
Key members of the House Republican leadership this week finally signed on to a measure that would repeal health care reform -- after pressure from the ultra-conservative Club for Growth.
We've written thousands of words about Republicans' on-again, off-again desire to repeal the health care reform law passed this spring. There are plenty of bills out there that would repeal the measure, and the official GOP platform as they attempt to win back power in Congress during this fall's elections is that they would "repeal and replace" reform with their own version. This strategy comes as the Republican base is pushing them more and more to fight what critics call "ObamaCare," while the general public is warming to the law. Another new poll yesterday adds to the trend that health care reform's popularity is on the rise.
But the only action that would actually roll back the reform law before the election comes in the form of a "discharge petition" that would force Speaker Nancy Pelosi to put the Republican repeal bill on the floor. Rep. Steve King (R-IA) is so serious about repealing health care that he filed a discharge petition that went largely ignored. On Monday, King's attempt had just 30 signers, most of them his buddies who join him on most of his legislation.
Yesterday, however, King suddenly had 66 friends. Most of them jumped on the bandwagon after about 4:39 p.m. on Monday, when the Club for Growth's government affairs director Andy Roth emailed members about the legislation. The threat was clear: Roth told members the discharge petition "will be considered as a key vote on the Club's annual congressional scorecard," one of the gold standards in conservative rankings.
Calling it by the conservative moniker "ObamaCare," Roth wrote that "The Club has played a leading role in working to make sure this ill-conceived, over-reaching law gets fully repealed, allowing lawmakers to start over with something that will actually lower costs and reduce the size of government. This petition will force the House to act in that direction."
On Tuesday, 22 Republicans jumped on board, including NRCC Chairman Pete Sessions (R-TX). Wednesday, 14 more GOPers signed on, including the big cahunas House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) and Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA).
"The American people asked Congress and President Obama not to pass the massive health care overhaul, and they were ignored," Boehner and Cantor said in a statement Wednesday morning. They said that voters remain opposed to the law -- but as noted above, the law is getting more popular.
The Club for Growth isn't the only group pressuring Republicans. As RedState.com's Erick Erickson noted here, the Heritage Foundation's new group Heritage Action will make the discharge petition a top priority.
"So here's the deal: Republicans in Congress say they'd vote for full repeal of Obamacare. But how many are willing to put their signature where their mouth is?" Erickson wrote, urging readers to appeal to their members of Congress, even Blue Dog Democrats who opposed the bill.
"Many of them say they are for repeal. Let's weed out the honest ones from the liars," Erickson wrote.
Although Democrats retort that this means Republicans want to go back to the days of allowing insurance companies to discriminate based on preexisting conditions, the Boehner-Cantor statement claims that the legislation they support doesn't amount to a full repeal.
They say King's bill "would repeal the portions of ObamaCare that originated in the Senate and clear the way for Congress to start over with better solutions, such as the common-sense health care bill House Republicans offered during the health care debate." The text of the legislation, however, simply repeals all provisions of the health care reform and puts back into place the laws that existed before it passed -- it doesn't replace the health care reform with anything new.
They also plan to sign on to a bill by Rep. Wally Herger (R-CA) that would fully repeal the bill and "replace it with the common-sense solutions Republicans have put forth." As a reminder, there's a bit of a discrepancy as to how those common-sense solutions would work.
tommyo
July 1, 2010 8:57 AM
"..after pressure from the ultra-conservative Club for Growth."
I believe the full name is The Club for Growth of the Nations Bloated Millionaire Class at the Expense of Everybody Else.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
NerdRage
July 1, 2010 11:29 AM in reply to tommyo
FAILTRAIN....PULLIN INTO THE STATION!
AAAAAAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLL ABOOOOOARD!
lol...unfortunately they don't know the failtrain drives right off a cliff
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
It's Pat
July 1, 2010 9:02 AM
Maybe this will also light a fire under Democrats not motivated to vote this year. Particularly college students who are looking forward to getting on their parent's insurance plan.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Riesz Fischer
July 1, 2010 9:25 AM in reply to It's Pat
Yeah, "Vote for us! The other guys are even worse!". That'll get 'em out to vote.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Clarance Vine
July 1, 2010 9:39 AM in reply to Riesz Fischer
Exactly! We sold out on HC too, but we we have a conscience. Vote for us!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
chameleon
July 1, 2010 4:34 PM in reply to Clarance Vine
Yep Darcy Dancer aka sister kevin is back -
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
It's Pat
July 1, 2010 10:00 AM in reply to Riesz Fischer
That's not what I posted and you know it.
To explain further; people that see some good in the bill may be motivated to get out and vote against the idea of repealing something they like - particularly those that want to remain on their parent's insurance.
But yeah, your sarcastic response is exactly why we got 4 more years of Bush. People thought there was no difference, when it was obvious there was. Still, they stayed home or voted third party.
Worked out great.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
It's Pat
July 1, 2010 10:29 AM in reply to Riesz Fischer
That's not what I wrote and you know it.
To repeat: There are people that see some good in this bill and this may motivate them to get out and vote against it's repeal. Particularly college students that want to remain on their parent's health insurance.
Your sarcastic reply is the same attitude that got us 4 more years of Bush; people said the same thing and either voted third party or stayed home.
That worked out great.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CityGuy
July 1, 2010 10:46 AM in reply to It's Pat
Agree completely. The HCR bill that passed is both historic and gaining in popularity. I want the Repubs to campaign this way into November! Well see how that works out for them then.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
runfastandwin
July 1, 2010 5:13 PM in reply to Riesz Fischer
It was ever thus wasn't it? When have people ever voted positively? It's always the lesser of two evils.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ADad
July 1, 2010 9:04 AM
Hey Republicans! Get your government out of my health care!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The BBQ Chicken Madness
July 1, 2010 9:24 AM in reply to ADad
Hey Republicans! Get your incompetence out of my Government!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CityGuy
July 1, 2010 10:47 AM in reply to ADad
LOL "More specifically, get your government out of my Medicare!"
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Ugg the Repug
July 1, 2010 9:22 AM
Ugg too have monkey who dance when Ugg wave ouch hammer. Har har har.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JonathanU
July 1, 2010 9:26 AM
Now if they would only pledge to repeal Medicare and Social Security, we'd be set.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
EnnuiDivine
July 1, 2010 9:42 AM in reply to JonathanU
Don't forget the 16th and 17th amendments. And, if we had a nation of Sharron Angles in charge...the 21st amendment would be gone too.
Come to think of it, the 14th amendment would be changed to only apply to "certain" people.
It's a utopia, I tell's ya.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JonathanU
July 1, 2010 10:04 AM in reply to EnnuiDivine
Yep, for all their carrying on about the Constitution, the GOP always seems to want to chip away parts of it... except the 2nd Amendment of course.
This recent movement to have Senators elected by state assemblies like in the old days seems especially insidious because I think it flies under the radar for most people. But it is just designed to entrench corporate interests. You have to ask yourself, why does the GOP hate democracy so much?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
donquijoterocket
July 1, 2010 3:52 PM in reply to EnnuiDivine
Don't forget those second amendment remedies.That's the winger constitution for you it's only got one real amendment all the others are optional suggestions.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
thomas1
July 1, 2010 9:45 AM in reply to JonathanU
well, the great orange boner does believe they should be means tested.
the D's better hit on this one too.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CityGuy
July 1, 2010 10:49 AM in reply to JonathanU
Roy Blunt's against Medicare too. He said so himself!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
aq
July 1, 2010 12:04 PM in reply to JonathanU
Why the hell couldn't they just call it 'medicare for everyone'.
