
Sen. Bob Bennett (R-UT) has lost at his state Republican convention -- officially defeating him for re-nomination without a primary. He is the first incumbent Senator to lose re-election in 2010, a Republican driven from office by the anti-establishment conservative insurgency.
The results of the second ballot, courtesy of the Salt Lake Tribune: Businessman Tim Bridgewater 37%, attorney Mike Lee 36%, and the incumbent Sen. Bennett 27%. There will now be a final round of voting pitting Bridgewater against Lee, to see whether one of them can get 60% of the delegate vote and thus be nominated outright. If neither receives 60% of the delegate vote, the race will go to a primary on June 22.
It should of course be noted that Utah is one of the most conservative, Republican-friendly states in the nation. The last time it voted Democratic for president was in the 1964 Lyndon Johnson landslide; the last time it elected a Democratic Senator was 1970; and it voted for John McCain in 2008 by a margin of 63%-34%. So with that said, the eventual GOP nominee will be heavily favored to keep the seat in Republican hands.
Late Update: There will be a primary. Bridgewater took 57.28%, short of the magic 60%, to Lee's 42.72%.


MyMy
May 8, 2010 5:49 PM
Heavens to Murgatroyd! So they really want a far right Senator?
I sure hope they end the 'privilege' of allowing 'secret holds' and modify the filibuster; if one of these guys wins there will endless Senate gridlock forever.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
sufi66
May 8, 2010 6:06 PM in reply to MyMy
Bennett was a right wing lunatic by any standard, so this isn't much of a change. Utah is a brain-dead state.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Docb
May 8, 2010 9:00 PM in reply to sufi66
Scary Scary...the fringe is there ! Bennett was not much but the alternative ---this signals a more divided Congress..The wingnut s are not enven informed---just liars! pond scumb Heavns save us... at least he was sane!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jjdjjd
May 9, 2010 3:34 AM in reply to Docb
hey, how about new jersey about 6 or 7 years ago? the democrat incumbent torrecelli fell behind the republican candidate by 10 points with less then 30 days before the election, so the dems dumped him and broke out the old old warhorse lautenberg by order of then governor [mcgreevey, now a gay american]in violation of the state constitution. when the case went before the state supreme court they agreed that it was illegal, but told the dems they could do it this one time but don't do it again. the characters involved; mcgreevy had to resign as he tried to appoint his boyfriend as homeland security director for the state, soon to be governor and then senator john corzine; who would go on to lose his re-election bid in 2009, and the aforementioned lautenberg; now almost dead and a man who never did accomplish much in the senate, either on his 1st go around or since he made his comeback. karma; you gotta love it. i really like what corzine did, he spent about 200 million of his own money, which he made as ceo of goldman -sachs, [yes that goldman-sachs] to serve 4 years as a senator and 4 as governor, then lose the governorship. now he had to take a job as ceo of another wall st. firm, at a base of 5 million per year. oh yeah, plua a teaching gig at princeton, where he will not be teaching ethics. karma, karma, karma. oh, and i think torrecelli either went to jail or made a deal to stay out. its hard to keep track of all the jersey democrats that either are serving time in jail or those who have served time.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
chameleon
May 9, 2010 10:04 AM in reply to jjdjjd
The only ones harder to keep track of are all the republicans who had to resign because of sexual misconduct. Just thought I'd remind you in case you'd forgotten.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jjdjjd
May 9, 2010 1:21 PM in reply to chameleon
not here in jersey, we only recently started to elect republicans. however i think its about even nationwide as to who has more sex scandals.......perhaps it is the republicans now that ted kennedy is dead. lets not forget barney frank's house being used as an escort service for gay's, and who can forget bill clinton? that is if you count a blowjob as sex. but yes indeed, the repubs certainly have their share, can't argue with you on that point.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tedski
May 9, 2010 1:56 PM in reply to jjdjjd
Remind me again, what's this got to do with Bob Bennett? If you want to duel with lists of scandal ridden incompetents from whichever party each of us doesn't like, I'm from Arizona and I'd probably win. However, last I checked, this was about Bob Bennett losing his nomination, a rare occurrence that has nothing to do with who was appointed to the Senate from New Jersey seven years ago.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jjdjjd
May 9, 2010 4:31 PM in reply to tedski
hey we having fun, thats all. you don't like our posts don't read them.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Peter Principle
May 10, 2010 12:44 PM in reply to jjdjjd
you don't like our posts don't read them.
