
The key to understanding Nevada Republican Senate candidate Sharron Angle may be the fact that she has not always been a Republican.
For at least six years in the 1990s before she held state-level elective office, Angle was a member of the little-known Independent American Party, a right-wing party that combines elements of Ron Paul's doctrinaire libertarianism -- pro-gun, anti-tax, anti-bureaucracy, pro-states' rights -- with Christian social conservatism and fear of the "North American Union" and other forms of "global government." The small party attracted considerable controversy in 1994 when it took out a newspaper ad titled "Consequences of Sodomy: Ruin of a Nation," which suggested HIV could spread through the water.
Three members of the Independent American Party tell TPM that Angle, a Nye County, Nevada, school board member at the time, was an active member of the party in the 1990s. They say she only left the Independent American Party and became a Republican out of political expediency when she decided to seek a seat in the state assembly, to which she was elected in 1998.
"It was because she wanted to run for office. And it was difficult for members of our party to get elected at that time," Janine Hansen, executive director of the Independent American Party, tells TPM. "It was a strategic move on her part."
Hansen's brother, the late Daniel Hansen, founded the Independent American Party in 1967 "after realizing that the Republican Party was growing too corrupt and socialistic," according to the party website. The party lost its ballot position in the late 1970s and didn't get back on until a push by Hansen in 1992. That year, Angle signed the petition to get the Independent American Party back on the ballot, according to multiple party members and news reports.
That was a heady time for the reborn party. A 1992 Los Angeles Times article (via Nexis) describes Hansen at a political rally wearing a Stetson hat and bearing a sign that read, "If Guns Are Outlawed, How Can We Shoot the Liberals?" His rhetoric would not be out of place at a 2010 tea party.
"Don't give up your guns, folks," he told a crowd. "That's all we've got to protect us against the advance of socialism. America is in a survival phase."
Angle's campaign did not respond to a request for comment.
But a campaign spokesman told the Wall Street Journal, which first noticed Angle's membership in the party, that she had been a Republican before she was an Independent American member. She re-registered with the GOP in 1997.
Lynn Chapman, the chair of the Independent American Party in Washoe County, where Angle lives, tells TPM that she remembers Angle leaving the party "because she was going to be running for assembly and she knew that -- at that point in time the party was still growing very slowly -- she had a better chance of getting into the assembly if she was a Republican."
During the period that Angle was a member, the party bought a red, white, and blue 16-page advertising insert in several Nevada newspapers to promote an effort to add a clause to the state constitution stating that "objection to homosexuality is a liberty and right of conscience and shall not be considered discrimination relating to civil rights," according to a 1994 article in the Las Vegas Review-Journal. The so-called Minority Status and Child Protection Act would have explicitly allowed discrimination against gay people in jobs and housing.
The party then picketed a newspaper, the Reno Gazette-Journal, that refused to run the ad.
These days, some longtime Independent American Party members feel bitter about the arc of Angle's career.
Christopher Hansen, brother of party founder Daniel Hansen and himself a former chair of the party, tells TPM that "I think Sharron in her heart is a very good person." But he remains upset that "she decided to go over and join with the fascist Republicans."
"The national Republicans are going to come in here and teach her how to be a good Republican stooge," he predicts. "She'll just be another dyed-in-the-wool stooge Republican."
Sniffit
June 15, 2010 11:59 AM
She's crazy AND a scumbag. Go for it NV. Elect her. We dare you.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Pthomas2mm
June 15, 2010 3:27 PM in reply to Sniffit
Be careful what you wish for.... I'm not exactly sure how you know she's crazy and certainly have no basis for calling her a scumbag. You obviously have NO interest in the truth. You can always count on liberals for two things
1.) Follow the smear machine like bleeting sheep
2. ) Have no sense of humor (unless you are making fun of someone with a different viewpoint).
I couldn't care less what party Angle was a member of 10-18 years ago. She changed parties to get elected. I'm shocked that a politician would try to get elected.
