TPMDC

Republicans To Unemployed: Why Won't You All Just Get Some Jobs Already?


Kentucky Senate candidate Rand Paul (R), Senator Jon Kyl (R-AZ) and an unemployment line in the 1930s.

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Jim Bunning and Tom Coburn blocked the extension of unemployment benefits. Jon Kyl called supporting the unemployed a "necessary evil." There's even been talk from one Republican that Congress is creating a nation of "hobos."

So here's TPM's round-up of Republicans hating on the jobless for...well, for being jobless.
























Pennsylvania Attorney General Tom Corbett, who is running for governor, said last week that unemployed people are purposely avoiding jobs so they can continue collecting benefits from the government: "The jobs are there. But if we keep extending unemployment, people are going to sit there and - I've literally had construction companies tell me, 'I can't get people to come back to work until...they say, I'll come back to work when unemployment runs out.'"



Rand Paul, the Republican nominee for senator of Kentucky, said in June that the unemployed need to stop being so picky when it comes to getting a job: "As bad as it sounds, ultimately we do have to sometimes accept a wage that's less than we had at our previous job in order to get back to work and allow the economy to get started again. Nobody likes that, but it may be one of the tough love things that has to happen."



Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ) said in March that unemployment benefits don't "create new jobs. In fact, if anything, continuing to pay people unemployment compensation is a disincentive for them to seek new work." More recently, he's called unemployment benefits a "necessary evil," though added that "it's not a good thing for the economy. It's a bad thing for the economy but it's still the right thing to do for other reasons."



South Carolina Lt. Gov. Andre Bauer compared the unemployed to stray animals back in January, saying that unemployment insurance is a lot like helping out strays. One is "facilitating the problem if you give an animal or a person ample food supply," he said. "They will reproduce, especially ones that don't think too much further than that. And so what you've got to do is you've got to curtail that type of behavior. They don't know any better." Though he later backtracked, saying this probably "wasn't the best metaphor," he has since said that "flat-out lazy" people "would rather sit home and do nothing than do these jobs."



In June, Nevada Senate nominee Sharron Angle said that "what has happened is the system of entitlement has caused us to have a spoilage with our ability to go out and get a job." She added: "They keep extending these unemployment benefits to the point where people are afraid to go out and get a job because the job doesn't pay as much as the unemployment benefit does."



Former House Majority Leader (and former Dancing With The Stars contestant) Tom DeLay appeared on CNN in March to point to "studies that have been done that shows that people stay on unemployment compensation and they don't look for a job until two or three weeks before they know the benefits are going to run out." When host Candy Crowley pointed out that saying "people are unemployed because they want to be" is a "hard sell," DeLay responded: "Well, it is the truth."



Back in May, Sen. Judd Gregg (R-NH) said that Congress needs to think twice about continuing unemployment benefits "because you're out of the recession, you're starting to see growth and you're clearly going to dampen the capacity of that growth if you basically keep an economy that encourages people to, rather than go out and look for work, to stay on unemployment. Yes, it's important to do that up to a certain level, but at some point you've got to acknowledge that we're not Europe."



Rep. Dean Heller (R-NV) said in February that he thinks that though "there should be a federal safety net," extending unemployment benefits yet again raises the question: "Is the government now creating hobos?"







Comments (158) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (1)

July 14, 2010 8:53 AM   

Isn't there a secret valley somewhere that these people could go to and create their perfect society?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

aq

user-pic

July 14, 2010 9:41 AM    in reply to blkblt

Galt's Gulch.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 10:02 AM    in reply to blkblt

yeah.. They can spent thier tax break to start a company.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Joe

Facebook

July 14, 2010 10:07 AM    in reply to Bear

But they don't.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 10:22 AM    in reply to blkblt

Somolia.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

aq

user-pic

July 14, 2010 10:39 AM    in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve

Somalia already had a plague of locust. Why burden them with another?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 3:38 PM    in reply to blkblt

my favorite is 'if you pass this bill unemployment will not go above 8%'. who said that? plus after almost 2 years on unemployment my brother-in -law found a job as soon as his benefits ran out, but i must admit, it wasn't the job he wanted. get a job, any job, have some pride, don't let the government take care of you.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 5:15 PM    in reply to jjdjjd

Let's set the record straight. When Bush took office in 2000, the unemployment rate was heading down at 4.1%. It bottomed out in May, 2000 at 3.8%. Consider that inherited downward elastic momentum.

From May 2000 until February 2009, the US unemployment rate doubled, increasing from 3.8% to 8.2% UNDER BUSH. Unemployment actually skyrocketed with the tax cuts. Bush inherited a 4.1% unemployment from Clinton. Obama inherited an 8.2% unemployment rate from Bush. That is indisputable.

Between February 2009 to December 2009, unemployment went from the inherited 8.2% to 10%. Consider 1% of that (roughly up to 9.2%) upward elastic momentum. It has since fallen to now 9.5%.

The numbers do not lie. Unemployment doubled (a 100% increase) by 4% under Bush. Under Obama unemployment increased by a maximum of only 1.8% (a 22% increase) and is currently down to 9.5 (1.3% higher than his inheritance)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 6:37 PM    in reply to tinsk

you are gilding the lily. and you know it. the reason the rate is dropping is benefits are running out. real rate is about 17%.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 7:57 PM    in reply to tinsk

Just to set the record straight, Bush did not take office in 2000. He was elected in Nov. 2000 and took office on Jan. 20, 2001.
Now lest you think I am a Bush fan, I am not. I am a staunch liberal and support Pres Obama in most every thing he stands for.
But when you make statements, try to be certain you are not discreiditing yourself by posting obviously incorrect facts.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 8:26 PM    in reply to Rick Shreiner

I have friends who are unemployed and they are having difficulty finding work.

I had a friend who used to make $85,000/yr and is now collecting $450/week in California. He has declared bankruptcy and unless he's able to find a decent job, he's going to lose his house.

Every time one of these guys talk about unemployment being a disincentive just makes them sound stupid. In California, $450/week will not pay any mortgage, or rent. A cheap 2 bedroom apartment is over $1,000/mo....

I know that every penny that he gets, he spends on food and clothes for his family. Every penny goes back into the economy.

