TPMDC

Vitter Attorneys Pressured Louisiana Newspapers To Soften Coverage Of His Violent Aide


Senator David Vitter (R-LA)

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Has David Vitter been pressuring newspapers in Louisiana to take it easy on Brent Furer, a former aide who attacked his girlfriend with a knife, but got to keep his job for two years anyhow?

According to two editors in Louisiana, the answer is yes.

"Senator Vitter's attorney sent us a letter taking issue with the way we worded one particular sentence...about Mr. Furer's difficulty," says Carl Redman, executive editor of The Advocate.

Vitter went to great pains to avoid commenting on the scandal, and has sought to publicly distance himself from Furer. But privately, he's been trying to intimidate newspapers into giving Furer what he considers fair coverage.

In what Redman describes as a "somewhat hyperbolic" letter, Vitter's attorneys attacked The Advocate for not dancing around Furer's history.

"We said that Mr. Furer did something -- that he slashed his girlfriend -- and the police report alleges that and when he finally went to court, he ended up pleading down to lesser charges," Redman said. "Furer was never actually convicted of slashing his girlfriend.... We missed an alleged or an accused of."

The letter from Vitter's counsel threatened no legal action, and The Advocate responded. According to Redman, The Advocate's counsel informed Vitter "we're exercising our First Amendment freedoms...we agree that the sentence that he pointed to was inartfully crafted, there was nothing untrue about it and that we would continue to report on Mr. Vitter and his campaign."

The Monroe News Star had a similar experience several weeks ago.

"We had a local article that referenced it and did not have an updated thing on what the final disposition of the case was," says Ken Stickney, the News Star's managing editor. "They wanted us to send them copies of the article...anything we'd ever written about the fella."

"Our facts were substantially correct, so we went ahead and ran a clarification," Stickney says.

"I thought on first reading he didn't want to be associated with Brent Furer," Stickney recalls.

But in fact, he was attempting to minimize Furer's bad press. "He was asking for a correction but the principle of the story never was. Brent Furer never contacted us," Stickney said. "David Vitter did."

Vitter's attorney, James Garner, confirmed that he contacted the papers "to clarify and set the record straight."

Louisiana's largest newspaper is the Times Picayune. Their politics editor, Tim Morris, says he doesn't believe Vitter's counsel has sent a similar letter to his paper.

Comments (24) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (0)

August 27, 2010 8:49 AM   

You'd think with a name like "Furer", you'd be a huge liability in the sphere of politics.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 8:55 AM    in reply to jolly ranchero

Not in GOP politics. With a name like that, you get to automatically pass Go and collect your $200.

In reality, they should just Go Directly To Jail.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 2:09 PM    in reply to tinsk

Yes, it is both the GOP *AND* the Tea Party. Both are extremely bad when it comes time to try and get rid of bad news. They are both NAZI and Fascists tendencies.

They learned their lesson well from the Religious right.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 8:57 AM    in reply to jolly ranchero

With a name like "Furer", Teabaggers will flock to him in an instant. It's like a homing signal to them.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 9:03 AM    in reply to dswx

Sure, let's hope it more like moths to a flame because we all know who wins that self-destructive wish.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 8:55 AM   

Why is this not surprising? Out of one side of their mouth, Republicans scream about liberty and rights. Out of the other side, they're screaming at someone to take away their liberty and 1st amendment rights.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 1:25 PM    in reply to Joekuh

The 1st Amendment doesn't protect you from libel suits. That's what this is about. And frankly, if you're reporting on someone who has been charged with but not convicted of a crime, saying "allegedly" is not optional. Though Brian has gone to some trouble to minimize the newspapers' mistake ("for not dancing around Furer's history" ...really?), it sounds non-trivial to me.

The only thing that surprises me is that apparently the lawyers didn't threaten an actual suit, although everyone involved would recognize that they wouldn't actually go to that kind of trouble. As it stands all they did was write the proverbial "sternly worded letter" telling the newspapers to do their jobs properly. As much as I don't care for Vitter, I just can't seem to get worked up over something like this.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

AJM

user-pic

August 27, 2010 2:41 PM    in reply to hunter

Using "allegedly" is optional -- if he did do it and the standards for proving that in civil suit are much lower than those needed for a conviction the newspapers are perfectly safe.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 3:40 PM    in reply to AJM

so did clinton get a blowjob or alledgedly get a blowjob? there is a difference.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 9:01 AM   

Oh, so now republicans are hyperventilating about the word "alleged". I guess he's just lucky he has a Nazi sounding name and not a Muslim sounding name. Because we all know it's unAmerican to give a Muslim the protections of our beloved Constitution.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

AJM

user-pic

August 27, 2010 9:09 AM   

Straight Record: Vitter is trying to cover Brent Furer's ass.

There is no protection in the Constitution from somebody telling the truth about you. If Furer knifed his then girlfriend and the papers tell the truth about it, they are perfectly safe. Doesn't matter if Furer was allowed to plead to a lower offense.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 9:19 AM   

TPM. Where are the links to these "letters"?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 9:45 AM    in reply to Johann

The letters weren't sent to TPM. TPM doesn't have them, and therefore can't post them. Unless the senders or recipients choose to make them public, you're not going to see them. That's how letters work.

And why are you putting "letters" in quote marks? Is this a euphemism for something else?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 10:24 AM    in reply to Early Out

I think 'letters' means that there are none. Even though Vitter's office said that they wrote them.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 10:26 AM    in reply to boyoboy

...and the newspapers said that they received them.

It's all a vast conspiracy, I tell ya'!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 9:23 AM   

Vitter's lawyers can send letters until they own the post office, but it won't change the facts.
The practice is stupid as it results in more articles like this, infuriates local papers who feel theyre pressured and has more pics of Vitter looking like the douche he is splashed everywhere.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 9:39 AM   

Now, La. Republicans are going after a free press? What next GOP?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 10:28 AM    in reply to BrightLightsBigCity

The only press the GOP likes are Rupert's properties, which aren't covering this story.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 10:41 AM    in reply to jeffgee

Co-sign.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 10:16 AM   

Hello, summer, good place for shopping, fashion, sexy, personality, maturity, from here to begin. Are you ready?

===== http://www.shoes2.us/ ====

Air jordan(1-24)shoes $30

Handbags(Coach l v f e n d i d&g) $35

Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $15

Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30

Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,gucci,A r m a i n i) $15

New era cap $12

accept paypal or credit card and free shipping

====== http://www.shoes2.us/ ====

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 10:27 AM   

Wonder if the Vitter team are just as vigilant in protecting and standing up for the woman Furer slashed and knocked around.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 10:55 AM   

This shows that Vitter's team is worried about the issue. Hopefully Melancon really hits on it and his prostitution past. That happened early in this last term, meaning folks never got to vote on him since so it's still a legit issue.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 11:08 AM   

=== http://www.dearsales.com ======

jordan(1-24)shoes $33
Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35
Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&g) $35
Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16
Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30
Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,gucci,Armaini) $16
New era cap $15
Bikini (Ed hardy,polo) $25
FREE sHIPPING

==== http://www.dearsales.com ====

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 11:17 AM   

The teabagging/gop are fascists. There's no doubt about that. Just look at the definition of fascism and the definition starts with the words, right wing extremists. What is more extreme than the teabagging/gop?

Now had any Democrat had anything close to vittner or his aide furer the fascists would be all over it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Follow us!