
Sometimes it's just too easy. In the course of defending the record of Supreme Court Nominee Elana Kagan at a press conference today, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy broadsided Republicans, who, he said, could find a reason to oppose even the purest of nominees.
"We have some Republicans who would automatically oppose anybody who was nominated," Leahy said. "The President could nominate Moses the Law Giver. In fact I told the President, I said you realize if you'd nominated Moses the Law Giver, somebody would raise, 'but he doesn't have a birth certificate! Where's his birth certificate!'"
Leahy dismissed both conservative and liberal critiques of Kagan, trumpeting her experience outside the judiciary, and highlighting her years of scholarship. "It would be hard to find people in this country who would stand out as a greater legal scholar than she does," Leahy insisted. "She will be confirmed." Kagan's critics, particularly her liberal ones, have focused on her thin publishing history as an academic, and her substantive political views remain a mystery even to long-time friends.
In fairness to Republicans, they'd also likely characterize Moses as a judicial activist who foisted Ten Commandments on the people.
FreeRider
May 10, 2010 11:09 AM
I LOVE Pat Leahy! He puts Kagan's liberal and conservatives critics in the same bag--the nutbag.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
EnnuiDivine
May 10, 2010 11:31 AM in reply to FreeRider
It's like I've been saying: could we have done better than Kagan? Probably.
Doesn't change the fact that she's well-qualified and immensely intelligent. She'll be a good fit for the court.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
May 10, 2010 11:36 AM in reply to EnnuiDivine
Agree.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Effin Rightman
May 10, 2010 11:47 AM in reply to FreeRider
If you can't have Moses, then I say why not a nice Jewish girl? Sarah Silverman, perhaps? No, too tall. Kagan I like better.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
GTFOOH
May 10, 2010 11:57 AM in reply to Effin Rightman
Oh, come on! We could reduce Silverman's size by removing her spine. She'll still fit right in on the court!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Effin Rightman
May 10, 2010 12:02 PM in reply to GTFOOH
You'd also have to remove her mouth. Her opinions are I'm thinking perhaps "outside the mainstream." Oy vey!
I'm sticking with Kagan.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JNagarya
May 11, 2010 2:30 AM in reply to EnnuiDivine
I think she's an excellent choice. If you can, catch the Charlie Rose with two who knew and know her well. They describe her, by the way, as being a progressive.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
EnnuiDivine
May 10, 2010 11:30 AM
Well, was he born in Egypt or was he born in Canaan?
And, for that matter...what about the Pharoah? I haven't seen HIS birth certificate carved in hieroglyphics, either.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Glenn in NYC
May 10, 2010 11:54 AM
"It would be hard to find people in this country who would stand out as a greater legal scholar than she does"
Um, OK, I like Leahy and Kagan may very well be a fine pick, but this is ridiculous. Her record of scholarship is quite thin. That's not a reason to oppose her, but to say that it's hard to find better scholars out there is just ignorant.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
May 10, 2010 12:01 PM in reply to Glenn in NYC
Her record of published writing is thin. Her record of scholarship is not.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Glenn in NYC
May 10, 2010 12:27 PM in reply to FreeRider
OK, I'll bite: Explain to me the evidence for her "scholarship" that does not consist of her legal writings. What, she thinks big thoughts?
Again, I'm not trying to knock her intellect, just was reacting to Leahy's ridiculous hyperbole.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
May 10, 2010 1:48 PM in reply to Glenn in NYC
Scholarship means "knowledge acquired through study." Scholarship is not based on writing and publishing.
What evidence is there of her scholarship?
Graduating at the top of her law school class.
Being a constitutional law professor at two of the top law schools in the country.
Being selected as a law clerk to a supreme court and a federal district court judge. (You have no idea how tough those jobs are to get.)
Being a top lawyer in the Clinton administration.
Being a partner at a prominent law firm.
Being the first woman Dean of Harvard Law.
Being the first woman solicitor general.
Now, you might think she achieved all of those things by being a lucky C student but I doubt it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ejg3
May 10, 2010 12:19 PM
Doesn't the Bible say that Moses was either a rush job or basket case or am I thinking of some of today's political tactics and GOP politicians.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Tony C
May 10, 2010 1:22 PM
Too bad Obama can't find a Hispanic named Jesus who is qualified.
Just watching the republican melt down would make my year.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Chilidog
May 10, 2010 1:28 PM
The Republicans would never vote for Moses on the Supreme Court. He's Jewish and we already have two jews on the court.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Phoebe Fay
May 10, 2010 1:44 PM
Not only would they oppose Moses, they'd oppose Jesus if he showed up again. Actually, they'd be more opposed to Jesus than Moses, what with all that socialistic feed the poor, heal the sick stuff he talks about.
On second thought, they're probably still bitter about that whole golden calf policy...
Maybe they'd just prefer Pharaoh.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
storm
May 10, 2010 3:24 PM in reply to Phoebe Fay
assume there were no birth cert or tan skin or aramaic accent issues. which side would oppose him more?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
May 12, 2010 10:16 PM
Leahy isn’t too bright. Moses was not born on U.S. soil nor were his parentS citizenS. Ergo, Moses isn’t eligible for the nomination. But then neither was Obummer. Go figure.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?