For the GOP to stop unemployment and want to save those making over $200K/yr (AGI) 3% in taxes is outrageous.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 4:00 AM    in reply to Blueline99

so just how long should we support your friend? or perhaps he should move to where the jobs are, god forbid we inconvience him like that.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 1:21 PM    in reply to jjdjjd

He has worked for over 20 years without ever taking a penny out of the UI system.

Typical Republican ideology... I've got mine, screw the rest of you.

I've known many people who had the same thought until they lost their job and health insurance...

Moving to a new state where there's job is easier said then done... really hard to do when you're out of work.

The money spent on unemployment has an immediate and tangible stimulus effect, withholding it will only make matters worse...

My point of course was wondering why we would consider extending the Bush tax cuts, which only help the top 2%...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 19, 2010 11:30 AM    in reply to jjdjjd

Why shouldn't we help this guy? Sounds like he is an upstanding citizen who has worked hard and contributed. What is your problem with helping your fellow citizen who has fallen on hard times? Isn't that what communities are for?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 7:35 AM    in reply to jjdjjd

You don't get the luxury of foaming at the mouth for almost a year now about Pres Obama not creating enough jobs [one job for every unemployed person], and then turn aroung and say that there ARE plenty of jobs, just as long as we move to where they are found !

I'm calling you out on that self-inflicted contradiction !
You just let us know where all these jobs are, and we'll happily move to them ! !

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 4:05 AM    in reply to tinsk

and when obama took office the rate was 7.7%. like i said, 'gilding the lily'.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 7:51 AM    in reply to blkblt

there is a land that's far away beside the crystal fountain and there's a lake of stew and whiskey too and you can paddle all around in a big canoe.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 8:54 AM   

Where is the DNC in all of this? Why isn't a compilation of all of these quotes in a commercial that is running ad nauseum? I just don't understand why the Dems suck so badly at messaging.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 9:05 AM    in reply to SchrodingersCat

A segment of the DNC, those corporate loving DLCers, enabled the job losses through their policies that encouraged companies moving overseas for cheap labor (NAFTA, Clinton's MFN status with China) not to mention the repeal of Glass-Stegall signed by President Bill Clinton. Sadly, both parties have been taken over by the Money Party Elites who are looking out for their own profit/enrichment. The few Dems outraged have had their voices muted by a media that was consolidated by the Telecom Act of '96 (also signed into law by Bill Clinton).

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 9:16 AM    in reply to verite

*snooze*

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 10:57 AM    in reply to FreeRider

Time to wake up.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 11:18 AM    in reply to cwnidog

I've been telling you firebaggers that for a year now.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 1:27 PM    in reply to FreeRider

And I've been trying to get you Dead Armadillos to smell the coffee for the last 10 years.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 1:55 PM    in reply to cwnidog

Good thing we didn't listen. Otherwise, Republicans might still control Congress and the White House.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 3:56 PM    in reply to FreeRider

Got news for you, they still control Congress with a 41-59 majority in the Senate, helped by what are referred to as "moderate" Democrats.

I think that one of the reasons that you're so upset with the left is that they remind you that you're settling for scraps, giving away most of the meal before negotiations even begin.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Ray

Facebook

July 14, 2010 10:24 AM    in reply to verite

your completely wrong about (NAFTA), NAFTA was created by the Bush 1 administration and the Republican controlled Congress, Clinton signed signed it but he had no choice because it was veto proof the republicans made sure of that.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 11:22 AM    in reply to Ray

Stop making things up. GHWB started NAFTA but Clinton fully supported it and pushed for it. It was passed with a Democratic-controlled Congress, although more Republicans voted for it than Democrats.

NAFTA went into effect 1/1/94, before the Republicans took control.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 11:28 AM    in reply to FreeRider

Which is why you should wake up and listen to people like verite. They're correct and the Dems are in hot water now precisely because of their betrayal of working people.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 11:46 AM    in reply to Steve LaBonne

After winning big in 1996, 2006 and 2008, Democrats are in trouble in 2010 because they passed NAFTA in 1993? LMAO!

Dude, you get more stupid every day. I thought you'd hit rock bottom by now but apparently you have a lot more quick sand of idiocy to go through before reaching the bedrock of sanity and reason.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 12:02 PM    in reply to FreeRider

You really are a useless idiot. The slaughtering of the blue-collar workforce is not just something that happened the last 2 years, it's a long term trend that has been abetted by Democratic as well as Republican policies.

LOL all the way to electoral oblivion, dumbass. You are the poster child for the self-destructive fecklessness of the Democratic party.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 12:05 PM    in reply to Steve LaBonne

Adding, since elections are basically decided by whether the voters have more or less money in their pockets, they won during the bubble economy- not a recipe for durable political success. The long-term reality is the economic decline of the Democratic base, which has been accelerated rather than retarded by things like NAFTA.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 12:20 PM    in reply to Steve LaBonne

Yeah, yeah, yeah. There's no difference between Democrats and Republicans. *yawn*

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 12:56 PM    in reply to FreeRider

Nice try @ spin but the reason Dems are in some trouble is their support of the powerful over working people. Millions of jobs have moved to China (which is why Clinton's MFN status for China was so damaging) and elsewhere oversea. They have also failed to remove some of the damage done by 8 years of an illegitimate pResident that gave generous tax breaks to the rich including practically eliminating the estate tax while spending huge sums waging 2 wars. No bid contracts to cronies (think Halliburton, Blackwater & KBR) have also depleted the coffers.

Also you might want to recall there was a dotcom bubble that looked like it was providing new jobs only to take many pensioners $ into the pockets of a few.

If the purpose of the tax cuts were to create new jobs-where are those jobs & why are so many unemployed? Just wondering how you'll spin that one.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 1:54 PM    in reply to verite

Utter horseshit.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 12:48 AM    in reply to verite

Tax cuts are good, but the people they favor are not loyal to the U.S.

We're being run by outsiders. Nixon started with the Chinese and it went right up to Clinton. The only common denominator is Kissinger. Now we have Brezhinski.

We need to get out of this network.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 11:38 AM    in reply to verite

This is pure, unadulterated crap. First off, it's high time progressives wake up to the fact that anti-trade rhetoric and policies a)won't get us anywhere politically, and b)hurt the economy. The economic case is closed on this one. Secondly, Glass-Steagall was a pretty ridiculously blunt instrument, and we're better off without it; I recognize the knee-jerk reaction that anything Wall Street likes must be bad...but the really dangerous things were increasing the amount of leverage the banks could have, failing to regulate mortgages, swaps, and the ratings shops that judged them, and holding down interest rates for an extended period. Frankly Glass-Steagall didn't hurt and wouldn't have helped.

