
Meet Ray Griggs, a California conservative who wants to stop government spending through the magic of claymation. Conservatives will probably be hopping on Fandango this fall to get tickets to see Griggs' Michael Moore-style documentary billing itself a "controversial look at government spending" and featuring an animated boxing match between President Obama and Ronald Reagan.
I Want Your Money, which will land in theaters this October, aims to contrast the "two paths" the United States could take -- Obama's approach or Reagan's. The promotional site tells visitors that $182 million is spent during the span of one viewing of the 90-minute film.
Today TPM interviewed Griggs, who said one third of his flick is animated to "make it entertaining for a younger audience." (It includes claymation and 3-D computer animation.)
Griggs, who also brought the comic book flick "Super Capers" to screens last year, is currently working on a film adaptation of Wind in the Willows. Readers might remember him from Rachel Maddow's critique last fall of Griggs' "I guess I'm racist" anti-health care ad.
Griggs, 36, has a young daughter and a new baby on the way and he made the movie because he's "just really worried about the freedoms and the opportunities they are going to have and the amount of debt the nation is taking on."
"We need to stand up and start taking a stand, we need to stop the spending. Reagan had it right," Griggs told TPM. "Whether you're on the left or the right side whatever your view is, we all pay taxes."
Griggs would not disclose the cost of making the film, but said it was self-funded and that he is not affiliated with any organizations that might benefit from such a movie coming out so close to the election. He described himself as a conservative who thinks Republicans are becoming too much like Democrats, but he did vote in the GOP primary this summer.
Among the film's featured interviews are John Stossel, Club for Growth's Stephen Moore, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, Ohio's Kenneth Blackwell, Rep. Thad McCotter, Newt Gingrich, Steve Forbes and Andrew Breitbart.
"The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people's money," Huckabee says in the trailer. Portions of the film will showcase tea party activists to show they "are just every day people."
FreeRepublic types seem to be excited about it. Watch the trailer:
To see the Griggs anti-health care ad, check out Maddow's segment around the 3-minute mark:
Matt Jones
August 6, 2010 1:18 PM
Griggs added: "Everyone knows that the only appropriate uses of government money are handouts to the rich and to the military-industrial complex, just like Reagan backed!"
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
expat46
August 6, 2010 1:35 PM
So, Reagan was the 'great white hope' and Obama is the black man that will keep us from ever regaining the title. Very clever.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Lycurgus
August 6, 2010 1:36 PM
yup, no deficit spending with Regan
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Daddy Love
August 6, 2010 1:47 PM
Reagan tripled our national debt from $1 trillion to $3 trillion.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JEP07
August 6, 2010 2:05 PM in reply to Daddy Love
and simultaneously turned the middle class into a urinal to be trickled on...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JEP07
August 6, 2010 2:06 PM in reply to JEP07
"tinkle down economics"
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Joekuh
August 6, 2010 2:41 PM in reply to JEP07
BRAVO!!!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreemanW
August 6, 2010 3:40 PM in reply to Daddy Love
The Great GOP Saint and his Administration of snake-oil salesmen with their Reagan-omics took this country from being the largest creditor nation in the world to the largest debtor nation in the world.
