Bob Dole may like the health care bill, but Bob Dole has plenty to criticize in the Obama administration.
Dole has signed on to be Sen. Chuck Grassley's national finance chairman for his reelection campaign. In a letter to Grassley supporters, Dole blasted Obama has hiring "30 of his cronies as 'czars' over massive new bureaucracies with billions of dollars in budgets and thousands of employees."
Dole also said MoveOn and ACORN are trying to unseat Grassley (R-IA), who he believes has been instrumental in standing up to Obama. Grassley, Dole argued, is "good for America."
Grassley has been one of Obama's loudest detractors, and especially opposes the health care plan. Dole has argued for the plan's passage, though last month sparred with Democrats over use of his support in a political ad.
Dole takes aim at health care in this letter, saying Grassley is trying to block "an attempt to allow government to take over health care and for Washington bureaucrats to decide which patients sees which doctor and what limits and access there will be on their treatments, drugs and therapies."
That's a far cry from Dole's statement last month:
The American people have waited decades and if this moment passes us by, it may be decades more before there is another opportunity. The current approaches suggested by the Congress are far from perfect, but they do provide some basis on which Congress can move forward and we urge the joint leadership to get together for America's sake.
Oh yeah, and Dole says liberals are trying to please Castro and Chavez.
Read Dole's full letter to Grassley fans after the jump.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (25) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (1)Earlier today, I had an interesting exchange with Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME) about the abortion language in the Senate health care bill. She seemed to think Harry Reid made the right call--that the provision is similar in many ways to the provision passed by the Senate Finance Committee, which she supported. Interestingly, though, she also said the notorious Group of Six health care negotiators--including staunch conservatives Chuck Grassley and Mike Enzi--also thought that language was acceptable.
"We discussed that for an extensive period of time within the Group of Six and what approach to take that would work, and be consistent, with codifying current law, and we thought that the approach that was embraced in the Senate Finance Committee did that."
Now, of course, Republicans are all up in arms. I asked Snowe whether Grassley and Enzi believed at the time that Reid's approach--segregating federal and private funds to prevent tax payer dollars from financing abortion--was sufficient.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (2) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL)--the highest ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee--is unclear about the Constitutionality of current health care legislation, and he's turning for clarity to the Federalist Society.
"I think that's a good question," Sessions said on a panel at the Federalist Society's National Lawyers' Convention. "Matter of fact I met with my staff...we were talking about, and you know what I said Leonard? I said we ought to ask Federalist society folks what they think too. I said let's begin to think about that question and what's the constitutional thing...can the government require to do what we think is in your best interest if you don't think it's in your best interest?"
Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), who also sits on the Judiciary Committee, once said there was a bipartisan consensus in favor of individual mandates. But he too seems to have joined the tenther fringe.
You can see the video here. The exchange occurs about 27 minutes in.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (12) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (1)Former Iowa First Lady Christie Vilsack has announced that she will not run for Senate against five-term incumbent republican Chuck Grassley in 2010, the Des Moines Register reports.
A recent Daily Kos/Research 2000 poll had shown Vilsack trailing Grassley by a margin of 51%-40% -- which was actually pretty good, considering that Grassley has never been re-elected with less than 66% of the vote.
Vilsack said in her statement: "Committing to a campaign for the US Senate next year requires more than the confidence that I have the right experience, the necessary support and the resources to be successful. It must come with an understanding that it is the best way for me serve our State and my fellow Iowans in the most effective way possible at this time."
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (0) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)Former Iowa First Lady Christie Vilsack, wife of former Gov. Tom Vilsack, now says she's considering a run for Senate in 2010 against Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley.
"I think I'm qualified to serve, so time will tell." Vilsack told WHO-TV, the central Iowa NBC station.
"You know, I've spent the last 12 years traveling around the state, developing a relationship with the people of Iowa," she explained, "and I just really appreciate the fact that people have been so supportive in suggesting this. But, as I said, time will tell."
Grassley was first elected in the 1980 Reagan landslide, and has been re-elected by comfortable margins ever since, winning 70% of the vote in 2004.
