TPMDC

Vitter Claims Disgraced Staffer Didn't Work on Women's Issues; Records Say Otherwise


Senator David Vitter (R-LA)

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Facing reporters for the first time in weeks on Wednesday, Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) denied a key element in the controversy surrounding a former legislative aide who remained on Vitter's staff after pleading guilty to attacking his girlfriend with a knife in 2008. But records reviewed by TPM show clearly that Vitter's claim is false.

Brent Furer pled guilty in 2008 to attacking his girlfriend with a knife, but was nonetheless retained in Vitter's DC legislative office in the role of legislative assistant for women's issues until the details of Furer's crime were publicized in late June. He subsequently resigned. In Louisiana today, Vitter categorically denied that Furer worked on women's issues in any way. But numerous records and published accounts prove otherwise.

Several DC-based information services publish detailed listings of staff assignments and contact information for Capitol Hill offices. And multiple directories, both online and in hard copy, name Furer as Vitter's legislative assistant on women's issues.

Below is a copy of the print edition of the Capitol Advantage Guidebook directory of Women's Issues legislative assistants for the 111th Congress (which is to say, after the knife attack in 2008), and passed my way by a source.

We've reviewed other, similar directories which also list Furer as a women's issues LA.

These guidebooks are put together by a handful of companies, which get their information directly from legislative offices.

Furthermore, in his capacity as Vitter's Women's Issues LA, Furer worked with at least one prominent Louisiana advocate -- Beth Meeks, executive director of the Louisiana Coalition Against Domestic Violence -- on domestic violence legislation, and she was personally informed that Furer was Vitter's point man on the issue.

According to ABC News, Meeks "had been in Washington in June - just before news of the incident went public."

A call placed this evening to Vitter's congressional spokesman Joel DiGrado was not returned.

At his press conference today, Vitter was asked why Furer was assigned to work on women's issues even after Vitter knew about the assault.

"Uh, he was not," Vitter said.

To clarify, a reporter asked, "He was not assigned to women's issues?"

"Correct," Vitter responded. "And that's just one of several issues that have been completely misreported. Tonya Newman, Nicole Hebert in my office are assigned to women's issues. That's always been the case."

Tonya Newman, according to Legistorm, serves as his Deputy Chief of Staff, and has served over the course of years as both Chief of Staff and Communications Director, while bouncing back and forth between Vitter's personal office and his Banking and Urban Affairs Committee office. Nicole Hebert works out of his Lafayette office as a liaison on women's issues.

You can see the entire exchange below.

Comments (59) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (0)

July 8, 2010 12:22 AM   

Liar, Liar, diapers on fire.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 1:03 AM    in reply to tillie630

Seriously. I mean, does anyone really think that after what he got caught doing, Vitter is going to worry about telling a few flagrant lies about a former staffer?

It's like at some point the light off in the guy's head: "Wait a minute, my constituents are such a bunch of mindless, brainwashed automatons, I can say or do ANYTHING and STILL get re-elected!"

It must be very liberating.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 1:06 AM    in reply to Peter Principle

He does seem to think he's indestructible at this point. Alas, the evidence would seem to bear him out.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 1:34 AM    in reply to Josh Marshall

You never know what will be the straw that breaks the camel's back. Keep up the pressure.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 9:51 AM    in reply to Josh Marshall

"Wait a minute, my constituents are such a bunch of mindless, brainwashed automatons, I can say or do ANYTHING and STILL get re-elected!"

And that makes him different other Republicans in Republican-heavy states or districts only in that he can do anything. They can all apparently say anything they want and still get reelected.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 10:09 AM    in reply to Peter Principle

Louisiana voters follow a few key principles in political life: 1) All politicians lie. 2) The federal government is a gravy train to get free money. 3) God chooses certain people to be in political office, and that's why they're in office.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 10:36 AM    in reply to Peter Principle

It makes you wonder why he's bullet-proof. It's not like LA is a totally red state. I don't really understand it. Has he done a lot for the state?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 10:45 AM    in reply to Tim Church

Louisiana has been a thoroughly red state ever since the Republicans upended its demographics by allowing New Orleans to drown.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 1:50 AM   

Maybe Vitter will say he understood the "assigned after" question to inquire whether he initially tasked Furer to women's issues, and that that had occurred before the "incident," so he didn't lie, given how he understood the question. Of course, that would not get him off the underlying charge of colossally bad judgment.