But far, far more important than these rather esoteric points is this: during Bill Clinton's 8 years in office every quintile of the income spectrum gained wealth, and they did so at remarkably similar rates. During the Reagan/Bush/Bush years the top two quintiles gained at obscene rates while everybody else lost wealth. This "Money Party" poppycock is given the lie by this very simple dataset. The proof is in the pudding.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 11:58 AM    in reply to hunter

All rite, say this again with a little more clarity and a little less generalization. I get the drift of what you are saying--I think--but it would be so much more helpful if you could share some specifics and get a grip on the point of contention for you.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 12:10 PM    in reply to hunter

The economic case is closed on this one.

That, frankly, is horsecrap. The theoretical claims of economists about the benefits of free trade are never borne out in the real world.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 12:26 PM    in reply to Steve LaBonne

After NAFTA passed, 23 million jobs created in the next 7 years. The biggest expansion of the middle class. The biggest growth in salaries across the board. A decline in poverty rates.

But according to you Smoot-Hawley firebagging nutbags, free trade is the enemy of the working man. You're just like those teabaggers who claim that the science is still out on evolution and climate change.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 12:45 AM    in reply to FreeRider

We HAD a manufacturing base back then. All gone, now!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 12:33 PM    in reply to dwjoae

blah, blah, blah.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 6:01 PM    in reply to hunter

well said.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 9:26 AM    in reply to SchrodingersCat

One of the problems are is that there are enough people that totally believe everything that these people say. I know where I live, a job fair was held by Eric Can'tor yesterday which was totally unorganized and was a complete waste of time for those who attended (myself included). People who dared to criticize Can'tor for running such a sham of an operation said "at least he's doing something instead of creating a bunch of government jobs like Obama does" not mentioning, mind you, the fact that NONE of the people at the job fair were hiring but directing people to their websites. There are enough brain-dead people in my district to keep voting Can'tor in consistently, so in their eyes he can do no wrong.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 3:05 PM    in reply to SchrodingersCat

You and me both! Let's face it, rethugs are much better at messaging and walking in lockstep.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 8:55 AM   

One thing is clear: the aforementioned Republicans need to be added to the ever-growing list of unemployed.

Even though it's not like they'd ever have to rely on meager unemployment benefits to support their family or pay for rising healthcare costs (which they seem to be all in favour of...)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 8:56 AM   

You know... it's only a matter of time before one of these reptiles starts talking about unemployed people on 'welfare benefits' buying cadilacs and expensive liquor.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 9:05 AM    in reply to Lemur

They've already started doing that!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 12:26 PM    in reply to chameleon

SO TRUE, Chameleon ... in fact, on the way
to the hospital

I passed a group of "hobos" on the corner,
chuckling as they opened and passed around a
bottle of early 90's Chateau d' Yquem ...
YUM YUM (wicked laugh).

These "male, pale and stale" Rethugs really
need to see a Cardiologist ~ who would gasp
with amazement after applying a stethoscope to
those sunken chests, which reveals

They have NO HEART. Return KARMA is overdue
for these men, truly ...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 12:36 PM    in reply to IVY LEAGUE

LOL.....Bon Jour yvonne.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 7:50 PM    in reply to chameleon

The Dems need to make electoral hay out of this.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 4:52 PM    in reply to Lemur

Yeah, they're doing it already. Emmer, the endorsed GOP candidate running for governor in MN (to replace Gov. "Pot-Hole" AKA "Gov. I-35 Bridge Collapse" Pawlenty) wants to lower the state minimum wage for wait staff in the hospitality industry. He says too many of them are earning $100,000 a year.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 8:57 AM   

They will reproduce, especially ones that don't think too much

And will these new hobos be shovel-ready???

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 9:08 AM   

So, a recent Chemical Engineering graduate from Drexel University, with 3.8 GPA cannot find a job commensurate with his investment and six years of hard work should take a job selling hamburgers at McDonalds? These are the same people who constantly obscure their own responsibility for the mess we're in, who called us a nation of whiners, and are now calling those on unemployment drug addicts, and lazy. When are the teabaggers going to learn that they are wrong headed in their opinions and are juxt being manipulated by right wing wedge issues invented by the spin doctors of the powerful special interest groups. Your black, hispanic, or homosexual neighbor is different from you,that's true, but he is not the cause of your problems, and somehow disenfranchising them is not going to make your life better in any way, in fact, when they're gone, you may be the next problem they may focus on. We are where we are because of the policies, mismanagement and ineptitude of the Bush/ Cheney administration, that's why the GOP was canned, remember that. This country cannot turn on a dime, it took us eight years to get to the depths we're in today, it's going to take a long time to get us out, and the GOP is not pulling for you, in fact they're still part of the problem.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 9:13 AM    in reply to Whenwillthisnightmareend

And to think there are progressives who are so down on the President that they are threatening to stay home or vote Green? How anyone could be so spiteful as to possibly create a win for these folks is beyond the pale. Boggles the mind doesn't it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 9:48 AM    in reply to chameleon

Amen to that! So Obama's been more of a gradualist than a lot of Lefties would prefer? Remember that the perfect is the enemy of the possible. The HCR reform(s) are what is possible right now. The economic stimulus packages, and Wall Street Reform, are just what is possible right now. And far from walking away from Obama for achieving what is possible, the Left had better realize that these sleazebags are the alternative.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 4:06 PM    in reply to Whenwillthisnightmareend

These guys (on both sides of the aisle) have done NOTHING to make sure the jobs that were created here and still should be here stayed here. Tell me why do they think we should do what they say we should do? They don't do what we want and they are supposed to be working for us.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 11:36 PM    in reply to Whenwillthisnightmareend

But the good Dr.teabagger wants the gubmint to subsidize his income in the form of medicare and medicaid payments
http://www.thirdage.com/insurance/rand-paul-cut-government-spending.
I'm still convinced that the first time one registers as a Republican an operative from that party contacts you and offers a rebate or discount on a simultaneous lobotomy and asshole transplant and if they're both successful you're approved for membership,if they're really successful you're encouraged to run for political office or join up with the teabaggers or both.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 12:38 AM    in reply to Whenwillthisnightmareend

Wow! Give an idiot some amphetamines...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 9:12 AM   

Rep. Dean Heller (R-NV) said in February that he thinks that though "there should be a federal safety net," extending unemployment benefits yet again raises the question: "Is the government now creating hobos?"