/nuff said
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jjdjjd
August 6, 2010 8:57 PM in reply to Daddy Love
so thats a 2 trillion increase. after 18 months obama has him tied.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Scott in PacNW
August 6, 2010 10:23 PM in reply to jjdjjd
FY09 belongs to Dubya. It started October 2008.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jjdjjd
August 7, 2010 4:37 AM in reply to Scott in PacNW
no, it belongs to obama because he could have changed it but didn't.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ADad
August 7, 2010 6:50 PM in reply to jjdjjd
Bush increased it by $5 trillion. He could have changed it but didn't.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Dave
August 7, 2010 10:52 PM in reply to ADad
It's all here:
http://www.economyinperspective.com
Just to reaffirm what you said.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
blkblt
August 6, 2010 11:09 PM in reply to jjdjjd
Reagan passed the largest tax increase in history while talking about smaller government. We are living under the lowest federal tax burden in 50 years right now. Even if the Bush tax increases are allowed to lapse we will still have lower taxes than under Reagan.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jjdjjd
August 7, 2010 11:10 AM in reply to blkblt
bullshit.........1st it was bush tax DECREASE that is set to expire, and when it does the recession will get worse. as for reagan he never whinned that he inherited it. obama, 18 months as president and all he does is blame,blame,blame. he said that the unemployment rate would never go past 8% if his stimulas was passed, did he lie or as i suspect doesn't even know basic economics. he reminds me of a little kid, taking credit for good things, blaming bad news on someone else, all while the wife is jetting around europe, costing us tax payers more then 10 anericans make in a year. w are at an oligarchy stage in america, but come november we will change that.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreemanW
August 7, 2010 6:27 PM in reply to jjdjjd
Why do conservatives and Reprobates suck so hard at math?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ADad
August 7, 2010 7:01 PM in reply to jjdjjd
Having been royally screwed by 8 years of Bush/Cheney, and the tireless effort put forth by their fellow-Republicans in Congress to turn America into a plutocracy, I'll take my chances with Obama. His only real mistakes thus far have been the result of trying to negotiate in good-faith with Republicans. The stimulus package should have been at least $1 trillion, and shouldn't have contained a dime in tax-cuts (instead of the more than $300 billion that it did), which time and time again have been show to be the least efficient way to stimulate the economy during a recession.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jjdjjd
August 7, 2010 9:32 PM in reply to ADad
well then, you are a socialist and i am not, its that simple. as for bush, we all suffered, not just you.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ADad
August 7, 2010 11:18 PM in reply to jjdjjd
The Socialists wouldn't have me because I made too much money as a capitalist. Then Bush and the Republicans came along and messed up a good thing. Damn Republican plutocrats. Don't know the crucial difference between pro-business and pro-market. Given a choice, they'll kill the goose that lays the golden eggs every time. Every. Damn. Time.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
blkblt
August 8, 2010 10:40 AM in reply to jjdjjd
Why didn't anyone like you scream about socialism when President Bush took over the whole airline security industry and federalized it? THAT was socialism. He closed down companies and made their employees federal workers. Seems kind of hard to justify for a party that keeps saying government can't do anything right. If the private sector is always better, why did we show them the door? Why did W. hate America?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ADad
August 7, 2010 7:10 PM in reply to jjdjjd
As for the First Lady spending part of the $5,505,409 the she and her husband earned in 2009, apart from the $1,792,414 that they paid in federal income taxes, the Obamas gave $329,100 to 40 charities, and the president donated the entirety of his $1.4 million Nobel Prize funds to 10 charities.
In the future, try to bring something better to the party than that weak sh*t you brought today.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Bwakfat
August 8, 2010 9:29 AM in reply to jjdjjd
Lets just return to Reagan-era tax rates, then.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tres
August 8, 2010 2:04 PM in reply to Bwakfat
this is genius! this is the kind of message that we should be pushing 24x7. It's simple & very effective.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
blkblt
August 8, 2010 10:34 AM in reply to jjdjjd
Sorry my mistake, your right, it is the Bush tax DECREASES that are about to expire. And when they do we will still have a lower federal tax burden than we had under Reagan. I stand by my statement that Reagan passed the largest tax increase in history, and it was on middle class Americans. You seem pissed off that Obama couldn't accurately predict the future. Were you as angry when Republican predictions like "We will be greeted as liberators" or "Tax cuts pay for themselves" turned out to be false? And were you as pissed off when the Bush daughters were jetting around the world getting drunk and "costing us taxpayer more than 10 anericans (whatever they are) make in a year?"
It's almost comical that you think we are in danger of becoming an oligarchy, since that's been pretty much the GOP goal since 1980. I guess you figured the ruling class would look like you.
We are in the middle of a huge supply side experiment right now. The government injected a ton of money into the top of the economy just like the Republicans always like to do. How do you think it's going so far?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Smitallica
August 8, 2010 2:49 PM in reply to jjdjjd
Reagan never blamed Carter???? Outrageous and factually incorrect.
His entire CAMPAIGN was based on the question, "Are you better of today than you were four years ago?"
