
Maybe it's just sour grapes, but sure seems like a lot of Republicans are hating on the tea party these days. Spurned GOPers ousted in primaries have been the most vocal, but even candidates who tried to court the tea party are criticizing the approach of the populist movement.
Whether it's because they feel liberated (or because, as some tea partiers have suggested, maybe they are liberals at heart), here's TPM's roundup of the Top Five Republicans who have spoken ill of the movement in recent weeks.
1. Sen. Bob Bennett (R-UT)
Considered a conservative by all political measures, Bennett was unseated as a "moderate" by Utah tea party activists and the uber-conservative Club for Growth this summer. Since losing his seat, Bennett has held nothing back.
In an interview with the Associated Press last week, Bennett said tea partiers are actually helping Democrats, given their support of novice candidates like Sharron Angle who might blow chances at unseating the party in power.
"With the tea party creating the mischief that it is in Colorado, we may not win that seat. My sources in Nevada say with Sharon Angle there's no way Harry Reid loses in Nevada," Bennett said. He also said thanks to Rand Paul's candidacy, "that's a seat we could lose."
"That's my concern, that at the moment there is not a cohesive Republican strategy of this is what we're going to do. And certainly among the tea party types there's clearly no strategy of this is what we're going to do," he said.
2. Robert Hurt (R-VA)
The GOP nominee in Virginia's 5th Congressional district, state Sen. Robert Hurt, managed to topple several Republicans in a competitive primary last month. Tea partiers and others in the district fought his candidacy in part because he supported a $1.4 billion tax increase in 2004 under then-Gov. Mark Warner (D).
The tea party group is refusing to back Hurt. Now, Hurt also is taking heat because he won't agree to debates which include a third-party tea party candidate who is running on the fall ballot.
Hurt spokesman Chris LaCivita criticized the tea party in an interview with the Los Angeles Times, saying: "With this group, if you can walk and chew gum at the same time, you think you can be a member of Congress."
This is, of course, the same local tea party in the central and Southside Virginia district that targeted freshman Rep. Tom Perriello with plans to hang him in effigy last fall. (It was called off following bad publicity.)
3. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC)
Graham, who is often courted by the White House as a bipartisan deal maker on foreign policy, judicial nominees, climate change and immigration, isn't even up for reelection until 2012. So it's a little strange he felt compelled to tell the New York Times that he thinks the tea party is a passing fad.
"The problem with the Tea Party, I think it's just unsustainable because they can never come up with a coherent vision for governing the country. It will die out," he said.Graham also said he challenged a group of Tea Partiers in a meeting: "'What do you want to do? You take back your country -- and do what with it?'...Everybody went from being kind of hostile to just dead silent."
4. Rep. Bob Inglis (R-SC)
Inglis is another GOPer on his way out the door, having lost a runoff election in a Republican primary this month by double digits. And, as he leaves, he's letting loose on the tea party and even his own party's leadership team.
In an interview with the Associated Press, Inglis suggested "that tea party favorites such as former vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin and right-wing talk show hosts like Glenn Beck are the culprits" of "demagoguery" that threatens the Republican party long term.
Inglis didn't directly name the tea party movement, but challenged one of the key talking points tea partiers picked up from Palin during the health care debate.
"There were no death panels in the bill ... and to encourage that kind of fear is just the lowest form of political leadership. It's not leadership. It's demagoguery."
On C-Span yesterday, Inglis complained about GOP leaders Minority Leader John Boehner and Whip Eric Cantor. Via Think Progress:
"I think that to some extent we're getting what we deserve," with Boehner and Cantor leading the Party, Inglis said, adding, "We have basically decided to stir up a base, and that's a bad decision for the country."Later in the segment, Inglis criticized those on the right who blamed the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) for causing the 2008 financial crisis:
INGLIS: What I'm supposed to do as a Republican is just echo back to you Anne that yes, CRA was the cause of the financial meltdown in October of 2008. And if I said that to you I'd be clearly wrong because if you think about it, CRA had been around for decades. So how could it be that it caused the problem suddenly in October of 2008? ... So therefore we can just establish it as a scapegoat. Democrats like it and we can of course put the racial hue on that and that makes it even more powerful. But if we do that, we go further away from the solution, the solution is to deal with those fundamental things, not pick up on scapegoats and run with it.
5. Scott Rigell (R-VA)
Rigell is the GOP nominee to challenge freshman Rep. Glenn Nye (D-VA) this fall in
In Virginia's 2nd Congressional district.
The local tea party backed the GOP primary's other candidates over Rigell, a car dealer who donated to President Obama and other Democrats in recent years. The tea party now says they won't get involved in the general election.