Or actually make it medicare for everyone.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CityGuy
July 1, 2010 1:42 PM in reply to aq
They didn't have the votes for that sort of comprehensive HCR this time around. Step-by-step now. First this, then that.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Maritza
July 1, 2010 9:33 AM
In the words of bumbling Bush "BRING IT ON"!!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Sir T
July 1, 2010 9:49 AM
TO be somewhat fair, being against health care was the only thing that brought them any kind of electoral success in the polls. So its natural the might want to bring the good times back. Also if HCR gets more popular the republicans are in danger of having every statement they made against it used in attack ads. They have to drive public opinion down again somehow before that happens.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ahumbleopinion
July 1, 2010 12:51 PM in reply to Sir T
They'll use repeal of health care the same way they use repeal of abortion rights. A wedge issue to get people to vote for them without any real plan to actually take action.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dmacgregor
July 1, 2010 9:50 AM
"... the only action that would actually roll back the reform law before the election comes in the form of a "discharge petition" that would force Speaker Nancy Pelosi to put the Republican repeal bill on the floor."
A TPM article to explain the likely result of this ploy's implementation would be very helpful. What would Democrats do to stop it, etc.?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
runfastandwin
July 1, 2010 5:15 PM in reply to dmacgregor
Well it has to have a majority vote, for starters.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
johnnydoughey
July 1, 2010 10:07 AM
Sad that the two mobs in Washington won't allow them to vote their conscienc... oops, I forgot. The folks who used too represent this once great nation no longer HAVE consciences... only reelection goals.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Matt Jones
July 1, 2010 10:10 AM
Yeah, after all, all the districts that kicked out Rethugs and went for candidates who ran on passing HCR - they aren't Real 'Mericans. The teabaggers bussed in by FreedomWorks on the other hand, half of which are already *on* government healthcare - even if there are only a couple thousand, they're the ones that count! :)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
IowaKid
July 1, 2010 10:50 AM
Oh gee what else do they want to do. First they are apologizing to BP then the leader apologizes to Wall Street now they to reverse the health care bill. Are people so stupid they don't see what's going on under there nose? Get out and vote.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
crazycarnypoptart
July 1, 2010 10:56 AM
speaking of healthcare. You know how they say it would turn us into canada and we will have to deal with long lines at all doctors. Funny thing about canada is that they were one of the first countries to get out of the recession. Their economy is booming.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
crazycarnypoptart
July 1, 2010 10:57 AM
of course their senators are picked by the queen of another country.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Clarance Vine
July 1, 2010 11:01 AM in reply to crazycarnypoptart
And ours are picked by corporations.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Steaming Pile
July 1, 2010 4:15 PM in reply to crazycarnypoptart
Who is also the Queen of Canada.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
July 1, 2010 10:59 AM
I don't like going to the doctor anyway.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Rick Jones
July 1, 2010 12:05 PM in reply to Kyle
The health of me and my family is secondary to the power of the Republican party, and a distant third when you throw in the absolute power of big corporations.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Ugot2bkidnme
July 1, 2010 11:12 AM
Seems to me both Repubs and Dems have made this too complicated. Simply expand the Federal Employee Health Benefit program (FEHB) that is offered to federal employees including members of Congress. Spend some time on the OPM website and see for yourself. Open it up to individuals, businesses, etc. Give tax credits to small business to help pay employer portion of premiums, create a sliding scale for low income families, etc. Lots of consumer friendly provisions. Visit the site and see for yourself. If it's good for members of Congress, surely they would like to extend the opportunity to their constituents!? www.opm.gov/insure/health/
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
July 1, 2010 11:19 AM
I really don;t understand why the Republicans are listening to the right wing groups. It's a sure fire way to end up out of power and even more pissed off.
Everyone I've talked to more or less likes the Health Care bill and are starting to see some of it's provision take a effect. Even my friends on the right who hated the bill are starting to come around.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
It's Pat
July 1, 2010 12:53 PM in reply to Scott
"I really don;t understand why the Republicans are listening to the right wing groups."
Because that is their base now. There does not seem to be any moderates or reasonable people in the party so now you're seeing the GObP co-opt with Teabaggers, John Burch and the Chamber people.
Plus the Republican Party has no principles or ideas (thank you, Bennett) so they will dance to the tune of anything these groups say.
