TPMDC

Right Wing Howls: Felons Put Franken Over The Top! (Nope)


Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty (R), Senator Al Franken (D-MN) and former Senator Norm Coleman (R-MN)

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

The right-wing media has been going ape over a study from Minnesota Majority, a conservative group in the Land of 10,000 Lakes, claiming that hundreds of felons illegally voted in the disputed 2008 Senate race that ultimately saw comedian and Democratic activist Al Franken defeat incumbent Republican Sen. Norm Coleman by a mere 312 votes out of 2.9 million. But is there any validity to it? Nope.

Fox News -- an outlet that has a long-running bad relationship with Franken -- claims: "The final recount vote in the race, determined six months after Election Day, showed Franken beat Coleman by 312 votes -- fewer votes than the number of felons whose illegal ballots were counted, according to Minnesota Majority's newly released study, which matched publicly available conviction lists with voting records."

But were there really so many illegal ballots? And did they all go for Al Franken? As TPM's in-house expert on that roller-coaster of an election, recount and litigation, allow me to walk you through all the problems with this new claim -- plus the small kernel of truth that lies within.

Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, a potential Republican candidate for president in 2012, fielded a very loaded question on Fox News on Wednesday, from host Brian Kilmeade, asking Pawlenty to "weigh in on the controversy with felons voting for Al Franken." Check out the 3:50 mark here:

"There's a group here in Minnesota that's investigated that," said Pawlenty. "They seem to have found credible evidence that many felons who are not supposed to be voting actually voted in the Franken-Coleman election. I suspect they favored Al Franken. I don't know that. But if that turned out to be true, they may have flipped the election. In a very close election, there were only few-hundred vote difference, as you know."

And the Star Tribune reported on Coleman's reaction:

Coleman said Wednesday that he is "not looking back." But he also termed Franken an "accidental senator," who benefited from court rulings that overlooked an array of alleged voting irregularities.

"There's always going to be a cloud of doubt that hovers over this election, and this thickens the cloud," Coleman said.

As it turns out, though, Minnesota Majority's study has had its share of sloppiness and false assumptions. As the Twin Cities NBC affiliate noted, it's not even proven that hundreds of felons illegally voted at all -- in some cases there were felons who could legally vote in Minnesota, having had their rights restored, and in other cases Minnesota Majority submitted the names of the wrong people:

In reality, that has not been proven. And the actual number of felons who voted illegally will likely be much lower based on reviews from prosecutors who received Minnesota Majority's lists in the form of spread sheets in February.

"We received about 480 names from Minnesota Majority," Ramsey County's lead prosecutor Phil Carruthers told KARE Wednesday, "About 270 were clearly inaccurate and were rejected right from the get-go."

He said a quick review revealed the names and birthdates didn't match, or that the felons in question were no longer barred from voting.

In addition, instances of individual felons voting is different from any organized fraud. As Franken's former attorney Marc Elias told The Hill: "Sen. Coleman was represented by some of the best lawyers there are in the country. At the end of that process, the lead lawyer for Sen. Coleman told the state Supreme Court that there was no evidence of persistent fraud in the election."

Furthermore, the report runs up against a pesky obstacle that in this country dates back to the late 19th century, called the secret ballot. Even if it were proven that hundreds of illegal votes were cast, it can't ever be proven who those people voted for. Right-wing media outlets have simply been assuming that all the felons voted for Franken. In fact, there was one solid case in January 2009 of a felon who pled guilty to illegally voting -- and he said he voted for Coleman, though his word is obviously less than 100% credible. But in any case, the point stands: It can't be proven who any one of these people would have voted for, or what any spread might have been, much less that they would have all voted for one candidate out of several who were on the ballot.

If the point here is to cast doubt on Franken's election, here's the funny truth of it all: Anybody who was watching that election, or any similar super-close election, already knows that there exists a certain level of reasonable doubt about the whole thing. In an election that close, there will always be a margin of error that is wider than the margin of victory -- as a top county election official openly admitted at the trial.

