TPMDC

Say What?! Republicans Filibuster Tax-Cutting Jobs Bill


Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY)

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

All 41 Senate Republicans yesterday filibustered a jobs package comprised largely of tax cuts.

You read that right. Republicans filibustered tax cuts.

By the GOP's own admission, the underlying legislation has broad bipartisan support. It would create a $30 billion Treasury-backed fund to help community banks issue loans to small businesses and provide entrepreneurs with $12 billion in tax cuts -- a Republican kind of bill if ever there was one.

But Republicans had been threatening for weeks to stop it, unless they were offered a chance to offer amendments on issues like border security, capping federal spending, and the estate tax -- all of which Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid held to be non-germane to the issue of job creation. Many of them also objected to a provision added to the bill that would have provided disaster and agriculture relief funding.

Faced with a choice between allowing the Republicans to successfully block the bill, and making concessions, Reid stripped the relief funding and offered Republicans the chance to offer three amendments.

That wasn't enough either.

"I think we're getting closer," Minority Leader Mitch McConnell offered. "[Reid] and I can continue to try to unsnarl this."

"There's nothing to unsnarl," Reid fired back.

The impasse led to a testy exchange between the bill's chief sponsor, Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-LA) and McConnell, who ultimately cut her off by forcing a scheduled vote on ending the filibuster. All Republicans, even those who support the jobs package itself, voted no. Reid switched his vote from yes to no -- a procedural maneuver that will allow him to hold a revote when he chooses. But that likely won't happen until next week, after the House of Representatives has adjourned for August recess.

Comments (51) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (0)

July 30, 2010 9:43 AM   

Isn't Landrieu a Democrat?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 10:08 AM    in reply to Xantar

Yep, the big D and she isnt bad looking either

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 11:07 AM    in reply to Mrwilson1

She's a babe. A few years ago I watched her chew up Sean Hannity and spit him out. She was smiling and relaxed the whole time too. But unfortunately she's in Louisiana so she has to act like a Puke to get reelected.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 31, 2010 10:42 AM    in reply to Riesz Fischer

Mary Landrieu is second generation Louisiana politics in general and New Orleans politics in particular. Her father was former New Orleans mayor "Moon" Landrieu who vigorously fought for desegration and her brother Mitch is a former Lt. Governor of Louisiana and recently elected mayor of New Orleans. With that kind of training, she could probably chew up a Chicago wardheeler from the days of the first Mayor Dailey and chew him out. Hannity probably wouldn't even count as an appetizer for her.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 11:07 AM    in reply to Mrwilson1

Oh God, you're not gonna go all sailor on us are you?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 1, 2010 5:02 PM    in reply to Mrwilson1

what???... Ok not bad looking, but surely not a babe. Hell, the majority of humans are not bad looking.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 9:44 AM   

"Sen. Mary Landrieu (R-LA) and McConnell, who ultimately cut her off by forcing a scheduled vote on ending the filibuster."

Yeah, she often acts like one but not in this case.

I hope McConnell's kidneys fail! There I said it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 10:43 AM    in reply to mike from Arlington

Speaking as a kidney transplant patient who was on dialysis for 2.5 years, please don't wish that on anyone. No one deserves that kind of he11.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 11:02 AM    in reply to FLRealist

Mitch McConnell does.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 4:21 PM    in reply to JimmyBobby

No. No one does. Grow up.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 11:44 AM    in reply to mike from Arlington

Ugg hope he swallow his chin...ooops...never mind. Har har har.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

JVC

user-pic

July 30, 2010 9:53 AM   

Mary Landrieu is a Democrat.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 9:57 AM   

Labeling Landrieu a Republican may be less accurate, but it is more informative.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 9:58 AM   

Where is the multi-million dollar ad buy blasting the Repugnuts for opposing jobs and opposing tax cuts for small businesses?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 7:10 PM    in reply to Moose49

Yeh, where is Kaine when there is real amunition to use against Republicans?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 10:00 AM   

This is transparency in the Senate.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 10:01 AM   

More proof that Sen. Franken was right.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 10:09 AM   

So Mitch's fee-fees were hurt when mean old Harry told him he couldn't stick all his garbage onto the bill. Awww. Screw him. Bring out the cots. Day before the recess. Nobody goes home before this gets done.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 10:45 AM    in reply to Steaming Pile

I like the way you think. Kitty got claws.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 1:36 PM    in reply to Steaming Pile

