
Has Kent Conrad done an about face and become a supporter of the Republican plan to endlessly extend tax cuts for the rich? Far from it.
"The Republicans' proposal to me is a formula for the decline of the United States," Conrad said last night in response to a question from TPMDC.
Conrad is among the only Senators whose hawkish rhetoric on deficits closely matches his voting record, and he surprised many -- even senior members of his own party -- when he was quoted widely supporting a continuation of the Bush tax cuts, including for high income earners.
"The general rule of thumb would be you'd not want to do tax changes, tax increases ... until the recovery is on more solid ground," he told reporters outside the Senate chamber yesterday afternoon.
And indeed, he reiterated that position at length when TPMDC caught up with him last night. But he also made it clear that he's in no way supportive of the GOP position on taxes.
"In the short term, most economists would say raising taxes or cutting spending during an economic downturn is counterproductive," Conrad said. "Now if you break it down, the high income would be the least problematic in terms of...a change in the tax rates, because they're the least likely to spend the money. Middle income, far more important. And with [unemployment insurance], that's actually the most important thing, because that money's all going to get spent."
In other words, a deficit-financed tax cut for the wealthy (as the GOP currently proposes) is the least stimulative of the options Conrad listed and ,though he'd like to preserve all of the current tax rates temporarily, tax cuts for the rich ought to be the first to go.
"[M]ost economists are saying that for the next 18 months or two years, we're going to have continued economic weakness," Conrad said. However, "the analysis has been done by CBO and others show that deficit-financed tax cuts actually hurt long term growth.
"I was answering what would be my reaction to the circumstance we face," Conrad explained. "My reaction would be don't cut spending, don't raise taxes and that would mean on anyone. But this is the time to prepare to pivot, to put together a plan that does bring deficits and debt down over the more extended period of time."
Conrad said he'd be happy sunsetting the Bush tax cuts on the wealth after 18-24 months. But faced with a choice between the Republican plan -- indefinite tax cuts on the rich -- and the Democratic plan -- ending tax cuts on the rich this year -- Conrad was crystal clear.
"[Republicans] will absolutely explode the debt," he said.

Barack ObamaJob Approval |
45.7%Approve | 49.5%Disapprove | -3.8Spread |
CongressionalGeneric Ballot |
42.0%DEM | 47.7%GOP | +5.7SpreadR |
TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

Steve LaBonne
July 22, 2010 10:12 AM
No, Conrad's deficit- hawk rhetoric will not be matched by his actions until he comes out in favor of ending the wars and making major cuts to the Pentagon. That goes for the rest of them as well.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hologram5
July 22, 2010 10:29 AM in reply to Steve LaBonne
Well said. Trillions of dollars get sunk into the black hole of intelligence each year to do what? Spy on our own people? Time to trim the fat...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Steve LaBonne
July 22, 2010 12:11 PM in reply to hologram5
Also, a single-payer health care system would do more than anything else to hold down the long-term deficit. But the "deficit hawks" care about making Granny eat cat food and about bashing DFHs, not about the deficit.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jeffgee
July 22, 2010 2:59 PM in reply to Steve LaBonne
THAT'S the beast that must be starved if anyone's serious about the deficit.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
PeninsulaMatt
July 22, 2010 10:29 AM
Good report. Nicely done. I haven't seen any similar follow up to his quote and this puts his comments in perspective.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Icon
July 22, 2010 10:36 AM
Conrad has officially earned a few points with me because it's apparently he was actually paying attention in Econ 101 while his colleagues across the aisle were dozing off.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Andreams
July 22, 2010 11:32 AM in reply to Icon
Well said.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Walter Mitty
July 22, 2010 11:26 AM
And in 18-24 months time Conrad and his ilk would have another reason to keep the tax cuts in place.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Steve LaBonne
July 22, 2010 11:53 AM in reply to Walter Mitty
Yup. Too bad TPM is the only "liberal" site falling for his BS.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
An Outhouse
July 22, 2010 12:53 PM in reply to Walter Mitty
Haven't they had enough time to be effective (if they were going to be)?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
EdA
July 22, 2010 12:40 PM
Ah yes, Kent Conrad and Max Baucus, both serving on the "deficit" commission rigged to destroy Social Security, the two corrupt "Democratic" Senators who sabotaged meaningful health care reform on behalf of the only people they really represent, the financial services and health care industries.
About the only difference between Kent Conrad and Ben Nelson is their haircuts.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
MsMolly
July 22, 2010 12:42 PM
The question is whether one deficit-hawk's about-face on extending tax cuts for the wealthy will persuade any other hawks to revise their thinking.
Let's hope so.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
DEACON54
July 22, 2010 2:19 PM
What he fails to add is you DO NOT CUT TAXES when you go to war. Which is exactly what the GOP did, because if they raised taxes to cover the cost of the wars there would have been a lot less support, so they tried to make it virtually painless. I say virtually, because we are feeling it now.
BUSH SUPPORTS SHIFT OF JOBS OVERSEAS
February 10, 2004
The loss of work to other countries, while painful in the short term, will enrich the economy eventually, his report to Congress says.
WASHINGTON — The movement of American factory jobs and white-collar work to other countries is part of a positive transformation that will enrich the U.S. economy over time, even if it causes short-term pain and dislocation, the Bush administration said Monday.
The embrace of foreign outsourcing, an accelerating trend that has contributed to U.S. job losses in recent years and has become an issue in the 2004 elections, is contained in the president's annual report to Congress on the health of the economy.
more --
http://articles.latimes.com/2004/feb/10/nation/na-bushecon10
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?