Now you're talking sense.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jeffgee
May 10, 2010 1:44 PM in reply to Peter Principle
Not the policy at Redstate or Freerepublic. No disagreement allowed there.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
chameleon
May 9, 2010 4:02 PM in reply to jjdjjd
Oh really, Remember Christie Whitman, Governor Keane, just to name a few. Granted they weren't involved in scandals, but they were definitely republicans and they sure raised their share of taxes. They are a part of why property taxes are so high in NJ
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jjdjjd
May 9, 2010 4:30 PM in reply to chameleon
yup, they sure did, of course my taxes [under keane] were about 1,200 per year. under whitman about 3300, under corzine 9000 per year. same house, same property. but your point is well taken, even these two republicans wouldn't control taxes. of course you realize they are republicans only by jersey standards. any utah republicanwould laugh at us calling whitman and keane a republican.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
chameleon
May 9, 2010 4:45 PM in reply to jjdjjd
Keane and Whitman are part of what used to be the Republican Party. The people being supported nowadays are the far right wing fringe or the tea party. People like Whitman and Keane don't recognize their party.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jjdjjd
May 9, 2010 7:56 PM in reply to chameleon
well that goes back to the old northeast 'rockefeller' republicans, you know, when they were a bit more inclusive. now, neither party is tolerant of people like me, liberal on some issues, conservative on others. too bad.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AJM
May 10, 2010 11:53 AM in reply to jjdjjd
What issues are you liberal on?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Powkat
May 10, 2010 12:27 PM in reply to AJM
Response from jjdjjd: crickets.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jjdjjd
May 11, 2010 5:39 PM in reply to Powkat
on most social issues i am liberal. i mean who the hell cares if 2 gay men want to marry, i also think the govenment should feed the poor and provide better schools for them. i am for most of the health care reform, until the part that says you have to have it. women should have the right to choose, even though i am against abortion i have no right to tell a women what to do.i want religion out of politics, i believe the government should help those who want it, and leave those who don't alone.what else you got?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
April 18, 2011 6:41 PM in reply to sufi66
I agree with this opinion 100%
Find out how to Watch TV on Laptop and how to find international live TV channels.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rosebowl
May 8, 2010 5:52 PM
Next on the list: Arlen Specter. I hope Pennsylvania Democrats show up in force and vote him out in the primary. If Specter manages to win re-election as a Dem, given his party switching ways, what is to stop him from switching back to the GOP? Can Dems and Obama gamble on Specter, like they did for Lieberman?
Vote Sestak.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
musgrove
May 8, 2010 6:51 PM in reply to rosebowl
i trust specter over sestak really.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
daveminnj
May 8, 2010 6:55 PM in reply to musgrove
why?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
farnsworth
May 8, 2010 10:23 PM in reply to musgrove
Yeah, why? Sestak would have to be a colossal scumbag to be worse than Specter.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Davis_X_Machina
May 8, 2010 6:54 PM in reply to rosebowl
There is a large, teabag-shaped obstacle in the way called Pat Twoomey.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
teabagger
May 8, 2010 7:57 PM
Beware incumbents, either Democrat of Republican, 'The Times They Are a-Changin'!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Sailormarlowe
May 8, 2010 8:25 PM
Utah leading nation in brush-cutting dead stalk Republicans. Time to weed 'em out. Too bad Marie Osmond isn't interested in running for public office. The great American West & Northwest will provide our best leaders in future. East Coast/San Francisco axis of anisette-sippers on the run.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
stavrogin2
May 9, 2010 10:08 AM in reply to Sailormarlowe
It's so difficult nowadays to tell the difference between actual conservatives and the people making fun of them.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hollywood
May 9, 2010 3:28 PM in reply to stavrogin2
Utah is the closest thing we have to an American Taliban religious controlled state. Nothing is done without the blessing of the Mormon Church. The fact that they groupthink themselves over a right wing cliff is a little funny and a little scary.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
grimshizzle
May 9, 2010 5:05 PM in reply to hollywood
Well, you're not entirely wrong about the influence of the Church on politics in Utah, but you don't tell the whole story. The Utah State Legislature has been rather more conservative than the LDS Church for some time now on several issues, including immigration, gun control, environmental issues, and--believe it or not--gay rights.
