
Here's an interesting flashback into the recent political career of Minnesota state Rep. Tom Emmer, the presumptive Republican nominee for governor: He sponsored legislation last year to lower the legal penalties and procedural hurdles that face accused drunk drivers -- all while he has had brushes with the law on this very subject in his own past.
As the Star Tribune and local blogs reported back in March 2009, Emmer sponsored legislation that would get rid of the state's process of automatically revoking the licenses of people accused of driving while under the influence, or who refuse to take a sobriety test. The law Emmer tried to water down currently calls for a civil court process to have a license restored pending a final conviction. Instead, under Emmer's bill, a license revocation would have only occurred after a conviction.
In fact, Emmer himself had received a ticket for DWI in 1981, when he was 20. And then again in 1991, when he was 30, he was charged with DWI and pleaded guilty to a lesser charge of careless driving. "We all come to the Legislature with life experiences, but it has nothing to do with this bill," Emmer said in 2009. "This is a good bill."
A month after the Star Tribune article, Emmer also authored a legislative amendment, adopted by the state House, to seal information on DUI convictions after 10 years, for all new convictions going forward. Although the amendment passed the House, it was later dropped in the state House-Senate conference committee. It should also be noted, as the local CBS affiliate pointed out, that this would not have applied to Emmer's own past record. His past convictions would not have been sealed.
Back during the contest this past April for the state GOP convention's endorsement (a process that is usually tantamount to nomination, by custom in Minnesota), Emmer was attacked for these proposals and his past record by his main GOP opponent, state Rep. Marty Seifert.
Seifert's campaign went so far as to distribute to convention delegates a letter from a pro-Seifert delegate whose husband and son had been injured by a drunk driver. The delegate wrote: "I won't question Tom Emmer's motives in sponsoring these pieces of legislation. As an elected representative of his district, he is within his rights to author bills on any subject he likes. As a lawyer, he also undoubtedly has strongly held views on the state's civil and criminal laws. But I think it is completely legitimate for us delegates to question his judgment as a politician and public figure. Was it wise for multiple offender Tom Emmer to sponsor these bills as a legislator?"
In response, Emmer posted a YouTube video in which he bluntly discussed having made past mistakes, what a difficult experience it was for him, and how he changed his direction in life:
Emmer went on to win the state party's endorsement, thanks in part to a late endorsement from Sarah Palin, and was then endorsed by Seifert, Gov. Tim Pawlenty and the rest of the state GOP.
JohnW1141
July 15, 2010 6:28 PM
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JohnW1141
July 16, 2010 12:00 PM in reply to JohnW1141
I meant to type;
hic
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Matt Jones
July 15, 2010 8:02 PM
Well, that's a refreshing change of pace from the typical Republican playbook - normally, he'd be leading the charge to *toughen* DUI laws while having several himself. See also Mark Foley advocating for tighter controls on pedophiles, Larry Craig tightening up public indecency, practically ANY Repub whining about the sanctity of their (several) marraiges, etc...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
matts2
July 16, 2010 2:02 AM
Actually this is refreshing. We are used to gay Republicans denounce gays and cheating Republicans denounce cheating, so to see a Republican drunk driver want the law to go easy on drunk drivers is kind of nice.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ericf
July 16, 2010 2:36 AM
This won't hurt nearly as much as the story of the $100,000 servers. It's galvanizing workers in tipping jobs in Minnesota. They often hadn't heard anything about Emmer before. Why can't the tip penalty be an economic issue that works for Democrats nationwide? I made my case: http://www.mnprogressiveproject.com/diary/6654/will-the-tip-penalty-be-emmers-waiterloo
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Nancy Irving
July 16, 2010 3:19 AM
"...and how he changed his direction in life" -
Yeah, now that he's an elected official the highway patrol doesn't stop him anymore.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Riesz Fischer
July 16, 2010 10:59 AM
Well, well, well... A repuke who believes that people should be presumed innocent until proven guilty. Yeah, this is sure to hurt him with his conservative base.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
KdNicewanger
July 16, 2010 12:07 PM
Imagine TPM were a right-wing outlet, and Emmer was a Democrat in the same situation doing the same things. Do you think those decent and fair right-wingers would have pointed this part out? No, me neither.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?