Of course, this would also mean that this very same doubt would have clouded any win for Coleman, too. And it should also be noted that a similar circumstance was present in 2000, when George W. Bush officially won the state of Florida over Al Gore by a margin of 537 votes out of nearly six million -- a smaller percentage difference than Franken's final win in Minnesota -- amidst allegations of vote suppression and faulty ballots. And while the true outcome of that election remains a genuine mystery, too, folks on the right never seem to be at all concerned about or to even acknowledge that particular conundrum.

Comments (90) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (0)

July 15, 2010 2:22 PM   

I'm beginning to think when Bachmann and company are considered the state is the home of at least 10,000 loons and I'm not referring to the State bird. This this shows that sour grapes need long time to age for a bad whine.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 2:22 PM   

If the Republicans learned anything from the 2000 election, it was this: You don't need a list of actual felons. You just need a list of names, some of which match those of actual felons, or are in some way similar to the names of actual felons, or at least share the fact of being names with the names of actual felons. In fact, you just need a list of names and then you can lie your ass off to make whatever point you want from it. And, you'll get away with it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 9:19 PM    in reply to FawkesFOX

One additional and critical ingredient....keep repeating the lie even if it is discredited.....and repeat it and get your right-wing media friends to repeat it. Trust me....when Franken's term ends, you will be hearing this claim over and over and over again.....do everything you can to plant the seed of doubt.....you know the routine....

This is Obama's economic disaster

Obama is not an American

Death Panels

ACORN

Mexicans coming across the Arizona border and....

acting as drug mules

raping, robbing and pillaging in missive numbers

cutting off heads and leaving them in the desert

WMD

Yellowcake

Global Warming research conspiracies

all crap....and all repeated endlessly

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 10:39 PM    in reply to dweb823

Didn't McCarthy use the same tactic with his "list" of Communists?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 11:49 PM    in reply to traitorjoe

Actually the best recent history of propaganda is Nazi Germany. The rethuglicans are the exact distillation of fascism to America that the Nazi was to Germany. The same corporate, nationalistic, religious white christian conservative lockstep minority hating southern bigots. They all would be fine with religion merging with government and corporations to make one big unresistable fascist thing.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 16, 2010 9:43 AM    in reply to hollywood

except we got Keith, Rachel, TPM and The Daily Show to protect us from the insidious influence of rightwing fascist propaganda!

And I'm only partly snarkin'.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 16, 2010 1:48 PM    in reply to dweb823

Their new game is "Grasping at Straws." I thank them for playing

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 16, 2010 4:01 PM    in reply to dweb823

This is Obama's economic disaster

It is now. I mean, unless he isn't actually in charge and is the puppet head of someone else.

Death Panels

It's called triage. It's what medical people do when Resources

Mexicans coming across the Arizona border and....

Honestly? If there aren't any crossing the border, then what's the problem with SB1070? No one to find?

acting as drug mules

Many Mexicans are hard workers and very poor in their country. Some of them have to even work hard hauling drugs to get help across the border.

raping, robbing and pillaging in missive numbers

Check the crime statistics for the area, eh? Especially considering the population density of some of those areas.

all crap....and all repeated endlessly

Either nobody loved you as a kid...

...or someone loved you a little too much.

I totally understand looking at things with a critical eye, but you really need to keep your mind open for facts sometime and not automatically decide to ignore everything based on association. Hell, even a broke (non-digital) clock is right twice a day!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 2:26 PM   

Brought to you by the same party that accused Democrats of "whining" when they contested the FL 2000 results. Nice.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 2:28 PM   

You no longer need any facts. You just need FOX.