After reading this article I can see why this is called Talking Points Memo
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SFCWallace
June 15, 2010 12:04 PM
This is how it works (as oppossed to NY-23). If you want a more consevative candidate, run them in the primary. If they win great, if not back the Republican. No third party candidates to split the vote and let the Dems squeak by.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hunter
June 15, 2010 12:47 PM in reply to SFCWallace
Sorry Sarge, but you're downright nuts if you think Angle's going to beat Reid.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CyberDuckie
June 15, 2010 3:40 PM in reply to hunter
Let's just stick with downright nuts. Period.
The crazy is becoming more visible.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Winston Smith
June 15, 2010 12:17 PM
Sorry, TPM, but IMHO there is nothing wrong with being in a "fringe" third party these days. The Democrat and Republican halves of the one ruling "non-fringe" party are a fucking embarrassment to democracy.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hunter
June 15, 2010 12:51 PM in reply to Winston Smith
Now wait...you're saying there's nothing wrong with being in a party that:
1)Runs ads warning about AIDS spreading through the water supply
2)Displays signs that advocate shooting people who disagree with them
3)Wants to codify discrimination in the state constitution
Have I got that right?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Redwood Rhiadra
June 15, 2010 12:54 PM in reply to hunter
Well, these days that's not fringe - that's mainstream Republicanism.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Signalman
June 15, 2010 3:38 PM in reply to Redwood Rhiadra
+1
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Matt Jones
June 15, 2010 12:17 PM
Talk about the pot and the kettle - calling another group "fascists" while actively promoting the right to hate gays and cheering for *shooting* people based on political beliefs.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
whataretheysmoking
June 15, 2010 3:00 PM in reply to Matt Jones
make that the crackpot and the kettle.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
brooklyndweller
June 15, 2010 12:18 PM
"Christopher Hansen, brother of party founder Daniel Hansen and himself a former chair of the party, tells TPM that "I think Sharron in her heart is a very good person." But he remains upset that "she decided to go over and join with the fascist Republicans.""
OK - that's it. The living end...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Dave Adams
June 15, 2010 3:17 PM in reply to brooklyndweller
The way I read it, he's upset that she didn't stay with his fascist party.
See? It makes sense now.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
biff diggerence
June 15, 2010 12:19 PM
"Consequences of Sodomy: Ruin of a Nation"
(Mister Angle reports deep, dark fun after a night of bourbon and shooting)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
vasu
June 15, 2010 12:19 PM
I remember a time in this country when you were so far out of whack with the mainstream that it wasn't even possible to get past the primary...
I guess it speaks volumes about the overall education in this country where the stupid seem to be getting elected even when their ideals are so far out of whack with mainstream. And moreover, why is it always white folks who spew this wacko shiz... They give us all a bad name.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hunter
June 15, 2010 12:54 PM in reply to vasu
And moreover, why is it always white folks who spew this wacko shiz...
Because it's not tolerated from minorities. The right to be as crazy and borderline violent as you want and still be thought of as a "regular, patriotic American" is part of white privilege.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CyberDuckie
June 15, 2010 3:57 PM in reply to vasu
I guess it speaks volumes about the overall education in this country where the stupid seem to be getting elected even when their ideals are so far out of whack with mainstream.