(Via The Political Carnival.)
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (3) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (1)Check in here for continuous updates until the vote, which may not come until the afternoon.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (97) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (3)I just caught up with Sen. Kent Conrad (D-ND) and asked him about a new idea floating around the Hill that would give states the choice to opt out of a national public option. Just, how nascent is the idea?
Here's what he said: "I've heard about it, I've not seen one...I was in a group like this somebody talking to somebody else, kind of raising it."
Does it sound like something that you could support?
"Honestly, I just don't know enough about it," he said.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (10) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)The Senate Finance Committee worked until the wee hours of Friday morning to vote on amendments to its health care bill before adjourning until Tuesday when, after the Congressional Budget Office weighs in on the spending implications of the package, it will hold a final vote.
The delay was baked into the cake several days ago when the committee agreed not to hold a vote on a bill that hadn't received a preliminary analysis from the CBO.
The progress prompted a statement from the White House, which you can read here.
If the panel advances the legislation, Senate health care leaders, White House officials, and Majority Leader Harry Reid will meet to merge it with the more liberal HELP Committee bill, and introduced on the Senate floor later this fall.
Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) has introduced his public option amendment before the Senate Finance Committee. In making the pitch to the panel's skeptics, he's noted that it will save the federal government about $50 billion over 10 years, and would be, as its name implies optional--i.e. it's not a "government takeover" of health care.
Late update: To the chagrin of chairman Max Baucus, Rockefeller is lambasting the insurance industry, and citing a number of ways other health care reform bills do a better job at reining in their excesses. He cited insurance industry whistleblower Wendell Potter, who said that, without a public option, health care reform legislation might as well be named the "Insurance Industry Profit Protection Act."
The House bill, Rockefeller noted, would place strict limits on the so-called medical-loss ratio (i.e. percentage of each premium dollar that can go to profits, administrative costs, and other non-health care related activities.)
Late, late update: It's worth mentioning that you can follow the hearing at this link.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (59) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (7)On a conference call with Iowa reporters yesterday, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) said he's looking to assemble a new bipartisan group to work on health care reform.
Grassley said he's reaching out to have senators from both parties -- and from neither of the committees that are currently working on reform, the Finance Committee and the HELP Committee, The Hill reports.
The hypothetical group would offer amendments to whatever bills come out of those committees.
"I think, though, that it'd be very helpful for people who aren't on the Finance committee or even the HELP committee...would kind of take the bull by the horns themselves and try to coalesce around something that could eventually become more bipartisan," he said.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (19) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (3)After courting Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Mike Enzi (R-WY) for months--making concession after concession and coming up empty, and angering Democrats who were shut out of negotiations--Senate Finance Committee chairman Max Baucus may be preparing to make amends by undoing some of the damage he made in the name of consensus.
A new report out from Roll Call suggests the new goal is a bill that can win each of the panel's Democrats plus, perhaps, Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME).
"I think there's a view on the part of the chairman and on the part of just about everyone who was there to try and come up with a consensus that every Democrat, and perhaps Olympia Snowe, could support," after meeting with committee Democrats. "I would say, just about everyone in the room thought it's doable."
Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) opposes the bill as it stands from the left, and has said that other Democrats on the panel were infuriated by the length and failure of the process. Snowe, meanwhile, hasn't said one way or another what she'll do. Democrats were initially skeptical that she'd sign on, but a number of signs yesterday suggest that she's leaning toward supporting the bill as it moves out of committee.
If Snowe opposes the bill, Baucus can afford to lose no more than one Democrat. So consensus--or near consensus--within the party will be critical for him.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (8) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)The Senate Finance Committee will soon begin debating a health care bill that will likely be unveiled this week, and already, a tug of war is emerging between committee Democrats who want to bolster a number of measures and Republican negotiators who want to see the bill get smaller.
Democrats are largely concerned that the plan won't offer uninsured Americans the sufficiently generous subsidies they'll need in order to afford the health insurance they'll be required to buy.