Listen to a recent speech where Rigell compared his primary race with boot camp. "The primary lasted 11 months, boot camp only lasted three months," he says in the below clip, obtained by TPM.
Bonus: Democrats with tea party love
In a few up-is-down sorts of moves, a local tea party in Idaho endorsed Rep. Walt Minnick (D-ID) for reelection over a Republican challenger, and Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WI) has highlighted his tea party-ish support, too.
Late Update: Reader PH flags a recent Michael Gerson column where he criticizes the tea party and particularly Angle in Nevada. Gerson, a former Bush White House speechwriter, concludes that "[T]he Republican Party rides a massive wave toward a rocky shore."
LucidPanther
July 16, 2010 12:01 PM
I just saw Mark Williams ( a tea party leader ) on MSNBC claim that it is "impossible for there to be any racism in the tea party"...He also claimed that the racist signs at their events are all brought there by infiltrators who want to sabotage the tea party...he says those signs were brought by NAACP folks just so they could then turn around and accuse the tea party of racism
This guy is a sick puppy and so are the racist teabaggers.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
July 16, 2010 12:19 PM in reply to LucidPanther
I saw that. It was surreal. The media is responsible for putting this asshole on TV and giving his bullshit rantings more play. He is a proven liar AND a racist.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Seismedia
July 17, 2010 5:52 AM in reply to FreeRider
"putting this asshole on TV and giving his bullshit rantings more play. He is a proven liar AND a racist"
Not to mention he's got a foul potty mouth! But we can't let him get away with the lies. Join together and call out this astroturf movement for what it is, just another attempt by Oil Executives, Bank CEOs, and fat cat Wall Street fat cats to disenfranchise Blacks, Gays, and Latinos. Time to invoke some social justice on these tea bloggers, or something.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SqueakyRat
July 17, 2010 4:48 PM in reply to Seismedia
Thanks for the concern, troll.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mibwilso
July 16, 2010 12:25 PM in reply to LucidPanther
If those people with the racist signs were really "infiltrators", it didn't seem like anyone else there was demanding that the signs be taken down either.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rynato
July 16, 2010 1:39 PM in reply to LucidPanther
Oh really? Would that be the same Mark Williams who recently wrote this:
http://politicalcorrection.org/blog/201007150012
I bet that was a liberal agent provacateur as well...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
midnight rambler
July 16, 2010 2:26 PM in reply to rynato
In response to that being reposted on the Tea Party Nation forum, one of the regulars there posted this:
Of course, that's not racist at all, since he mentions that there are other parasites besides black ones.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Michael
July 16, 2010 7:56 PM in reply to midnight rambler
That is so funny. A couple of weeks ago, I confronted a group of tea baggers here in Ft. Lauderdale (I was riding my bike to the beach). One sign said "Send the NI***R back to Kenya." When I called him on the sign, several of them called me a "parasite on society." In fact they were shouting it....
It must be one of their new code words. I feel honored!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
July 16, 2010 2:34 PM in reply to rynato
Read it, and all I can say is "Wow..."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Grassrootsmyass2
July 17, 2010 1:21 PM in reply to rynato
What if the Tea Party were bl.ack:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZtH7vH4yRcY
Pass it on!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
LonewackoDotCom3
July 16, 2010 7:05 PM in reply to LucidPanther
I'm definitely not a fan of the many of the things to be found on this site, but at the same time I'm not a fan of the tea parties.
If the other opponents of the 'partiers weren't almost as bad as them, you'd "be home by now". Instead of constantly playing the race card, try something else for a change. I mean, seriously, these buffoons pretend they're the only patriots in the U.S. and they support policies that most Americans don't support. Yet, all their other opponents can do is play the race card. That's almost #TeapartyDumb.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JasonsRobot
July 17, 2010 4:58 AM in reply to LonewackoDotCom3
The Race Card gets played because the racist signs and comments are the only actual, concrete thing the Tea Partiers can be specifically called on where everyone knows what's being talked about. Everything else they rant about is 'patriotism', 'founding fathers', 'tyranny', 'socialism', 'wanting THEIR country back'. It's all a bunch of empty catchphrases that even they don't know what they mean. It's been fruitless to point at a sign and say, "it's statement makes no sense", because the TP'ers won't even consider it. Whereas a racist sign or comment can be pointed out to be racist and most can understand why.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
MrRandom
July 17, 2010 9:24 AM in reply to LonewackoDotCom3
Your right calling racists and their apologists on their overt racism is playing the race card, we should all be like you, bury our heads in the sand and pretend it isn't happening. Moron.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Donald from Hawaii
July 16, 2010 9:56 PM in reply to LucidPanther
Agreed. Of course, this is the same guy who said back in 2006 that black people in New Orleans deserved their fate, because they were too lazy to evacuate from an oncoming Hurricane Katrina in the late summer of 2005.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jjdjjd
July 17, 2010 3:59 AM in reply to LucidPanther
you know why i don't like obama? because he is now taking credit for stopping the oil leak. on friday morning he said 'we are now capturing 80,000 barrels a day'. before friday it was always 'they'. haha. what a phony.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Grassrootsmyass2
July 17, 2010 1:20 PM in reply to LucidPanther
What if the Tea Party were black:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZtH7vH4yRcY
Pass it on!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
July 18, 2010 8:44 AM in reply to LucidPanther
I can't decide which is more racist: The Tea Party or the right's reaction to the NAACP resolution asking them to denounce racism
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tinsk
July 16, 2010 12:12 PM
Yeah I saw that too on MSNBC. I was wondering why I saw 1000's of black people at those tea party rallies with all those Obama African witchdoctor and N-word signs.