This man is nauseating.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 2:20 AM    in reply to Subliminability

Then again, nah -- Vitter names the other two staffers who were supposedly assigned, rather than Furer.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 6:52 AM    in reply to Subliminability

Listen to what he says again:

"Tonya Newman, Nicole Avare in my office were assigned to woman's issues, that's always been the case."

(emphasis mine)

So even the weasel-like narrow parsing of that you say he might have tried doesn't hold up. But as others have noted, Vitter is in some sense liberated form having to say anything remotely close to fact based or truthful, since he was greeted with applause by the GOP caucus on the Senate floor after it came out he was paying prostitutes for sex, and he will likely be re-elected.

Why would you think you need to be honest when you are given a pass like that?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 1:51 AM   

Vitter doesn't have to admit to anything. He just stands up and lies and no one really cares. I have heard it so often these days "all politicians lie". And the republicans know that the more outrageous the lie the more the people will believe it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 9:40 AM    in reply to CarmanK

It's not a matter of whether it is outrageous or not. It's a matter of whether the lie fits into people's pre-existing notions and stereotypes of the politician(s) and political party. The Willie Horton smear job worked because people already thought Democrats were weak and soft on crime. LBJ's Daisy Ad worked because people already thought that Barry Goldwater was a trigger-happy nutjob. The Swift Boat ads worked because people already thought that the Democrats were weak on national defense and security and anti-military (with national security and defense being the issues of the campaign).

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 2:20 AM   

It's as if, ever since Dubya was elected, the GOP has been unburdened from having to use facts in any capacity.

That's how far gone the discourse is; at this point, they could go on a Sunday morning talk show to discuss how the sky isn't blue and no one would bat an eye.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 2:30 AM    in reply to TeddyKGB

They understand that, as Jean-Baptiste Colbert once observed, facts have a well-known liberal bias.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 8:00 AM    in reply to TeddyKGB

TeddyK,

Meet the Press, David Gregory; Mitch McConnell says the world is flat, what about that Senator Kerry?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 2:23 AM   

GOP: Massive tax cuts (for the rich) will improve the US economy, while an increase in taxes on the rich will tank it.
GOP: George W. Bush defeated Al Gore in 2000.
GOP: Saddam was working with Al Qaeda.
GOP: Saddam has vast stores of WMDs.
GOP: ACORN is behind extensive voter fraud.
GOP: Barack Obama is solely responsible for the bank bailout, the deficit, and most of the problems we face.

When you can pimp lies like this and get the "mainstream" media and zombie Blue Dog Democrats to repeat and believe them, why should David Vitter worry his pretty little mind about a blatant lie like this to protect a creep who stabbed his girlfriend?

Risking the Godwin's law rule, Joseph Goebbels: "They keep up their lies, even at the risk of looking ridiculous."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 8:14 AM    in reply to Langston_Hughes

One more for your collection:
Afghanistan is a war of Obama's choice.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 10:52 AM    in reply to Langston_Hughes

Obama is also responsible for the oil spill. No, wait, that was Bill Clinton.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 11:37 AM    in reply to JBL1955

Obama pushed the iceberg in front of the Titanic!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 12:05 PM    in reply to JohnW1141

HE BOMBED PEARL HARBOR

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 7:28 AM   

Furer was assigned to women's issues after he attacked his girlfriend or BECAUSE he attacked his girlfriend.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 7:51 AM    in reply to Adrian Browne

Exactly. In Vitter's world, what Furer did is precisely how you deal with "women's issues."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 8:28 AM    in reply to rabbit

