
Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd has for weeks called into doubt whether Elizabeth Warren can be confirmed to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. But for the first time this week, Dodd has called into question whether she's qualified for the job, reversing his earlier position.
"It isn't just a question of being a consumer advocate. I want to see that she can manage something, too," Dodd told the Hartford Courant.
That's a far cry from what he told TPM and other reporters just weeks ago, when his only stated concern, based on his conversations with colleagues, was that Democrats may have a hard time rounding up 60 votes to confirm her.
"She's qualified, no question about that," Dodd said. "The question is whether she's confirmable."
Despite his reservations, Dodd acknowledged that he'll support her if President Obama nominates her. "If the president wants to name her and it goes through the hearing process, then fine, she'll have my support," Dodd said.
daveminnj
August 18, 2010 10:38 AM
cripes, he's dodging and weaving. sounds like he's already
on the payroll of his future lobbyist employers.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
madmatt
August 18, 2010 10:55 AM in reply to daveminnj
He has been ever since he joined the senate!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Docb
August 18, 2010 11:09 AM in reply to madmatt
Dodd is done...Call him about protecting the corporations by appointing a corporate shill like him or his choice Blair? 1.800.828.0498
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Mimi katz
August 18, 2010 11:56 AM in reply to Docb
That's Bair.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dorn76
August 18, 2010 1:43 PM in reply to madmatt
You mean like when he passed Family and Medical Leave? He was really in the insurers pockets there, man, whew!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dorn76
August 18, 2010 1:51 PM in reply to dorn76
He's a chickenshit on this, and on financial reform, but your arguments work better when they stick with facts and leave the "he's always been no good jerk" at home. There's plenty of solid progressives in my home state that have alot of respect for Chris Dodd as a result of things he has actually accomplished for his constituents.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Progressive Party
August 18, 2010 10:38 AM
Lining up your lobbying gig here Mr Dodd? What an asshole to be casting doubt on Warren has to be viewed as to what goal has Mr. Dodd....See ya later, Chris!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Ego
August 18, 2010 8:48 PM in reply to Progressive Party
I love your avatar! I haven't seen that anywhere.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
toddincabo
August 18, 2010 10:40 AM
Up Yours Dodd....just how much of a signing bonus from wall street have you been promised if you help stop her.
Scumbag piece of shit !
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bw
August 18, 2010 10:43 AM
I don't think anyone will listen to Chris Dodds advise, we all know he's in the pocket of the Big Banks and they are putting pressure on him to try and kill her nomination by now saying she isn't Qualified to head this bureau. Sham on you Mr. Dodd it's too bad it took this crisis to see who's side you have really been on.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
biff diggerence
August 18, 2010 10:57 AM
You're an ex-Senator, Mr. Dodd.
STFU.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Walter Mitty
August 18, 2010 10:57 AM
He's getting pressure from his bankster buddies. Probably holding potential job offers over his head. His talk about not having votes was obviously Dodd trying to kill the potential nomination by blaming the Senate when it now comes out that he personally doesn't want her.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mycomment
August 18, 2010 11:05 AM
...'then, fine'...
sounds like a pissy teenager.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FlownOver
August 18, 2010 12:20 PM in reply to mycomment
In other words, like nearly every member of the senate.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
August 18, 2010 11:20 AM
Dodd is what a made good fella acts like. So his opinion is worthless. Obama on the other hand will lose broad support should he make any choice other than Warren. Many of his supporters will stay home in November 2012. There is zero wiggle room. Tis ideological show and tell time folks.
It's time to send a message to Corporate. No more games.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
August 18, 2010 11:57 AM in reply to Stephen
Two years from now, Democrats will stay home because Obama didn't nominate some woman most of them have never heard of to run some second-tier agency most of them don't even know exists?
LMAO! It's too early to be drinking.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
EastWest
August 18, 2010 12:04 PM in reply to FreeRider
The cumulative weight of many straws finally breaks the strongest camel's back, FreePer. Obama and the Dems have done everything they can to blow 2010; 2012 is just over the horizon.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
August 18, 2010 12:33 PM in reply to EastWest
OK.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dorn76
August 18, 2010 1:53 PM in reply to EastWest
When you'll finally have your wish of a Palin Presidency, and you can say "told you so!" That will be AWESOME.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
EastWest
August 18, 2010 2:39 PM in reply to dorn76
You haven't been paying attention. I'd "hoped" for a strong Democratic President. Still hoping, still waiting....