The biggest discrepancy is probably on immigration. The Church has publicly taken what would be considered a moderate/left position, while the state legislature is currently considering following Arizona's lead. The Church and the legislature have also butted heads on concealed carry laws. Environmental issues usually fall outside of the Church's public political opinions. However, the Church has supported a number of alternative energy initiatives in Utah; it participated in Earth Hour (a climate change awareness event) in 2009; it recently unveiled the first of several all-solar-powered church buildings, with plans for more; and all of its future temples are going to be LEED certified.
Finally, a few months ago the Church openly voiced its support for a proposed ordinance in Salt Lake City prohibiting employment and housing discrimination against homosexuals, and when the state legislature threatened to overturn Salt Lake's ordinance through new state law, the Church talked them out of it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hollywood
May 9, 2010 8:05 PM in reply to grimshizzle
Hey thanks! That is interesting stuff. I live in California as you may have guessed, and I am still quite angry that the Mormons came barging in to spend tens of millions of dollars to pass the hateful Prop8. I can only imagine the outrage that would be felt in Utah if liberals came flooding in from California to pass laws in their state! As social norms move slowly to the left through history it is sad to see the Utah rethuglicans lurch to the right and set themselves back even farther behind.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
benjoya
May 8, 2010 8:30 PM
East Coast/San Francisco axis of anisette-sippers on the run.
oh yeah, bob bennett is one of those. ease up on the glue, sailor.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
chameleon
May 8, 2010 8:37 PM in reply to benjoya
LOL.......LMAO.....
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
farnsworth
May 8, 2010 10:25 PM in reply to benjoya
I guess this means he wants to have sex with Marie Osmond.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
RocketEngineer
May 8, 2010 10:30 PM in reply to farnsworth
Ahhh, jeez! Did you have to say that? I mean, the image of anyone having sex with Marie Osmond....
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Matt Jones
May 9, 2010 7:42 PM in reply to farnsworth
Actually, I think he wants to have sex with Ronald Reagan like most conservatives do. But in lieu of that, he'll settle for anything in a skirt that can propose tax cuts while quoting Ayn Rand.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
holyhandgrenaid
May 8, 2010 8:47 PM
Its a bit of shame really, because, while conservative, Bennett is 'one of the good ones', by which I mean not totally insane. Looks like we're in for a complete lunatic as the junior Senator from Utah now.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SS451
May 8, 2010 10:50 PM
Notice: no talk of Bennett simply ignoring the verdict of his party and running on a "Utah for Bennett" ticket. That's because Bennett knows that he will get NO support from the party establishment if he defies the verdict of the convention. Compare this to the amateur hour which ensued after Lieberman spit in the eye of Connecticut's Democratic primary electorate, with confused and weak-willed Democratic heavyweights milling around every which way, begging not to be pushed to endorse, refusing to campaign for Lamont, etc.
It's no wonder the Democrats can't keep their caucus in line, when that's the way they react to an out-and-out betrayal of the party. The party just isn't playing for keeps.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Kaneblues
May 8, 2010 11:44 PM in reply to SS451
State law prohibits Bennett from running as an independent.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
acf_ma
May 8, 2010 11:22 PM
If Bennett got tossed out, even from his party's primary, what does that say about the idea that Republicans have the upper hand in the next elections? Could it be a case of equal opportunity losses with both parties suffering and the split remaining close to what it is today?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Kaneblues
May 8, 2010 11:46 PM
Before the next guy takes the oath of office, his hands are already tied. He has no room to move to the center or the abilitiy to seek a compromise on legislation. The moment he is seen as working with Democrats, someone futher on his right will begin the campaign against him.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
GTFOOH
May 9, 2010 12:23 AM
This is like kicking David Duke out of the Klan, because he got his teeth fixed!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AdAbsurdum
May 10, 2010 5:38 PM in reply to GTFOOH
LOL!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mcc
May 9, 2010 12:30 AM
lol
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
grimshizzle
May 9, 2010 12:48 AM
Maybe I'm insanely naive, but I don't think the Dem contender for Bennett's seat, Sam Granato, can be written off that easily. He's the archetypal successful small business owner, he's got far better name recognition in the state than either of the GOPers who beat out Bennett, and he's a political "outsider" with a very impressive resume. There was a ton of energy and support for him at the dem convention today--which boasted the largest and most energetic crowd for a midterm that they've ever had.
Also, the LDS (Mormon) Church has issued some statements recently that seem geared towards distancing it from the far-right (and more specifically, from Glenn Beck), including a denouncement of "the politics of fear and rhetorical extremism that render civil discussion impossible." At the same time, the dems in Utah have made a concerted effort to brand themselves as the party of moderation and rational thought. Republicans in Utah are often extreme but they don't like to think of themselves as extreme, and there have been a handful of races in recent decades where the dems successfully branded the GOP candidate as distastefully extreme.