A Hobo is a migratory worker or homeless vagabond, often penniless.[1] The term originated in the western—probably northwestern—United States during the last decade of the 19th century.[2] Unlike tramps, who worked only when they were forced to, and bums, who didn't work at all, hobos were workers who wandered.[2][3]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hobo

Perhaps he meant to say "Tramps" or "Bums"... Hobo's appear to work.


Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 9:14 AM   

How did we ever get out of recessions before if people just sat around collecting unemployment checks? It's not like they've never been extended before. The leaps in Republican logic are just amazing. It's a true joy arguing with a Republican when they can just make sh*t up as a counterargument.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 9:20 AM   

Anyone sitting around for 99 weeks, waiting for a job, is worthless in the market.

The 90's boom was the result of lost jobs during a very serious recession. The unemployed created their own jobs. Thus, the tech boom.

"Neccessity is the mother of invention."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 10:00 AM    in reply to Silence

"The 90's boom was the result of lost jobs during a very serious recession. The unemployed created their own jobs. Thus, the tech boom. "

The 90-92 recession in the grand scheme of things was hardly a blip compared to other recessions.
http://calculatedriskimages.blogspot.com/2010/07/employment-recessions-june-2010.html

God you don't know what you are talking about.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 10:13 AM    in reply to gene1138

Geezus. You folks are pathetic. What ever happened to, "Yes we Can."?

It's become, "No, we can't. We're waiting for THEY(whoever they are) to do it for us."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 10:34 AM    in reply to Silence

You really need to pray to whatever misbegotten god would have the likes of you among his worshipers that you never find yourself unemployed, trained and experienced only in an industry that the people you adore have exported to China, hungry and on the brink of homelessness. Because you're not going to find these words provide much in the way of nutrition once you've chowed down on them if that happens.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 11:54 AM    in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve

And I will pray that he suddenly finds himself in exactly the situation he so glibly talks shit about. People like him only learn things the hard way.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 12:51 PM    in reply to Silence

Geezus. You folks are pathetic. What ever happened to, "Yes we Can."?

It's become, "No, we can't. We're waiting for THEY(whoever they are) to do it for us."

OK... let's point out a couple things...

1 - Not everyone is an enterpreneur. Everybody has different skills, and the skill set needed to start and run your own business is not one that everyone has.

2 - I was unemployed for 18 months [at the age of 46] from 7/01 thru 1/03. I have several things I'm good at, so I looked at doing my own businesses. The problem for me was my 11-year old, type-1 diabetic daughter. I could not get any kind of health insurance. As soon as I mentioned her, I was told 'We will not cover you'. Period. No discussion. So, although I could [and did] use my skill set to bring in some living money, it was not a long term solution. BTW - no who was opposed to Health Insurance Reform ever stopped to consider that our health care issues may be stopping people from being more independent.

3 - Re: the construction company guy who said no one would work for him until their benefits ran out... did the guy ever stop to consider that their may be other reasons for that? Construction is a business that is notoriously feast/famine. Here in Minnesota, If you take a job and are employed for a certain time, you can't apply again for unemployment for six months. So... if you take a construction job, and it only goes for a couple months and are laid off again, you have *no* source of income. When you're in this situation, your main consideration is maximizing your income. Should that person cut off up to a year of needed income to take a three month job so that the Cons will feel better? The construction employer [and the Con Governmental Candidate] is making the assumption that people aren't taking the jobs because they are morally defective [e.g., lazy and feeding off the government]. Where's the proof? Is this another Reagan-Welfare-Queen-Driving-A-Cadillac story [which was a lie, BTW]?

4 - Put yourself in the shoes of an unemployed person. When I was unemployed, I had just lost a tech job that was within hailing distance of six figures [roughly 2K paycheck after taxes, health insurance, etc. every two weeks]. According to the Cons, I would instead prefer to not work and live off an income that is not only capped [mine was at $450/wk. before taxes], but also time-limited [39 weeks in my case]? In addition, I needed to cough up $975/month for COBRA benefits to keep my health insurance instead of the $300/month it had been costing me when I was employed. Also - any money you *do* go out and make is deducted from the umemployment amount - if I made $100 during a week, my unemployment check was reduced to $350.

Now... put on that Common Sense Tin Foil Hat that the Cons love to bandy about. Does that sound like a great deal to you?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 3:40 PM    in reply to vickj

4. Put yourself in the shoes of an unemployed person. When I was unemployed, I had just lost a tech job that was within hailing distance of six figures [roughly 2K paycheck after taxes, health insurance, etc. every two weeks].

Been there, done that.


.............................................................
"I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth I traveled much, and I observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer."

- Benjamin Franklin

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 5:10 PM    in reply to Silence

I was born into this world on welfare and at sixteen it was yes I can!! Worked two jobs all my life both of them went under after fifteen years. I'm fifty two now and your telling me cuz some sucker's in a suit and tie and their butt licking sidekicks known as our representatives wrecked this country and you want me to start all over from go? I really don't need you telling me how to do life. I did it and I did it right, your buddies did it wrong.. Don't call me pathetic...

" Getting up every day and going through this again and again is hard. "

" Good for some may not be the same for others. "

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 4:53 PM    in reply to Silence

"Neccessity is the mother of invention."

yea

" I'm playing for my life. You're working for money. "

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 9:24 AM   

Unemployed to GOP please return the jobs your greed stole from us

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 9:30 AM    in reply to bpalmer51

You are responsible for your future. Create your own job. Then, create jobs for others. That's how it works.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 9:33 AM    in reply to Silence

You prove yourself to be a bigger moron every day.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 9:49 AM    in reply to chameleon

*** Advice ****


If you extract your brain from your rectum, someone might hire you.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 10:39 AM    in reply to Silence

You should know about brains in the rectum because that's where your brain lives and fyi, I have a job and a good one and for long time, but I also know others aren't as fortunate as I and why shouldn't they be able to collect something to help them through?

You are a pathetic moron. Everything you say in your posts proves it again and again

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 11:12 AM    in reply to Silence

So where are all the jobs that the Bush tax cuts were supposed to create?