Mr Williams clarified that today. NAACP Infiltrators. yeah... that's the ticket.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ladyfractal
July 16, 2010 1:30 PM in reply to tinsk
It's really quite simple. There are no racists in the Tea Party therefore, any racism seen in the Tea Party is the fault of infiltrators. You see everyone in the Tea Party marched with MLK in 1963 and stood raptured at the reflecting pool in D.C. as he said "judged by the content of our character, not the color of our skin" over and over and over again (it's a liberal lie that the speech had more words than that). If you look at the pictures of the '63 march, you can see a sea of white faces with the odd black person scattered through the crowd. Oh and the segregationists weren't racist--George Wallace and Bull Connor were liberal infiltrators, probably planted by the NAACP.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mamesyr
July 16, 2010 12:31 PM
Dede Scozzafava should be on the list also....NY-23 was a lock for the GOP until the baggers like Armey and the Club for Growth stepped in with Doug Hoffman....a clueless little man who did not live in the district and who was only capable of uttering the standard slogans while diddling with himself to a Ronald Reagan picture.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ladyfractal
July 16, 2010 1:08 PM
One wonders how long it will take for the other sane Republicans--the half-dozen left--to work up the same courage.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
DownriverDem
July 16, 2010 2:09 PM in reply to ladyfractal
This is funny. Most tea baggers are really just repubs. I have been loving watching them turn on their own.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
justaJ0e
July 16, 2010 4:44 PM in reply to ladyfractal
Yep. It's just like any other low budget horror film. They created a monster to help them take over ... and right on schedule, the monster has begun to turn on it's creators.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
July 16, 2010 1:15 PM
God, this makes me feel better.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
de TOQUEville
July 16, 2010 1:19 PM
QUOTE:
"In an interview with the Associated Press last week, Bennett said tea partiers are actually helping Democrats, given their support of novice candidates like Sharron Angle...."
Shhh! Bob, you're gonna ruin everything.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Seatower
July 16, 2010 5:22 PM in reply to de TOQUEville
ROFL...deT! Great post...thanks for the grins.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
July 16, 2010 1:28 PM
The Tea Party has very little to do with race. You can be any color to go to your local political rally (Tea Party) and protest government spending.
I know the left doesn't have a movement, so the left wants to tear down the right's movement.
I'm a former democrat who went to a few Tea Parties. I guess now I'm just an independent racist, according to the left.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
condew
July 16, 2010 1:42 PM in reply to Capitalist
I think you mean't to say "mob" not "movement".
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
July 16, 2010 1:44 PM in reply to Capitalist
Why do you guys lie so blatantly? Do you really expect anyone to believe that you're a former democrat? Your facebook page shows that you think Mitch McConnell, one of the most conservative members of the senate, isn't a conservative.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
chameleon
July 16, 2010 2:34 PM in reply to Steven
Way to bust his/her ass.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
smartalek
July 17, 2010 11:52 PM in reply to Steven
@Steven West July 16 1:44pm
They lie so blatantly because that's all they can do.
The "policies" they support -- "lower taxes," "less regulation," and "invade countries that pose zero threat, while letting bin Laden literally walk free" -- were fully tried, and they fully failed.
Publicans had full control, and everything they did left our country, our citizenry, our economy, our military, and our standing in the world weaker than when they took control.
They were warned about al Qaeda, but did nothing, and we got 9/11.
They were warned not to repeal Glass-Steagall, and not to leave derivatives unregulated, and we got the worst financial collapse since the Depression, and the people and firms that caused it not only went unpunished, they were given taxpayer $ to remain "competitive."
