TPMDC

NRCC Creates Campaign Outreach Program -- For Safe-Seat Candidates


Rep. Pete Sessions (R-TX)

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

The National Republican Congressional Committee, which is tasked with electing Republicans to Democratic-held House seats and protecting vulnerable GOP-held seats, has now rolled out a new program -- for candidates in open safe GOP seats.

The new Young Guns Vanguard program, an NRCC press release announced, will "assist candidates running in Republican-leaning open seats as they head into the fall. It kicks off a working relationship between the NRCC and these Vanguard candidates, as well as their future colleagues in the House Republican Conference, in advance of the election."

The first seven candidates announced for the program are all in seats that are GOP-leaning or fully safe for the Republicans.

Here are the seven candidates, along with John McCain's percentage in each district: Jeff Denham (CA-19, 52%), Jeff Duncan (SC-03, 64%), Trey Gowdy (SC-04, 60%), Todd Rokita (IN-04, 56%), Tim Scott (SC-01, 56%), Marlin Stutzman (IN-03, 56%), Steve Womack (AR-03, 64%).

We didn't quite get the point of this, so we asked NRCC deputy communications director Paul Lindsay: Will party resources and fundraising energy end up going to these candidates who are already in safe seats? What is the purpose and benefit of this program?

"The NRCC's primary focus will remain on winning as many competitive Democrat-held seats as possible," said Lindsay. "With that being said, the Young Guns Vanguard gives these candidates an opportunity to be brought into the fold and establish a relationship with their future colleagues well before the Election."

Comments (6) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (0)

July 7, 2010 4:55 PM   

What this means is that there are no "safe GOP seats". Perceived Republican gains in November are dissolving fast and they may lose ever perceived "safe" Republican seats.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 7, 2010 5:18 PM    in reply to John M

That would be nice. But do you see any actual evidence to support it?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 7, 2010 5:38 PM    in reply to hunter

I would say that the teabaggers are evidence of that. With the GOP purging Moderates and the extreme right wing running candidates that are going to siphon off votes from them, this election cycle could be very interesting. I think that there are going to be seats that would normally be considered "safe for Republicans" going to a Democrat because of a split vote.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 7, 2010 6:31 PM   

Maybe they want freshmen feeling dependent on the other incumbents so they'll follow the party line.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 7, 2010 7:05 PM   

establish a relationship with their future colleagues well before the Election

Is that the new euphemism for outings to bondage clubs, or does it involve an airport bathroom? :)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 7, 2010 7:54 PM   

You know, this is so not 1994 for the Republicans. Seriously, are they that dumb?

Never mind.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on