
Right-wing youth will gather in D.C. at 12:30 today to call on the Senate not to confirm Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court. The event, hosted by the conservative Young Americans for Freedom, will include speeches by leaders from the libertarian CATO Institute, the Heritage Foundation and the tea party movement.
The event, coming four days into the Kagan hearings and after the end of Kagan's public testimony before Congress, is the first organized demonstration for or against Kagan this week. So far, the hearings have been relatively controversy-free (outside the hearing room that is), with only Capitol Hill mainstay Randall Terry and his followers showing up each day to attack Kagan over abortion rights.
Today's protest also includes talk of abortion, but will focus on other conservative attacks on Kagan as well.
"Our generation cannot afford to be denied job opportunities and the ability to patriotically serve our country because Kagan poorly judged the value of military service," YAF executive director Jordan Marks said in a statement. "Our generation cannot afford to to have Kagan on the bench for the next forty years because Kagan's awful judgment to favor Socialism over freedom."
It's not clear how big today's event is or what, if any, effect it might have on the Kagan nomination itself. The feeling on the Hill these days is that Kagan taking retiring Justice John Paul Stevens' seat on the Supreme Court is essentially a fait accompli, despite vocal opposition to her record from prominent Republicans like Senate Judiciary Committee ranking member Jeff Sessions (R-AL).
Today's YAF event kicks off at 12:30 on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court. According to organizers, young conservatives across the country who cannot attend "will be calling their U.S. Senators during their lunch break to encourage them to keep out Kagan."
Note: This post has been updated.
toxophilite
July 1, 2010 9:33 AM
This looks like a sorority photo before the Big Game.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Early Out
July 1, 2010 9:37 AM
I'd like to know how many of their members have enlisted.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Joshua the Teacher
July 1, 2010 9:50 AM in reply to Early Out
Heck, I'd like to know which of them has actually worked in a job. Trust fund brats...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
DeathSquad
July 1, 2010 9:51 AM in reply to Early Out
This quote made me laugh considering the fact that she kept the military recruiters out because of DADT. Which of course blocks more Americans from openly and "patriotically" serving their country in the military.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ohyeathatsright
July 1, 2010 11:24 AM in reply to DeathSquad
Irony is often lost on conservatives.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
It's Pat
July 1, 2010 9:53 AM in reply to Early Out
Hadn't you heard? General Kagan personally blocked them for enlisting!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
NerdRage
July 1, 2010 10:20 AM in reply to Early Out
the whole brief article makes me wonder what the hell they're learning in school...
i thought that young whites generally outpreformed everyone else...
perhaps not in the common sense arena though...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Signalman
July 1, 2010 12:14 PM in reply to Early Out
I don't believe I'd care to share a foxhole with any of those kids. They'd fall asleep on guard and get somebody killed.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jeffgee
July 1, 2010 1:06 PM in reply to Early Out
Did all those protesters take a day off from work to go to DC?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Ann Arbor
July 1, 2010 1:16 PM in reply to Early Out
They really need to get out of the right-wing echo chamber once in a while. Tell them that military recruiting at Harvard Law actually increased under Kagan, and watch their heads explode.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dswx
July 1, 2010 9:50 AM
Such a tiny group of people will receive an absurd amount of attention from the MSM. It is almost a guarantee that video of the group will show up on the Sunday talk shows. Most likely with David Gregory.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
RhodaA
July 1, 2010 9:52 AM
(A bit OT, but only place to post)
“Telltale Signs of a Political Agenda”
The Roberts Court:
At the Kagan hearings, I think Whitehouse, Franken and other senators, including Specter, were building a case to re-visit Citizens United (or impeach Roberts-?). Two basic themes were developed in their remarks: a) "results oriented" decisions (conservative activism); and b) principles of our legal system were violated. In much of his questioning, Whitehouse talked about “telltale signs of a political agenda.”