Some of us are very hopeful that the teaparty uprising that booted Bennett will increasingly be seen as extremist and out-of-touch with mainstream Utahns in the coming months. (In fact, Bennett has high approval ratings among Utahns--but the rightwing fringe is always overrepresented in the state GOP organization, and in this case they're clearly out of touch.)
So keep an eye on Sam Granato. There's a possibility there.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Bethany
May 9, 2010 12:19 PM in reply to grimshizzle
A Democrat in Utah has as much chance of winning as a Republican in Massachusetts. Oh, wait...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Mary Alice
May 9, 2010 5:01 PM in reply to grimshizzle
Bennett left trailing clouds of glory.......the last conservative, principled Republican not quavering before the extreme right which now IS the Republican Party. There, in that tattered shell of a party, with no more principles left to betray, stands John McCain, groveling frantically for votes.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
pgbach
May 9, 2010 1:49 AM
Bennett's defeat should be seen not in the context of 2010. Rather, it must be seen in the context of the medium and long terms for the GOP. The increasing marginalization of the party to the most extreme right of the American political spectrum renders it a permanent, irrelevant minority party on the national level. Teabaggers will claim victory over Bennett's defeat. Indeed, they have won one battle. However, in the process they will lose the war. This is not good for the country.
It is now the FL Senate race that demands our attention. Rubio's defeat in the general election is essential whether by Crist or Meek. As a Democrat, I would prefer Meek prevail. However, as an American, I understand that Rubio's defeat is paramount.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
eggroll
May 9, 2010 3:09 AM
Some here are no doubt better at understanding Mormon inside baseball. A most welcome outcome, though, is Bennett's departure from the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
VexSmith
May 9, 2010 4:02 AM
State law prohibits Bennett from running as an independent.
A Lieberman effort wouldn't have worked anyway.
Could it be a case of equal opportunity losses with both parties suffering and the split remaining close to what it is today?
No way: Dems in big, big trouble which is why Toomey is going to be very formidable --if not the favorite-- no matter who he gets, Joe or Arlen. You also have health problems of three in the Senate not up: big changes ahead and questionable chances for success.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
navamske
May 9, 2010 7:43 AM
Of course it isn't going to happen, but it would be so cool if Bennett switched to the Democratic Party, or just decided to caucus with the Democrats, for the remainder of his term. Just as a big ol' "F**k you" to the 'baggers.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
osage
May 9, 2010 11:38 AM
REPUBLICAN PARTY PLATFORM 1956 – COMPARE TO TODAY’S CORPORATE REPUBLICANS
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=25838
“The legitimate object of Government is to do for a community of people whatever they need to have done but cannot do at all, or cannot so well do, for themselves in their separate and individual capacities.” — Abraham Lincoln
“In all those things which deal with people, be liberal, be human. In all those things which deal with people’s money, or their economy, or their form of government, be conservative.”
“[T]he purpose of the Republican Party is to establish and maintain a peaceful world and build at home a dynamic prosperity in which every citizen fairly shares.”
“We shall ever build anew, that our children and their children, without distinction because of race, creed or color, may know the blessings of our free land.”
“We believe that basic to governmental integrity are unimpeachable ethical standards and irreproachable personal conduct by all people in government. We shall continue our insistence on honesty as an indispensable requirement of public service. We shall continue to root out corruption whenever and wherever it appears.”
“We are proud of and shall continue our far-reaching and sound advances in matters of basic human needs—expansion of social security—broadened coverage in unemployment insurance —improved housing—and better health protection for all our people. We are determined that our government remain warmly responsive to the urgent social and economic problems of our people."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
osage
May 9, 2010 11:38 AM
THEIR HYPOCRISIES AND STUPIDITIES ARE STAGGERING, which is WHY "Teabagger Conservatives" have NO POLITICAL CREDIBILITY or VALIDITY “OUTSIDE” THE REPUBLICAN PARTY
Why now? Why, at this time in history, have “Teabagger Conservatives” suddenly developed an “awareness” of the improvidence in government spending? Were they not aware of the TRILLIONS plus taxpayer dollars being futilely squandered in Iraq and Afghanistan?