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Clarance Vine
August 18, 2010 12:26 PM in reply to FreeRider
Right Free, and when the Big O extends the Bush tax cuts w/o any changes, you're gonna take your lips off his butt and say "ah, an old tax policy most people have never heard of that generates almost no revenue and barely matter at all because most people don't even know it exist." Classic Free.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
August 18, 2010 12:35 PM in reply to Clarance Vine
Allrighty then.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
osage
August 18, 2010 11:29 AM
8 OUT OF 10 DEMOCRATS THE COOK REPORT JUST DOWNGRADED ARE BLUE DOG DEMOCRATS!
by John Aravosis
"It seems the Cook Report has just downgrade the election chances of 10 Democrats. Eight of them are conservative Blue Dogs. Adam Green of PCCC thinks he knows why."
"The big lesson of 2010 for Democrats will be that if you govern like a Blue Dog and put corporate contributors ahead of your constituents, you lose. If you listen to what progressives have been telling you all along and stand up to corporations on issues like the public option and Wall Street reform, you win -- especially among Independent voters." -- Adam Green, co-founder of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee (PCCC)
THE LEFT ISN’T THE PROBLEM; THE CORPORATE WING OF THE PARTY IS.
http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010083210/gibbs-left-dog-bites-man
"The left isn't the problem; the corporate wing of the party is. The left hasn't gotten in the president's way, for better or worse. It's the corporate right of the party—the Blue Dogs and New Democrats—that have stood in the way."
"The left hasn't been a rebel; it's been too good a soldier."
"The White House has been hurt less because the left is critical, but because the White House isn't listening. The left correctly understood the White House faced a pitched battle over the direction of the country, not a post-racial, pragmatic, bipartisan era of good feelings."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
August 18, 2010 3:10 PM in reply to osage
Yes. That's what "the left" keeps saying. Always. Every time. In all cases, and in all things, they were always right and nothing that happens is ever even partially their fault. They are true and pure and good and noble and everything they do is right and productive and helpful. All that is bad is the fault of the evil corporatists and "evil corporatist," of course, would be anyone who takes issue with them on anything, from the smallest point of tactics to the largest issue of policy.
It's remarkable how consistent they are on that point, at all times and in all things. But then, it's hard to maintain your constant state fashionably outraged dudgeon if you think otherwise.
Frankly, it would be a lot easier to have a meaningful dialogue with people like Hamsher and Greenwald and Avoris if they'd set aside the their perpetual state of self-rightousness indignation and at least concede the theoretical possibility that not everyone who disagrees with them about something (except, apparently, Grover Norquist) is more evil than Manson and Richard Ramirez and that they, themselves, might have been wrong about something at some point.
Mind you, not everyone on the left is like that. Chris Bower, for example, comes immediately to mind. Howard Dean if you're inclined to categorize him as "the left" despite his rather comfortably centrist policies as governor. But enough are to make it hard to take any of them seriously.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
nick
August 18, 2010 11:35 AM
All Dodd the crook who took the deal from Citywide is bowing to his banker masters just like his dad a under the table dealer
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FlownOver
August 18, 2010 12:31 PM in reply to nick
I defy anyone to diagram that sentence.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Clarance Vine
August 18, 2010 12:51 PM in reply to FlownOver
that's funny! I tried but commas can only get you so far.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
erwin
August 18, 2010 11:36 AM
What, does Dodd need the money? Here are 10 things Dodd can do after after he retires from the senate and gets out of his own way and confirms Elizabeth Warren:
1. learn to sail
2. learn to cook
3. write a book about his career in politics, the peace corps, or whatever
4. write a book about finance reform or any of the other critical issues that he cares about (and like Tom Daschle did about health care).