The Republicans are cowards.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
sparrowhawk
July 1, 2010 1:36 PM in reply to Scott
It just seems to me that the Republican party is the ultimate party of projection. They constantly kowtow to Grover Norquist and the Club for Growth, while simultaneously claiming that the Democrats are beholden to MoveOn and George Soros. I can't think of many Democrats who would be scared into supporting a bill because otherwise "MoveOn will put a mark on your scorecard..." while it seems that half the Republican caucus is running scared at the possibility of getting a blip from the Club for Growth.
Are there any Democrats who accept DFA or PCCC or MoveOn as their masters the way that the Republicans bow to Rush Limbaugh, the CFG and GN?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Freeman
July 1, 2010 11:46 AM
Another power grab effort.
What I like is that at least the Tea Party picks whomever is fit to do the job.
Republicans have been told several times, we are a 'party' of independent choice, etc.
Seems desperate people will try to latch onto anything if it looks like a winner. Funny, leaches do that too...
I doubt any of this will mean a whole lot as we go under from the oil spill. As that grows it will gain traction with everyone.
It remains to be seen what the outcome will be when things get so bad people have to be evacuated, by choice or force...
I suggest most everything else will take a back seat as this crisis unfolds.
I wonder when the rest of the world will become actively involved?
As the oil travels across the Atlantic, I bet the first sighting in northern Brittan will set things off.
Health care for a dying planet...
Repeal shouldn't be limited to just that. Those who authored, supported, and voted for this need to be put out, starting with their office, then maybe the country...
Thinking of that...what a long list that is! Whooee!
Then again, no decent person wants to be convicted by association and refuse any idea of holding any office, elected or appointed...
Too bad that distractions like this are allowed when the real deals are being made on the QT...Pelosi is attempting to use a U.N. treaty to subjugate our Second Amendment Rights.
Soon our First Amendment Right of Free Speech will be legislated out too...Disclose.
Let's all regress back to our founding documents, return to state government, and castrate the fed back to where The Constitution says it's supposed to be.
Supreme court, civil only. Title III courts adjudicate Constitutional matters. A council of states forms the fed and offers constitutional opinion on laws and legislation.
Everything after the Thirteenth Amendment deleted as unconstitutional.
Confine the fed, its authority, and central banking system to The District of Columbia and its territories as written.
See how they do with the debt they made on their own...
Have a dose of CHANGE your own self!
Cry FREEDOM!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
condew
July 1, 2010 12:25 PM in reply to Freeman
Yawn.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JonBrownzBody
July 1, 2010 5:09 PM in reply to Freeman
Seriously. When everyone you know tells you to seek help, you should consider that there is probably something to message. Really....the 'northern brittans' will thank you for it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Capt Elaine
July 1, 2010 11:50 AM
Beats me HOW ObamaCare could be popular now, since NOT ONE benefit has happened, nor have the TAXES associated with it started yet... check your first paycheck Jan 2011... assuming you work and get a paycheck. You'll start paying for it then... Senior Citizens, will also pay then, because they will LOSE benefits.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ahumbleopinion
July 1, 2010 12:57 PM in reply to Capt Elaine
You might want to fact check:
Paying for the Plan:
* Medicare Payroll tax on investment income -- Starting in 2012, the Medicare Payroll Tax will be expanded to include unearned income. That will be a 3.8 percent tax on investment income for families making more than $250,000 per year ($200,000 for individuals).
* Excise Tax -- Beginning in 2018, insurance companies will pay a 40 percent excise tax on so-called "Cadillac" high-end insurance plans worth over $27,500 for families ($10,200 for individuals). Dental and vision plans are exempt and will not be counted in the total cost of a family's plan.
* Tanning Tax -- 10 percent excise tax on indoor tanning services.
Medicare:
* Closes the Medicare prescription drug "donut hole" by 2020. Seniors who hit the donut hole by 2010 will receive a $250 rebate.