Beside, we all know felons are only voting Democratic. That is to keep their welfare checks rolling in. ;-)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 5:36 PM    in reply to PAvoter

FACTS - FOX
the difference is reality is much greater than the difference in spelling

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 2:28 PM   

I am grateful that the Dems & Franken fought this without backing down one step. With Coleman sitting, this would have been a disastrous period. With Franken, it has been hopeful and trending ever upward.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 4:30 PM    in reply to FellowAmerican

Al Franken is proving to be a very good Senator. Even Newsweek is complimentary. But, smart, funny and compassionate is a good combination.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 16, 2010 4:06 AM    in reply to Powkat

Any one who knew even the littlest bit about Al Franken pretty much knew that would be the case.The wingnuts idea of a comedian is Dennis Miller, who might put on a pretense of being intellectual, Franken comes much closer to actually being one although that fact might explain some of the wingers antipathy given their strenuous anti-intellectual inclination.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 16, 2010 9:55 AM    in reply to donquijoterocket

They hate him because he wrote that book about their king!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 2:28 PM   

Pass the tin hat. I think a few righties need to be fitted.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 2:43 PM   

A very similar argument failed miserably when the GOP contested the very close WA state governor's result in 2004. They offered statistical models but no actual felons, whereas the Dems produced 3 or 4 felons who signed affadavits saying they voted for the GOP candidate.

The judge threw out the case but deducted four votes from the GOP side of the final tally.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 3:01 PM    in reply to Scott in PacNW

So Republicans contend that statistical models can be used to overturn a hand recount of the votes of the people in a close election, but can't be used to determine population counts for the Census.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 2:45 PM   

Florida should be brought up anytime someone complains about this - if they're going to get upset about the faint possibility of maybe some felons voted for Franken, remind them of the thousands of people in Florida in 2000 whose names were incorrectly removed from the rolls because they had the same name as a felon, and prevented from voting.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 2:48 PM   

True or not, it doesn't matter, the right-wing has their ball and they will run with it, and every Fox News watcher and AM radio listener will repeat the allegation until it is generally accepted as true by anyone who isn't really paying attention.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 2:48 PM   

The truth? We can't handle the truth!

It's so much more useful to shout that the election was stolen by Stuart Smalley.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 2:53 PM   

But he also termed Franken an "accidental senator," who benefited from court rulings that overlooked an array of alleged voting irregularities.

who benefited from court rulings that overlooked an array of alleged voting irregularities.

Hmmmm, now where oh where have I heard something like that before? hmmmm, why does Florida ring a bell?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 2:53 PM   

Gee - what's next - endless hours spent wasted discussing whether some OTHER 'group' somehow stuffed the ballot boxes - with not a shred of evidence whatsoever?

Geeze - if journalists would just do their freaking JOBS, the world would be a much better place.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 4:08 PM    in reply to GayIthacan

Sorry, but the folks at Faux are not real news people. They are simply tools spouting each days right-wing talking points to attack Obama, Pelosi, etc. They have never had the slightest interest in the truth or the facts. Hannity, Beck, the three morning idiots, etc. are like the Nazi propagandists: Tell a lie, a big lie, and repeat it endlessly.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 6:11 PM    in reply to GayIthacan

What journalists? Other than Rachel Maddow, there are none. Dan Rather was the last of the journalists from times passed.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 2:54 PM   

Even if the list contains a few accurate names, my guess is that some of those felons are 2nd amendment voters anyway...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 3:03 PM   

Chris Uggen and Jeffrey Manza have both been doing sociological research on felon disenfranchisement for the past decade. So has Marc Mauer at the Washington DC based Sentencing Project. To argue that the vote of convicted felons led to a political victory and that this is a problem is to not only accept the belief that people convicted of a felony offense (which is hugely broad and disproportionately focused on people of color) should lose their right to vote, but to move beyond to the point where such a phenomenon is seen as ideologically natural and common-sensical, and to see the reinstatement of such voting rights as not only political, but as biased in that it will favor democrats.

See some of Chris Uggens work here:
http://www.soc.umn.edu/~uggen/felon_disenfranchisement.htm

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 3:13 PM   

You know, these days, you can't hear enough jokes about prison rape even though that is not a joking matter. But I can see where the cons would throw their sypport behind Franken.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 3:15 PM   

Well, first of all I don't believe it. But if it IS true, it is pretty obvious that Minnesotans owe a big debt to illegally voting felons! (I'm pretty sure they know it too)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 10:37 PM    in reply to CVille Dem

We all owe a debt to illegally voting felons who gave us a very good senator.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 3:24 PM   

This is silly. Everyone knows it was the lizard people who put Franken over the top.