5. run a philanthropic organization
6. raise money for a worthy cause
7. teach
8. spend time with with his young children
9. spend time in Ireland where he has a home
10.fish, or, cut bait
It's possible that the snippets we're reading about him don't tell the whole story, but it seems to me that he started down the road to reforming financial markets with real fire in his gut. It's sad that his legacy will be tarnished by not carrying through to the finish line. Elizabeth Warren is the perfect person to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dorn76
August 18, 2010 1:55 PM in reply to erwin
Careful, you're employing context here.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
nick
August 18, 2010 11:39 AM
Look this guy has been taking money all along just like his dad who was a disgrace to the senate if that's possible
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
nick
August 18, 2010 11:41 AM
Just another guy like matthews who ducked into the peace corps instead of wearing a uniform and going to nam like many of our brave young men.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Flybynite
August 18, 2010 11:43 AM
I'm beginning to think Chris Dodd isn't qualified to serve in the U.S. Senate. Oh wait, did I say Senate, the world's greatest chamber of conservative dunderheads? Never mind, eminently qualified!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
nick
August 18, 2010 11:45 AM
go to his Webb site and you will find that he is one of the few senators who will not accept letters or e-mails from any U S citizen out side his state
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
August 18, 2010 11:59 AM in reply to nick
Not true. Most members of Congress won't accept mail from people not in their district.
I know because I have to make up an address and zip code when I write them.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
oleeb
August 18, 2010 11:52 AM
The tired old hack that Chris Dodd has become in his final years in the Senate is really appallingly sad and pathetic. He's doing all he can to serve his Wall Street masters while he still can use his favors for them to translate into a nice cushy job for himself upon leaving the Senate. Pitiful really.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
EastWest
August 18, 2010 11:57 AM
Told ya so.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Dadzilla
August 18, 2010 12:01 PM
It's sad to see Dodd opposing someone strong on consumer protections. Sad, but to be expected when someone has been in Congress for so long.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
xargaw
August 18, 2010 12:15 PM
Dodd is doing everything he can to eliminate any shred of a reputation he may have left. I guess some big corporate lobbiest position is in the wings for him because he is toast with the public. Only his good 'ol boys in the Senate will give him the time of day soon. Sadly, he will be buying votes from those guys which will be in opposition to good public policy. And, he will have all those new friends on the right too.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ericf
August 18, 2010 12:23 PM
I used to think highly of Dodd. Now I'm thinking that Connecticut is trading up if Blumenthal wins.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FlownOver
August 18, 2010 12:28 PM
Doesn't matter. In a couple of years President Quittygirl will appoint one of the bank presidents to this job, explaining that he has "common sense" and "real great American spirit."
The senate will go along, because it's the senate.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
chitowner
August 18, 2010 12:31 PM
His future employers should be pleased with this performance. Can't wait till this old DINOsaur is extinct.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rockdart
August 18, 2010 12:59 PM
Has anyone considered that since he's soon to be out of a job, that HE wants the position for himself, but won't say so outright? Maybe someone should ask him that question.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Bushdidit
August 18, 2010 1:00 PM
Chris Dodd is a criminal bankster of the worst kind. Please watch the movie Capitalism -A love story to see who the real Chris Dodd is.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dorn76
August 18, 2010 2:06 PM in reply to Bushdidit
Guilty because Michael Moore said so, while failing to point out the rate Dodd recieved from Countrywide was a standard rate, and that the bipartisan ethics committee found no wrongdoing. Well, I'm convinced.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lamonth
August 18, 2010 1:40 PM
chris dodd is a scumbag and i do not want to see him in democratic politics again and i would not trust dodd as far as i can throw him in looking out for the consumer
don't let the door hit ya, where the good lord split ya
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ondioline
August 18, 2010 2:00 PM
I generally agree with the sentiment that Dodd is being a buttmunch on this. *Sounds the "On the Other Hand" alarm.*
On the other hand, to be fair, "If Obama nominates her, I'll support her no matter what... Golly gee willickers!" wasn't exactly a strong position either. Is it possible he's put different policy positions on the wheel from a game of Twister and has decided to ride out his term by spinning it periodically and seeing what happens?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
August 18, 2010 3:37 PM
The capacity of you people to work yourselves into a preemptive state of furious snitrage based upon a hypothetical future state derived from your (or Brian Beutler's) inferences from six or seven words in a news story would be hilarious if it wasn't so pathetic.
Go read the actual story. All Dodd did was preview how we should expect him to present her at the confirmation hearing if she's nominated (because, as chairman, that's what he'll really be doing) and making the usual pro-forma senatorial mouthnoises that what happens at those hearings could affect his vote followed by the additional mouthnoises that signal "NOT! Because like all confirmation hearings, it will just be partisan Kabuki."
The longer we go, the more it looks to me like the difference between the teanut right and "progressives" is the difference between a petulant, self-absorbed angry adolescent and a petulant, self-absorbed angry adult.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Viva!America!
August 18, 2010 5:37 PM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
you are always so brilliant.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?