They were repeatedly told that cutting taxes on the rich would accomplish nothing to create jobs or boost the economy, but they did it, and turned the federal budget surplus that Clinton left them into the biggest deficit, and the biggest national debt, in America's history -- and for the first time in any Presidency, left the economy with fewer jobs than when it had started, and with real incomes for everyone except the top 5% falling.
And despite being warned (famously, by one of their own: Powell and his "Pottery Barn rule") of the disaster that would ensue from invading Iraq, they did so, and screwed it up so badly that we've created far more terrorists and terrorist-sympathizers than we could ever kill.
And despite all this, they want to put all of the same policies back in place!
With all of this as the proven, undeniable results of all of their theories put into action, what else can they possibly do but lie, lie, lie?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
commie atheist
July 16, 2010 2:12 PM in reply to Capitalist
I'm a former democrat...
I know, I know, “I used to consider myself a Democrat, but thanks to 9/11, I'm outraged by Chappaquiddick ..."
Or all those Liberal dinner parties you went to where people said bad things about George W. Bush.
You're a transparent tool.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
joeinmaryland
July 16, 2010 2:15 PM in reply to Capitalist
Capitalist Banner,
The core principals of the tea party, "smaller government, lower taxes, less regulation are not BY DEFINITION racist. However, the mob has attracted an element to its activities that espouses racism in its worst form. Rather than denounce those participants for what they present, the tea party makes the leap in logic that is in your post. You may not be a racist, but if you participate in an event where snide remarks are made about our "Halfrican" President or racist signs are present, you condone or accept that behavior. That silence implies an acceptance of racism.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
zonk
July 16, 2010 2:30 PM in reply to Capitalist
Tough shit, crybaby.
Lemme tell you something...
While I've always been politically active, I was never a marcher for causes. In 2003, so strongly did I oppose the then-upcoming Iraq debacle that I actually attended a few marches and anti-war rallies.
One of them drew 350,00+. Attendees at those rallies were near uniformly regular folks... blue collar, white collar, lunchboxes and brief cases. At NONE of them did I see a single sign or hear a single chant of even the mildest controversy.
Yet - your then-allies in the media sure managed to find the half dozen -- the 0.000017% that might have worn or brought signs of questionable value.
You'll get ZERO pity from me.
You have a movement of a few thousand -- out of which a few hundred ARE whack-jobs, white supremacists, and utterly nuts.
You don't like being tarred by them?
Tough shit. Welcome to the hard world of political activism.
I'll offer you the same advice that conservatives offered me in 2003 when I would complain about the uneven coverage of the anti-Iraq debacle-in-the-making...
Grow up, stop being a whiny baby, and maybe you ought to quit hanging in movements that draw whackos.
T-O-U-G-H S-H-I-T.
Your movement is wrought with the worst sort of divisive miscreants the nation has to offer... if it bothers you to be painted with the same brush they deserve, then I suggest you tend to your own movement. It's neither my nor the media fault to point out your "tea parties" seem rife with them.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jmargaret
July 16, 2010 3:33 PM in reply to Capitalist
Protest government spending? Where were you guys during the administration of George W. Bush? Or Ronald Reagan, for that matter?
What you're really protesting, in case you haven't noticed, is a black man in the White House. All the other "issues" you claim to be protesting about are just a cover story. At least be honest with yourself, if you're capable of it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CityGuy
July 16, 2010 4:15 PM in reply to jmargaret
Nailed that argument!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ladyfractal
July 16, 2010 5:26 PM in reply to jmargaret
No, no no. Let me explain:
When, for instance, a Republican president cuts taxes while not cutting spending, therefore raising the Federal deficit that is stimulating the economy and letting loose the power of the free market (There are no markets but free markets and Hayek, blessings and profits be upon him, is Its messenger). Any deficits resulting from that policy either are not *really* deficits or if they are, deficits do not matter. This is obvious economics 101--in fact, it's SO obvious that no economics course will teach this in the same way that no science class will teach that the sun shines. In fact, deficits that might result from this are actually a *surplus*.
On the other hand, if a Democratic president spends so much as a single dollar on a social program then it is as if we had returned to the days of Pharaoh and the union is under its greatest existential threat imaginable. In fact, it would be preferable that the United States be wiped out by a massive nuclear attack than that we should spend money on social programs. Any deficits accrued by such spending (and ONLY by such spending, military spending does not cause deficits and cannot be thought of as government spending) is an economic catastrophe and it is only a matter of time before the bond market simply hires the Russians to perform a hit on the United States using ICBMs to discipline us for our profligacy.
Why this is so hard for Americans to understand is completely beyond comprehension. :)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Seatower
July 16, 2010 5:40 PM in reply to ladyfractal
I LOVE your comments.... Bizarre how so many really believed in "trickle down" economics (or, pee on the poor, as it were)and other Repug nonsense.