Slash the vessels of iniquity!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 7:46 AM   

Why do republicans constantly lie? I don't think I have ever encountered a more dishonest group of people than today's far-out conservative "leaders". They lie about everything. If they're caught, they lie about having lied. This behavior must appeal to the great unwashed republican masses somehow, but it just seems disgusting to me and other thinking people.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 12:11 PM    in reply to OhioMan

Every time they lie, a devil gets it's horns.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 8:15 AM   

Yesterday Vitter lied and we had some rain over here.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 8:40 AM   

look it's one thing to go to a whore to get laid but to have your dirty diapers changed is what this guy was into how sick is that the folks of LA need better.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 8:41 AM   

"Correct," Vitter responded. "And that's just one of several issues that have been completely misreported. Tonya Newman, Nicole Hebert in my office are assigned to women's issues. That's always been the case."

This would make a great campaign ad for Vitter's opponent to run.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 10:19 AM    in reply to It's Pat

Lying in my campaigns and time in Congress? That's always been the case.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 8:43 AM   

Look his wife also lies she said during the Clinton affair that she would cut off her husbands penis if he did anything like that and as far as we know Vitter(diaper Boy) doesn't have to sit to pee

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 9:10 AM   

It appears that Louisiana is being punished for the sins of vitter.
Well really all the gulf coast states, which all happen to be red states. I do see a pattern here, republicans lie people die.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 9:58 AM    in reply to concerned parent

If they die, plenty more are available to vote GOP down there. Don't get your diapers in a wad.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 9:35 AM   

I think there is a lot more to this story. I wonder of Furer got the "womens issues" portfolio to help him in his court case or something. Is it known when he first got that portfolio? He got off pretty easily considering he cut his girlfriend on the chin and on her hand with a knife and held her against her will for 90 minutes. How did he afford the very high powered attorney? Does this lawyer have any connection to Vitter? How about playing six degrees between Vitter and the Lawyer? High powered lawyers don't take on domestic abuse cases like this one for a guy off the street. Did the victim feel any pressure from Vitter's people at any time to change her testimony?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

SVH

user-pic

July 8, 2010 9:40 AM   

Let me get this straight; you're actually publishing a news piece that identifies David Vitters- adulterer, street walker John and sexual deviant- as a Liar.

Words fail me at this journalistic exercise in the glaringly obvious.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 9:59 AM    in reply to SVH

If the effing MSM would occasionally report the bleeding obvious, the blogs wouldn't have to. But it doesn't, so they do.

Like, just for example, how many times have you heard that economic measure x was "blocked by Senate Republicans" or "filibustered by Republicans" in the MSM? Nope. It's always "stalled in the Senate" or "locked up in Congress" because otherwise the big, bad, all-powerful Republicans will accuse them of having a liberal bias.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 10:59 AM    in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve

Or, when they have an occasional Democarat, aka Nelson, join them in their filibustering, they'll claim an " bipartisan effort to stall progress in the name of the American people ", or some BS reason like that.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 10:00 AM   

Do democrats really think this is going to keep them from being flushed out of office and losing control of Congress this November? When unemployment is 10%, the wars still dragging on, people still enraged over the health care fiasco, the bungling in the gulf, you think people are going to care about what topics some guy who used to be an aide, worked on after he got into a fight with his girlfriend? HA. If that's the best you've got, you democrats better start packing up your DC offices.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 10:56 AM    in reply to theCleverBulldog

If that's the best you've got...

Well that's a kinda funny way to look at it; the whole point about Vitter is that under any ordinary circumstances a Senator visiting multiple prostitutes for particularly kinky sex while retaining a "women's issues" staffer who assaulted a woman with a knife and then bald-faced lying about it would be automatically sunk. I'm not sure how you look at those facts and taunt us with "that's the best you've got?" but by all means, have fun with that worldview.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Don

user-pic

July 8, 2010 4:17 PM    in reply to hunter

Vitter just proves that Louisiana voters are stupid. Period.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 10:08 AM   

This really demonstrates democratic hypocrisy at it's finest. When Clinton was himself accused of groping women (Wiley), exposing himself to women (Jones), raping women (Broderick), democrats rallied around to support him (and still do). Now you think it's a major issue that a former aide to a senator allegedly assaulted his girlfriend, and may have worked on women's issues.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 10:17 AM    in reply to theCleverBulldog

woohoo the Clenis! But don't talk about Dubya's destroying the economy and killing 10 million jobs because that is ancient history! Also, too. and Palin!

