
Illinois state Treasurer Alexi Giannoulias, the Democratic nominee in the state's hotly-contested Senate race, could have yet another political liability to deal with from the collapse of his family's bank: As a result of the financial loss, he has collected a tax refund of about $30,000, though he immediately indicated he would donate the money to charity.
Giannoulias lost $2.7 million as a result of the bank's failure, and was thus able to get a tax refund on the amount that had been withheld from his salary as state treasurer. His Republican opponent, Rep. Mark Kirk, quickly pounced on Friday: "Giannoulias wants to raise our taxes but doesn't pay any taxes himself."
When asked for comment by TPMDC, the Giannoulias camp turned the story right back to Kirk's own personal dirt, relating to his previous inaccurate statements about his military record. Giannoulias spokesman Matt McGrath told us: "It comes as no surprise given his record of mistruths, half-truths and untruths about his military record, but when he says Alexi wants to raise taxes, Congressman Kirk is lying. Again."
The TPM Poll Average gives Kirk a lead of 43.1%-38.4%.
FreeRider
July 5, 2010 5:33 PM
So, let me get this straight.
1. Alexi lost $2.7 million when the bank failed.
2. He had already paid taxes on that money.
3. So, in accordance with federal tax laws, he's owed a refund of $30K.
I'm sure you will soon explain how this is a scandal and/or evidence of wrongdoing.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
libdevil
July 5, 2010 5:38 PM in reply to FreeRider
He's a Dem. That's all the evidence of wrongdoing the GOP or traditional media needs.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
chameleon
July 6, 2010 8:37 AM in reply to FreeRider
When there is no scandal, create one -right?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Paul Turner
July 5, 2010 5:37 PM
What a bogus, opportunistic accusation! If you have negative income you don't owe income tax. I bet plenty of Kirk's fellow Republicans are reading this story and wishing that he hadn't suggested that qualifying for a refund is improper.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
eclecticbrotha
July 5, 2010 5:42 PM
Mark Kirk really thinks he can distract from his pattern of habitual lying by whining about Alexi's refund? Oh yeah, I forgot I'm talking about the guy who was worried preschoolers would be bringing guns to class...
And um, why is a supposed progressive blogger suggesting this will be a problem for Alexi again?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
cmpnwtr
July 5, 2010 5:57 PM
This is no story! I might expect to see it on Redstate, but not here.. sheesh... The guy got a legitimate tax refund for pete's sake.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
decisivemoment
July 5, 2010 6:20 PM
I'm tired of this. It's also all over the Chicago media like a cheap suit. I hear ordinary people I know who are middle-of-the-road pontificating about it.
Maybe all the people who are pontificating about it ought to give up their right to collect any kind of tax break on lost income. That would shut them up real fast.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Prysmith
July 5, 2010 7:40 PM
He paid this money on non-existent income. He is now getting the money refunded. Who in their right mind sees this as a problem?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Clarance Vine
July 5, 2010 8:38 PM
Well,people can blame the media, blame the TPM headline, blame Kirk, but if the Illinois voters can't put this together (figure it out) on their own, then they be stupid, really, really, stupid.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
midnight rambler
July 6, 2010 2:49 AM
I'm guessing none of the people posting actually claimed a loss on their taxes. If this is really legit, can someone explain why he was able to deduct $2.7 million worth of losses (or at least up to whatever part of his salary would make for a $30,000 refund), whereas I was only allowed to deduct $3,000 from my income even though I lost $6,000?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
July 6, 2010 8:31 AM in reply to midnight rambler
Where does it say he deducted $2.7 million? It doesn't. It says he LOST $2.7 million. The refund covers several years, not just one.
Also, if it's not legit, take it up with the IRS since that's who concluded he was due a refund for overpayment.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
July 6, 2010 8:37 AM in reply to midnight rambler
Correction: the refund covers one year.
Alexi's annual salary is $135K; He lost nearly 20X his annual salary in one year. Does the $6K you lost = 20X your annual salary?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
midnight rambler
July 6, 2010 3:13 PM in reply to FreeRider
My Schedule D says you can only deduct up to $3,000 in investment losses from your income, no matter what it is relative to your salary. If he's got the $2.7 million to lose, then I'm guessing he has more income than just his salary and I say it's his tough shit.
I'm really fucking sick of all the supposed Democrats being rich scumsuckers like this.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
July 6, 2010 3:42 PM in reply to midnight rambler
What difference does it make if he has money or not? There isn't a thing to indicate that he's a scumsucker.
Having money doesn't make you evil just like being poor doesn't make you virtuous.
George Soros, LBJ, FDR, Kennedy, Herb Kohl, John Kerry, Al Gore are just a few examples of rich people who were unstinting advocates for the little guy.
Policy positions, not bank account, matter.
If you resent someone simply because they have money, you're a knee-jerk moron.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
gecagecaca
July 6, 2010 9:05 AM
look look look http://www.tnta.us
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?