Ah, but they haven't gotten elected yet. They've been nominated by the same group of crazies that they come from. Now they have to win the votes of middle America, which is not nearly as whacko as these nutjobs believe them to be. Don't give up hope for the November elections - they're still a long way away. :)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
It's Pat
June 15, 2010 12:22 PM
Ok to discriminate against gays, anti flouride in water, believing HIV is in the water, wanting to get rid of Medicare and Social Security....wow. This is the standard bearer for the NV GOP?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
barnacle
June 15, 2010 12:29 PM
Where Ugg? Me rumble with Ugg, kill him with rock till he dead.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Interested Canuck
June 15, 2010 12:31 PM
Sorry for a comment from an interested neighbor, but it passes my understanding how a major political party can nominate people such as Angle and Rand Paul (or Sarah Palin for that matter). The US right-wing appears to have lost its collective mind (and soul). Didn't she also suggest that having an abortion increased the likelihood of breast cancer? As to prohibition -- bring it on, Canada earned billions shipping illegal bgooze across the Detroit River during the last one ;-)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Kestrel
June 15, 2010 12:49 PM in reply to Interested Canuck
It's the media. Here's an example. Sarah Palin waits till someone is 20 points up on their opponent then she endorses them. Then that person wins and right away the media starts calling Parah Sailin a king maker. It's just fricking crazy.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
KingCool
June 15, 2010 1:13 PM in reply to Kestrel
seconded.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
theorajones
June 15, 2010 12:32 PM
You'd think that fluoride in the water would kill the HIV. But I guess the government is too clever for that...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ejg3
June 15, 2010 12:34 PM
I waiting for her endorsement from Fred Phelps ( I know he claims to be a Democrat) but if she still believes this stuff it would certainly be consistent with his views.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
maya89
June 15, 2010 12:34 PM
so the only method these goons have of forwarding their political agenda is with violence.. this is terrorism, pure and simple; isn't it exactly what those Islamic jihadists are all about??
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Richardxx
June 15, 2010 1:38 PM in reply to maya89
That's what the Southern slave holders thought when they sent the South Carolina militia to fire on the federal government Fort Sumpter. Those earlier Southern traitors did not like the U.S. federal government, either. So they started a Civil War, thinking they were representatives of a growing majority who could take the federal government down.
Just every so often the loons come down from the isolated piney woods to afflict civilization with their insanity. Looks like they are back again.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Helpcomputer
June 15, 2010 3:32 PM in reply to Richardxx
They never went away. They're just quiet when a Republican is in the White House. These clowns have been fighting the Civil War since the South surrendered at Appomattox.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
pmb50
June 15, 2010 12:40 PM
she is an ugly version of Sarah Palin
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tinsk
June 15, 2010 12:54 PM in reply to pmb50
Well, nobody ever said she was acute Angle.
Sorry, my father's sense of humor has officially rubbed off on me.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Richardxx
June 15, 2010 1:41 PM in reply to tinsk
So she's a wedge - not the sharpest of tools in the tool chest.
Your father may have some other comments that could be shared.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tinsk
June 15, 2010 1:58 PM in reply to Richardxx
Nice additional word play. You're also correct. A wedge - a blunt instrument useful only when driven with force in order to split and divide. Sounds like the Tea Party to me.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jeffgee
June 15, 2010 2:20 PM in reply to Richardxx
It's a wedge I have issues with.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
sam storm
June 15, 2010 2:06 PM in reply to tinsk
That is terrible, and my mother would have loved that joke.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Boidster
June 15, 2010 2:14 PM in reply to sam storm
/cosin
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Boidster
June 15, 2010 2:13 PM in reply to tinsk
Well it's a tossup between right and obtuse, that's for sure.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Walter Mitty
June 15, 2010 12:58 PM
What - that was over 15 years ago. She was a crazy kid then, she doesn't believe that stuff anymore.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
justhinkn
June 15, 2010 1:15 PM
Methinks there is an oxymoron going on here: Libertarian and Christian social conservative. Uh-uh. No can do. Libertarians by definition are economically conservative and socially liberal. This is just plain vanilla ultra-right wing thinking-- keep your guvment hands off my money but I will direct what you can do at home or in your bedroom.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Dean L. Surkin
June 15, 2010 1:30 PM in reply to justhinkn
justhinkn is absolutely right, and his or her point should be widely disseminated.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
June 17, 2010 11:39 PM in reply to justhinkn
EXACTLY. Every day I see people call themselves libertarian who have NO clue what that word even means.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
nick
June 15, 2010 1:27 PM
let me get this straight she wants to do away with social Security and Medicare that should get the support of all the retires in NV. she also wants steam baths and massages for felons that should get the support of the Teabaggers. just the thought of Blond Swede Women given massages to all those black felons would keep the teabaggers on TV for months.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Pthomas2mm
June 15, 2010 3:48 PM in reply to nick
She doesn't want to do away with social security. She wants to do what anyone with an ounce of financial sense would. Guarantee the benefits for those forced to rely on them by the false promises of our government and let those younger workers who can get a better return by investing privately do so. Do you REALLY believe that a fund that is already paying more than it is taking in will be their when you need it? SSI is nothing more than a government run PONZI scheme. If writing IOU's is all it takes to make it okay to use other peoples's money for your own whims why is Madoff in jail?