Sometimes I wish that Limbaugh and Beck and Gingrich and the rest of your leaders would tell you all about those awesome stories about the multiple wives they divorced while in the hospital recovering from chemotherapy and boinking their secretaries and campaign aides, instead of just filling your brain with their drug addled venom.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 10:57 AM    in reply to Ajax the Greater

Sure. Everyone knows it's worse to lie about an extramarital blowjob than to start a war under false pretenses.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 11:34 AM    in reply to theCleverBulldog

The level of hypocrisy in your own writing amazes me. Yes, Clinton was accused of these things. But, was it proven? No. Vitter is PROVEN to have employed a staffer for women's rights that attacked his girlfriend. The proof is at the beginning of the article! Am I the only one seeing this?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 10:17 AM   

I am sure he will be held accountable by republican voters. Luckily he's not a democrat or he would have had to resign after the hooker scandal.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 10:18 AM   

Mr. Vitter will be re-elected to the U.S. Senate, in spite of moon-bat weeping & wailing.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 10:36 AM   

You Lie!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 10:59 AM   

"'Correct,Vitter responded. 'And that's just one of several issues that have been completely misreported. Tonya Newman, Nicole Hebert in my office are assigned to women's issues. That's always been the case.'"

And we've always been at war with Eastasia.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 11:28 AM   

Vitter is simply a symptom of the betrayal of the MSM in it's priorities and reporting, the laziness of the electorate and the brain washed undereducatd electorate that doesn't give a damn about integrity anymore. We get what we deserve and a public that supports the likes of the GOP, FOX and RW radio without discernment doesn't deserve much.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 11:37 AM   

Jeebus! Did Vitter trot out his wife to stand next to him at a press conference, AGAIN? What is WRONG with that woman?!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 1:30 PM    in reply to conniptionfit

Is that his wife, or "Long Suffering Wife" out of Central Casting?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 11:41 AM   

Vitter; 'Sure I lie; and among other things I also commit adultery, but that doesn't matter to the majority of Republican voters (unless those acts are done by a Democrat), I'm sure to get re elected.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Kal

Facebook

July 8, 2010 11:47 AM   

Vitter has long ago and amply demonstrated that truth is a total stranger to him. As soon as he opens his mouth someone should scream, "stop lying and prove what you are saying."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 12:33 PM   

Here's the script for the Democratic attack ad:

Middle-aged white guy: I'm a conservative Republican who believes in family values. I have a daughter who I love very much . That's why I can no longer support David Vitter. He hired a man convicted of attacking a woman with a knife to be responsible for advising him on woman's issues. I owe it to my daughter to elect someone who is concerned about her safety and well being. I would be a bad father if I voted for Vitter.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 3:26 PM    in reply to Thornhill

Trouble is there aren't any such Republicans. They'd have to hire somebody.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 12:39 PM   

Why do the most morally-bereft Republicans always drag their wives to the podium as props?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 1:20 PM   

At what point does Vitter just say: "Look. I know I'm corrupt. You know I'm corrupt. Let's just give it a rest and let me get back to what I do best: demeaning the office of the Senate.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 1:35 PM   

Busted, but not with a live boy, dead girl

As a LA native, I pains me to say so but Lousiana its time they washed you away

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Don

user-pic

July 8, 2010 4:12 PM   

and people think the only slimy oil in Louisiana is from BP? LMAO But, they deserve him and everything else that goes along with him, as long as they keep putting people like him in office.

by the way, who changes his diapers now?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on