Not to mention, the above shows 100% of felons known to have voted in this election voted for Coleman.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 3:53 PM    in reply to theorajones

couldnt be...the lizards, they have died...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 5:31 PM    in reply to Sniffit

But, before the lizards died, they voted for Coleman. Cause and effect? You judge.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 3:41 PM   

Wow - I thought Coleman had set the mark for sore losers - but just when you thin k he's finally finished, Faux Nos turns up more inflammatory lies to stoke the crazies.
From the people who elected batshit crazy Bachmann - it's hard to believe Al Franken got any votes!

Minnesota seems to be a microcosm of the larger electorate - sane enough to elect a qualified candidate (Franken) but still enough crazies to slip one by us (Bachmann)

Remember folks - "All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing" Tolstoy

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 3:54 PM    in reply to Informed Citizen

That was Edmund Burke.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 3:59 PM   

Well, obviously all those felons voted for Franken, because all felons are colored people and all of those people vote for Democrats. Case closed.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 16, 2010 4:21 AM    in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve

Lol, what impeccable logic, I'm surprised we didn't all realize this sooner.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

AJM

user-pic

July 15, 2010 4:09 PM   

Anybody seen the birth certificates of the Minnesota Majority?
I THOUGHT NOT. Just goes to show -- damn, those Socialist Scandinavians are sneaky. Illegal, and nobody even knows it!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 4:39 PM   

Truth is, it was felines that put Franken over the top!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 5:29 PM   

...and somewhere in Florida votes are still being counted.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

slb

user-pic

July 15, 2010 5:42 PM   

I am SO tired of the right-wing assumption that anytime a Democrat wins an election, even if it's not a close election (as the 2008 presidential election was not), there simply HAS to be something illegal going on that achieved that result. It's ACORN, it's voting felons, it's biased judges, it's corrupt election officials, it's anything at all except that fewer people chose to vote for the Republican candidate.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 6:43 PM    in reply to slb

they know bush didn't actually win in 2000 and doing this kind of stuff on a regular basis obfuscates an inconvenient fact.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 5:56 PM   