Let's scare the seniors into believing ANYONE who understands what HAS TO HAPPEN for Social Security to continue wants to take their check away. It doesn't solve the problem but it does get the vote. Until democrats pull their heads out of the sand and realize that government cannot (not should not) CANNOT sustain printing more and more money and gets down to seriously addressing the issues of Social Security, Medicare, Energy and Education both fundementally and structurally, the problem will only get bigger.
As long as politicians treat real problems as opportunities to make part of the electorate fearful to get a vote nothing will change, regardless of what change you may favor
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
farnsworth
June 15, 2010 6:11 PM in reply to Pthomas2mm
Wow, you really proved that you don't understand in a hurry there!
Well done!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Signalman
June 15, 2010 6:17 PM in reply to Pthomas2mm
"Guarantee the benefits"
I bet you think that 401(k)s are guaranteed, huh?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bill57
June 16, 2010 9:17 AM in reply to Pthomas2mm
take away the $90,000 cap. problem solved. see... not too hard
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Sinister eyebrow
June 15, 2010 1:49 PM
The HL Mencken observation that "no one ever went broke underestimating the stupidity of the American Public" keeps getting proven right, year after year. If the voters put the Republicans back in power in November, I think that American stupidity should become a tradeable commodity. It's value will never go down. Dow 36,000!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ralpho
June 15, 2010 1:59 PM in reply to Sinister eyebrow
A new Dow of stupidity -- Quick, how do I invest?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
unknowncitizen
June 15, 2010 2:35 PM in reply to ralpho
Ah yes, and as Friedrich Nietzsche so aptly put it as well:
To predict the behavior of ordinary people in advance, you only have to assume that they will always try to escape a disagreeable situation with the smallest possible expenditure of intelligence.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jeffgee
June 15, 2010 2:25 PM in reply to Sinister eyebrow
Mike Judge's Idiocracy dystopia of fat, lazy, stupid people set 500 years in the future will happen in this century.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Leftflank
June 15, 2010 2:04 PM
It seems she knows what she is doing, do the electorate?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
MarinCat
June 15, 2010 2:37 PM
Angle sounds like an iteration of Wassilla's own Bible Spice.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Signalman
June 15, 2010 3:45 PM in reply to MarinCat
Breechloader Spice, then?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
pakaal
June 15, 2010 3:31 PM
I'm sure this will get just as much attention as Sarah Palin's association with the Alaskan Independence Party.
Sometimes the apathy in the US regarding these traitors astonishes me.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Pthomas2mm
June 15, 2010 3:59 PM in reply to pakaal
Traitors? Where did that come from? Is it possible to disagree with your point of view and not be a traitor? HIV being spread through water is silly/stupid. So are massages for inmates. So is believing the government should run healthcare (they 've done such a bang up job with Medicare and Medicaid). So is giving $50 Billion to rescue states unwilling to curb their spending and make the tough choices many of the unemployed have been making for 2 years. I wouldn't say those that support any of those rediculous positions is a traitor. I mean if stupid ideas were the critera for treason we'd have no government at all. Oh wait I think I'm on to something.......
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CyberDuckie
June 15, 2010 4:34 PM in reply to Pthomas2mm
You lose any credibility (if you had any to begin with) with that crack about Medicare. Medicare is one of the most successful government-run programs of all time.
