TPMDC

Meg Whitman Copies 'Obama Playbook' In Pursuit Of Her California Dreams

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

It was only a matter of time before Republican candidates took a hard look at Barack Obama's 2008 campaign strategy and decided to make it their own. A few have dabbled in Obama-like Web sites, campaign texting and classifying t-shirts as contributions, but it's billionaire Meg Whitman who is trying to copy piece after piece of the 2008 campaign and make the Obama Playbook her own.

Whitman, a former eBay executive, is pulling out all the fancy "change" messages -- and campaign tactics -- as she battles Attorney General Jerry Brown (D) for the governor's mansion. Whether this strategy can work in a state that's stayed solid blue for presidential elections -- but which has twice elected Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger -- is a very open question. But the race is all tied up, according to a new poll out yesterday.

The Democratic take on Whitman being a 2010 version of Barack Obama? "In her dreams," they say. And of course, much of Obama's success had to do with the candidate's own popularity and appeal. Obama was a young, African-American senator who represented generational change and used technology to mass finance much of his campaign. Whitman is a middle-aged former tech CEO who's already self-financed her campaign to the tune of almost $100 million. But plenty of the building blocks and strategies of the Obama '08 effort can be copied. And Whitman seems to be trying to duplicate pretty much all of them.

For instance, TPM has learned exclusively that today Whitman will reveal giant billboards along the highways and ads on the city bus shelters. They will tout her campaign message in Spanish, targeting a key demographic that Obama also aggressively courted in 2008.

Whitman has poured $90 million of her own money into the race, walloping a primary challenger last month thanks in part to her flood of ads on the Golden State airwaves. Her spending is showing no signs of letting up.

Obama pioneered a similar spending spree, taking advantage of opting out of the public campaign finance system to spend hundreds of millions on an iPhone application, a 30-minute infomercial and even putting his image on virtual billboards in video games.

Another example came Tuesday as Whitman launched "Gen-M," an effort targeting young professionals and students. Anyone remember the poorly named "Generation BO"?

Team Whitman resembles Team McCain, as it's filled with the same ambitious staffers who watched their guy get pummeled by an Obama operation that made all the right moves. Several Whitman operatives are McCain veterans, or were close watchers of the 2008 campaign after working for one of the many Republican hopefuls who didn't make it to the nomination.

A Republican operative familiar with the Whitman campaign admits that Obama has inspired many of the technological advances used by the his candidate's operation. And they're not just using his voter outreach tactics -- they're also using the same technologies for opposition research, with aides able to edit and upload and blast out unflattering video of Brown within minutes of when it happens.

"Campaigns are much the same as the free market, in the way that people are constantly striving to do them faster and better because there is an objective of achieving your goal," the operative said. "Smart campaigns like Barack Obama's and George W. Bush's reelection campaign in 2004 utilized technology and new techniques to reach the largest amount of voters, and we've applied that simple principle."

The Whitman campaign is using a new technology that allows for personalized auto calls to voters, so when potential voters answer the phone, a pre-recorded Whitman greets them by name, mentions whether they are Democrats, Republicans or independents and provides a tailored message for each group. The operative suggested that Whitman's campaign could even be a sort of "incubator" for Republican presidential candidates to copy in 2012.

Right before the primary, Team Whitman boasted she had nearly 20,000 voters on hand to make 1 million phone calls. Campaign aides say Whitman gave the state party $250,000 for a massive new voter registration drive, another tactic Obama used in 2008.

McCain veterans learned their lessons from 2008, remembering too well how they watched Obama benefit from months of extra press exposure during the contested primary as their own candidate lollygagged through month after wasted month. Long before the primary was over, Obama framed the race as a contest between himself and McCain while the Republican did little to define his own candidacy. The McCain aides who joined Whitman realized early on they would take the Obama strategy and do the same thing to Brown, who avoided a primary challenge.

Obama aides also sometimes portrayed McCain as a bumbling old man -- and Team Whitman has done the same to Brown, 72. (She's 53.) Consider this ad, Whitman's first hit against Brown. It starts out showing an old record player and images of Vietnam:

Get the idea?

Campaign operatives who don't want to speak ill of their former boss privately will admit they learned a lot about what not to do during the Obama-McCain race as they watched Obama clobber their guy. They also spent months watching Team Obama smartly deploying technology to reach more voters and skirting the press filter. Now they're doing the same thing on Whitman's behalf. A new system allows the campaign to stream events directly via iPhone video. (Listen to a smart take from a Wired reporter here.)