I saw this missive on openleft.com written by Paul Rosenberg and wanted to share it with you and others as it encapsulates conservatives vs progressives:
"Conservatives believe in tribally-shared narrative myths that comfort them in perpetuating a world of inequality,
while
Progressives believe in a universalist, critical-empirical approach to creating a world that works for everyone."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ladyfractal
July 16, 2010 5:54 PM in reply to Seatower
That encapsulates the difference pretty much perfectly.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jmargaret
July 17, 2010 3:16 PM in reply to ladyfractal
Thanks for the elucidation! :-)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
thepoliticalcat
July 17, 2010 8:00 PM in reply to ladyfractal
Wasn't it our very own dearly beloved (how it pains me to say that!) Darth Cheney who said, a mere two or three years ago, "Deficits don't matter"? All this while running up, of course, the largest deficit this country has ever had the misfortune to see.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
July 18, 2010 3:08 AM in reply to thepoliticalcat
Exactly. "Reagan taught us that deficits don't matter" was exactly what he said.
What he really meant was that deficits don't matter if you create them in order for the money to go to rich people or to military contractors. Deficits only matter when you want the money to go to help lift up the people at the bottom of the stack.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
aacme
July 18, 2010 9:25 PM in reply to slb
Or more exactly: 'Reagan showed that deficits don't matter if you are followed by a Democratic administration that can fix everything but be destroyed by attacks, propaganda and obstruction, so Reps can start over again making the rich still richer at everyone else' expense.'
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
trippin
July 18, 2010 8:52 AM in reply to ladyfractal
"When, for instance, a Republican president cuts taxes while not cutting spending, therefore raising the Federal deficit that is stimulating the economy"
Just like when, for instance, a Democratic President faced with the economic collapse of the Free World due to the deregulatory largess attribuatble to those who worship "free markets" spends money on stimulus, raising the Federal deficit and stimulating the economy...
There of course is no such thing as a "free market" -- no market can exist without rules. We see what happens when we allow Republicans (and Democrats who act like them) dismantle those rules.
When the top tax rate was between 70% and 90%, we didn't have all this white collar crime and robbing of the Treasury by special interests like banks. We made things the world wanted to buy -- we all earned a decent wage -- we had enough to buy a home, feed our families, afford our medical bills and send a kid to college -- we had enough as a society to build an interstate highway system, send missions to the moon, and win the Cold War, and provide a financial safety net for our elderly. We were the model country on Earth.
Since Reagan made greed fashionable again for the first time since the last Depression by among other things reducing that tax rate to 30-something percent, thereby enabling the criminals to keep their spoils, we've seen the systematic stick-by-stick destruction of the middle class. Jobs exported, cheap labor imported, incessant driving down of wages and benefits stifling our purchasing -- in short, the disparity of wealth this grievous error created put us on an economic death spiral, and what you fail to realize is that there's no hope for you and your busted ideology either -- you're sucking us all down the drain, and you're coming with us.
The meritocracy is an illusion. It's a game rigged for insiders, and thanks to their propaganda outlets like talk radio, certain internet sites, and Fox, we have a populace thoroughly convinced that the very governing principles that are putting them on the path to ruin are good for them.
Well you can have it. I know better. Make the top tax rate 90% and we'll be able to afford to rebuild our infrastructure and not slide into the sorry state the Soviet Union was -- a few wealthy "party leaders" on top and a dirt poor public and a crumbling physical plant except where the party leaders frequented. We have in many ways become the Soviet Union under Republican "leadership."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Seatower
July 16, 2010 5:28 PM in reply to jmargaret
Spot on, JM. The "Old Party" ain't so "Grand' anymore.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Silence
July 17, 2010 11:11 AM in reply to jmargaret
The black man or the white man in the White House?
He's both, right?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jmargaret
July 17, 2010 3:06 PM in reply to Silence
Does it matter whether he's white or black?