Addressing that issue, though, seems mutually exclusive from meeting the goals of ranking member Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Sen. Mike Enzi (R-WY), both of whom want the price of the bill to be significantly lower than it is, and also object to a plan to pay for it by imposing fees on insurance companies.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (17) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (1)Senate Finance Committee chariman Max Baucus (D-MT) told reporters today that he's moving forward on his health care proposal with or without Republicans. He said that the trigger concept hasn't really been discussed in his panel's negotiation, and that he's increasingly of the belief that a public option can not pass the Senate.
"I will move forward anyway," Baucus said. "We have to move forward. I told Chuck Grassley that."
Grassley is the Finance Committee's ranking member, and the Republican leader on health care negotiations in the committee's so-called "Gang of Six"
Baucus said the proposal he unveils next week will be similar to the draft he released yesterday, which mandates subsidized coverage and expands Medicaid, but only provides for the creation of private co-ops--not for a public option.
"It is similar to the proposal I issued on Sunday night. I think that is close to a measure that will pass both the committee and Senate," Baucus said.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (37) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)Senate Finance Committee chairman Max Baucus says that if the three Republicans and two Democrats he's been working with to negotiate a health care reform want to see changes in his proposal, they better speak up by 10 a.m. tomorrow.
"The rubber is starting to meet the road here. We're gonna have to start fishing or cut the bait pretty soon and I made that very, very clear to the group."
Lot of metaphors in there. But also a hard deadline. We'll see if, after weeks of trashing health care reform to constituents, Republicans Mike Enzi and Chuck Grassley are ready to start playing nice.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (7) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)This doesn't come as a tremendous surprise at this point, but Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA)--ranking member on the Senate Finance Committee--has some pretty serious reservations about his friend Max Baucus' health care proposal.
According to CNN, Grassley objects to a fee Baucus has suggested imposing on insurance companies to help cover the cost of the legislation, as well as to the fact that the bill's bottom line is expected to hover near $900 billion. Grassley was aiming for something about $100 billion lower.
As I reported earlier, the Finance Committee's "Gang of Six" will meet later this afternoon to discuss the proposal and where Baucus will gauge whether his proposal will have any Republican support other than from moderate Olympia Snowe (R-ME).
White House adviser David Axelrod says Sen. Chuck Grassley's attempt to raise funds by attacking "Obama-care" was a bridge too far.
"If you're sitting at a table negotiating in good faith, then you probably don't send out mailers saying, 'Help me stop Obama-care.' That's just common sense," Axelrod told the Wall Street Journal, adding that Grassley's actions, along with those of Sen. Mike Enzi, suggest "they don't want to participate" in constructive health care negotiations.
"They're satisfied with the status quo. We are not," Axelrod said.
Earlier this week, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said that, by lending credence to the "death panel" attack, Enzi had turned over his cards and walked away from the table.
Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT), who chairs the Senate Finance Committee will likely have the ultimate say in who's allowed to negotiate for health care reform, and who won't. But as far as the White House is concerned, the gang of six is down to four, and they're now looking to more moderate Republicans like Olympia Snowe for support.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (47) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (3)White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said today that the "Gang of Six" health care negotiators on the Senate Finance Committee might now be the "Gang of Five."
During this week's GOP YouTube address, Sen. Mike Enzi (R-WY)--one of the three Republicans involved in bipartisan health care negotiations--trashed Democratic reform ideas.
"The bills would expand comparative effectiveness research that would be used to limit or deny care based on age or disability of patients," Enzi said, echoing the rationale used by those who falsely warn that Democrats plan to create "death panels."
For the White House, that appears to have been a bridge too far.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (45) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (3)The Progressive Change Campaign Committee and Democracy for America are teaming up once again to target a key opponent to the public option. This time, they're going after Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA)
The groups recently teamed up to run a similar ad targeting Democratic Sen. Ben Nelson of Nebraska.
This ad will run 200 times in four Iowa markets and 100 times in Washington, DC over the next week, though the groups hope to extend the run. As ranking member on the Senate Finance Committee, and lead Republican health care negotiator, Grassley has said the public option is a non-starter.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (8) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (1)Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) wants (you guessed it) yet more time to reach a health care compromise on the Senate Finance Committee.