Where was their “impassioned concern” about government spending BEFORE they lost the presidency? Were they not aware that Bush/Cheney had EXPANDED the size and power of government to unprecedented levels?
Where were "Teabagger Conservatives" during the eight years of Bush/Cheney pissing on "The Constitution", usurping our personal freedoms, giving tax cuts to the rich they didn't need and we couldn't pay for, starting two wars we didn't need and couldn't pay for, spying on Americans in America, trashing the Geneva Convention and making torture a “legally sanctioned” government policy?
Where were "Teabagger Conservatives" when the middle class was being destroyed by corporate greed?
Where were "Teabagger Conservatives" when Insurance Companies, Banks and Wall Street ALL became TOO BIG TO FAIL and TOO RICH TO GO TO JAIL?
"Teabagger Conservatives" have no credibility or validity because the “Teabagger Movement” IS NOTHING MORE THAN A PROPAGANDA ARM OF CORPORATE AMERICA......and "Teabagger Conservatives" are too ignorant, dysfunctional and gullible to realize that THEY are THEIR own worst enemies.
"Teabagger Conservatives" are clueless sheep being lead to slaughter having somehow convinced themselves that their butchers are their saviors.
Only WITHIN the REPUBLICAN PARTY can they impact who the REPUBLICAN will be to run against the opposing DEMOCRAT and or INDEPENDENT, thereby fracturing/dividing their own party.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bill
May 9, 2010 7:41 PM
It is a sign that 'the people' do understand what has happened to them under the administrations beginning with Reagan.
The government has become 'less':
Privatized regulation of the financial industry,
Privatized regulation of the energy industry,
Privatized consumer protections,
Crushed unions,
All but stamped individual's rights to sue corporations,
etc.
Then, took voters investments, lost their money, took voters taxes to cover the loses.
Whether it's Bush or Obama, Goldman, Geithner, Summers, Paulson, Bernanke, et al are accelerating the shift of wealth from the middle classes to the wealthy.
Here's the problem: The Democrats cannot say they've stood against this shift; they have in many cases enabled it.
For example, several of Obama's major decisions have harmed the middle class and fattened the corporations:
1. Supported a stingy stimulus that was a third tax breaks -
2. Doubled-down, the accelerated the Bush bailouts (effectively closing off any other options to address the recession) -
3. Escalated a meaningless and fruitless war -
4. Gutted real financial reform (no Glass-Steagle, no 'too big too fail) –
5. Not helped people with bankruptcy & mortgages remediation -
6. Fiddled around & not passed a jobs bill (last month highest unemployment rate: 9.9 %)-
7. Rejected the only option that would have simultaneously extended coverage and cut costs (single payer) -
Poor Dems, they abandoned their principles and now will have hell to pay.
Poor voters, the Republicans will be worse.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
May 9, 2010 8:06 PM in reply to bill
Jesus.
The post is about how Bob Effing Bennett isn't rightwing enough for the Republican base. What do we get in the comments? On one hand, we get the freeper troll who veers way the hell off into the depths of history land to distract with a tales of this one time when Democrats somewhere did something or other. On the other we get the Firebagger "progressive" rhetorical double-back reverse twist to make this have something to do with how awful, awful, awful Obama is.
I really don't know which is worse. Can't say, because the judges' scale doesn't go below zero so technically you both tie.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
chameleon
May 10, 2010 9:36 AM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
http://www.scotusblog.com/2010/05/where-we-go-from-here/#more-19874
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
sheerahkahn
May 10, 2010 2:14 PM
yes, yes, yes...as the last two elections have shown the GOP/teaparty/Fox-w/e the American people want more conservatism, not less.
So I say to the Teaparty/GOP/Faux-laughbox...assemble your best and brightest, those who represent the intellectual prowess of your political platform...perhaps...a suggestion.
Sarah Palin for President, and Michelle Bachmmann as VP, Gov. Stanford for family values, and the rest of the GOP reprobates who talk the walk, but can't even manage to limp the talk.
Good riddance to the GOP...the most useless, Wall-street friendly, and quite possibly the closest thing this country has ever gotten to a Fascist party ever...oh wait, no...I'm wrong, our only Fascist party ever.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Tosh
June 6, 2010 7:41 AM
Utah leading nation in brush-cutting dead stalk Republicans. Time to weed 'em out. Too bad Marie Osmond isn't interested in running for public office. The great American West & Northwest will provide our best leaders in future. East Coast/San Francisco axis of anisette-sippers on the run.
m65 kamagra
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?