To the teabaggers, it does. He's "not one of us."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
donquijoterocket
July 17, 2010 3:22 PM in reply to Silence
Unfortunately most of murka and especially the baggers and wingnuts of all stripes still go by the old "one drop rule".It's really handy for them because it frees them of the responsibility of actually thinking about their stance and makes it much easier to sort people into the wingnuts/baggers two main categories US and THEM.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jsdc007
July 16, 2010 4:22 PM in reply to Capitalist
No, you're just a liar.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JasonsRobot
July 17, 2010 8:15 AM in reply to Capitalist
Sure, the Tea Party's against gov't spending but everyone knows it doesn't stop there. They're also against: separation of church and state (regarding Christianity), womans' choice, gay equality, evolution, sex ed, climate change, green energy, anything anti-war, Muslims, stem cell research, and being polite to other countries. (those'r just off the top of my head) Claiming that it's about gov't spending is just lying by omission.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Kammy Political
July 16, 2010 1:47 PM
You know a movement is bullshit when even the very party it supports rallies against it. Terrific. :)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tinsk
July 16, 2010 4:13 PM in reply to Kammy Political
And if their movement is in fact bullshit, which it is, wouldn't that just make the tea baggers one big smelly bowel movement.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
donquijoterocket
July 16, 2010 4:28 PM in reply to Kammy Political
Though of course Bennett will be depicted as a "disgruntled" sour grapes loser, and the numbers of "RINOs" will increase too bad they can't have the same success with the African variety rino with an H.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
donquijoterocket
July 16, 2010 4:32 PM in reply to Kammy Political
Best description I've seen so far calls them minimally reprogrammable zombies- They can change the tapes so when you pull the string they blurt out this weeks blathering points- and Dick Armey's combination cash cow and personal corps of shake and bake fucktards.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Silence
July 17, 2010 3:08 PM in reply to Kammy Political
The GOP tools of Wall street suddenly have credibility with progressives? Why am I not surprised?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Kammy Political
July 17, 2010 11:51 PM in reply to Silence
...
You, sir, are an idiot.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
thunderbay63
July 16, 2010 2:05 PM
The tea party is the GOP's Frankenstein monster. They fabricated the beast out of astroturf, but can no longer control it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
DownriverDem
July 16, 2010 2:15 PM
Tea baggers are just repubs. They also appear stupid. Why? Many of them are on Social Security and Medicare and yet they yell about getting the government out of their lives.
Who are these folks? Race does play a part. They will not accept a duly elected president who happens to be half white and black. The repubs are going to be in bad shape down the road. They are slowly pissing off every minority in the land. I am white, but they will never win with just angry white folks. Down the road we will see the full results of having only old white folks in their party. Remember their 99.9% white convention? Remember the diversity of the folks celebrating in Grant Park on election night? Many young folks are bi-racial. They will never vote for the repubs. All the repubs have done is show they are the old white folks party.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
condew
July 16, 2010 2:29 PM
Repubs had a choice; pander to the Teabagger mob, or join with Democrats to enact pragmatic solutions to the enormous problems this country faces, and then go to the voters with solid accomplishments. They chose to pander to the baggers. I have no sympathy for them, they may have doomed us all.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
chameleon
July 16, 2010 2:35 PM in reply to condew
Actually they have doomed themselves.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Ahmedsaid
July 16, 2010 2:34 PM
Linda Graham is a "top Republican? No wonder voters turn to the Tea Party.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Ron Jeremy
July 16, 2010 3:12 PM in reply to Ahmedsaid
I can see you're really familiar with who Mr. Lindsey Graham is.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
zonk
July 16, 2010 2:43 PM
Yeah...
Remind me again - how many elections and primaries has the tea party won?
What's your record?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
July 16, 2010 3:55 PM in reply to zonk
They can win primaries, but they can't win the general.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bwilson27
July 16, 2010 2:57 PM
Let's not forget where this all started: Fox News. The whole thing was orchestrated by guys like Beck as a way to attract more viewers, namely, the millions of people who were outraged that a black man could be president.
That's the true foundation of this "Party".
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Ron Jeremy
July 16, 2010 3:17 PM
Father Coughlin's Christian Front. The John Birch Society. Ross Perot's Reform Party. We've seen this "conservatives will take our government back, its a revolution, we're a rising tide of regular Americans" act before. It gets weaker and dies out faster on every iteration. By the next election cycle the tea party will be a trivia question.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Forrest
July 16, 2010 3:19 PM
Wow, the comments made by those folks about policy are actually coherent, intelligent, and thought provoking. I'm sure many other Republicans feel the same way, but they value their jobs over the good they might do for their country in a time of crisis.
If nothing else, the fact that the Tea Party has become such a force should be proof that the current Republican 'leadership' shouldn't be allowed to hold their jobs.
The fact they let the Tea Party gain such a stranglehold over them is just the icing on their multi-tiered cake of failure.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
George C
July 16, 2010 3:24 PM
On a slightly more serious note, on NPR yesterday they read a letter from someone who made a really interesting point. NPR had run a story about the Tea Parties' reliance on the Constitution, a document with which they're obviously not familiar. The letter writer noted the similarity between this facet of Tea Partier belief and fundamentalist Christian belief in the Bible: written by God, words can't be changed, and we have to spend our lives searching for the divine meanings, which of course are not subject to interpretation by mere mortals.