Abso-friggin-lutely. This is all about extending gifts to the given tax cuts. The most interesting aspect is the Fux Noise Lemmings are going to lose their tax benefits when the entire bill expires. I say let it expire and then bring the bill back to session asking for tax cuts for the

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 1:41 PM    in reply to glblank

Oops... tax cuts for the

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

LFC

user-pic

July 30, 2010 10:11 AM   

Why do Republicans consistently hate our country?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 10:15 AM   

Imagine getting a job, then refusing to do any work because you loathe the CEO. I wish I could say I was amazed, but when you talk to most "conservatives" their breathtaking stupidity reveals precisely how and why Republican politicians can get away with this crap time after time.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 10:22 AM   

The Top 10 reasons the Republicans filibustered this bill:
1) It doesn't provide enough tax incentives to export more jobs
2) It's geared to helping Main Street and NOT the Top 1%
3) This bill is not something Milton Friedman, Barry Goldwater, or Ronald Reagan would support....it's not a trickle down tax cut for the rich.
4) This bill is not Wal-Mart Economics....it's geared to helping us finance making things right here in the US vs buying Chinese things at Wal-Mart.
5) This bill was not drafted by the Republican & their lobbyists....
6) This bill would actually create jobs
7) Wal-Mart is the single largest lobbyists in DC and they told the Republicans to stop this bill.
8) The Chinese didn't like this bill so the Republicans are stopping it
9) This bill didn't include any military spending so the Republicans stopped
10) This bill was good for America..

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 10:29 AM   

Reid must extend the week and get this bill passed. It is really that simple.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 10:33 AM   

It's been crystal-clear for awhile but this ids more proof that the GOP wants everything to suck as much as possible so they can blame the Democrats. Fox hammers this point 24/7

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 1:23 PM    in reply to jeffgee

Precisely!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 1:26 PM    in reply to CityGuy

Oh and Rush and the Right-wing talking heads do also. Remember: "I want him to fail!"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 10:49 AM   

Reform the filibuster. Do it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 10:50 AM   

This is more great political ad content for the Democrats in November!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 11:02 AM    in reply to dswx


Yes , you are right. The Dems need to grab on and run with this one.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 11:40 AM    in reply to VAsouthernliberal

You assume the Democrats have the messaging acumen to do that.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 2:56 PM    in reply to jdb316

Actually, it's Obama who needs to provide the leadership, inspire his base of liberals and progressives, and stop pretending that if he and the rest of the Dem leadership just keep pandering to the right Republicans will somehow "get it" and start playing nice.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 7:18 PM    in reply to Lizskin

I fear he is too dense; most would have figured this out a year ago. I wonder if Hillary might want to run in 2012.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 11:23 AM   

news that the Republicans are filibustering anything is like news that the sun come sup in the east... Until the Democrats and Obama figure out how to make them pay for their non stop obstruction, which means, until the Democrats and the President figure out a way to get the corporate press to cover the story for what it is, not for what Drudge and Murdoch say it is, then this is not news, and no one cares!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 11:36 AM    in reply to cosliberal

The MSM will report on this bill: "Senate Republicans successfully blocked another Democratic effort to increase taxes, increase spending, increase bureaucracy, and prevent a recovery from the mild recession now being experienced."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 11:41 AM    in reply to hoppycalif2

Sad but true. When do they pay the price for misreporting the story??????

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 12:27 PM   

So here we have a week in which the GOP voted against Small business lending, voted against 9/11 first responders health claims and now voting against Tax cuts? Did hell freeze over or does the GOP seriously have no clothes on? Is it opposite day? So I am guessing the Dem's can release the hounds on the airwaves to show the American people just how much the GOP and its congressional members care about the American people, namely the openly don't give a rats a%s about the American people as it is much more lucrative to be a group of lock-step soldiers for their parties attempt to get back in power.

And if as Hoppy says on here the MSM reports that the "GOP successfully blocked Democrat efforts to increase taxes, increase spending ..." this country is f&ck*d and I am tempted to walk away from hope. The MSM should be hammering the GOP members every chance they get by simply asking how they can claim for decades or for however long they have been a member to be for small business, a GOP mantra but vote against it? How can they be for tax-cuts but vote against it? Do they simply have no values or are they simply a party of no for as long as President Obama is in office and as long as Dem's control congress.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 1:00 PM   

heartless bastards.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 1:05 PM   

It's time for Mr Obama to play hardball just the way these bastards do. Hold congress in session and keep bringing this jobs bill up for a vote. Do it now.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 1:48 PM   

So, the plan is to guarantee loans, with taxpayer money, to troubled businesses that do not qualify for banks loans or private investment funding.