There are plenty of stark differences. Whitman and Obama couldn't be farther apart on policy, and Whitman has never held political office. Obama's strength was in oratory, and he won early in Iowa in part because of his ability to connect with crowds. Whitman struggled when she was caught refusing to take questions from the press and she took heat for over-staging a town hall.

But her team seems to have gotten past those early stumbles, and the Whitman victory rally last month, for example, featured the candidate in front of vibrant, diverse, cheering young people. Brown looked a lot like McCain that night, giving his own speech in a drab ballroom.





"Meg understood what she had to do very early on. I call it bombing the rubble and she is watching the rocks jump up," said Shawn Steel, an RNC member and former chairman of the California Republican Party.

Steel cited Whitman's unprecedented spending on Spanish-language television (including heavy advertising during the World Cup games). It's no secret that Hispanic voters tend to vote for Democrats, but Republicans who have been successful in California and occasionally nationally were boosted by appealing to that key demographic.

"She's going right into the heart of the community and you watch, it's going to work," Steel said. "Our fortunes as a party depend on what she does."


Late Update: A Chronicle reader sends them a photo of one of Whitman's billboards, which highlight her opposition to Arizona's new law.

Comments (23) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (0)

July 8, 2010 7:31 AM   

She'll be fine as long as the teabaggers can't speak Spanish:

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/06/meg-whitmans-spanish-ad-she-opposes-arizonas-immigration-law-video.php

Otherwise, she may have a *bit* of an immigration problem with the base...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 8:37 AM    in reply to Matt Jones

Tea baggers don't really care about issues or whether a Republican lies. When Rand Paul said he would not accept money from TARP Senators and then turned around and DID, they pretty much shrugged their shoulders and excused it. They will most likely do the same with the about face of Whitman. Tbaggers are simply rebranded Republicans.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 8:38 AM   

I'm not surprised. I think we'll be seeing a lot of candidates mimic Obama's campaign.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 8:46 AM   

Aaaggghhh! Ditch that horrible "photo"! I'm trying to eat breakfast here!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 9:51 AM    in reply to KY Yellow Dog

I agree. That's a disturbing photo. I lost my breakfast!!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 9:38 AM   

Well, we knew Meg was going to buy this election and she will be successful. Californians, you asked for this. Good luck. I was born and raised in this state. However, you are going to elect another novice with absolutely no government experience touting real world business experince; AGAIN. Evidently Schwarzenegger wasn't enough. You continually blame Democrats, but we've had Rebublican administrations since Reagan. Brown was the one Democrat we had, AND he was successful. We tried Gray, but you recalled him before he could do anything. You are on the precipice of disaster and you are going to elect another idiot. Good luck. I wash my hands of you.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 3:37 PM    in reply to Nicnack74

I was born in Washington but I've lived here since '52. Otherwise, ditto for everything you said.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 10:09 AM   

Big difference here is that almost everyone in California has a pretty firm idea of Brown, good or bad, so all her attempts at re-shaping him are probably for naught.

Plus, no matter how much outreach she tries with youth or latinos, there has to be a message there to inspire them. What is hers? "I'm not as racist/homophobic/xenophobic as the rest of my party?" "I can write a check to help pay down the state debt but I'd rather spend it trying to get into an office I don't understand?"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 10:52 AM    in reply to calbearinillinois

I wouldn't be too optimistic.

I'm noticing that Meg Whitman has the right idea about how to run a campaign, at least so far.

So far, she has been incredibly successful in trying to capture the zeitgeist of the California public; that is, the feeling that California is in dire straits, in too much debt, too much crumbling infrastructure, too many teacher and police layoffs, and too much maialise. Hell, I mean just look at the pics above of Jerry Brown and Meg Whitman. On the surface, which one makes you feel better?

Of course, we know that once she's in office, she's going to gut government even more and turn California into Somalia, but so far, she's been a hell of a campaigner. It's very easy to convince the public that cutting government down to nothing will bring good times had by all.