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
grantimatter
August 6, 2010 1:53 PM
Pedantic note: That's digital animation, not claymation.
It takes less design effort to keep claymation out of the uncanny valley.
Also pedantic: Obama and Reagan really should be the same height: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heights_of_Presidents_of_the_United_States_and_presidential_candidates
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
twirling fartknocker
August 6, 2010 1:53 PM
what was that about conservatives have been suffering or taking abuse or whatever for too long?
after repugs ran congress from '94 to '06 and had the presidency from 2001 to 2009???
so I guess a dem pres in office for two years and a dem congress for four is just f'n too long
these people are simply crazy
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Duck Stab
August 6, 2010 1:56 PM
Maybe this little flick will have such a huge impact as "An American Carol" or Ben Stein's "Expelled"
Conservatives and creativity just do not mix. They suck at it. Their music sucks, their jokes aren't funny, and they couldn't write a decent movie to save their lives.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jeffgee
August 6, 2010 2:27 PM in reply to Duck Stab
And "1/2 hour news hour", Fox's failed attempt to be the right-wing Daily Show. Without the humor.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Duck Stab
August 6, 2010 4:50 PM in reply to jeffgee
I remember that one. That was so painfully unfunny, but I just had to watch like a car wreck.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lovethesinner
August 6, 2010 4:31 PM in reply to Duck Stab
Ditto.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
sangsue
August 7, 2010 9:49 PM in reply to Duck Stab
Look what happened to Dennis Miller.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tctundra
August 6, 2010 1:56 PM
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/78/US_Debt_Trend.svg/450px-US_Debt_Trend.svg.png
According to the numbers, Reagan presided over the most dramatic increase in national debt in US history.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
aq
August 6, 2010 2:33 PM in reply to tctundra
i find this absolutely amusing.
mostly because revisionist history ignores it so blatantly.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jjdjjd
August 6, 2010 8:59 PM in reply to tctundra
until now.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
kash79
August 6, 2010 2:06 PM
Reagan is wearing the stars and stripes short, and Obama is wearing a strange color shorts with his campaign buckle.
By the way, all this is really small stuff. The new unemployment figures show further job loses, and that is the MAJOR story for the mid-terms.
Why don't we have a comment thread on the new unemployment numbers story?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Terry
August 6, 2010 2:08 PM
"Deficits don't matter"
Ronald Reagan, referring to Voodoo Economics.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
brianm0122
August 6, 2010 2:22 PM in reply to Terry
I think that was Dick Cheney.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
romanxp47
August 6, 2010 4:09 PM in reply to brianm0122
Shooter was citing Gipper. Scumbags in a pod, just Reagan was better, according to some, at presentation.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
eclecticbrotha
August 6, 2010 2:19 PM
Another grifter exploiting right wing paranoia to make a buck.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jeffgee
August 6, 2010 2:22 PM
Ummm, Reagan increased the debt AND raised taxed.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
RickS
August 6, 2010 2:34 PM
Reagan of myth = only cut taxes.
Reagan of historical fact = followed the 1981 tax cut act with seven years of tax increases:
Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982;
Highway Revenue Act of 1982;
Social Security Amendments of 1983;
Railroad Retirement Revenue Act of 1983;
Deficit Reduction Act of 1984;
Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985;
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985;
Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986;
Continuing Resolution for 1987;
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987;
Continuing Resolution for 1988
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
stabtron
August 6, 2010 2:48 PM in reply to RickS
Yes, but he did say that government is the problem, so your argument is invalid.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
absurdity 007
August 6, 2010 3:03 PM
Let's start with axing the overseas military Spending, the wars, and all the rest of the nonsense in the middle east. It's amazing that they won't blink at that spending but when it comes to doing something that benefits the common man at home, their panties get bundled pretty quick.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Barry Ragin
August 6, 2010 3:19 PM
We can thank the blessed St. Ronnie for the Taliban as well. If the goal was endless war, then that turned out just swimmingly.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Darrius
August 6, 2010 3:28 PM
This is the dumbest thing ever. Ronald Reagan invented deficit spending as we know it. INVENTED DEFICIT SPENDING. He tripled the National debt.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreemanW
August 6, 2010 3:46 PM
Never let anyone tell you that the wealthy and their GOP henchmen do not know how to put their boot-heel on the neck of the middle-class.
