on White House aides working for lobbyists after their tenure in the administration
Lower drug costs for seniors
Making more loans available to small businesses
Negotiated deal with Swiss banks to permit US government to gain access to records of tax evaders and criminals
New federal funding for science and research labs
New funds for school construction
Ordered all federal agencies to undertake a study and make recommendations for ways to cut spending
Ordered a review of all federal operations to identify and cut wasteful spending and practices
Phasing out the expensive F-22 war plane and other outdated weapons systems, which weren’t even used or needed in Iraq/Afghanistan
Reengaged in the treaties/agreements to protect the Antarctic
Removed restrictions on embryonic stem-cell research
Restarted the nuclear non-proliferation talks and building back up the nuclear inspection infrastructure/protocols
Returned money authorized for refurbishment of White House offices and private living quarters
Sent envoys to Middle East and other parts of the world that had been neglected for years; reengaging in multilateral and bilateral talks and diplomacy
Signed national service legislation; expanded national youth service program
States are permitted to enact federal fuel efficiency standards above federal standards
67. Students struggling to make college loan payments can have their loans refinanced
The FDA is now regulating tobacco
The missile defense program is being cut by $1.4 billion in 2010
The public can meet with federal housing insurers to refinance (the new plan can be completed in one day) a mortgage if they are having trouble paying
US Navy increasing patrols off Somali coast
Set timetable for exiting Iraq (already started removing troops)
Improved relations with Russia
Improved relations with the Islamic World
81. Made progress towards greater cooperation on limiting nuclear proliferation
Economic stimulus plan has created jobs. (Unemployment rate decreasing)
Drastically slowed down the recession
Saved Wall Street
Passed the Lilly Ledbetter Act
HEALTHCARE REFORM
Once again, this is a lot to accomplish in such a short amount of time. He was elected President, he wasn't elected Jesus.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Davran
June 1, 2010 6:27 AM in reply to It's Pat
Yes, the fact that President Obama has accomplished less in a year-and-a-half than FDR did during his entire presidency is quite a disappointment.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
cimabuehw
June 1, 2010 10:50 AM in reply to It's Pat
"He was elected President, he wasn't elected Jesus"
Important point.
I have issues with Obama. The trajectory from Columbia to Harvard to University of Chicago is a very conservative and suggests that his underlying intellectual assumptions bend his thinking toward a laissez faire point of view. Give that, he's shown some ability to think outside of the box of his influences which takes considerable intellectual ability and effort.
Basically I support him. I trust his work ethic, his essential moral compass, and his intellectual skills...and I don't expect perfection from him.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?