Jerry Brown better get his shit together. I know for a fact that no one can run a better "outsider" campaign than him. The question is, will he do so now?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 3:12 PM    in reply to mezcalero

100 million puts her even w/ a guy who is 72 and bald. A guy whose creds are distant and accomplishments unknown to anyone under 50. You have to wonder what his game plan is but this vast expenditure of personal wealth though impressive begs the question: what is she in this for? No business person has the plight of the the good people of the state at heart, so why is she in politics? Obviously the big money for her is down the line. How does she plan to get her money back because as the smart guys say, it's all about the money.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 3:32 PM    in reply to Bizmark

President of course. Cronyism is as cronyism does.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 12:22 PM    in reply to calbearinillinois

I just moved to California a few months ago, and I really don't know anything about Jerry Brown. I'm not so silly as to vote for Meg Whitman (the very idea of that woman as governor scares the shit out of me) but other people could definitely be swayed by such negative ads.

And she has A LOT of money to run them.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 10:51 AM   

that is the scariest f'ing thing iv ever seen that pic is like crazy

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 11:28 AM   

Brown needs to put up some ads on Univision with a picture of Whitman and Pete Wilson. That'll scare the crap out of Latinos.

Like this one:

http://www.leveltheplayingfield2010.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Whitman-Wilson.jpg

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 12:56 PM    in reply to Juan Camaney

Agreed... along with reminders of that "They keep coming" ad of 1994.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 11:29 AM   

California is already in the toliet. And if we are saddled with this crazy Whitman, well, turn out the lights and move to another state. Because this is going to lead California right into the stone age again. The critters in the La Brea tar pits will feel right at home.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 12:14 PM   

Yow! That is one ooogly picture. Take it down!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 12:38 PM   

I don't know. I live in California and she had nothing to excite anyone. She is running on not being Jerry Brown, but I don't see any principles on her side, and while I am conservative (it was your Rand Paul mention that drew me here) I want principles. Jerry Brown at one time had them, and I need to look into this race more before I vote. There just WASN'T a good alternative in the GOP race, the amounts of money being spent basically froze anyone out that we would actively want.

Rand is different in the TARP senator thing because if you look at what he said all through the primary he actually ALWAYS said he would work with McConnell after the primary. If McConnell, the only continuing senator from Rand's state AND the minority leader hadn't voted for the bailouts, Rand could have avoided bailout Senators. He'd have to forgo party backing altogether to do that since McConnell voted for the bailout, and that was never the plan. So the stupidity was in making a big deal of this in the primary, and you can refuse to forgive that and get Conway who is unacceptable, or say 'Rand screwed up in the primary based on inexperience, but he is still Rand.'. I'm taking the latter path.

Note that more than twice as many Senators supported Rand's primary opponent in his DC fundraisers, and AIG's lobbiest held a fundraiser for that opponent as well. Rand is STILL never going to get support from those who think bailouts are the reason for giving support.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 1:31 PM    in reply to sailingaway

If you are truly conservative you really should look at Jerry Brown. While the man is a Democrat, his a true fiscal conservative. When he left office, California had a budget surplus. My mother worked for him during his administration. She still complains about how cheap he was to work for. He chose not to live in the governors mansion because it was wasteful. Moreover, he actually knows the issues of California. Ms. Whitman seems to be selling slick packaging. Everything she is shilling has already been done. I would argue that he still has principles. His only problem is that he's old, and we Californians are superficial.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 1:29 PM   

I would rather have an icepick driven through my skull than vote for Smegma. I have a feeling her candidacy will crash and burn against JB. He's not my favorite guy but he is not trying to buy his way in and I'm sure he cared enough to vote the last 30 years.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 3:25 PM   

she spent $100 million of her own money? why? I always find that suspicious.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 3:26 PM   

Meg has gone negative really really quick so I hope Jerry spends some money beating the piss out of her on television. She is just another rich know it all bitch who has no problem screwing working people to make some more assholes like her filthy rich. Private wealth is SACRED to rethuglicans and no matter how the poor suffer and the middle class shrinks they will never ever give up on hoarding money. Notice how the rethuglicans do everything they can to perpetuate the recession because it is good politics for them. They do not give a shit. Corporations are people now and human beings are disposable. God bless America!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 8, 2010 3:53 PM   

She's 53? She looks like she's in her mid 60's! Why would anyone vote for a lying millionaire who knows nothing about government and whose business experience is allegedly creating jobs by heading up e-bay? What a load of bullshit. Can't wait for Brown's campaign to gear up and cut her off at the knees.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on