GOP Claim: Tax cuts create jobs

Subsequent action: nice fat tax cuts

Expected result: lots of jobs created

Actual result: job growth fails to keep pace with population growth; jobs lost during 2002-2003 recession not replaced, unemployment continues to grow


Please explain where all the jobs are that were supposed to have been created by the Bush tax cuts. And don't blame things on President Obama; the lackluster job growth has been going on since 2002. The GOP gets to own this one.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 1:05 PM    in reply to Silence

Once again, you are either not capable of critical thinking or are an idiot [I know where my money is].

* - There are currently 5 workers for every available job. That means [try and follow along] that if every job were filled, 80% or workers would still be unemployed.

* - Many jobs are being shipped overseas by the same people that you think of as 'heroes'.

* - Employers won't hire people that are overqualified. Even if you fake it, you have to somehow explain that you are perfect for that fry-cook job at McDonald's even though you just spent the last five years as an Airplane Mechanic

* - It has been documented in more than one place [the most recent one I saw was on the Money Magazine website] that employers will not consider a candidate that is currently unemployed.

* - It has also been documented in more than one place that if you're over a certain age [roughly early-40's] you are almost unemployable.

* - Let me just say in closing [since your comments indicate that you think like this] that 'Atlas Shrugged' is one of the most poorly thought out and stupid book that I ever read.

You are one of those idiot clones that the Matrix feeds off of [didn't much like the film but the concept is valid]. You can't/won't consider anything that isn't spoonfed to your brain and don't know how to distinguish fact from opinion. Your motto is pretty much 'Thank You, Mr. Beck/Limbaugh/Gingrich, may I have another?'

The real heroes in this tale are the people who are getting constantly sucked dry by the people you admire and still manage to keep body and soul together without going on a shooting rampage...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 7:46 PM    in reply to vickj

Ugg step out of character. Friggin' BRAVO!!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 12:44 AM    in reply to vickj

You need to do something with that energy!

Don't let the negative suck you in to that.

I'm sure you didn't want to fly off, but sometimes it's good.

I wish people her could brainstorm instead of stabbing at each other.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 8:47 AM    in reply to vickj

* - Many jobs are being shipped overseas by the same people that you think of as 'heroes'.

Sounds truly sinister, doesn't it? I received a notice last week stating if I do not move a segment of my US based manufacturing to Asia, I will lose my current business in Asia? Why? Government stimulus money. It was handed to Asian companies with conditions....create jobs. Asian companies, especially in China, are demanding that US companies build any products purchased by their homeland companies in that country.

Got it? I have no choice. There are very few orders coming from US companies and in order to remain viable, I must comply with the demands of their goverments.

Obama is a playing checkers in a chess tournament.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 5:35 PM    in reply to Silence

Any company who got it's start here then takes it's jobs to another country is a traitor!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 5:45 PM    in reply to Silence

In my book you my friend are a traitor to this country. You do realize America will never become a part of the one world government? I doubt seriously if all those home grown militia's are going to sit silent while you incorporate our land and change our countries name? I don't see any way around it we got one nasty future ahead of us... with Islam wanting us on the one hand and Europe trying to incorporate us on the other while our brothers, sisters, aunts, uncles, grandma's and grandpa's fight to live comfortably?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 5:31 PM    in reply to Silence

hehehehe How do I respond to that?

"I ain`t got no magical powers and mystical trips and all that kind of crap"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 9:35 AM    in reply to Silence

Ugg create job. Make hammer rests out of empty skulls ... like yours. Step this way. Har har har.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 10:35 AM    in reply to Ugg the Repug

Lol. Morning Ug!!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 11:00 AM    in reply to chameleon

Good day. Ug call you Chamee for short. Har har har.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 12:25 PM    in reply to Ugg the Repug

Defintely - it's Chammy to you.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 11:41 AM    in reply to Ugg the Repug

Ugg continues to bring the funny.
Needed now more than ever.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 11:58 AM    in reply to Indie Tarheel

Ugg thank Indie. Call me Ug for short. Har har har.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 5:23 PM    in reply to Silence

" Pain's not bad, it's good. It teaches you things. I understand that. "

Living is what scares me. Dying is easy.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 9:36 AM   

Man wants to work, he can find work. Take off the Birkenstocks, put on some overalls, and get your lazy butt out there.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 9:50 AM    in reply to Ahmedsaid

I'll bet that line of yours gets nodding heads of approval at the all-white, republican country club you belong to Sailorboy!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 9:51 AM    in reply to Ahmedsaid

...says the man who is busy typing on a website (devoted to views not of his own) instead of working. Maybe the job you are in is not challenging enough for you?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 10:23 AM    in reply to Rojo Johnson

Cashing mommy's checks can't be very challenging.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 9:52 AM    in reply to Ahmedsaid

Sailorboy forget to add "...and pick some cotton," didn't he? Don't be afeared, Sailorboy. Speak mind. Har har har.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 11:35 AM    in reply to Ahmedsaid

Oh as if you even have a job, earnie! You have been posting moronic comments here 24 hours a day, 7 days a week all the while collecting your SSI disability for months now.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 9:53 AM   

Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ) said in March that unemployment benefits don't "create new jobs. In fact, if anything, continuing to pay people unemployment compensation is a disincentive for them to seek new work."
Whether or not people want to work is immaterial to whether or not jobs are being created. "If anything," more jobs should be available if less people are willing to work.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 9:56 AM   

Are these people really looking at the same economy in the United States we are? Wait until election time. I'm sure their sentiments will change. Why should I get a job making less than unemployment? Especially when it wouldn't pay my bills? Some people are just stupid. Well, I'm unemployed and pregnant so I'm just a stray hobo dog.

There is a story about how Iraqi officials are killing about 56,000 stray dogs a month. So maybe the next step is they round us up and just shoot us. :) Such idiots.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Joe

Facebook

July 14, 2010 10:10 AM   

I consider unemployment a hand in getting from my old job to my next one. In my case, from a 15-year career getting very specialized into another one I could go at least halfway to supporting my family.

We're talking about thousands of people with training, education and seniority who've been invited to seek opportunity elsewhere. All the investment in making me a really brilliant biotech instrumentation expert is valuable in a society, for example, and there's no way I can continue being me, married with children, working an hourly wage job under $20/hour.

Defense of Marriage, my ass!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 10:11 AM   

We have got to find a way to cut the senators pay. I think that would really help with the deficit. I say we cut it by about 70%, I really think that would help the economy and if they don't like it let them look for another job. They make to much money. They are doing nothing to create jobs for the unemployed. Better yet, lets fire them all and "let them eat cake".