> Received this from a friend. Good stuff, but don't know really what we
> can do in the long run to fix it. Food for thought......
>
>> This is about as clear and easy to understand as it can be Please read
>> the entire article.
>>
>>
>> The article below is completely neutral, not anti republican or
>> democrat.
>>
>> Charlie Reese, a retired reporter for the Orlando Sentinel has hit the
>> nail directly on the head, defining clearly who it is that in the
>> final analysis must assume responsibility for the judgments made that
>> impact each one of us every day.
>>
>> It's a short but good read. Worth the time. Worth remembering!
>>
>> 545 vs. 300,000,000
>>
>> EVERY CITIZEN NEEDS TO READ THIS AND THINK ABOUT WHAT THIS JOURNALIST
>> HAS SCRIPTED IN THIS MESSAGE. READ IT AND THEN REALLY THINK ABOUT OUR
>> CURRENT POLITICAL DEBACLE.
>>
>> Charley Reese has been a journalist for 49 years.
>>
>> 545 PEOPLE -- By Charlie Reese
>>
>> Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and
>> then campaign against them.
>>
>> Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are
>> against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?
>>
>> Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation
>> and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?
>>
>> You and I don't propose a federal budget. The President does.
>>
>> You and I don't have the Constitutional authority to vote on
>> appropriations. The House of Representatives does.
>>
>> You and I don't write the tax code, Congress does.
>>
>> You and I don't set fiscal policy, Congress does.
>>
>> You and I don't control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.
>>
>> One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one President, and nine Supreme
>> Court justices equates to 545 human beings out of the 300 million are
>> directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the
>> domestic problems that plague this country.
>>
>> I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that
>> problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its
>> Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally
>> chartered, but private, central bank.
>>
>> I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason.
>> They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a
>> senator, a congressman, or a president to do one cotton-picking thing.
>> I don't care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash.
>> The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what
>> the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator's responsibility to
>> determine how he/she votes.
>>
>> Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that
>> what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con
>> regardless of party.
>>
>> What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive
>> amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a
>> Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating
>> deficits.... . The President can only propose a budget. He cannot
>> force the Congress to accept it.
>>
>> The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole
>> responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and
>> approving appropriations and taxes. House members, not the President,
>> can approve any budget they want. If the president vetoes it, they can
>> pass it over his veto if they agree to.
>>
>> It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million can not
>> replace
>> 545 people who stand convicted -- by present facts -- of incompetence
>> and irresponsibility. I can't think of a single domestic problem that
>> is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp
>> the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal
>> government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to
>> exist.
>>
>> If the tax code is unfair, it's because they want it unfair.
>>
>> If the budget is in the red, it's because they want it in the red ..
>>
>> If the Army & Marines are in IRAQ , it's because they want them in IRAQ
>> If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement
>> plan not available to the people, it's because they want it that way.
>>
>> There are no insoluble government problems.
>>
>> Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they
>> hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and
>> advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to
>> regulate and from whom they can take this power. Above all, do not let
>> them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical
>> forces like "the economy," "inflation," or "politics" that prevent them
>> from doing what they take an oath to do.
>>
>> Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible.
>>
>> They, and they alone, have the power..
>>
>> They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are
>> their bosses.
>>
>> Provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees...
>>
>> We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!
>>
>> Charlie Reese is a former columnist of the Orlando Sentinel Newspaper.
>>
>> What you do with this article now that you have read it......... Is up
>> to you.
>>
>>
>> Sales Tax
>> School Tax
>> Liquor Tax
>> Luxury Tax
>> Excise Taxes
>> Property Tax
>> Cigarette Tax
>> Medicare Tax
>> Inventory Tax
>> Real Estate Tax
>> Well Permit Tax
>> Fuel Permit Tax
>> Inheritance Tax
>> Road Usage Tax
>> CDL license Tax
>> Dog License Tax
>> State Income Tax
>> Food License Tax
>> Vehicle Sales Tax
>> Gross Receipts Tax
>> Social Security Tax
>> Service Charge Tax
>> Fishing License Tax
>> Federal Income Tax
>> Building Permit Tax
>> IRS Interest Charges
>> Hunting License Tax
>> Marriage License Tax
>> Corporate Income Tax
>> Personal Property Tax
>> Accounts Receivable Tax
>> Recreational Vehicle Tax
>> Workers Compensation Tax
>> Watercraft Registration Tax
>> Telephone Usage Charge Tax
>> Telephone Federal Excise Tax
>> Telephone State and Local Tax
>> IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax)
>> State Unemployment Tax (SUTA)
>> Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA)
>> Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax
>> Telephone Federal Universal Service Fee Tax
>> Gasoline Tax (currently 44.75 cents per gallon)
>> Utility Taxes Vehicle License Registration Tax
>> Telephone Federal, State and Local Surcharge Taxes
>> Telephone Recurring and Nonrecurring Charges Tax
>>
>>
>> Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago, & our nation was the
>> most prosperous in the world.
>> We had absolutely no national debt, had the largest middle class in
>> the world, and Mom stayed home to raise the kids.
>>
>> What in the hell happened? Can you spell 'politicians? ' I hope this
>> goes around THE USA at least 100 times!!!
>> YOU can help it get there!!!
>> GO AHEAD - - - BE AN AMERICAN!!!
>>
>> PS.
>>
>> If you do the right thing and pass this on - which is entirely up to
>> you -
>> please do the right thing and highlight and delete any addresses you
>> receive with it.
>>
>> Thank You.
>
> Take care all.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 6:12 PM    in reply to Mark

This is a republican generated email.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 6:38 PM    in reply to chameleon

...maybe we need a political email tax?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 6:49 PM    in reply to JEP07

Oh my goodness. Can you imagine.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 16, 2010 4:00 PM    in reply to JEP07

Don't encourage them.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 16, 2010 4:22 AM    in reply to chameleon