Asked by reporters for Kaiser Health News if a mid-September deadline to unveil legislation was still in the works, Grassley said, "If you asked me that on Aug. 6, I would have said yes, I think so, September. But you're asking me on Aug. 27 and you've got the impact of democracy in America. Everybody's showing up at town meetings."
As ranking member on the committee, and chief Republican health care negotiator, Grassley has demanded a number of significant compromises, and set benchmarks--such as an 80 vote threshold for legislation--that most observers believe to be unreachable. Senate Minority Whip John Kyl (R-AZ) has said the GOP almost certainly won't support legislation out of that committee, triggering calls from a growing number of Democrats for Finance chairman Max Baucus to scrap the negotiations and proceed without (or with minimal) Republican support.
Are the Senate Finance Committee's bipartisan health care negotiations getting anywhere? According to the panel's lead Republican, Chuck Grassley, the answer is no. And yes!
"I don't think it's going to be possible to work it out with the administration because they're all over the field -- all over the ball park, I guess, as we say," Grassley told reporters in Iowa, presumably while trying to come up with the word "map."
He added that the Obama administration has been unclear about whether it wants health care legislation to include a public option, which, Grassley said, "leads to single-payer, completely government-run health care system and no choice."
So I guess that's it for bipartisanship, then, right? Well....
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (12) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (1)Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) has backtracked on comments that the government "would decide when to pull the plug on Grandma," saying yesterday on Face the Nation, "It won't do that."
Grassley also said, as he has in the past, that it "scares the devil out of people" that doctors will have financial incentives to discuss advance directives such as living wills, and that the provision "oughta be dropped."
Grassley said he only used the phrase "pull the plug on Grandma," because President Obama had used it the day before at a town hall in Portsmouth, N.H.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (18) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)McCain Defends Palin, Also Says: "I Don't Think They Were, Quote, 'Death Panels'"
Appearing on This Week, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) defended his former running mate Sarah Palin on her claim that President Obama's health care plan would create "death panels," though he did admit her wording was off. "Look, I don't think they were, quote, 'death panels,' don't get me wrong," said McCain. "I don't think - but on the best treatment procedures part of the bill, it does open it up to decisions being made as far - that should be left - those choices left to the patient and the individual."
Grassley: End-of-Life Provision "Just Scares The Devil Out of People"
Appearing on Face The Nation, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) explained that he used the phrase "pull the plug on grandma" while trying to assuage fears that people have about the health care bill: "It won't do that, but I wanted to explain why my constituents are concerned about it, and I also want to say that there is an $8 billion cost with that issue, and if you're trying to save money and you put an $8 billion of doctors giving you some advice at the end of life, doctors are going to take advantage of earning that $8 billion and constituents see that as an opportunity to save some money. It just scares the devil out of people."
It's hard to keep track of all of Sen. Chuck Grassley's health care machinations. Whether it's pulling the pug on grandma, or saying there should be 80 votes for a health care bill, or demanding Obama denounce the public option, he always seems to be finding new and creative ways to move the line on bipartisan reform closer and closer to the GOP view. Thankfully, Rachel Maddow did a pretty good job of putting it all together last night.
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
For more on this, too, read Greg Sargent.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (2) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)Kennedy Urges Massachusetts To Provide For Speedy Senate Appointment
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA) has written a letter to Gov. Deval Patrick (D-MA) and state legislative leaders, urging them to change the state's special-election law to allow a temporary gubernatorial appointment. Kennedy wrote that "it is vital for this commonwealth to have two voices speaking for the needs of its citizens and two votes in the Senate during the approximately five months between a vacancy and an election."
Obama's Day Ahead
President Obama will appear by phone on Michael Smerconish's radio show at 1:10 p.m. ET. At 2:45 p.m. ET, he will participate in the Organizing for America National Health Care Forum, at DNC headquarters.
After saying that Democratic health care reform could allow the government to "pull the plug on grandma," calling the public option a "predator," and saying he'd vote against his own compromise legislation if it didn't have overwhelming GOP support, Senate Finance Committee ranking member Chuck Grassley (R-IA) says its time for Democrats and Republicans to work together on health care reform.