They've been waging successful war intent upon the destruction of the middle-class since the sixties. Oh those halcyon days of anti-war protests and single-income households putting their children through college.
The middle-class had far too much power as far as the wealthy were concerned.
Enter the long term strategy of deficit spending and tax cuts for the wealthy, along with myriad schemes to enhance the re-distribution of wealth upward.
These days, with the economy in shambles, the infrastructure failing, and public education on the ropes, they can smell victory. They're putting the pedal to the metal with their 2010 election hopes and aspirations.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jeromeoneil
August 6, 2010 3:56 PM
Oh, the irony...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
August 6, 2010 3:59 PM
It's amazing how Regan Maximus was in office 8 years and didn't spend a dime or run a deficit -- same with Bush 43 -- how did they do that ?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Kuyleh
August 6, 2010 4:04 PM
This might make me a bad person, I don't know, but the pictures made me laugh.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
August 6, 2010 4:06 PM
I wonder if the current administration went around saying "we're not spending money" and "we're the problem" or "we're starving the beast" would conservatives fall for it ?
Because they certainly did for Regan and Bush & Bush.
Only modern day administration that even came close to achieving the fiscal conservative pipe dream was Clinton - a Democrat.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
latinjum
August 6, 2010 4:08 PM
So, Christina Bellantoni and TPM consider this to be an interview? More like a promo for the flick, if you ask me, as Ms. Bellantoni just pretty much let Mr. Griggs say whatever he wanted to say and challenged him on nothing - not the fact that Reagan increased spending, increased the size of the government, raised taxes many times, and increased both the deficit and debt. Sharron Angel would just love Ms. Bellantoni's interview style!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
larmar
August 6, 2010 4:09 PM
Wonder which Billionaire paid for this movie? Just like Roves PAC is funded by only 4 contributors, all Billionaires. Go figure!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
afterimage
August 6, 2010 4:22 PM
I would like to know where the Tea Party was when Bush went on his extravagant spending spree and allocating monies for a war in Iraq? What happened to the Clinton surplus?
Obama made it clear that we were in a mess during his speech after the election. We were in the biggest mess due in part to lack of regulation on the fat cats and sectors that almost forced a total economic collapse of our economy. How easily we forget that.
What about reversing the Bush tax cuts on the well to do? That would go a long way in helping us with this deficit and fair for those of us that seem to take on quite a burden at the lower economic rungs.
Don't get me wrong... I do agree that the government should be held accountable for spending. I am not for or against a small government or a big government. I would like to have a SMART government that can clean up house and get things under order.
Please don't make me laugh by making this an Obama administration thing. All that money that disappeared in Iraq because of "Favored" companies with attachments to Dick Cheney and the like. Shame on these people for being truthful and spinning facts.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Duck Stab
August 6, 2010 6:04 PM in reply to afterimage
"I would like to know where the Tea Party was when Bush went on his extravagant spending spree and allocating monies for a war in Iraq?"
I can tell you where all those 'concerned citizens' were during those years. They were calling anyone who opposed the Iraq War a traitor, in between noting how fat Michael Moore was.
Oh, and something about the sanctity of life with Terri Schiavo
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lovethesinner
August 6, 2010 4:48 PM
Republicans are always talking about "American exceptionalism" while making exceptionally LAME arguments.
This film is so full of holes the Swiss could sue.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Grokenstein
August 6, 2010 5:34 PM
Neoconservatives know history has a liberal bias, so it's God's will that they ignore it and substitute their own, based on whatever horseshit they're flinging at the moment. So they'll hail Reagan as the great man who reined in deficit spending, and when you point out that's not true, they'll hail Reagan as the man who used deficit spending to destroy the Soviet Union.
...When, in fact, the USSR was wrecked in part by a quagmire war in Afghanistan that drained its coffers. WHOOPS
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lester
August 6, 2010 5:42 PM
Where were these people when Bush ran the debt from $6 trillion to $12 trillion??? Where were they?