1. The Highest Court has no check on itself. It therefore has a responsibility of restraint.
2. In recent cases the Roberts Court has advanced theories of precedent that have toppled prior or longstanding precedent, e.g., Citizens and McCanin-Feingold.
3. In Citizens United, they went so far as to overrule Congress’ Findings of Fact that corporate funding of elections can lead to, at the least, the appearance of corruption.
4. Instead of deferring to Congress, they have been “ignoring Congress’ intent - re-writing laws.
5. In Citizens United, the Court expanded the scope of the question before it. Supreme Court cases are supposed to be decided in their narrowest scope.
6. In Exxon Valdez, they overturned the jury award to favor corporate interests on the grounds that financial “predictability” for corporations is more important justice “for the people.”
7. Many important recent cases have been decided by a 5-4 conservative majority, therefore smelling of political ideology.
8. Roberts misled Congress by making rulings that repudiated everything he testified to at his confirmation hearings.
Impeachment - ?
“A high crime is one which seeks the overthrow of the country, which gives aid or comfort to its enemies, or which injures the country to the profit of an individual or group. In democracies and similar societies it also includes crimes which attempt to alter the outcome of elections.”
In other words, decisions that intentionally favor corporations over people.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Militant Without A Cause
July 1, 2010 9:57 AM
So is Kagen also stopping them from walking to the local recruitment office and enlisting as well? If not, then I don't see what the problem is.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CityGuy
July 1, 2010 11:13 AM in reply to Militant Without A Cause
Agree.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
DeathSquad
July 1, 2010 11:43 AM in reply to Militant Without A Cause
Middle to Upper class white citizens don't join the military. Somebody has to stay home and pretend imperialism is about protecting out freedom. And those magnetic yellow ribbons don't place themselves!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
davewtf
July 1, 2010 1:04 PM in reply to DeathSquad
Not true. I did. White upper middle class upbringing all the way. We *imported* intelligent minorities (gawd, that sounds horrible) from poorer neighboring towns to give them a chance. I joined the Army to payfor college. Best decision I ever made in my life.
But these conservative morons just prove the point I recently made to my Conservative uncle recently. I DO NOT respect uneducated, uninformed opinions, and this rally is all about UNEDUCATED, UNINFORMED opinions. They don't even realize that Kagan went out of her way to give the military access to the students.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hollywood
July 1, 2010 2:26 PM in reply to Militant Without A Cause
They THINK that she was stopping poor minority kids from enlisting at Harvard. Each and every one of these spoiled little brats needs a slap in the face and a minimum wage job.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ahumbleopinion
July 1, 2010 10:05 AM
Who wrote those "talking points"? Doesn't sound like any young person I've ever hear speak.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
TBender
July 1, 2010 10:45 AM in reply to ahumbleopinion
Young, in conservative-speak, is anyone not yet drawing SS or Medicare
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
benny 4 facts
July 1, 2010 10:07 AM
I was watching the “Military Channel” last night and I will dog gone, Germany, from about 1935 and their defeat in 1945, had a youth group. I guess it is true; there is nothing new under the sun. Well under a tea baggie sun any way
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mrdufus2u
July 1, 2010 2:02 PM in reply to benny 4 facts
The Hitler Youth? That was actually the Boy Scouts, renamed and repurposed.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Barry Champlain
July 1, 2010 10:33 AM
Mm-hmm. Glee Club rejects.
Don't ever fret that these nerds represent anything other than whom you see there. I went to high school and college in the 1960's, and there was always a tiny contigent of "Hitler Youth" (as we fondly dismissed them). We paid less attention to them and their "ideas" then, than the media is apparently doing, now.