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 10:21 AM   

You're missing one Republican asshole from this parade of idiots: Ben Nelson (D-Neb).

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 10:24 AM   

No job? No problem! Just use that free time making the luxury items you used to go out and buy!

Well, that's probably the GOP mentality. Here's a sardonic look at how they probably see it:

Video link: http://bit.ly/ozqT6

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 11:06 AM   

What happens to peoples self worth when you say "get a job!" Shure you can lose 10% of employment in two years; but you can't gain 10% back in 2 years. 2% job growth per year would be phenomenal! Even if job growth was 5% you would still have about 1/2 the people who lost jobs unemployed after a year! And half the unemployed would be going "what am I doing that I am not geting a job!" It is sad.


Then ther is the longterm damage unemployment does. 20 year olds put off buying a house and having a family and the age you bought your first house is THE most important predictor of your wealth at retirement age.

Older workers will never go back to work.

Lower middle class teenagers will not be able to earn more than a 2 year degree because they can't save enough money or time to finish a four year degree.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 11:12 AM   

It's not about the work it's about the rent fool. No point in taking that Wal-Mart job if it pays less than the unemployment check that covers your rent and necessities.

Just another round of plutocratic self righteousness from out of touch GOPers, who can't be bothered to know or care about the masses...because they got theirs so all is well.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 11:35 AM    in reply to MrRandom

You will definitely remain unemployed.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 12:20 PM    in reply to Silence

You know what you're right, encouraging people to make less than their cost of living and subsequently spend far less, in an economy heavily dependent on consumerism is a sure path to success.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 12:22 PM    in reply to MrRandom

But at least they'll be working Silence, being a wage slave isn't so bad when you have an inflated sense of self worth. At least that's what the GOP told me.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 2:20 PM    in reply to MrRandom

Sometimes, one must take less in the short run to end up with more in the long run.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 7:00 PM    in reply to Silence

Plutocratic rubish but okay I'll use your (extremely flimsy) logic. If thats the case then the rich and well-to-do shouldn't mind taking LESS home in revenue to pay MORE in taxes, for services, debt reduction, and UI benefits especially since the latter increases consumption and helps slow economic contraction. Happy agreement.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 9:22 AM    in reply to MrRandom

IU benefits create jobs? Are you serious?

So, you're theory is that the consumer, receiving money from producers for not producing, is stimulating?

All right. The next time I require plumbing services, I'll demand that that the plumber advance to me the money required for his services and explain to him that this is how jobs are created.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 1:16 PM    in reply to Silence

UI benefits help maintain a higher level of consumption than we would have otherwise. They slow economic contraction, which compared your plutocratic alternative (accepting wages below living standards, just so you can say you work) is much better.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 11:21 AM   

These people make blanket statements. They are dismissive and counter productive. And counter-intuitive. It's apparent that these people have never lived on UI "benefits." It's also apparent these people have enjoyed charmed lives; enjoy steady incomes and fail wholly to comprehend the hardships faced by 2.5 million unemployed in this country. Their collective responses and mindset resonates with those of MacArthur who, in 1933, moved a tank division and a cavalry charge against the Bonus Army, WWI veterans who had marched on DC asking Congress to "redeem" their Service Certificates (like bonds), which were not due to be paid until 1945, to help weather the Great Depression. Congress and Herbert Hoover refused the Bonus Army's request due to fears of a 2.6 billion deficit such a payout would create.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 11:40 AM   

This is what it means to be a Republican. In fact, this is what enables one to be a Republican. Two missing qualities: foresight and empathy. The Republican has a job and doesn't see any possible way that he's going to lose it. He can't foresee that, thus it won't happen. So, he can't imagine what he would have to do if he suddenly lost his job. "Oh I'd just go get another one." Show me. He can't. That's a mental exercise that he just doesn't feel like doing. The available jobs pay far less and are actually not enough to sustain him and his family. How fast can he sell a house? So, the mortgage, health care, relocation costs, auto repairs, and the high cost of having to borrow just to pay the bills after you run out of money--not considerations for him.

And, the missing empathy means he sees no connection between himself and the next guy if the next guy has lost his job first. The Republican has empathy for himself AFTER that unforeseeable event in which he's lost his job. And, he'll blame that on Democrats and/or illegal immigrants.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 12:00 PM    in reply to chimpale

Recently there was a letter in the local paper from a woman who has been unemployed for over a year. She said she has always been a Republican, but she now she thinks the government should do more for the unemployed.

To me THAT is the essence of being a Republican: opposition to social programs unless it benefits them. I still remember a debate in the House on something that affected children. Democrats held up photos of children who would benefit. Republicans held up photos of their children and grandchildren and complained that they would have to pay for it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 12:10 PM    in reply to Powkat

I got mine screw you! Oh wait I lost mine help me!

That's conservatives in a nutshell.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 12:14 PM    in reply to MrRandom

"Keep the government's hands off my Medicare!"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 1:52 PM    in reply to chimpale

Chimpale,
Your observation that Republicans lack foresight and empathy makes about as much sense as asserting that ALL Democrats possess these same qualities. Democrats have controlled both Houses of Congress since 2007. If the leaders of the Democrat Party possessed the foresight you attribute to them, shouldn't they have anticipated the economic collapse fueled by no-doc NINJA loans made to anyone with a pulse, the abuse of the derivative market, the role Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had in causing the financial meltdown and taken pre-emptive action?
You folks on the left are always quick to point the finger at the cold, heartless Republicans, but you never hold your own party members accountable for failing to step to the plate to defend the non-union working class, by enforcing immigration laws so that American workers are not undercut by cheaper foreign labor and ending the use of taxpayer dollars to subsidize corporations that move jobs to foreign shores.
Who cares what these goofball politicians said? They're all out of touch with reality, Democrats and Republicans alike. Many of them never held jobs in the private sector; guys like Arlen Specter, John Kerry, Joe Biden and the late Robert Byrd have sponged off the taxpayer's dime their entire professional careers - they're clueless. All they know how to do is spend Other People's Money to get elected and re-elected. The bigger question is, the question that all of us should be asking regardless of political affiliation, what is the President's plan for reversing the course of our nation's economy? Nothing as far as I can tell, which portends a deeper, longer-term systemic problem over the next 5 years, maybe even the next decade. Do you know any self-respecting, reasonably motivated American thrilled with the prospect of receiving UC benefits for 5 or even 10 years?
Isn't it long past time for us to be petitioning our Representatives to put a moratorium on new H1B and H2B visas to ensure that American citizens are given first crack at the higher-paying technical /professional jobs and non-professional, lower-skilled jobs that foreign workers are filling now? Or demanding that the 58% or so of the unspent Stimulus money be spent NOW to enable private companies to complete the critical infrastructure projects and build the new nuclear plants that we are going to need to remain a world-class power?
And for the record, I am a registered Republican who has been without full-time work for slightly over two years. It's not the first time I have been unemployed but it is by far the longest time for me to be without a FT job. Every day I meet folks who have been out of work far longer than they ever thought possible. Empathy won't get us or any other American back to work. We need to demand that our politicians stop using divide and conquer tactics to take our minds off the lousy job they are doing on the economy, border security, dealing with hostile foreign powers, preserving the Constitution and start doing the job they are paid to do - represent the interests of the voters who elected them to office, not big business, not the self-serving illegal invader lobby, not China or India.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 9:36 PM    in reply to NotBuyinIt