These guys are trying to scare white folks with the image of: "Look, the black guy is gonna steal your money"-----and it's gonna work, because it always does.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Grokenstein
August 6, 2010 5:45 PM
"Among the film's featured interviews are John Stossel, Club for Growth's Stephen Moore, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, Ohio's Kenneth Blackwell, Rep. Thad McCotter, Newt Gingrich, Steve Forbes and Andrew Breitbart."
"Super Capers"
"Grigg's 'I guess I'm racist' anti-health care (reform) ad."
Oh, wow. And neocons say they don't believe in abortions.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
zoester
August 6, 2010 7:03 PM
Why does President Obama look like Napoleon Dynamite in the still shot above and in the boxing scene in the trailer?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Winston Smith
August 6, 2010 8:27 PM
Hilarious. Ronald Racist was a huge deficit spender. And they show the foreclosures caused by conservative deregulation and the exponential growth of income inequality they caused.
That's...rich.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
August 6, 2010 9:42 PM
If they want to call it too much spending, they should go right ahead but the fact that they ignorantly label it as "socialism" shows they have no real understanding of the subject. Or are blatantly lying. It's embarrassing to witness their stupidity either way. An actual intelligent discussion COULD be had on the subject of government spending but too many conservatives choose not to.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dougom
August 6, 2010 10:18 PM
Maybe I missed something, but didn't Reagan leave office more than two decades ago, and die more than half a decade ago? Didn't his fiscal policies explode the deficit, while the "tax and spend" liberals of the Clinton era actually turn that around and end up with us having a surplus?
And isn't it fascinating that the most recent Republican President only have a fleeting appearance; that none of the commentators had their names shown; that aside from one token appearance the only non-white in the video was Barack Obama?
I also loved how they did a wonder Breitbart on Obama's speeches--nice editing there, Mr. Griggs! Breitbart would have done a better job, but I'm sure you did him proud!
Really; we simply can't let these loons back in charge of the country.
(And is it just me that finds it incredibly creepy how hard the right has hugged Reagan to their collective bosom? You don't see folks going around making videos like that with clips of Roosevelt in them.)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rachelrachel
August 6, 2010 11:29 PM
I find it amusing to hear that Ronaldus Magnus cartoon talking about learning things "from the real world."
This was the guy who thought that trees caused air pollution!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
August 7, 2010 2:27 PM
Well Michael Moore: Got something for the Fall?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
MyUke
August 7, 2010 5:41 PM
Well... if ya' want less government, then why do you want laws saying only a man and woman can marry, and a woman can't choose to end a pregnancy under dire circumstances? Huh?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
BrightLightsBigCity
August 8, 2010 10:04 AM
Let's see, it is not a "big" government vs. "small" government issue. It is about effective governance which was never present between 2001 to 2009. During that time of Bushwacked government, our nation was had ineffective governance creating the following:
Recession;
a commander-in-chief that bungled war;
inept foreign policy;
falling asleep during Crawford,Texas vacation in 2001 before 9/11;
incompetent leadership from FEMA during Hurricane Katrina;
unregulated business;
failing public works (infrastructure) at the national, state, and local levels; all this and more from 8 years of Republican misrule.
Newt Gingrich ..." moral responsibility to God..." Newt, go cheat on your wife. That seems to be the only act you have mastered.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Smitallica
August 8, 2010 2:51 PM
Ronald Reagan as the symbol of reduced government spending????
BWAHAHAHAAAHAAHAHAAAHAHAHAA!!!
Hoo boy. That's funny. Gotta go dry my eyes. These conservative Reagan fetishists are a PANIC!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Leftflank
August 9, 2010 2:06 AM
First off, do these current group of conservative wackos have the permission to be spouting "Reagan is all God all the time" crap? Reagan was way wrong, but not a flippin' lunatic.
Secondly, Obama would woop old Ronny's butt, live, in the cinema, politically & especially in cartoon character. Ronny was a poser, an actor, pure phony from the get.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
August 29, 2010 8:55 PM
Cartoons and Claymation so that it's easy to understand for the teabag morons and the rest of the moron cohort. Gotta make it super-simple, I guess. Draw the morons a picture. Christ, and they wonder why we don't show some erspeck.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?