* Beginning in 2011, seniors in the gap will receive a 50 percent discount on brand name drugs. The bill also includes $500 billion in Medicare cuts over the next decade.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
thomas1
July 1, 2010 4:44 PM in reply to ahumbleopinion
you expect a troll to check facts? Ain't gonna happen. Facts have a liberal bias.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
runfastandwin
July 1, 2010 5:18 PM in reply to ahumbleopinion
I don't think the Cadillac tax will make it all the way to 2018, but we'll see.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
LiberalRedneck
July 1, 2010 3:07 PM in reply to Capt Elaine
Nutball.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Middleclassvotingbloc
July 1, 2010 11:52 AM
That is great news, just what the Democrats want them to do!!!. The Club for Growth now working with the Democrats--Great News!!!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Middleclassvotingbloc
July 1, 2010 12:07 PM
Capt Elaine, sounds like you get your information from Beck, Your Grand Wizard and leader, Rush Limbaugh and Palin and of course-Fox News. Don't believe the propaganda. Republicans are using you poor people as pawns in their game. Look like you may be already on the governement's rolls.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Middleclassvotingbloc
July 1, 2010 12:14 PM
The Republicans are telling their poor trailer park and uneducated voters that the Democrats want to redistribute their wealth. The one thing they failed to mention is that they don't have wealth to redistribute. The Republicans' goal in congress is to protect their own wealth and that of their corporate donors. These people don't care about the poor and middleclass not one ounce.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Roger
July 1, 2010 12:22 PM
Well, setting aside the obvious for a moment...he doesn't look quite as orange as he used to look. Your good work in bringing his "orangeness" to our attention is paying off...he must be secretly following TPM.
Rog
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
pmb50
July 1, 2010 12:35 PM
True to form the vile jackals do nothing to give Americans healthcare and do everything to take it away
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ahumbleopinion
July 1, 2010 12:46 PM
The only growth the Club for Growth has achieved is the growth of the top 1% at the expense of the rest of Americans.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dustbunny44
July 1, 2010 1:11 PM
Boehner is the sneering face of the Republican wealth police now that Cheney is retired.
That face of his really inspires loathing, and like Bush it's immediately full of what is behind it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
condew
July 1, 2010 2:28 PM
The Republican Death cult speaks. They care soooo much about the unborn (and the rich); for everyone else, a life that is nasty, brutish, and short.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
condew
July 1, 2010 2:29 PM in reply to condew
Don't get sick.
And if you do, die quickly.
-Alan Grayson
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
LiberalRedneck
July 1, 2010 3:04 PM
Americans have moved on. This is a strategic blunder.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
July 1, 2010 4:08 PM
Yes, Republicans are to be opposed in their fight to maintain health care as a "privilege," not a simple human right. But the current health "compromise" is far from a progressive victory for all Americans, and continues the corporatized status quo of relying on insurers and employers to cover the sick and impoverished. A repeal and new vote on single-payer is what the people demand.
http://www.facebook.com/campaigncorner
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Lucieann
July 1, 2010 4:39 PM
The gift that keeps on giving....to Democrats!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JDinBalt
July 1, 2010 4:52 PM
I'm putting on the popcorn right now :)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Bryce
July 1, 2010 5:04 PM
What a blunder. Hopefully it will just keep building the progressive momentum that got us reform in the first place. Read this excellent piece today by the national campaign director of HCAN, it's really interesting and inspiring: http://www.newdeal20.org/2010/07/01/health-care-and-the-winds-of-history-13361/
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JonBrownzBody
July 1, 2010 5:13 PM
WHACK....please Club for Growth....may I have another!
WHACK....please Club for Growth....may I have another!
So predictable. So sad. So addictive, thank the lawd.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
crazycarnypoptart
July 1, 2010 5:47 PM
You know I want to start an extremist right fringe group too. Then I will make the republicans campaign on something ridiculously unpopular like a war on the orphans as a way to cut spending. That would be awesome.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
crazycarnypoptart
July 1, 2010 5:57 PM
in fact if we just put a 1 percent tax on the upper 10 percent thats all it would take. Then boehner would be talking about free loading orphans.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
crazycarnypoptart
July 1, 2010 5:58 PM
oh and have 1 percent go to orphans.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?