"I've said all year that something as big and important as health care legislation should have broad-based support," Grassley told The Hill.
"So far, no one has developed that kind of support, either in Congress or at the White House. That doesn't mean we should quit. It means we should keep working until we can put something together that gets that widespread support."
Grassley's entreaty may come a bit too late. Senior White House officials, including Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel and Press Secretary Robert Gibbs publicly admitted today that most Republicans aren't interested in health care reform. Taking Grassley at his word, that suggests there's no reason for him to continue participating in negotiations. And taking the administration at its word, it may just be the case that bipartisan health care talks are dead.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (18) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (1)In a huddle with progressives at Netroots Nation, Rep. Eric Massa (D-NY)--an outspoken Democrat from a conservative, upstate district--says Sen. Chuck Grassley's comments about end-of-life care constitute "an act of treason."
Grassley told a crowd of health care reform skeptics they were right to be concerned that, under Democratic health care legislation, the government would "pull the plug on grandma." Dishonest? Yes. But treason?
Now, on the one hand, Massa is a former military officer, and so should know perfectly well what is treason and what isn't. But he's also a former Republican, and apparently hasn't yet lost the "when in doubt, accuse of treason" reflex.
As a Democrat--and serving in a Republican-leaning district--Massa has eclectic views. He broke with the GOP over the Iraq war and plans to vote for single payer health care. But he opposes the health care plans the administration supports on cost grounds, and supported closing the southern border after the swine flu outbreak was traced to Mexico.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (11) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)
On a conference call today with reporters, Senate Minority Whip John Kyl (R-AZ) said almost no health care compromise is likely to win significant Republican support.
"There is no way that Republicans are going to support a trillion-dollar-plus bill," Kyl said. "I have no doubt that they can make it revenue neutral to find enough ways to tax the American people, but that doesn't mean the Republicans will support it."
As for the co-op compromise? "It's a step towards government-run health care in this country."
The remarks are particularly significant coming a day after Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), the lead Republican health care negotiator in the Senate, said he'd vote against his own bill--and all the compromises he's forcing into it--if it doesn't win a great number of Republican votes.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (39) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (6)Appearing on Fox News this morning, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) once again called the death panel controversy (which he stoked) a Democratic party diversion...and then noted that the House proposal to reimburse doctors for providing end-of-life care "raises questions."
"What they try to do is divert attention," Grassley said, referring to what he called the House's "miserably poor health care bill."
But then he switched gears, to defend his support for end of life counseling six years ago. "[W]e were talking just in the very narrow area of hospice care...nothing to do with saving money," Grassley said. "And when you get in to what their goals are in the House bill, it's saving money...and we never had anything like that in 2003."
Host Megyn Kelly interjected, "and your concern is the plan to save money and cut costs, coupled with these end of life consultations, raises questions, I guess.'
"And coupled with government takeover of health care," affirmed Grassley.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (6) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (2)
Yesterday, I noted that Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA)--the powerful ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee and chief Republican negotiator in the bipartisan Gang of Six--said he'd vote against his own health care compromise if it didn't win more than a handful of GOP votes.
That seems to have gotten the attention of some progressives, one of whom took to the cable channels this morning to suggest that the White House ditch Grassley.
"I don't know what's the point of negotiating with Chuck Grassley, frankly, if he says himself he can't deliver any Republicans," said Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) on MSNBC this morning.
Grassley's been putting on quite a public show of late, falsely affirming the concerns of some health care reform skeptics that House Democrats will create death panels, and then blaming the controversy on liberals.
For his part, Weiner has become a leading public spokesman for robust health care reform, criticizing the administration for its willingness to compromise, and insisting that health care reform will die in the House without a public option.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (10) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (6)In a rather lengthy telephone interview with MSNBC earlier today, Senate Finance Committee ranking member Chuck Grassley said he'll vote against his own bipartisan health care bill if it doesn't win the support of more Republicans.