Interesting.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tinsk
July 16, 2010 4:22 PM in reply to George C
Yeah, and little do they know or acknowledge that the Bible has been rewritten and changed countless times by the hand of man over the past 1.5 millennium. In most cases as a means of solidifying power and wealth over the masses.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
sherifffruitfly
July 16, 2010 3:38 PM
Clearly this is great news for John McCain.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bill
July 16, 2010 3:43 PM
The rational fringe of the Republican Party has been heard from ?!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
July 18, 2010 3:19 AM in reply to bill
"The rational fringe" -- I love it!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FellowAmerican
July 16, 2010 4:20 PM
As I read this:
"With this group, if you can walk and chew gum at the same time,"
I thought La Cavita (Hurt's spokesman) was going to say something like:
"you must be a liberal, commie, progessive, leftist unAmerican"
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Mark P. Kessinger
July 16, 2010 4:43 PM
So, I'm not sure how I am supposed to react to this article. Am I supposed to feel sympathy for these poor, arguably saner Republicans? I mean, these same guys stood around and said virtually nothing while the GOP actively tried to stoke the very irrational and unfocused anger that eventually turned around and bit them on the ass. Now they've got a tiger by the tail. Are they really surprised?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Winston Smith
July 16, 2010 5:57 PM
If it takes a teabagger to destroy the one-party neoliberal plutocracy, then more power (not real power, mind you) to them. I wish the liberals and progressives had the same influence over the so-called democrat half of the plutocrat party that the teabaggers have over the republican half.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Official A
July 17, 2010 7:18 AM in reply to Winston Smith
The progressives and liberals were getting the cold shoulder from the Democratic establishment long before the teabaggers were being disavowed by "leading" Republicans. Well, come election time, I suspect the Democratic wing of the Plutocrat party will discover how much influence progressives and liberals have on the electoral process.
Teabaggers, when they don't like what's going on, have rallies and yell. Progressives, when they don't like what's going on (and unable to attract the attention of the media) tend to find different outlets for effecting change. In 2008, that was Obama. Now, it's specific causes and the coalition the swept in 2008 is no more.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Kammy Political
July 16, 2010 6:33 PM
Now, inspired by Geico's commercials:
Is the Tea Party of today truly a legitimate movement?
...
Has there ever been a time where Fixed News has never slanted to the right (not saying other channels don't have a left bias - ALL channels do)?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
TM
July 16, 2010 7:22 PM
Inglis and Graham are frauds. The Tea Party just doesn't support them so now they have something to say. Last summer during the Death Panel crap Inglis was having town hall meetings and repeating the tea bagger lines. Graham is a racist but for some reason it's a popular belief that he is a closeted Gay man so no Tea Bag love for him.
I called and emailed both of these guys about Healthcare and other issues and they sent me xeroxed replies that read like a Tea Bagger brochure.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
OhioGuy
July 16, 2010 7:59 PM
What a surprise, Republicans trying to tack to the center now that the primaries are over. Good luck with that.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
castanea
July 16, 2010 10:53 PM
I had a discussion with a guy at work this week in which he ranted about how Muslims were building a mosque at the former site of the World Trade Center as a way of "rubbing it in" to Americans by "violating our sacred ground."
He had heard about this at a church meeting. Later I checked the web and found that the mosque is two blocks from the WTC--hardly "at the former site"--but no matter, if it were being built in Brooklyn, I'm sure it would still be cause for alarm because it would have been within site of the former twin towers, or some such.
Later, he began discussing how he is living his life according to the inerrant word of God, a confession that didn't surprise me at all. I thought about quizzing him on the derivation of the bible--who wrote it, when it was written, who chose which books to include, and so forth--but I'm sure he would have considered me a heretic from that moment forward, and who needs that sort of reputation in the work place?
But what really gave me the creeps was the way his facial expression changed during that conversation, from what I'd consider his "usual" face during our typical work-related discussions, to a somewhat blank expression when he slipped into his "hate Muslims, love the bible" riffs. It was like he slipped into a different mental dimension.