And regardless of the source would be BS anyway.Despite what the wingers and baggers howl about the U.S. is one of the most lightly taxed countries on the planet.I've gotten to the point where unless the winger doing the shrieking has corroboration and a link to the raw data supporting that corroboration I don't even listen,but assume it's a lie.Even sometimes when they do include backup for their statements I'll still assume it's a winger doing what they do best which is making shit up. It certainly isn't governing

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 16, 2010 8:41 AM    in reply to chameleon

So flag it, like I did, and stop feeding the trollz.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 16, 2010 8:47 AM    in reply to Steaming Pile

Me feed the trolls. You must have be confused with someone else.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 6:51 PM    in reply to Mark

I'm outraged that I must pay a tax that I didn't have to pay 100 years ago on technology that didn't exist at the time!

I want to go back to those years when less than 10% of our children graduated high school. Let's put them back in the factories where they belong.

We don't need power grids or highways either. Indoor plumbing? Pure New Deal socialism!

And what the hell is a women doing outside of the kitchen anyway!?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 6:59 PM    in reply to Mark

WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?

----

We don't.

Of course, such simplistic views of the world as this 'article' portrays are dangerous, and would lead to the utter destruction of our way of life in today's world.

Our nation was also quite prosperous in the mid 90s, and we had most if not all those taxes, and our women weren't forced to live in the kitchen, barefoot and pregnant. We *did* have higher taxes, though, more strict financial regulations, more strict campaign finance laws, and we weren't fighting two wars.

What in the hell happened? Can you spell George W Bush?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 8:15 PM    in reply to Mark

Taxation is not the problem, using the tax money inappropriately, is. But besides all the stuff you mentioned above, we still live in a pretty good country, offering untold opportunities for it's citizens. You just have to get off your butts and stop complaining and get involved and make an exceptional life for yourself, while you still have the time.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 9:08 PM    in reply to Mark

Tea Party madness

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 9:21 PM    in reply to Mark

hooray! facebook spam!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 9:28 PM    in reply to Mark

Yeah, this is the kind of crap I get e-mailed to me by Republican family members all the time. It's always that Paul Harveyesque 'common sense' kind of argument that relies on half-truths, flat-out lies, and the indiscriminate readership who don't dare fact-check any of the claims for fear of ruining a really good story. I've tried on a few occasions to point out to the sender where the story falls through and they go bonkers.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 16, 2010 8:50 AM    in reply to FawkesFOX

Second!! Mine have learned not to send them to me but they still trickle in from others. Absoluely harveyesque

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 9:40 PM    in reply to Mark

Actually Charlie, the process is called democracy. We ELECT Senators and Congresspersons to REPRESENT us, and frankly Charlie the system as it now operates is clearly unconstitutional.

I'll be blunt Charlie.....I voted for the Obama platform in the last election after eight years of the most disastrous and dishonest administration in the modern history of this nation. But honestly, the principle of "one man - one vote" has been trashed. Despite the fact that the GOP suffered massive losses in the voting, today, each GOP Senator effectively has a vote that is larger than his or her counterpart on the Democratic side and the reason is the cloture rule. It is not a part of the Constitution, but it has handed the minority the ability to turn EVERY single vote into one requiring at least 60 % of the votes to win passage. Not a simple majority as called for in most cases by the Constitution, but 60 votes out of 100.

The GOP didn't win with their lack of a real platform for dealing with the challenges we face and they have literally no coherent program today, but each GOP Senator has a vote that has more power than Democrats even though they lost the election. so they didn't lose the election. They won.

All those taxes Charlie.....they got passed after debate in Congress, by representatives representing us. You claim 300,000,000 Americans are being ignored. If Congress consistently ignored their constituents in every instance, they would be out of work.

A majority of Americans WANTED health care reform (and in fact in the years ahead our deficit problems would be a lot worse without it.)

A majority of Americans WANTED Wall Street reform.

And in those cases, despite the lies and the obstruction, the strength of their argument was so strong legislation passed....not as good as it should be, but it passed.

