
House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank is calling for the abolition of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored enterprises with a public mandate to boost home ownership, and which were taken into conservatorship during the 2008 financial crisis.
In an appearance on Fox Business Network tonight, Frank said they should be replaced with new programs to support affordable rental housing.
"I think they should be abolished," Frank said. "The only question is what do you put in their place. This is a situation where given the importance they had come to play in housing, you can't tear down the old jail until you build a new one. And that's a process that we've started."
Frank went on: "I have been very critical for a long time that not everybody should be a homeowner. There are people in this society who for economic and frankly social reasons can't and shouldn't be homeowners. I do want some government help to build affordable rental housing."
During the Congressional debate over financial reform, Republicans blasted Democrats for not taking steps to reform or abolish Fannie and Freddie. Many Democrats in Congress oppose GSE reform, particularly in absence of a parallel efforts to support housing for the poor. Republicans, though, have consistently overstated the role Fannie and Freddie (and low-income homeownership in general) played in creating the housing bubble and financial crisis.
"There were two problems with the housing market," Frank said. "People were making loans that shouldn't have been made, and Fannie and Freddie were then buying those loans in the market. One of the things we have already done is to take every possible step to stop the bad loans from being made. The bill that President Obama signed outlaws the kind of subprime irresponsible loans. We have made those loans illegal and that is an important part of this overall reform. We have taken a lot of the toxic elements out of the system."
Frank has pledged in recent weeks to draw up legislation reforming Fannie and Freddie later this year, though political gridlock and a crowded legislative schedule will make passage of any major reforms difficult.
Powkat
August 17, 2010 10:17 PM
35 years ago Oregon had a tax credit for renters - it was a pain to calculate, based on cost of rent, income, number of people, etc. but back in the day when I was grossing $400/month, it was pretty nice to have it. I don't remember when it went away (after I became a homeowner for the 1st time) but maybe something like that would be good.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Hobbes83
August 17, 2010 10:50 PM
I wonder when calls will come to reform the CRA now? I thought that Frank was dead-set AGAINST reforming Fannie and Freddie(despite all of the evidence to the contrary).
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
expat46
August 17, 2010 11:06 PM in reply to Hobbes83
Hey Hobbes, take a look at this thread for a good discussion on the role of F&F. That asshole acriticalarrogantthinker stepped off into a big pile of trouble in a thread that was supposed to be about McCain.
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/08/obama-on-his-mind-mccain-still-campaigning-against-08-rival.php#comment-4057608
Signalman had him reduced to a quivering pile of humanity, by the end arrogantthinker was barely coherent.
Great entertainment and informative.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Hobbes83
August 17, 2010 11:09 PM in reply to expat46
THANKS expat! I heard about it about a week or so ago, but I couldn't find a link to it. I've been laying low on TPM for the past couple weeks, trying to juggle school and studying, but I do try and check in from time to time. Take it easy brother!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Spyder308
August 18, 2010 9:42 AM
There is a serious problem with this tactic. What the Congress will come up with to replace Fanney an Freddy will be worse, as in poorly organized and full of compromises that will render the new orgainzation almost useless. I know becasue I work for a program that was set up to replace an existig program that the Heritage Foundation used as a football. The previous program was effective and efficient. The replacement might be in 5 years or so.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
aq
August 18, 2010 9:43 AM
Can we abolish sallie mae too? And replace it with something that doesn't suck the life out of half of America?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
alaric
August 18, 2010 9:48 AM
We must be at hypocrite central! If this were Rand Paul making this proposal all of you would have called him every vile name you could think of. Barney is doing a nice backtrack and rewriting the history of his position but if thats what it takes to get rid of Fannie and Freddie, so be it. Question, does this make Barney the House version of Pat Moynihan?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
expat46
August 18, 2010 10:36 AM in reply to alaric
It must be hard for you finding yourself in agreement with Barney Frank.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
numediaman
August 18, 2010 9:54 AM
It is essential for the Congress to come up with a new institution that can continue to take the risk of lending away from the banks and put it on the shoulders of tax payers, otherwise the banks would be left to the mercy of their own talents.
The job of the Congress is to guarantee profits for the companies that fund it, and I have great confidence that either the Democrats who control the place now, or the Republicans who may soon control the place, can come up with the proper solutions. After all, they will get their marching orders from the think tanks who will be doing the bidding of the banks any way.
There, cynical enough?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
An Outhouse
August 18, 2010 10:01 AM in reply to numediaman
FTW!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tytester
August 18, 2010 5:19 PM in reply to numediaman
Unfortunately, no, it is not cynical - it is just true.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tytester
August 18, 2010 5:22 PM in reply to numediaman
I would only add this - the reason why Barney came up with this ridiculous position is that Fannie and Freddie currently cannot take the risk of house loans from the banks. So, true to his calling, Barney takes a position that can benefit the banks, only the banks, and nothing but the banks, so help them Dollar.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
August 19, 2010 7:16 PM
...We only need to roll back the policies that got so far out of hand. The credit crisis was NOT created by either institution...That was created by the credit default swap derivitive instruments. They were "insured" about $8 to every real dollar. Well,actually they were insured against the future value of the loans as they matured...Hell,I could have taken a policy against them and didn't even need to have ownership of them! It was a short-selling scheme gone horribly awry...And in the end,the Government had guarranteed too many loans that they were no longer policing or regulating.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?