Yeah. OK. Another Fannie and Freddie in the works.

Good Gawd! I hope the Republicans manage to block this future "crisis".

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 2:57 PM    in reply to Silence

Um, no, actually, that's not what the bill's about. Go make something else up.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 3:25 PM    in reply to Lizskin

Uh, yeah. It is.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 7:21 PM    in reply to Silence

Childish.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 2:08 PM   

I've got news for you. In the 111th Congress, Republicans have never filibustered a single bill. What they regularly do is threaten filibuster (you know, stand up in the well of the Senate and read the bible, or my pet goat, or (god forbid) tell Americans why they are so opposed to a particular measure that they won't even allow an up-down vote. And what Democrats regularly do is cave to the threat, call a cloture vote and lose 57+ to 40-, a classic display of tyranny of the minority.

Republicans lose nothing by making threats; Democrats lose a bunch by predictably caving.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2010 6:30 PM    in reply to baba2nde

nope. not how a filibuster actually works. never worked that way before. still doesn't today.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

des

user-pic

July 30, 2010 7:27 PM   

fkaZk0sn, or fkaZ if I may; at one time a filibuster was exactly as portrayed in "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington". The person filibustering had to hold the floor by continually speaking. Obviously, this was easier if there were more than one person filibustering. Either way, though, those filibustering were the ones who had to do the work.
However, in the 1980s. there was a rule change and now it's those wishing to stop a filibuster that have to do all the work; in the main, lining up 60 or more votes for cloture. That's not all, though. Those wishing to end a filibuster must always have enough votes in the Senate equal to or greater than the number of votes supporting the filibuster. Otherwise, the filibusterer can call for a snap vote on the question and defeat it. As has been noted, if the Senate Majority leader is not there to vote nay, then the bill can't be voted on again without being re-submitted. I have a vague recollection that this change was done at the instigation of a Republican Senator, but I can't verify it.
If that is so, then the right's plan to destroy public confidence in the Federal government by paralyzing its operations was well thought out in advance. It also shows the extremes these people will go to: destroying tens of thousands, even millions, of lives and possibly even the country. And why? Because they just "know" that their well-disproven, half-baked, radical ideas about how to govern a modern nation are the only valid ones!
So naturally, all's fair...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 31, 2010 11:01 AM    in reply to des

You're right about the old-fashioned filibuster. The record for longest one-man filibuster is held by the late SC Sen. J. Strom Thurmond (24 hrs, 18 minutes) against the Civil Rights Act of 1957. Southern senatorial filibusters are why it took so long to get civil rights legislation through until the cloture vote for the filibuster against the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which had 4 more votes than needed to break the filibuster. Some were from Republicans, in part because this still was the pre-Southern Strategy Republican Party and because President Johnson appealed to Minority Leader Sen. Everett McKinley Dirksen's sense of history & his pride in being from the state of Lincoln. One of the votes was from Sen. Clair Engle (D-CA) who was terminally ill with brain cancer & could no longer speak or walk on his own. The vote was expected to be so close that this dying man had himself wheeled in his his wheelchair onto the Senate floor. When his name was called, he pointed to his eye to indicate he was voting Aye for cloture & it was so recorded. The bill passed 9 days later. Sen. Engle lived only another month and a half.

I don't wish physical harm to McConnell but I hope that Senators Dirksen and Engle haunt his dreams & prevent him from ever getting a good night's sleep again by showing him what real leaders and statesmen with courage look like & how he doesn't deserve to bear the title of senator as they did and the title of Minority Leader that Dirksen also held.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 31, 2010 2:39 PM    in reply to des

no. you are mistaken.

all of the continiuous speaking was done because those filibustering chose to do so, not because they were ever specifically required to do so.

and the wikipedia entry that is probably the source of your confusion has insufficient citation to support its erronious claims (the article cited is not a scholarly work and has absolutley no citations to support its claims, nor does the author have any claim that i am aware of to any sort of expertise on the subject of the filibuster).

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 31, 2010 2:51 PM    in reply to des

the only rule change that ever made clear that a filibustering minority needn't hold the floor by continually speaking happened way back in 1917, not, as you would have it, in the 1980s.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 31, 2010 2:40 PM   

Incredible, as ever. Mitch McConnell looks like a wax statue in the early stages of a fire at Madame Tussauds. I can't wait until he starts his next term as Senate Minority Leader.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on