But so much lies dying in the face of GOP obstruction....global warming issues are clearly getting more and more severe, but to the minority Republicans, the issue is a hoax, despite the scientific evidence.

Immigration reform is deeply needed, but instead the GOP has seized the issue and loaded it with demagoging....claims that hordes of maurauding Mexicans are sweeping across the border carrying drugs, killing waves of law enforcement personnel and ranchers and leaving heads in the desert.

Charlie, if we could survive it (and that is too risky to try) I would love to let the Tea Party gain full control of government for maybe a year and put in place (only temporarily) EVERYTHING they want to do from eliminating Medicaid and Social Security to gutting health care, restoring the robber barons on Wall Street and removing most regulatory controls on everything from cable tv rates to drugs to food and water.

Would just love to see the results of that play out. You know, in Afghanistan before 9/11, the Taliban had gained control over much of the country, including Kabul and before we ever got involved, the Taliban was in the process of being driven out of power by the people of Afghanistan. The reason....their methodology and religious fervor were so intense that they turned off the citizenry. They were banning music and kite flying.

The Tea Party, frankly is the American Taliban....trying desperately to restore some glossy image of a better time in days gone by when a plain vanilla America encapsulated in Norman Rockwell paintings exists in rose colored memory.

America is great because it has a democracy Charlie.....the danger is that the wingnuts are going to destroy it with their selfishness and wilful ignorance of everything from economic reality to scientific method.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 11:50 PM    in reply to Mark

I find your viewpoints intriguing, yet ambiguous. Could you rewrite this to be more lengthy, and resubmit? Y'know, expand some of your theses to include more detail. TIA!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 16, 2010 3:57 PM    in reply to Mark

Taxation with representation Charlie! Like it or not.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 6:22 PM   

The problem with submitting names to prosecutors in Ramsey and Hennepin counties is these happen to be Minneapolis and St. Paul, where loads of Franken votes were found. There seems to be no investigation of the GOBP parts of the state.

I believe it's also the case felons have to know they can't vote in order to be committing another crime. I'm not sure. Really, having met felons who didn't know they could vote once they were done with probation and parole, and with Pawlenty having vetoed a bill that would have required the sate to tell them their rights were restored, I can't help suspecting this is about intimidating former felons from voting. Do they vote Democratic? Well, which party is trying to suppress their votes and which party is try to protect their rights?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 6:44 PM   

MSM M.O.

IOKIYAR. IOKIYAR.

IOKIYAR, Iokiyar, Iokiyar, I.O.K.I.Y.A.R?

IOKIYAR.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 7:10 PM   

Then the LORD said to me, "The prophets are prophesying lies in my name. I have not sent them or appointed them or spoken to them. They are prophesying to you false visions, divinations, idolatries and the delusions of their own minds. Jeremiah 14:14

Just because they claim to be the Christians Right does not make them Christians OR right...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 7:28 PM   

If felons were part of Franken's victory then why didn't the radical right loons bring proof to the numerous court hearings they asked for? I think it's kind of odd they wait all of these months to start this nonsense. The radical right needs to go back to lovin' their cousins.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 8:05 PM   

Isn't it obvious that Republicans should always win every election, regardless of the vote count?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 8:13 PM   

My God I hate these people.

Serenity now.

Serenity now.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 8:16 PM   

There is no reason at all to believe that felons illegally voted to put Franken over the top. Now if somebody just so happened to "find" votes for Franken in the trunk of a car, that might raise some questions, but that didn't happen. Oh wait...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 10:45 PM   

Chris Uggen (at UMN, ironically) showed fairly convincingly that Republican-led efforts to disenfranchise ex-felons who had served their time swung the 2008 election. The common link: everyone deserves a second chance, except for people who are disproportionately likely to vote Democrat.