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
In case you don't have the patience to wade through the whole interview, Chuck Todd asked Grassley, "[a]re you willing to be just one of three or four Republicans while 36 or 37 including the Senate Republican leadership...all being against it?"
Grassley responded, "Absolutely not. And I told the President that a week ago Thursday and I told [committee chairman] Max Baucus that over a period of three or four months."
As a followup, "If you have--if it's something you believe...if you think this is a good deal, and overall because of the politics of the situation you can't get more Republicans on board, you're going to go ahead and vote against it."
"It isn't a good deal if I can't sell my product to more Republicans."
So Max Baucus has insisted on building a bill that can pass his committee with more than one Republican. For that he's allowed Grassley, along with Sens. Olympia Snowe (R-ME) and Mike Enzi (R-WY), to significantly water down the legislation. But Grassley says, publicly, that if the rest of the GOP is against the final product, he'll turn around and vote against it. Which seems quite likely. It seems to me, that if nominal GOP support is the name of the game, there are other Republicans who will actually vote for the bill they insist on weakening.
Late update: More on Grassley's appearance from Rachel Slajda.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (21) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (3)
Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA)--one of the most influential health care legislators on Capitol Hill--has an explanation for everybody who groaned when he told a crowd of reform skeptics they were right to be concerned that Democratic health care reform would "pull the plug on grandma."
You see, he says, "[t]he issue is whether end-of-life provisions should be part of legislation that's about controlling health care spending, and which also creates a government-run health care program, as the Pelosi bill does."
Ah yes. End-of-life counseling is a good thing--but when it's written in to a bill that creates a public option (which won't cover seniors, who already enjoy Medicare) and is devoted to cost containment...well, people might begin to think that's a recipe for coerced euthanasia. So paying Medicare doctors for providing end of life counseling should be codified in a stand alone bill. Or something.
I'm going way out on a limb here, but maybe deathers think what they think because people like Grassley go out and tell them they're right to be afraid, despite knowing full well that House health care legislation won't "give the government such authority in deciding when and how people die."
You can read his full statement below the fold.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (14) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (2)Well, Grassley never picked up. So Specter tweeted all about it.

And Grassley is not pleased.

And in a narrow sense, Grassley's right. He didn't use the term "death boards" or "death panels." He said "There is some fear because in the House bill, there is counseling for end-of-life. And from that standpoint, you have every right to fear.... We should not have a government program that determines if you're going to pull the plug on grandma."
But in the broader sense, Specter's got Grassley pegged.
And in the broadest sense, it's easy to imagine these guys starring in an Internet-themed sequel to Grumpier Old Men.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (57) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (5)
Sen. Arlen Specter (D-PA) just told a crowd of skeptical progressives that he's willing to take up and dispel the death panel rumor with perhaps its most respected proponent: Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA).
Specter said he'd call Grassley from back stage and tell him "it's not a death squad."
Progress. Earlier this week, Grassley endorsed the false rumor that Democrats were proposing a "pull the plug on granny" provision in their health care reform legislation, then turned around and scotched an end of life counseling measure the Senate Finance Committee's bill, alleging that it could be "misinterpreted" by the public.
Late update: Awwww. How sad. Seems Grassley didn't pick up the phone when Specter called him. Wonder if he got tipped off!
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (7) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (1)Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) is now backing up Sarah Palin's "death panel" line and Chuck Grassley's assertion that the Democrats would "pull the plug on grandma," citing as proof that the Democrats shot down an amendment he'd offered for an absolute prohibition on rationing based on comparative effectiveness research:
"Their plan -- they're not gonna speak it, because they know if they speak it, it'll never pass -- their plan is to control costs by limiting options," said Coburn. "That's how England controls costs, that's how Canada controls costs. They give you access to a waiting line. And unfortunately, tons of people die every year."
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (18) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (1)Less than a day after Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) validated cooked-up fears that Democratic health care legislation would create "death panels," it appears, according to the Wall Street Journal, that the Senate Finance Committee will not be including a provision to reimburse Medicare doctors who provide end-of-life counseling to dying patients in its bill.
Grassley is the Finance Committee's ranking member, and one of six senators on the panel working to craft a bipartisan health care bill.
