TPMDC

GOP Divisions Throw Wrench In Sequester Alternatives

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) speaks to reporters on the ongoing fiscal cliff negotiations on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC on Dec. 18, 2012.

It’s well known that Republicans are divided over whether they should drag out a sequestration fight with President Obama, or meet him part way by agreeing to new tax revenues.

But the divisions actually run deeper than that.

The Senate was scheduled to vote Thursday on two sequestration alternatives — one authored by Democrats and the other authored by Republicans. The Democratic bill would replace sequestration with a mix of higher taxes on wealthy Americans and cuts to defense and agriculture spending. The GOP plan with the most support behind it is a plan that would provide the Obama administration some flexibility to apply sequestration in a less indiscriminate manner.

But the vote on a Republican alternative appears likely to be delayed because as of Tuesday afternoon, Senate Republicans couldn’t agree among themselves on whether or how to proceed.

“I would be happy to give the President more flexibility and rely on the agency heads to apportion the amount of spending reduction in a different way than the sequester [requires],” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) told reporters at his weekly Capitol briefing. “There are some members of our conference who are suspicious of the administration taking advantage of such flexibility — would seek to punish their political enemies. So there are differences of opinions about that.”

Some senators, including John McCain (R-AZ), would like to avoid ceding this kind of power to Obama and pay down the sequester directly by cutting the federal workforce instead.

“We haven’t decided yet how many alternatives we will offer later this week,” McConnell said. “That matter is still under discussion in our conference. We’ll see how many votes we’ll have.”

But Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) isn’t going to let McConnell bandage GOP wounds by guaranteeing them votes on more than on sequestration alternative.

“No. No. The agreement was they would have a bill, we’ll have a bill. It’s been enough,” he told reporters Tuesday at his own Capitol briefing.

Neither plan is expected to pass in any event. But if McConnell can’t align the GOP behind one bill, it could slow down the process such that Democrats can’t secure a Senate vote on their own plan until after sequestration has been ordered on March 1.

Brian Beutler

Brian Beutler is TPM's senior congressional reporter. Since 2009, he's led coverage of health care reform, Wall Street reform, taxes, the GOP budget, the government shutdown fight, and the debt limit fight. He can be reached at brian@talkingpointsmemo.com.

Top Stories From TPM

Oklahoma GOP Sen. Tom Coburn Will Seek To Offset Tornado Aid

Secret Service Looking Into Radio Host’s Graphic Violent Comments About Obama, Hillary Clinton

GOP Nominee In Virginia Praised Three-Fifths Clause As An ‘Anti-Slavery Amendment’

VA GOP's Attorney General Nominee Wanted Women To Report Miscarriages To Police Or Face Jail Time

The NRA Thinks These Are The ‘Coolest Gun Movies’ Ever

McCain, Collins Slam Republicans For Budget Hypocrisy

Disqus Conversations

Click here to read the Disqus Commenting FAQ.

Editor & Publisher

Josh Marshall

Managing Editor

David Kurtz

Associate Editor

Nick Martin

Assistant Editor

Igor Bobic

Reporters

Brian Beutler

Sahil Kapur

Eric Lach

Hunter Walker

Frontpage Editor

Zoë Schlanger

News Writers

Tom Kludt

Video Editor

Michael Lester

General Manager & General Counsel

Millet Israeli

VP, Ad Sales

Bruce Ellerstein

Associate Publisher

Kyle Leighton

Assistant To The Publisher

Joe Ragazzo

Designer/Developer

Matthew Wozniak

Design Associate

Christopher O’Driscoll