And calling these people traitorous has nothing to do with HIV in the water and massages for inmates. It has to do with advocating taking up arms against a democratically elected government. This is treasonous, plain and simple.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
farnsworth
June 15, 2010 9:51 PM in reply to CyberDuckie
He is too stupid to understand that. He is a red-iculous person.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CyberDuckie
June 15, 2010 4:23 PM in reply to pakaal
I'm not sure that it's apathy regarding these people so much as it is complete disinterest in being an educated and informed voter. A vast majority of people tend to go into a voting booth without having the slightest idea of what these candidates stand for or where they come from. Headlines and party affiliation are the only things that matter.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
PB Hail
June 16, 2010 5:04 PM in reply to CyberDuckie
Sharron will motivate registered Democrats who make up majority of active Nevada voters. She is a miracle pill to cure their apathy.
I personally like Harry. I know he isn’t the most popular guy, even in his own party. No matter the anti incumbent rage, the public getting to getting to hear her seditious ideas will elicit abject fear across a broad spectrum. The thought of “that woman” representing Nevada in the Senate will become inconceivable.
Democrats and also any independents or Republicans left of Attila The Hun, who might otherwise have sat this one out, will make that drop into the ballet box, because of her. Sharron may still win the Tea Party and Libertarian vote, which should hover around 25%.
I think the big winner will be "none of the above", which we have on the Nevada Ballot.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
barryashe
June 15, 2010 4:57 PM
I find myself thinking that Dubya wouldn't even endorse this woman. In fact, I cannot believe I am saying this, but the Tea-Baggers make Bush look rational and moderate by comparison. I wonder if he will be the next to abandon the GOP and join the Big Tent Party? Just kidding, but you do not see him saying one good thing about the "New Wave GOP".
I read Mrs. Bush the other day defending Obama against criticism of his handling of the BP Crisis. She sounded sincere and made a valid point against expecting too much of the President, any President in great disaster situations. She certainly ground her own axe in likening such criticism to the attacks against her husband's handling of the Katrina Disaster, but still she sounded reassuringly coherent and reasonable.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Spads
June 15, 2010 8:40 PM
[If Guns Are Outlawed, How Can We Shoot the Liberals?]
Why would someone that wants to shoot you, have such a friendly smile? No, this is someone whom is joking around. May be social Darwinists and want you to be their business slave getting rich from exploiting you by various means, but actually shoot you, no. Working you to death is more profitable.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bill57
June 16, 2010 9:22 AM in reply to Spads
talk to the ghosts at Kent State
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Spads
June 17, 2010 1:46 AM in reply to bill57
Oh, those National Guard boys weren’t smilin...were they?
(point well taken, and, thanks for the reminder)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreemanW
June 16, 2010 4:01 AM
Well there's that, and they were too liberal.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
PB Hail
June 16, 2010 3:58 PM
As Nevadans we are red faced over our goofy Governor Gibbons and salacious Senator Ensign. A Silver State voter would be seriously delusional to replace the Majority Leader of the Senate, who is generally unexciting and occasionally misspoken, with a woman who is bat sh*t crazy.
Plus, these Tea Party Politicians cherry pick the constitution and use states rights when it fits their ideology.
Equal protection under the law applies to you if you are straight. States rights applies to your state unless that state's legislature has passed a law where gays and lesbians can marry.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
June 16, 2010 5:37 PM
I find it entertaining that this is the best TPM can come up with... very old , irrelevant news about Sharron (DOH, she left the Party, and the hangers-on still resent it, big deal!) Yet every day, Reid gives us plenty of juicy reasons to retire his sorry a$$. If you want to know what Nevadans really think about Sharron and Harry, ask me, the Reno Conservative Examiner, I write about it every day! http://bit.ly/bQkesC
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
billmc
June 16, 2010 5:42 PM
Janine Hansen, executive director of the Independent American Party, ... Christopher Hansen, brother of party founder Daniel Hansen and himself a former chair of the party...
So this is the Hansen Family Party? Was that a band in the '60s or the '90s?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
nick
June 17, 2010 10:48 PM
She is a nut bag
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
June 17, 2010 11:32 PM
It never ceases to amuse me to hear the rightards prattle on about this.
As if they're the only ones with firearms.
I almost hope they try their little rebellion: not only will it inoculate the electorate for decades against their brand of kool-aid when they fail spectacularly (because they will), but then all my target practice will finally pay off.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?