Until a few days ago, the measure--which is included in House legislation--was completely uncontroversial. But with opponents desperate to undermine support for health care reform, high profile Republicans are now equating it to "pulling the plug on grandma," reaffirming the fears of misinformed protesters who are lashing out at this and other misconceptions at health care town halls across the country.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (63) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (1)Two Sides Taking Health Care Debate Outside Washington
The Obama Administration and its opponents will be spending the August recess heavily promoting their sides of the health care debate. "Our job is to help folks understand how this will help them," said David Axelrod. On the other end of the spectrum, Sens. Tom Coburn (R-OK) and John Barrasso (R-WY) will be going on the road with their "Senate Doctors Show," warning against the Democratic plan.
Obama's Day Ahead
President Obama will deliver remarks at 11:05 a.m. ET, on the Post-9/11 G.I. Bill. At 12:30 p.m. ET, he will meet with Shaykh Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al Sabah, Amir of Kuwait, and the two of them will be joined by Vice President Biden for lunch at 12:45 p.m. Et. Obama will meet with Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA) at 3:30 p.m. ET.
Senate Finance Committee chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) says his health care negotiations won't bear fruit before the August recess, according to Politico.
The report, if accurate, comes a day after Republicans ground negotiations to a halt out of frustration with pressure from Democratic leaders who want the committee to produce a bill before the end of next week. Sen. Mike Enzi (R-WY), the most conservative Republican at the table, is facing significant pressure from his own party's leadership to slow down the negotiations, or scuttle them entirely. But Baucus is committed to a consensus bill. His counterpart, Ranking Member Chuck Grassley (R-IA) has indicated that he won't sign on to a bill unless a Republican other than moderate Olympia Snowe (R-ME) signs on as well. And as such, they've given Enzi--no moderate he--a great deal of say over the terms of the negotiations.
Late update: Here's Roll Call with the corroborating quote: "It's clear there will not be a markup next week," Baucus said. "That's clear. But nevertheless, we are as committed, if not more committed, to find a bipartisan agreement."
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (26) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (1)Beer Summit Goes Down Smoothly, Participants Agree To Have Lunch
The "Beer Summit" of President Obama, Harvard Prof. Henry Louis Gates and Cambridge Sergeant James Crowley appeared to conclude successfully yesterday -- with the three of them agreeing to meet again for lunch at a later time. Gates gave this very memorable line: "We hit it off right from the beginning. When he's not arresting you, Sergeant Crowley is a really likable guy."
Obama's Day Ahead
President Obama will meet with business leaders at 12 p.m. ET. He will meet with Vice President Biden and Sec. of State Hillary Clinton at 3:30 p.m. ET. Obama and Biden will host a meeting with member of the Cabinet at 6:15 p.m. ET at Blair House, and they will return to the White House at 10 p.m. ET.
Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA)--ranking member on the Senate Finance Committee--says President Obama's insistence on a public option might actually be a public show.
"It would have been good if he had said to the entire country what he said to me privately, that he would look to alternatives," Grassley said. "We have a very good alternative by going with cooperatives."
Critics are suspicious of the cooperative idea in general, but particularly of the sort Grassley has proposed. And since the committee's chairman Max Baucus seems insistent upon winning Grassley over, he is perhaps the greatest obstacle to the creation of a public health insurance option. Grassley does say, however, that the chances of passing health care reform legislation of some sort by the end of the year remain quite high.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (21) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) must've sat around waiting on President Obama's speech for as long as we did here at TPMHQ.

Obama speech on healthCareReform (sic) Absolutely (sic) nothing new Waste (sic) of time saying we are going to get that done Baucus (sic) and I know that But (sic) doRITE (sic)[.]
As ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, Grassley's no small voice in the health care debate. But he's also developing a reputation as an ornery tweeter. Last month, he similarly took to the text messaging service to blast Obama. "Pres Obama you got nerve while u sightseeing in Paris to tell us"time to deliver" on health care," Grassley said. "We still on skedul/even workinWKEND."
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (12) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (1)
TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com