Two things, I think chimpale was referring to the fact that when conservatives propose policy solutions or make commentary it is also from a position sorely lacking in empathy, as for foresight they seem to lack that when it comes to the economic concerns of the common man, when it comes to protecting the rich and connected they tend to be much more understanding.

Secondly your proposals on restricting visas and immigration border on protectionist and would only deeply hurt our country more. We're globalizing so each facet of are market is finding its relative global advantage, industries that need large levels of low-skilled labor are not where are country has an advantage, so unless we want to grossly drop the standard of living here to that of 3rd world countries we need to transition to something else.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 10:59 PM    in reply to NotBuyinIt

To be honest it doesn't matter what party...there are folks on both sides that think the same on many topics. The republicans that I am most disgusted with are: Rand Paul, Sharron Angle, Tom Corbett, and a couple of others that believe that those of us on unemployment are enjoying the high life because we are on unemployment, but what they lack in knowledge is the ability to understand that we are not making our full wages, which is killing us when it comes to making payments on houses and causing a lot of us to go into foreclosure. Yes, unemployment is nice to have because it "helps" however, in my case I am making 1/2 of my wages, which is not going to pay all my bills. I have no savings left now and in a few months, I will lose my house if I can't find a job. That is what makes me angry, is that I AM trying to find a job and they have the high and mighty attitude to say that I should take a lower paying job, just to have a job, but NO JOBS are hiring.
Does that makes sense??

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 1:40 AM    in reply to Stacey

I don't disagree with you, I was pointing out a more specific situation, where the sparse jobs available pay less than the meager UI benefits.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 11:59 AM   

Where is a hobo supposed to collect an unemployment check?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 12:21 PM   

The Republicans are stuck in 1886, and darn proud of it, too.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 4:09 PM    in reply to Michael

Santayana who?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 12:39 PM   

Heart-warming reality show: Republican members of congress have their identities stolen; they are isolated from their social network, put out on the street, and forced to try to find a job like the rest of us, with their families sharing in their ups and downs. Popcorn, anyone?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 1:14 PM   

To all of congress that believe the unemployed enjoy being unemployed -
I have been unemployed since JANUARY. I have applied for EVERY job that I can. It doesn't matter what the job is. I have applied to everything from McDonalds to corporate positions (for which I AM QUALIFIED). I complete any where from 15 to 20 applications a day. I mail as many resumes as I can, however that becomes pricey over time. Faxing is not an option for me because I don't have a fax machine, nor do I have long distance on my lan line. And the real kicker to it all is that when I interview for a job that is below my credentials the employer wants to know WHY I am applying for the job and that I am considered high risk for leaving the company because they couldn't dare pay me what I was making. And even though I state that I will work for the wage they suggest, they still don't want to hire me. Now, tell me what in the world I can do....
The ONLY "luxury" I have is a cell phone. What do you have? And WHY DON'T YOU TAKE A PAY CUT TO HELP COMPANIES SO THAT THEY DON'T LOSE CLIENTS SO US PEONS CAN GET A JOB? I am so disgusted with the way that congress keeps saying there are jobs out there...yes there are..and you know what? There are 500 people applying for the same job so if ONE person has a tiny bit more experience than another they can forget it. And what about these companies that won't even interview if you don't have a job? That is something else YOU as a congress should FIX!
I am disgusted with anyone that has the same feelings as you regarding us an unemployed...have you ever had to live on unemployment?? I get 1/2 of what I was making! Could YOU survive on 1/2 of your income?? I bet not as you and your family sit by your pool in your 50000 sq foot home! Now how is that for being judgemental? That is what you are saying about us Americans trying to find a job. I really hope you lose the next election. Have a great day.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 1:22 PM   

Silence said: "You are responsible for your future. Create your own job. Then, create jobs for others. That's how it works."

Wow, thank you for telling us how it works. I don't know why we all couldn't have figured this out sooner, because you make it sound so simple (or would the word be simplistic?).

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 1:23 PM   

Silence said: "You are responsible for your future. Create your own job. Then, create jobs for others. That's how it works."

Wow, thank you for telling us how it works. I don't know why we all couldn't have figured this out sooner, because you make it sound so simple (or would the word be simplistic?).

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 2:28 PM    in reply to beelzebubba

It is simple. If a "moron" like me can do it, certainly, brilliant, educated people like yourselves can do it, right?

I started with $1500 and a pink slip. Sound familiar?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 3:02 PM    in reply to Silence

So if you re so gainfully employed, why the fuck aren''t you working now instead of posting all day at TPM. Do you work for your daddy, asshole?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 3:48 PM    in reply to chameleon

I report to my customers. Today, they're all happy, so I can do whatever I want.


Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 4:07 PM    in reply to Silence

Yeah right!! Gotcha

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 4:18 PM    in reply to chameleon

Ahhhh. Nevermind.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 6:57 PM    in reply to Silence

Yes Silence that is the problem facing America not enough people were living like you and it caused a deep recession, then again you advocate people working jobs that pay less than their basic cost of living, so I guess your 'advice' only goes so far like an inch or two.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 3:14 PM   

This article is so enlightening. I thought my husband was a hardworking man in his 60's who lost his job 2 1/2 years ago when the company relocated overseas. I thought he was a man who's searched every day since then for a job of any kind.