I guess that's the sort of thing you get when a critical number of Americans forswear rational, critical thinking, ignore facts, and believe with all their hearts that the snake oil they just purchased from the charlatan will remove stains, cure hemorrhoids, and give them everlasting life.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
castanea
July 16, 2010 10:55 PM in reply to castanea
My comment immediately above was intended as a reply to tinsk @4:22.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Scyth
July 16, 2010 11:16 PM
The Republicans know that the Tea Party is a disease.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
inokeah
July 17, 2010 12:47 AM
Lets see what happens September 18 and then November 2? Who is still standing and who will be cutting bait. We will all be paying higher taxes, the "non profit" will have to kick in and OBlabla Care will be like a cancer on the medical field. I just paid $100. for what I paid $20. for before Oblabla Care.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
aacme
July 18, 2010 9:34 PM in reply to inokeah
Bullshit.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JasonsRobot
July 17, 2010 4:34 AM
So, an ultra-conservative group called 'Club For Growth'. Ironic, eh?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
nick
July 17, 2010 5:57 AM
Now that the TEABAGGERS are upset and DEM Senators who want to investigate BP for it's hand in freeing the Pan Am terrious they are showing their true colors not only are the anti Black and Hispanic but are for Big Oil and UN American for siding with a company who help free this murderer
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
okami
July 17, 2010 7:13 AM
i really, really wish there were 'approve/disapprove' buttons here for comments. all you guys are quite illuminating. tanx.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Grassrootsmyass2
July 17, 2010 10:14 AM
What if the Tea Party were black:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZtH7vH4yRcY
Pass it on!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
July 17, 2010 12:18 PM
Once the Tea Party draws out the crazies, maybe those of us who want financial responsibility and personal liberty will move back to the Republican Party.
D. Michael Bush
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jmargaret
July 17, 2010 3:18 PM in reply to D. Michael
You mean, financial responsibility as practiced by George W. Bush and Ronald Reagan? Personal liberty as guaranteed by Dick Cheney?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
MikeW67
July 17, 2010 7:35 PM
Bad news as in Party-Divisive, yes. Policy differences? No.
...hey, let's just listen to Palin and the failed GOP, and go back to cut taxes / cut govt that we tried for the 3 decades of the Reagan/Bush era. In fact, let's get ANOTHER big tax cut to the wealthiest as we did in 1981 and 2001.
I mean, that worked SO well to deliver Trickle Down prosperity. Almost nobody is unemployed now. And the banks and oil companies and health insurers, heck - they POLICED THEMSELVES!!! Get government out of the WAY by golly!
Abe Lincoln would have said;
"You can fool some of the people, ALL of the time"... ;^)
- Balkingpoints / www
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
trippin
July 18, 2010 8:35 AM
I guess they won't be joining Michelle Bachmann's one-person caucus (more aptly called a "kookus.")
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
neesy08
July 18, 2010 11:19 AM
maybe they are turning against them because:
1. they don't want to be seen promoting a racists group 9even though they may be themselves)
2. the teabaggers are crazy
3. they aren't winning many elections
4. they don't want to be seen associating with a group who have such extreme ideas
5. all of the above
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
DugFmJamul
July 18, 2010 1:39 PM in reply to neesy08
You got wrong, the 'progressive' Republicans are throwing the Tea Party Movement under the Bus because the Tea Party Movement represents what they refuse to honor...the Constitution!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
July 18, 2010 3:37 PM
Tea Partiers talking about the plight of black Americans would be like me trying to handicap a parliamentary race in Indonesia (assuming they have a parliament). By the numbers, the vast majority of Tea Partiers are white, suburban and comfortably middle class. They come from McMansion land. They wouldn't know economic diversity if it landed on their faces. I work in the sprawling, big box infested, no sidewalk suburbs where conservatives do well, and it's like a different world. I'm reading that the biggest population losses are happening in the farthest-out suburbs while cities and their immediate suburban areas are seeing growth again. I hope this continues, because the more people interact with each other, the more they understand one another. It's really easy to see blacks as parasites and to see welfare benefits as a racial issue when the only blacks you see are on the teevee in the rumpus room of your Ryan Home.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
John Taurus
July 18, 2010 9:28 PM
This Lin that is posting all these ads needs someone to open up a can of "AZZZZWhoop" on her/him.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
cacamp
July 18, 2010 11:21 PM
teabaggers are racist.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
John Taurus
July 19, 2010 7:07 AM
http://www.uruknet.de/?s1=1&p=68018&s2=18
Well, the government voted to cut unemployment to Americans who lost their jobs because of the government letting all our jobs go overseas and lettng the Zionist Israeli Jews control our banking system. There is no shortage of money to send to their fellow Jews in Israel. Damn the well-being of the slaves. Let the slaves starve and go homeless. All that matters is the master, Israel. Oil is not the reason the US is in Israel. America is there making more room so that the world Jews can flee there to safety as people are awakening to Jew treachery.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
John Taurus
July 19, 2010 7:24 AM
http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0718/drug-cartel-gunmen-slaughter-17-bringing-bloody-weekends-murder-total-50/
America's future. This is the life Americans will love and enjoy in the near future because of our open borders. Racist Tea Party???
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?