(And I totally co-sign the idea that these youthful bastions of political certitude need to go find their campus recruiters, stat.)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
KateO
July 1, 2010 10:48 AM
It's summer in DC. Granted it finally cooled down a bit, but why the scarves and gloves?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
anna am
July 1, 2010 11:01 AM in reply to KateO
good eye, kate. something's definitely wrong here.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
KateO
July 1, 2010 11:06 AM in reply to anna am
Hey Anna. TPM really should note when using stock or file photos.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
farnsworth
July 1, 2010 12:28 PM in reply to KateO
This picture was posted hours before the scheduled 12:30 EDT protest. Perhaps it was assumed that viewers would understand that it was a file photo?
Just guessing, certainly not defending or justifying.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jeffgee
July 1, 2010 1:09 PM in reply to KateO
and the bare trees
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jsdc007
July 1, 2010 10:57 AM
Why is the Cato Institute opposing Kagan's nomination? If anything, her laissez faire views should be right up their alley. Friggin' morons.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Demyankee
July 1, 2010 11:50 AM
Possibly right-wing headscarves - to preserve the purity of our fair young maidens?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tiowally
July 1, 2010 12:05 PM
Will they be issued the correct color shirts?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Eric
July 1, 2010 12:06 PM
Ignore the Hitler Youth and they'll eventually go away.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Mego
July 1, 2010 12:27 PM
Honestly these kids to need stop being sheep. WE didn't listen to our elders and we're STILL bitchin'...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SocialJusticeForAll
July 1, 2010 12:40 PM
Nice picture of the March for Life from January 2010. Too bad, TPM did not cover it like EWTN. 300K peaceful and beautiful -- inside and out -- people.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Debra
July 1, 2010 12:53 PM
Probably students from Libertarian University.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Chuck McCoy
July 1, 2010 12:54 PM
Hey Young Conservative People - why aren't you over in Iraq & Afghanistan fighting for your country, like the true patriots you claim to be.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
July 1, 2010 2:09 PM
I received this email today from teapartynation (a great collection of the crazy)
A message to all members of Tea Party Nation
Make no mistake about it; Elena Kagan wants to ban books. She thinks there is nothing
wrong with banning books based on their political content. Period.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=172653
That makes her the most dangerous person ever nominated to the Supreme Court and singularly unfit to sit on the court.
It would be one thing if she had simply said this one time. She has said it repeatedly. She has even argued to the United States Supreme Court that political pamphlets could be banned.
As far back as 1996, Kagan argued it might be necessary to ban speech that is offensive to society or to the government!
There are countries that have banned speech that is offensive to the government. The old Soviet Union, Communist China, Iran, Pakistan, Taliban controlled Afghanistan, Cuba, Nazi Germany and other dictatorships. Dictatorships ban speech, not America. But Kagan wants to ban books. I have a better idea, let’s ban Kagan.
Over the last year and a half, so many times we have called on you to step up to fight for our country and once again, we must do that. Kagan must be stopped. Obama may end up as a one term President, but his Supreme Court nominees serve for life! Kagan could easily be there for 30 years. Imagine the damage she could do.
Here is what we need you to do:
First, forward this email to everyone you know. Call your Senators and ask them to do the same. Tell them that we do not
want a Supreme Court Justice who thinks it’s okay to ban books.
Join us at www.teapartynation.com and discuss this in our forums!
We have all seen the film footage from Nazi Germany, where the Brown Shirts are throwing banned books into the bonfires. Never could I have believed that an American Supreme Court Justice would ever support the banning of books. If we do not stop the Kagan nomination, we will have just such a Supreme Court Justice.
Save America. Stop the Kagan nomination.
Also, our friends at Young Americans for Freedom are holding a rally today at the Supreme Court Building in Washington. This is the kind of 1st Amendment expression Elena Kagan opposes!
YOUNG AMERICANS TO RALLY AT SUPREME COURT AGAINST KAGAN - 7/1/2010 12:30 pm
Where: U.S. Supreme Court Steps, 1 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20543
When: Thursday July 1, 2010 12:30 - 1:30 pm (lunchtime)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
pgbach
July 1, 2010 2:16 PM
that crowd looks awfully white.... oops, I forgot, it's a right-wing crowd...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?