Now I know he is a stray animal with an uncontrollable urge to reproduce, living on spoilage, and his ambition is to be a hobo.

Thank you, Rethugs. We really appreciate the flattering description.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 3:52 PM   

Your husband is retired. Accept it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Ian

Facebook

July 14, 2010 4:15 PM   

Due to almost thirty years of Republican tax and fiscal policies we now have the same income distribution that we had in 1929, which means only the rich have made any gains during that time, the rest of us have lost share according to IRS statistics. This is proceeding according to Republican plans as they desire a situation where we have a large body of workers at Chinese wages and a super-rich overlord group who actually run the country.

Where is Teddy Roosevelt when we really need him?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 5:03 PM   

We need to tell these people to quit being so lazy they are holding up our economy:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703834604575365060863092000.html?KEYWORDS=unemployed+ceos

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 5:12 PM   

This is just how far the Republicans are so far out of the reality game.

Now I could see it if they stopped the benefits and voted for retaining the current taxation rate, but no these @!#$% are just forgetting who their base is. Sounds like its time to vote against all republicans in November and there after.

Of course on the other side the tea potty (that is intentional) will pick up seats and that means more of this type of thinking. But on the other hand it will point out to everyone that these crackpots are just that and nothing else.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 6:10 PM   

Why is everyone blaming the republicans? it's not there fault the country is broke! maybe if dems would stop spending money on socialist welfare programs maybe this wouldn't be an issue?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 6:54 PM   

Then the rich and well to do shouldn't mind taking LESS home in revenue to pay MORE in taxes, for services and UI especially since the latter increases consumption and helps slow economic contraction. Happy agreement.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 7:07 PM   

This statement is so utterly asinine and ignorant of even recent history that I can only assume that it's parody.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 8:05 PM   

Dumb question: Why does everyone demonize specific political officer holders and specific political parties when trying to understand why everything is so messed up right now?

In the grand scheme of things, who can do more damage....a bad president, or a bad congress?

The hottest topic right now is the economy. Has anyone bothered to sit and think about why the economy is bad? Hint.....BAD CURRENCY.

Yes, most of these problems were created by POLICY that these scumbags created or supported. But please, stop pointing finger at specific people...it's the entire system and democratic process that's broken.

I think the first step to recovery from our downward suicide spiral is not allowing people who own nothing to vote on issues pertaining to property and taxes.

Allowing people on welfare to vote for politicians who will support more welfare is process that ends in the opposite of liberty and freedom for all, which is what our government is supposed to pursue.

That is all.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 5:29 AM    in reply to Bobgod

Okay so that means your solution to provide liberty is to take it away from those on welfare? Sounds to me like more of that tea bagger hypocritical bullshit. When they say "liberty" they just mean for them and not anyone else.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 8:05 PM   

The Democrats need to make these into attack ads.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 8:05 PM   

So many glimpses into the frigid dark abyss where the conservative soul should be is as terrifying as it is depressing. How does the human psyche get that perverted?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 9:41 PM   

I guess they are not aware that at least 50% of the unemployed are Republicans.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 9:51 PM   

"I've literally had construction companies tell me, 'I can't get people to come back to work until...they say, I'll come back to work when unemployment runs out.'"

Wow, construction companies unable to fill jobs? In Pennsylvania? Oh Senator, tell us their names. Please!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 9:52 PM    in reply to Nancy Irving

Oops, I mean tell us, Mr. Attorney General!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 14, 2010 9:57 PM   

Rand Paul: "As bad as it sounds, ultimately we do have to sometimes accept a wage that's less than we had at our previous job in order to get back to work and allow the economy to get started again."

Is this the same Rand Paul who said we shouldn't ever reduce Medicare payments to doctors like him, because doctors *deserve* to make a good living?

Rand Paul is shaping up to be the biggest hypocrite on the November ballot. And that's saying something.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Sue

Facebook

July 14, 2010 10:37 PM   

Unemployment benefits are no more "welfare" or "charity" than the check I got from the insurance company last year after my heater pipes burst.

And I don't care how desperate construction companies are for workers - I doubt they are ever going to beat a path to *my* door.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Joe

Facebook

July 14, 2010 11:35 PM   

If the jobs were there, how come my professionally written resume, education, and 10+ years experience is not getting me an interview for any of the 10 minimum jobs I apply to WEEKLY? I just love how the rich and comfortable think everyone else is living like they are. get real republicans. get real.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 12:49 AM    in reply to Joe

you're right! he jobs are NOT there. But it's both parties hurting us.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 2:41 AM   

Let me clear the air on this mess..unemployment is against the Constitution and Bill of Rights. Don't let government be your mommy and daddy anymore.Go to work and make your own way. .That's what GOD intended for all of us to do. government is a parasite on your labors..Be all you can be and forget them.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 5:30 AM   

Okay so that means your solution to provide liberty is to take it away from those on welfare? Sounds to me like more of that tea bagger hypocritical bullshit. When they say "liberty" they just mean for them and not anyone else.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 5:33 AM    in reply to Joshua

HTML FAILURE LOL this comment belongs up above

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 12:17 PM   

They are doing the devil's work: they make it so easy for you to hate them, it's almost like they're doing it on purpose to put that hate in you and make you a worse person.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 4:58 PM   

Our unemployed could get a job but Obama and the Democrat majority refuses to remove 7 million illegals out of our jobs!

They also want amnesty for the illegals, so that will permanently put legal immigrants and citizens out of work! Way to go Democrooks!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 7:44 PM   

It is true that anyone who really wants a job can get one, it is just a matter of how difficult and uncomfortable that job is and how much it pays. The problem is not lack of jobs, it is really low paying jobs with bad working conditions. There are many people working 60 hours a weak in backbreaking jobs in a noisy smelly envirorment, who cannot even afford to share a 2-bedroom apartment with a roommate.
I think that this type of problem can never be solved with a minimum wage. There is simply an oversupply of desperate workers willing to put up with crap and willing to be paid peanuts, and not enough demand for their labor. So employers have little incentive to make the workplace comfortable or pleasant. The government might be able to dictate the pay of a job, but not the quality of the job.
I do not think people are entittled to jobs, but I do think they are entittled to be compensated for being denied access to land and natural resources in our current economic system.
Many politicians are completely ignorant of what it is really like to be poor. The police even kill homeless people by preventing them from building shelter or growing food.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on