Democracy, my a**.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 10:57 PM   

The felon who really helped Al win is named Norm Coleman.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 11:21 PM    in reply to sully18

Norm Coleman looks like Central Casting's idea of a corrupt preacher. When will this movie end?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 16, 2010 3:05 AM    in reply to chard

I've heard that he and Nancy Kerrigan had an illicit love child. See for yourself.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 11:01 PM   

The only thing surprising about this is that the full moon is weeks away.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 11:34 PM   

Unfortunately for the Repubs, Franken is doing such a great job, his re-election won't even be close.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 15, 2010 11:56 PM   

Thousands of unindicted felons voted for Coleman. They're called corporate Republicans.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 16, 2010 3:03 AM   

Must be more of the fancy GOP math... 480 names from GOP minus 270 which were clearly inaccurate translates somehow into a number greater than the 312 vote winning margin...

480-270 > 312 ...nope, even when I try and put on my reality distortion GOP beenie, I still see that 480-270

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 16, 2010 3:16 AM   

Whoops. Movable type can't seem to handle a raw 'less than" symbol.

That should have said:

I still see that 480-270 < 312

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 16, 2010 4:35 AM   

This is typically repug/wingnut. When facts alone won't support your BS do your best to impeach the process. You see it all the time in their anti-science rants when addressing global warming.It's not enough to create doubt about the conclusions the data lead to or about the data itself,you've got to create doubt about the process by which the data was gathered and the analysis done. The repug/wingnuts seek to create doubt not only about individual races but about the whole process of voting itself.Near as I can tell they're not really into this democracy thing.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 16, 2010 8:13 AM   

When you have to make things up your position does not hold water

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 16, 2010 9:51 AM   

Tariffs on imported goods once financed the entire Federal government.

It's time to revisit the idea.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 16, 2010 10:01 AM   

So, aside from this apparently being a Big Lie, it still pales in comparison to what the GOPers/conservatives did in 2004 by putting two felons in the WH.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 16, 2010 10:31 AM   

Funny; I heard Franken won because Minnesota - after 8 years of watching the antics of unconvicted felons - decided to go for law and order.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 16, 2010 10:54 AM   

What has happened to the State of Minnesota.....Buchanan, Pawlenty, and other wing nuts are so over the top it's not funny. Who's voting for these whack jobs....if it's the rural farm crowd, then that'd be a shame because the policies of the wing nut Republicans haven't helped rural economies in decades...since Nixon. And based on all the perverts and etc. in the Republican party....they aren't exactly the upstanding characters they pretend to be.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 16, 2010 11:06 AM   

To be clear.....Buchanan is McCarthy in lipstick. Lip stick on a pig is still a pig. Why are so many Americans embracing Buchanan, Palin, and the Tea Partiers?....they are little more than McCarthyism. South Africa and many other nations have moved away from racism and segregation and hate and ethnic and religious divides.....but the US seems to be heading backwards and into repressive territory with the likes of Buchanan, Pawlenty, McConnell, Palin, Cheney, Rove, and others. Why aren't Americans outraged by these radicals that call them selves conservatives....they aren't conservatives at all...they are threats to democracy and equal rights.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 16, 2010 2:09 PM    in reply to go2goal

Do you mean Bachmann?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 16, 2010 12:40 PM   

During the MN recount and subsequent court challenge, a large number of questionable ballots originally granted to Coleman were either deemed inconclusive (and voided) or awarded to Franken. Republicans cried foul. But my biggest question was: why were these questionable ballots originally awarded to Coleman on election night?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 16, 2010 1:35 PM   

Wasn't the Franken/Coleman recount about the most thorough in U.S. history? If there was a crime in there someplace, the court would have addressed it? The only felony I recall, was the question about Coleman's juggling of funds from a contact of his wife and whether it broke the law.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Kal

Facebook

July 16, 2010 4:38 PM   

Cheating during elections is a time honored American habit. Being certain of the validity of the outcome is not easy.

So far as I am concerned Bush never won the 2000 election but his dady and his dady's friends had pull in the SCOTUS and got him appointed to the office. A study of the 2004 election clearly demostrates that at least in Ohio the ballots were tampered with to help Bush win.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 16, 2010 6:30 PM   

Notwithstanding the absurdity of their grossly partisan claims, I would have gladly traded one Franken for two Bushs and two Cheneys.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Follow us!